Evaluation of X-Ray Repair Cross-Complementing Family Members as Potential Biomarkers for Predicting Progression and Prognosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Mei, Jie; Wang, Huiyu; Wang, Runjie; Pan, Jiadong; Liu, Chaoying; Xu, Juanying

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5751939

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 | Article ID 5751939 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5751939

Evaluation of X-Ray Repair Cross-Complementing Family Members as Potential Biomarkers for Predicting Progression and Prognosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Jie Mei,¹Huiyu Wang,¹Runjie Wang,¹Jiadong Pan,¹Chaoying Liu,¹and Juanying Xu¹

Academic Editor: Fumio Imazeki

Received18 Dec 2019

Accepted24 Jan 2020

Published17 Mar 2020

Abstract

The X-ray repair cross-complementing (XRCC) gene family has been revealed to participate in the carcinogenesis and development of numerous cancers. However, the expression profiles and prognostic values of XRCCs (XRCC1-6) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have not been explored up to now. The transcriptional levels of XRCCs in primary HCC tissues were analyzed by UALCAN and GEPIA. The relationship between XRCCs expression and HCC clinical characteristics was evaluated using UALCAN. Moreover, the prognostic values of XRCCs expression and mutations in HCC patients were investigated via the GEPIA and cBioPortal, respectively. Last but not least, the functions and pathways of XRCCs in HCC were also predicted by cBioPortal and DVAID. The transcriptional levels of all XRCCs in HCC tissues were notably elevated compared with normal liver tissues. Meanwhile, upregulated XRCCs expression was positively associated with clinical stages and tumor grades of HCC patients. Survival analysis using the GEPIA database revealed that high transcription levels of XRCC2/3/4/5/6 were associated with lower overall survival (OS) and high transcription levels of XRCC1/2/3/6 were correlated with poor disease-free survival (DFS) in HCC patients. Furthermore, Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) demonstrated the possible mechanisms of XRCCs and their associated genes participating in the oncogenesis of HCC. Our findings systematically elucidate the expression profiles and distinct prognostic values of XRCCs in HCC, which might provide promising therapeutic targets and novel prognostic biomarkers for HCC patients.

1. Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most fatal malignant tumors of the digestive system worldwide, which may cause 31,780 cancer-related deaths in the United States in 2019 according to the prediction by the American Cancer Society [1]. Although significant advances have been achieved in comprehensive treatment including surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and radiotherapy for HCC, the prognosis of patients with HCC remains largely unsatisfactory. Currently, the critical issue for HCC is the unfavorable five-year overall survival (OS) rate of only 30%–40% [2]. Besides, postoperative survival in patients with HCC varies widely. Detection of biomarkers associated with tumor malignancy and prognosis is critical for patients and clinicians. Although an increasing number of studies focusing on prognostic factors have been conducted [3, 4], it is still necessary to further explore more efficient potential biomarkers.

The X-ray repair cross-complementing (XRCC) gene family including numerous members (XRCC1-6, PRKDC, FANCG, BRCA2, etc.) mainly participates in homologous recombination to maintain chromosome stability and repair DNA damages. Several members have been reported to be involved in specific diseases. For example, FANCG plays a key role in the occurrence of Fanconi anemia [5]. Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 significantly increase the risks of breast cancer and ovarian cancer [6]. However, no literatures about the characteristic biological functions of six classical XRCCs genes (XRCC1, XRCC2, XRCC3, XRCC4, XRCC5, and XRCC6) are currently available. Dysregulation of XRCCs in cancerous disease may break repair processes and mechanisms of genetic instability, thus leading to tumorigenesis [7]. Consequently, our research focuses on the expression profiles and prognostic values of XRCCs in HCC.

