BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2020 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 6313480 |

Shanshan Ma, Zhongyang Xie, Huafen Zhang, Jiangcheng Rong, Lingjian Zhang, Ya Yang, He Jiang, Xiaowei Xu, Lanjuan Li, "Characterization of an Artificial Liver Support System-Related Vasovagal Reaction", BioMed Research International, vol. 2020, Article ID 6313480, 8 pages, 2020.

Characterization of an Artificial Liver Support System-Related Vasovagal Reaction

Academic Editor: Hongqun Liu
Received11 May 2020
Accepted03 Jul 2020
Published14 Jul 2020


Objective. An artificial liver support system (ALSS) is an effective therapy for patients with severe liver injury. A vasovagal reaction (VVR) is a common complication in various treatment settings but has not been reported previously in ALSS. Methods. This study retrospectively evaluated patients who suffered an ALSS-related VRR between January 2018 and June 2019. We collected data from VVR episodes including onset time, duration, changes in heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP), and drug treatment. Results. Among 637 patients who underwent ALSS treatment, 18 were included in the study. The incidence of VVR was approximately 2.82%. These patients were characterized by a rapid decrease in BP or HR with associated symptoms such as chest distress, nausea, and vomiting. The majority of patients (78%) suffered a VVR during their first ALSS treatment. Sixteen patients (89%) had associated symptoms after treatment began. Sixteen patients (89%) received human albumin or Ringer’s solution. Atropine was used in 11 patients (61%). The symptoms were relieved within 20 min in 15 patients and over 20 min in 3 patients. Conclusions. A VVR is a rare complication in patients with severe liver injury undergoing ALSS treatment. Low BP and HR are the main characteristics of a VVR.

1. Introduction

Liver failure is a severe clinical syndrome characterized by hepatic encephalopathy, jaundice, coagulopathy, and a high mortality rate. Hepatitis viruses, drugs, or toxins can precipitate acute liver failure in patients with or without chronic liver disease [1]. Unfortunately, liver transplantation currently remains the only definitive treatment option for irreversible liver failure [2]. Approximately 90% of patients are cured after liver transplantation [3, 4], but there is a serious shortfall of donors, especially in China, and costs are considerable for many families. Some patients recover spontaneously with standard medical therapy.

Artificial liver support systems (ALSSs) are a bridge to liver transplantation or recovery after liver failure and are useful means of improving biochemical parameters and clinical symptoms [5]. An ALSS is an external support system that can remove several types of harmful substances while supplementing essential substances, thereby improving the internal environment and create conditions for the regeneration of liver cells and restoration of liver function. There are various modalities connecting treatment units either in series or in parallel such as plasma exchange (PE) combined with hemofiltration (HF), molecular absorbent recirculatory systems, fractionated plasma separation and absorption (using the Prometheus system), and double plasma molecular absorption systems (DPMAS).

The safety of most ALSS devices has been well established by clinical studies [2]. Commonly reported side effects of ALSSs include filter clotting, leukocytosis, hypotension, bleeding, anaphylaxis, and thrombocytopenia [2]. A vasovagal reaction (VVR) is an abnormal autonomic imbalance precipitated by pain, hunger, heat, imagined or real exposure to bodily harm, certain medical and surgical procedures, cardiac spasm, distention of viscera, and pleural or peritoneal irritation, which is characterized by hypotension followed by paradoxical bradycardia [6]. More seriously, strong vagal stimulation may lead to arrhythmias, syncope, transient asystole, seizures, or death [710]. To the best of our knowledge, a VVR during ALSS treatment has not been reported previously. Here, we describe 18 patients who experienced a VVR during treatment with an ALSS.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Patients

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent ALSS treatment for liver failure at our hospital and suffered an ALSS-related VVR from January 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019.