With the successful implementation of numerous large-scale sequencing projects, including the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx), biomedical studies have been entering the field of “big data” [8–10]. Over the past few years, many interactive and user-friendly online platforms based on the TCGA database greatly elevate the efficiency of TCGA database analysis, and increasing amounts of tumor biomarkers have been identified based on the strength of these websites [11–13]. Our research employed these interactive online platforms to explore the expression profiles and prognostic values of XRCCs in HCC. Consequently, our research preliminarily and systematically summarizes the expression profiles of XRCCs in HCC and discusses the potential prognostic values of XRCCs expressions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. UALCAN

UALCAN (http://ualcan.path.uab.edu/) is an open-access platform based on level 3 RNA-seq and pathological files from the TCGA database [14]. It can be used to compare the relative transcriptional levels of candidate genes between tumor and paracancerous tissues as well as the correlation of genes mRNA levels with pathological features. In this research, UALCAN was employed to compare the transcriptional levels of XRCCs in primary HCC tissues and their association with pathological features.

2.2. GEPIA

Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA, http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn/) is an interactive web server developed recently for analyzing the RNA-sequencing expression data as well as the association between gene expression and prognosis from the TCGA and the GTEx database [15]. The differential expressions of XRCCs in cancerous and adjacent tissues were validated, and the prognostic values of XRCCs at the mRNA level in HCC were analyzed by GEPIA. The patients’ cohorts were split at the median expression of each XRCCs mRNA level. All cohorts were compared with Kaplan–Meier plots. Hazard ratio (HR) and log-rank value were calculated and displayed online.

2.3. cBioPortal

cBioPortal (http://www.cbioportal.org/) is a user-friendly, interactive website and provides visualization, analysis, and download of large-scale cancer genomics datasets [16, 17]. In the current research, we analyzed the genetic alterations of XRCCs, which contained mutations and putative copy-number alterations from GISTIC. Furthermore, Genetic mutations in XRCCs and their association with OS and DFS of HCC patients were displayed online, and the log-rank test was performed to check the difference between different groups.

2.4. GO and KEGG Analysis

The Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID, https://david.ncifcrf.gov/) [18] was employed to perform Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses of six XRCC genes and the 36 most frequently altered neighboring genes. The human genome (Homo sapiens) was selected as the background variable.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed on the bioinformatics database online. The differential mRNA expression of XRCCs in HCC tissues was analyzed by Student’s t-test. Kaplan–Meier survival plots were generated online with survival curves compared by log-rank test. For all analyses, differences were considered statistically significant if values were less than 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Upregulation of XRCCs in Patients with HCC

In order to assess the precise expression profiles of XRCCs in HCC samples, the differential transcriptional levels of XRCCs between HCC and normal liver tissues were evaluated using the UALCAN database. As shown in Figure 1, the transcriptional levels of all XRCC members (Figures 1(a)–1(f)) were notably upregulated in HCC tissues compared with paracancerous tissues. However, in consideration of the limited number of normal liver specimens in the TCGA database, we further employed the GEPIA web server containing more RNA-sequencing data of normal tissues from the GTEx database to confirm the differential expression of XRCCs in HCC. As we expected, the high transcriptional levels of XRCCs in HCC tissues were confirmed using the GEPIA website (Figures 2(a)–2(f)). Taken together, our results provided strong evidence showing that XRCCs were overexpressed in patients with HCC.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

3.2. Association of mRNA Expression of XRCCs with Clinical Characteristics of HCC Patients

After high expression of XRCCs was confirmed in HCC, we speculated that overexpression of XRCCs may correlate with the advanced clinical characteristics of HCC patients. So, we next analyzed the association between mRNA expression of XRCCs with clinical characteristics of HCC patients by UALCAN, including patients’ clinical stages and tumor grades. As shown in Figure 3, mRNA expression of XRCCs was significantly correlated with advanced clinical stages, namely, patients who were with advanced clinical stages tended to express higher XRCCs mRNA. The highest mRNA expressions of XRCCs (excluding XRCC4) were found in Stage 3 (Figures 3(a)–3(f)), and the highest mRNA expressions of XRCC4 were found in Stage 2 (Figure 3(d)). The reason why the mRNA expressions of XRCCs in Stage 3 seemed to be higher than that in Stage 4 may be due to the limited number of Stage 4 patients (only 6 HCC patients were at Stage 4). Analogously, as shown in Figure 4, the mRNA expressions of six XRCCs were positively related to tumor grade. The highest mRNA expressions of XRCC1/4/5/6 were found in Grade 4 (Figures 4(a), 4(d)–4(f)), while the highest mRNA expression of XRCC2/3 was found in grade 3 (Figures 4(b) and 4(c)). Overall, these findings above implied that mRNA levels of XRCCs were significantly correlated with clinical characteristics in HCC patients and may serve as potential biomarkers for advanced HCC stages or poor differentiation.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

3.3. Prognostic Values of XRCCs Expression in HCC Patients

Furthermore, we used the GEPIA website to evaluate the prognostic values of XRCCs. As shown in Figure 5, high mRNA expressions of XRCCs (excluding XRCC1) were all significantly associated with poor OS of HCC patients (Figures 5(b)–5(f)), while patients with high mRNA expression of XRCC1 also showed the trend with shorter OS (Figure 5(a)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

We next analyzed the associations between XRCCs mRNA expression and disease-free survival (DFS) of HCC patients, and the results exhibited that high mRNA expression of XRCC1/2/3/6 was significantly associated with shorter DFS of HCC patients (Figures 6(a)–6(c), 6(f)), while mRNA expression of XRCC4/5 showed no predictive values in estimating DFS of HCC patients (Figures 6(d) and 6(e)). To sum up, most XRCCs were associated with poor prognosis, which might be identified as promising biomarkers to predict the survival of HCC patients.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

3.4. Genetic Alterations in XRCCs and Association with Prognosis of HCC Patients

Next, we analyzed genetic alterations in XRCCs and their associations with OS and DFS of HCC patients. As was shown in Figure 7, a low mutation rate of XRCCs was found in HCC patients. In the 366 sequenced HCC patients, the genetic alteration was found in only 27 HCC patients and the mutation rate was 7%. Although mutations in XRCCs were not frequent, genetic alterations were significantly associated with poor prognosis. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that patients with genetic alterations in XRCCs had worse OS (Figure 7(b)) and DFS (Figure 7(c)) in HCC patients. These results revealed that genetic alterations of XRCCs could also notably affect HCC patients’ prognosis.

(a)

(b)

(c)

3.5. Predicted Functions and Pathways of XRCCs and Their Frequently Altered Neighbor Genes in HCC Patients

All the results suggested that XRCCs may play the roles of significant oncogenes in HCC. Next, to explore the potential mechanisms that XRCCs participate in the carcinogenesis of HCC, we used cBioPortal to construct a network for XRCCs, and the results revealed that a total of 36 genes were significantly associated with XRCCs alterations (Figure 8). Moreover, GO and KEGG analyses based on DAVID were performed to identify the functional enrichment of XRCCs and their associated genes. GO analysis possessed three main functions of selected genes, including biological process (BP), cellular components (CC), and molecular functions (MF). We finally reserved the top 10 terms of every subanalysis, including BP, CC, MF, and KEGG (Figures 9(a)–9(c), 10). Overall, these findings suggested potential mechanisms of XRCCs participating in HCC oncogenesis, which established the foundation for the coming molecular mechanism research.

(a)

(b)

(c)

4. Discussion

Abnormality of cancer genetics is an intrinsic factor in tumorigenesis and has been found to participate in the development and progression of HCC [19]. External environmental factors play a role in the development of tumors by affecting the stability of related genes. Therefore, the stability of the gene, namely, the repair ability after DNA damage is closely related to the occurrence of the tumor, determines the difference in the susceptibility of different individuals to tumors. Being important components of DNA repair genes, XRCCs are involved in the development of numerous cancers, including HCC [20, 21]. Despite some members of XRCCs have been shown to play critical roles in HCC, the accurate roles of XRCCs in HCC remained to be explored.