A VVR was defined as the presence of at least one of the following criteria with associated symptoms: (1) bradycardic episode ( beats/min (bpm)) and hypotension ( mmHg) in the supine position or (2) development of syncope [6, 11]. Common symptoms include pallor, faintness, dizziness, sweating, nausea, shivering, vomiting, heat intolerance, cold intolerance, and loss of consciousness [12]. Exclusion criteria were heart failure, myocardial infarction, or other severe liver diseases. A VVR was noted only if the reaction occurred following the entire procedure, including femoral vein catheter placement.

2.2. Data Collection

Data collected at the time of ALSS treatment included age, sex, body mass index, etiology of liver failure, serum total bilirubin (TB) level, alanine and aspartate aminotransferase (ALT, AST) levels, glucose level, and international normalized ratio (INR). The diastolic blood pressure (DBP), SBP, and HR after extracorporeal circulation were used as the baseline data. When a VVR occurred, the onset time, minimum BP and HR, symptoms, treatment measures, and recovery time were all recorded in detail.

2.3. ALSS Treatment

The indications for ALSS treatment were based on the Chinese Guideline for Diagnosis and Treatment of Liver Failure [13] and include (1) early- or intermediate-stage acute, subacute, and acute-on-chronic liver failure (prothrombin activity of 20–40%); (2) end-stage liver disease awaiting liver transplantation; (3) rejection after liver transplantation or a nonfunctional transplanted liver; and (4) severe cholestasis ( mg/dL) due to ineffective medical treatment. PE combined with HF was administered to five patients. PE was performed for 2 h each time using the EC-40 W plasma separator (Asahi Kasei, Japan), and the replacement fluid contained 500–1,000 mL albumin plus 1,500–2,000 mL fresh frozen plasma, for a total exchange volume of 2,500–3,000 mL. Subsequently, HF was performed continuously for approximately 4–6 h using the BLS816G (SORIN Group, Italy) at a filtrate flow rate of 50 mL/kg/h. The entire procedure lasted 6–8 h. A DPMAS was used to treat 13 patients. The plasma was separated using the EC-40 W device (Asahi Kasei), purified by an anion exchange resin column (HA330-II, Jian Fan, China) and a bilirubin adsorption column (BS330, Jian Fan), and finally returned to the patient. ALSS treatment was administered using the IQ21 machine (Asahi Kasei). A double-lumen catheter was inserted into the femoral vein to obtain vascular access. Heparin was given to prevent coagulation, with the dosage adjusted based on the transmembrane pressure and activated partial thromboplastin time. A plasma allergy was prevented by administering 5 mg dexamethasone before ALSS treatment.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Data were compared using Student’s -test conducted in Prism, version 8.0.0 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA). Statistical significance was defined at .

3. Results

Among 637 patients who underwent ALSS treatment, a VVR occurred in 18 (2.82%), who were included in the study. The clinical features of the 18 patients (9 males and 9 females) are shown in Table 1. The mean age of the patients was 53.2 (range 22–74) years, and the mean body mass index was 21 (range 18–28) kg/m2; excluding patient 17 who was too weak to obtain height or weight data. The most common etiology of liver failure was hepatitis B virus (56%), followed by drugs (22%). The glucose levels in all patients were normal to high (range 6.7–16.8 mmol/L) at the time of the VVR. All patients exhibited increased aminotransferase levels: the ALT level ranged from 39 to 427 (mean 138) U/L and the AST level from 34 to 383 (mean 129) U/L. Jaundice was present in all 18 patients. The serum TB level ranged from 175 to 583 (mean 358) μmol/L. In five patients, coagulation dysfunction was present, with an (the peak INR level was 2.78 in patient 15).