In this research, the transcriptional expressions, genetic alterations, and prognostic values of XRCCs in HCC were analyzed. Our results exhibited that the upregulation of mRNA levels was found in all six XRCCs, and mRNA expression of XRCCs was remarkably correlated with patients’ clinical stages and tumor grades in HCC patients. Besides, high transcription levels of XRCC2/3/4/5/6 were associated with lower OS and high transcription levels of XRCC1/2/3/6 were correlated with poor DFS in HCC patients. Moreover, mutations in XRCCs were not frequent, but genetic alterations were significantly associated with poor prognosis. Finally, Kaplan–Meier analysis exhibited that patients with genetic alterations of XRCCs genes had worse OS and DFS in HCC patients. All these findings suggested that XRCCs were essential for HCC oncogenesis and development.

As an effective analysis method, GO and KEGG analyses provide a comprehensive set of functional annotation approaches for investigators to understand the biological meaning behind the list of genes [22]. In our research, the functions and pathways of the alterations in XRCCs and their 36 frequently altered neighbor genes in HCC patients were analyzed, and our results suggested among all KEGG enriched terms, nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) was the most relevant terms. Chromosomal instability is a characteristic feature of HCC, Teoh et al. demonstrated that defects in the NHEJ DNA repair pathway may participate in the disruption of cell cycle checkpoints leading to chromosomal instability and accelerated development of HCC [23]. Besides, other enriched terms, including cell cycle, homologous recombination, and p53 signaling pathway , were also shown to affect HCC progression [24–26]. Taken together, these findings provide more in-depth insight on how XRCCs and these XRCC-related genes participate in HCC progression.

Among the XRCCs, XRCC1 is the most studied in cancerous disease. Overexpression of XRCC1 contributes to the development of ovarian cancer and its high expression was associated with advanced malignancy and poor clinical outcomes in ovarian cancer patients [27]. Besides, high expression of XRCC1 has also been found in glioma and gastric cancer [28, 29]. XRCC1 gene polymorphisms have been reported to be involved in multiple cancers, including breast cancer [30], lung cancer [31], and pancreatic cancer [32], but the potential mechanisms have not been identified. Meng et al. revealed a functional XRCC1 SNP, rs3213245, which enhances the risk of cervical cancer through mediating the Sp1/Krox-20 switch [33]. Moreover, XRCC1 interacts with ALDH2 and predicts poor OS in patients with lung cancer and liver cancer [34].

XRCC2 had been shown to participate in chemoresistance to 5-Fluorouracil in colorectal cancer [35]. An increasing number of studies observed the relationship between the polymorphisms in the XRCC2 gene and the risk of multiple cancers [36, 37]. However, recent research focused on the mechanisms that XRCC2 involved in the oncogenesis of cancer are not available yet. The association between the expression or polymorphisms of XRCC2 and the risk of HCC has no current reports as well.

Similar to XRCC1 and XRCC2, XRCC3 has been researched widely in the correlation between gene polymorphisms and the risk of cancer. Several studies have revealed multiple gene mutations, including rs861539 C > T, rs1799796 A > G, C241T, which are significantly associated with enhanced risk of HCC [38, 39]. Besides, XRCC3 overexpression has been found to be associated with clinical factors in breast cancer [40]. However, the expression profiles of XRCC3 in HCC have not been reported yet.

XRCC4, a member of XRCCs, had been reported to be an independent prognostic factor for HCC, and high XRCC4 expression was remarkably associated with HCC pathological features [21]. Genetic variants of XRCC4 were associated with susceptibility to esophageal cancer, and high expression of XRCC4 participated in radio-resistance in patients with esophageal cancer [41, 42]. Besides, XRCC4 depletion significantly sensitized cancer cells to chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Downregulation of XRCC4 by UHRF1 depletion sensitized retinoblastoma cells to more chemotherapy [43]. Silencing of XRCC4 increased the radio-sensitivity of breast cancer cells [44].

XRCC5 was found to promote the development of numerous cancers, including gastric cancer and colon cancer [45, 46]. Recent reports had also focused on the oncogene role of XRCC6. Zhu et al. revealed that high XRCC6 promoted the osteosarcoma process via the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway [47]. A literature review has been demonstrated the association between the XRCC5/XRCC6 dimer and the susceptibility to multiple cancers [48]. Besides, genetic polymorphisms in XRCC5 and XRCC6 genes also enhanced the risk of HCC [49].

Noticeably, there were some limitations to the current study. First, all the data involved in our study was obtained from online websites. Although the field of large data is the frontier of biomedical research, some unavoidable problems must be taken seriously. Mostly, sequencing databases, including TCGA and GTEx, only provide gene expression data at the mRNA level, which may not fully represent the expression even the activation of the candidate genes in the protein level. Further studies should apply western blotting as well as other protein detection techniques to validate our findings in protein level and explore the potential mechanisms of distinct XRCCs in HCC. Besides, further exploration of the clinical application of the XRCCs members in the targeted therapy of HCC should also be conducted in the future.

5. Conclusion

In summary, we systemically analyzed the expression profiles and prognostic values of XRCCs in HCC. Our results revealed that the overexpression of six XRCCs was found to be remarkably associated with clinical stages and tumor grades in HCC patients. Besides, higher mRNA expressions of XRCC2/3/4/5/6 were found to be significantly correlated with OS in HCC patients, while higher mRNA expressions of XRCC1/2/3/6 were notably correlated with favorable DFS. Overall, our research provided a systematic insight into the heterogeneous and complex roles of XRCCs in the carcinogenesis of HCC.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the relative bioinformatics database.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to this study.

Authors’ Contributions

CL, JX, and JM designed the experiments. JM, HW, RW, and JP acquired the data. JM, HW, RW, and JP analyzed and interpreted the data. JM and HW drafted the manuscript. CL and JX critically revised the manuscript for intellectual content. CL and HW were responsible for funding acquisition. Jie Mei and Huiyu Wang contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81602065), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China (BE2017626), and the Foundation of Wuxi Health Commission (QNRC003).