VariableAge (years)SexBMI (kg/m2)Etiology of liver injuryGlu (mmol/L)ALT (U/L)AST (U/L)TBil (μmol/L)INR

Patient 149Male23Hepatitis B virus9.7571355832.15
Patient 262Female24Hepatitis B virus13.453695291.47
Patient 371Male21Mixed16.84272432832.71
Patient 450Female19Drugs8.179743370.96
Patient 553Male21Hepatitis B virus7.8183742020.92
Patient 659Female19Cholestasis10.24253833661.19
Patient 773Female18Drugs14.92132491750.92
Patient 854Male21Hepatitis B virus14.291933321.48
Patient 959Female21Drugs8.91242142541.64
Patient 1069Female22Drugs9.354343530.97
Patient 1127Male19Hepatitis B virus8.797893721.41
Patient 1262Female18Cholestasis12.4151693331.12
Patient 1344Male21Hepatitis B virus9.739583221.16
Patient 1422Male23Hepatitis B virus6.777944011.3
Patient 1574Female21Hepatitis B virus10.860593222.78
Patient 1626Male28Hepatitis B virus91131655481.49
Patient 1767FemaleUnavailableMixed11.6921333982.68
Patient 1837Male26Hepatitis B virus8.5146823411.9

Note. ALSS: artificial liver support system; VVR: vasovagal reaction; BMI: body mass index; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; TBil: total bilirubin; INR: international normalized ratio; Glu: glucose.

Detailed information on ALSS treatment and the VRRs, including modality of ALSS, VVR duration, changes in HR and BP, and treatment provided for the VVR, are listed in Table 2. Of the 18 patients, 13 (72%) were managed using a DPMAS, and the remaining 5 (28%) received PE combined with HF. The majority of patients (78%) suffered a VVR during their first ALSS treatment. Sixteen patients experienced the relevant symptoms after treatment commenced and the onset time of VVR ranged from 10 to 100 min. Only two patients experienced symptoms during femoral vein catheter placement. The VVR was associated with significant changes in BP and HR. The mean basal and minimum HR were 80 and 52 bpm, respectively, and the mean basal and minimum SBP were 119 and 72 mmHg, respectively. Trends in HR and mean arterial pressure are described in Figure 1. Dizziness, sweating, nausea, and chest distress were frequently reported by these patients.

Modality of ALSSTreatment times of ALSSOnset time of VVR (since the treatment began)Time of durationHR (bpm)SBP (mmHg)DBP (mmHg)HR (bpm)SBP (mmHg)DBP (mmHg)SymptomsDrug treatment

P1PE+CRRT130 minutes7 minutes8110064607844Chest distress, waist discomfortDopamine 0.8 mg, aramine 0.4 mg, Ringer’s solution
P2DPMAS130 minutes10 minutes5311461306144Chest distress, nausea, dizziness, yawningAdrenaline 0.04 mg, human albumin, Ringer’s solution
P3PE+CRRT131 minutes7 minutes10115690577445Yawning, waist discomfort, defecationHuman albumin
P4DPMAS363 minutes17 minutes7010870418545Abdominal distensionAtropine 0.5 mg, dopamine 3 mg, Ringer’s solution
P5DPMAS1During catheter placement, 20 minutes5 minutes, 70 minutes7810964407647NervousnessAtropine 0.25 mg, Ringer’s solution
P6DPMAS149 minutes10 minutes7010256495833Palpitation, sweatingAtropine 0.5 mg, Ringer’s solution
P7DPMAS120 minutes10 minutes8510967505631Chest distress, nausea, dizzinessDopamine 20 mg, human albumin
P8DPMAS134 minutes5 minutes6112479367942Chest distressAtropine 0.5 mg
P9DPMAS130 minutes30 minutes7412068356745Chest distress, nausea, dizzinessAtropine 0.5 mg, dopamine 20 mg, Ringer’s solution
P10DPMAS140 minutes3 minutes7013268425231Chest distressAtropine 0.5 mg, Ringer’s solution
P11DPMAS356 minutes5 minutes8012070498339Abdominal painAtropine 0.5 mg, Ringer’s solution
P12DPMAS2100 minutes5 minutes5414272387240Urination, abdominal distensionAtropine 0.5 mg, Ringer’s solution, dopamine 20 mg, human albumin
P13DPMAS163 minutes9 minutes8911982627944Abdominal discomfort, nauseaHuman albumin
P14DPMAS150 minutes15 minutes8010769608942Dizziness, tinnitusRinger’s solution
P15PE+CRRT310 minutes10 minutes7012572507949Sore backHuman albumin, Ringer’s solution
P16DPMAS110 minutes40 minutes11411478836336Chest distress, palpitation, nausea, vomitingDexamethasone 3 mg, atropine 0.5 mg, dopamine 6 mg, aramine 3 mg, Ringer’s solution
P17PE+CRRT115 minutes11 minutes12011257986738Yawning, dry mouthAtropine 0.25 mg
P18Li-ALS1During catheter placement8 minutes8413586577535Nervousness, chest distress, dizzinessAtropine 0.5 mg, Ringer’s solution