References

R. L. Siegel, K. D. Miller, and A. Jemal, “Cancer statistics, 2019,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 7–34, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C.-S. Tai, Y.-R. Lin, T.-H. Teng et al., “Haptoglobin expression correlates with tumor differentiation and five-year overall survival rate in hepatocellular carcinoma,” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 2, Article ID e0171269, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Shimoda, Y. Ubukata, T. Handa et al., “High expression of forkhead box protein C2 is associated with aggressive phenotypes and poor prognosis in clinical hepatocellular carcinoma,” BMC Cancer, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 597, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. M. Liu, H. D. Zeng, C. Y. Zhang, and J. W. Xu, “Identification of a six-gene signature predicting overall survival for hepatocellular carcinoma,” Cancer Cell International, vol. 19, p. 138, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Garcia-Higuera, Y. Kuang, J. Denham, and A. D. D’Andrea, “The fanconi anemia proteins FANCA and FANCG stabilize each other and promote the nuclear accumulation of the Fanconi anemia complex,” Blood, vol. 96, no. 9, pp. 3224–3230, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Narod and L. Salmena, “BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and breast cancer,” Discovery Medicine, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 445–453, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Thacker and M. Z. Zdzienicka, “The XRCC genes: expanding roles in DNA double-strand break repair,” DNA Repair, vol. 3, no. 8-9, pp. 1081–1090, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. H. Q. Heng, “Cancer genome sequencing: the challenges ahead,” Bioessays, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 783–794, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. C. Li, L. M. Tachiki, M. H. Kabeer, B. A. Dethlefs, M. J. Anthony, and W. G. Loudon, “Cancer genomic research at the crossroads: realizing the changing genetic landscape as intratumoral spatial and temporal heterogeneity becomes a confounding factor,” Cancer Cell International, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 115, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Hanauer, D. Rhodes, C. Sinha-Kumar, and A. Chinnaiyan, “Bioinformatics approaches in the study of cancer,” Current Molecular Medicine, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 133–141, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Ning, Y.-L. Huang, L.-M. Zhen et al., “Transcriptional expressions of Chromobox 1/2/3/6/8 as independent indicators for survivals in hepatocellular carcinoma patients,” Aging, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 3450–3473, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Wang, G. Li, Q. Luo, J. Xie, and C. Gan, “Integrated TCGA analysis implicates lncRNA CTB-193M12.5 as a prognostic factor in lung adenocarcinoma,” Cancer Cell International, vol. 18, p. 27, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Cai, J. Mei, Z. Xiao et al., “Identification of five hub genes as monitoring biomarkers for breast cancer metastasis in silico,” Hereditas, vol. 156, p. 20, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. S. Chandrashekar, B. Bashel, S. A. H. Balasubramanya et al., “UALCAN: a portal for facilitating tumor subgroup gene expression and survival analyses,” Neoplasia, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 649–658, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Varambally, C. Li, B. Kang, G. Gao, C. Li, and Z. Zhang, “GEPIA: a web server for cancer and normal gene expression profiling and interactive analyses,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 45, no. W1, pp. W98–W102, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Cerami, J. Gao, U. Dogrusoz et al., “The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data: figure 1,” Cancer Discovery, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 401–404, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Gao, B. A. Aksoy, U. Dogrusoz et al., “Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal,” Science Signaling, vol. 6, no. 269, p. pl1, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. T. Sherman, D. Huang, Q. Tan et al., “DAVID Knowledgebase: a gene-centered database integrating heterogeneous gene annotation resources to facilitate high-throughput gene functional analysis,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 426, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Ozen, G. Yildiz, A. T. Dagcan et al., “Genetics and epigenetics of liver cancer,” New Biotechnology, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 381–384, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Llovet, R. Montal, D. Sia, and R. S. Finn, “Molecular therapies and precision medicine for hepatocellular carcinoma,” Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 599–616, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Lu, X. Z. Wang, T. Q. Zhang et al., “Prognostic significance of XRCC4 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma,” Oncotarget, vol. 8, no. 50, pp. 87955–87970, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Chen, Y.-H. Zhang, S. Wang, Y. Zhang, T. Huang, and Y.-D. Cai, “Prediction and analysis of essential genes using the enrichments of gene ontology and KEGG pathways,” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 9, Article ID e0184129, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. C. Teoh, Y. Y. Dan, K. Swisshelm et al., “Defective DNA strand break repair causes chromosomal instability and accelerates liver carcinogenesis in mice,” Hepatology, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 2078–2088, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Ma, H. Wang, J. Sun et al., “LINC00152 promotes cell cycle progression in hepatocellular carcinoma via miR-193a/b-3p/CCND1 axis,” Cell Cycle, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 974–984, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Lu, W. Xu, Z. Wang et al., “An LTR retrotransposon-derived lnc RNA interacts with RNF 169 to promote homologous recombination,” EMBO Reports, vol. 20, no. 11, Article ID e47650, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Meng, D. A. Franklin, J. Dong, and Y. Zhang, “MDM2-p53 pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma,” Cancer Research, vol. 74, no. 24, pp. 7161–7167, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Abdel-Fatah, R. Sultana, R. Abbotts et al., “Clinicopathological and functional significance of XRCC1 expression in ovarian cancer,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 132, no. 12, pp. 2778–2786, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P.-j. Madhusudan, J. Bai, F.-a. Miao et al., “Relationship between expression of XRCC1 and tumor proliferation, migration, invasion, and angiogenesis in glioma,” Investigational New Drugs, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 646–657, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Fan, T. Wang, J. Xu et al., “Prognostic significance of X-ray cross-complementing gene 1 expression in gastric cancer,” Chinese Journal of Cancer Research, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 355–361, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. T. J. Chong, L. P. W. Goh, E. U. H. See, J. A. Chuah, K. H. Chua, and P.-C. Lee, “Association of CYP2E1, STK15 and XRCC1 polymorphisms with risk of breast cancer in Malaysian women,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 647–653, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Tasnim, M. M. A. Al-Mamun, N. A. Nahid et al., “Genetic variants of SULT1A1 and XRCC1 genes and risk of lung cancer in Bangladeshi population,” Tumour Biology, vol. 39, no. 11, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. J. Wang, H. T. Wang, and X. X. Wang, “Association of XRCC1 gene polymorphisms and pancreatic cancer risk in a Chinese population,” Genetics and Molecular Research, vol. 15, no. 2, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Meng, S. Wang, W. Tang et al., “XRCC1 mediated the development of cervival cancer through a novel Sp1/Krox-20 swich,” Oncotarget, vol. 8, no. 49, pp. 86217–86226, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Chen, A. J. Legrand, S. Cunniffe et al., “Interplay between base excision repair protein XRCC1 and ALDH2 predicts overall survival in lung and liver cancer patients,” Cellular Oncology, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 527–539, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-z. Zhang, J.-H. An, Y.-X. Liu et al., “XRCC2-Deficient cells are highly sensitive to 5-fluorouracil in colorectal cancer,” Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 1207–1219, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. S. Qin, M. S. Luijsterburg, W. W. Wiegant et al., “Functional analysis of missense variants in the putative breast cancer susceptibility GeneXRCC2,” Human Mutation, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 914–925, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Saeed, I. Mahjabeen, R. Sarwar, K. Bashir, and M. A. Kayani, “Haplotype analysis of XRCC2 gene polymorphisms and association with increased risk of head and neck cancer,” Science Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, Article ID 13210, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Wu, H. Jiang, H. Yu, D. Xu, J. Liang, and J. Jin, “Significant association between XRCC3 C241T polymorphism and increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis,” Tumor Biology, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 3865–3869, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E.-R. Avadanei, S.-E. Giusca, L. Negura, and I.-D. Caruntu, “Single nucleotide polymorphisms of XRCC3 gene in hepatocellular carcinoma-relationship with clinicopathological features,” Polish Journal of Pathology, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 73–81, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Hu, N. Wang, and Y.-J. Wang, “XRCC3 and RAD51 expression are associated with clinical factors in breast cancer,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 8, Article ID e72104, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Ming-Zhong, J. Hui-Xiang, Z. Zhong-Wei, J. Hao, and Z. Rong, “Genetic variants of the DNA damage repair genes XRCC4 and RAD51 are associated with susceptibility to esophageal cancer,” Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 379–383, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hori, M. Someya, Y. Matsumoto et al., “Influence of XRCC4 expression in esophageal cancer cells on the response to radiotherapy,” Medical Molecular Morphology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 25–33, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. He, C. Lee, and J. K. Kim, “UHRF1 depletion sensitizes retinoblastoma cells to chemotherapeutic drugs via downregulation of XRCC4,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 164, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wen, G. Dai, L. Wang, K. Fu, and S. Zuo, “Silencing of XRCC4 increases radiosensitivity of triple-negative breast cancer cells,” Bioscience Reports, vol. 39, no. 3, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Zhang, F. Zheng, Z. Yu et al., “XRCC5 cooperates with p300 to promote cyclooxygenase-2 expression and tumor growth in colon cancers,” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 10, Article ID e0186900, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Gu, Y. Li, X. Yang et al., “Overexpression of CLC-3 is regulated by XRCC5 and is a poor prognostic biomarker for gastric cancer,” Journal of Hematology & Oncology, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 115, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Zhu, D. Cheng, S. Li, S. Zhou, and Q. Yang, “High expression of XRCC6 promotes human osteosarcoma cell proliferation through the beta-catenin/wnt signaling pathway and is associated with poor prognosis,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 17, no. 7, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D.-T. Bau, C.-W. Tsai, and C.-N. Wu, “Role of the XRCC5/XRCC6 dimer in carcinogenesis and pharmacogenomics,” Pharmacogenomics, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 515–534, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Li, Y. Yang, Y. An et al., “Genetic polymorphisms in DNA double-strand break repair genes XRCC5 , XRCC6 and susceptibility to hepatocellular carcinoma,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 530–536, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2020 Jie Mei et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

409

Downloads

1109

Citations