Note. ALSS: artificial liver support system; VVR: vasovagal reaction; PE: plasma exchange; CRRT: continuous renal replacement therapy; DPMAS: double plasma molecular absorb system; Li-ALS: Li’s artificial liver system; HR: heart rate; SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure.

During treatment, most patients (89%) received human albumin or Ringer’s solution to increase the circulating blood volume. Atropine, as an effective drug for blocking a VVR, was used in more than half of the patients (61%). Six patients received dopamine with or without aramine. The VVR duration was short (<20 min) in 15 patients and more than 20 min in 3 patients, ranging from 3 to 105 min. The VVR time of onset and duration in all 18 patients are shown in Figure 2.

4. Discussion

We detected an incidence of a VVR occurring during ALSS treatment of 2.82%. There are no previously published data on VVR incidence for comparison with our results. It is important differentiate VVR from hypoglycemia. VVR is a rare complication of ALSS treatment and is more frequently associated with spine procedures [14], blood donation [15], cerebral angiography via femoral catheterization [11], and percutaneous coronary intervention [16]. In the general blood donor population, the VVR rate was reported to be 1.4%. VVR during spinal injection was found to be a common adverse event, with a rate of 0–8.6. [14] As for PE treatments, it was reported that the VVR rate was about 0.5%, in which the patients were diagnosed with the Guillain-Barre syndrome, myasthenia gravis, and so on, but liver injury were not included [17]. Compared with other conditions, a VVR incidence of 2.82% may be considered moderate.

In the present study, all patients during the VVR experienced a remarkable decrease in BP or HR accompanied by symptoms such as dizziness and sweating. Symptoms and signs returned to normal within 3–105 min, which is similar to the duration (from several minutes to 2 h) reported in a study of VVR associated with cerebral angiography [11]. Sixteen (89%) instances of VVR occurred during normal ALSS treatment, ranging from 10 to 100 min after treatment commenced. The remaining two instances of VVR occurred during femoral vein catheter placement. In a study on VVR occurring during blood donation [18], 54.4% of VVR episodes occurred during blood collection, 28.6% after collection and 9.8% after entering the refreshment area; 1.4% occurred even later, after the donor had left the site. In addition, 5.9% of VVR incidents was associated with blood test procedures requiring venipuncture. In short, VVR occurred before, during, and after blood collection, whereas ALSS-related VVR occurred mainly before and during ALSS treatment.

The vagus nerve runs throughout the vascular endothelial system. Physiologically, a VVR is believed to be caused by the initial increase in BP and HR due to an adrenergic response, followed by overcompensation by a sudden withdrawal of sympathetic tone and increased parasympathetic tone, resulting in splanchnic vasodilation, bradycardia, and decreased cerebral blood flow [19]. Hypermetabolism in the adrenal gland responsible for synthesizing and secreting catecholamines is indicated by increased adrenal fluorodeoxyglucose accumulation on positron emission tomography/computed tomography [20]. Elements such as fear, pain, and a bad mood can be triggers, leading to a strong autonomic response [12]. Internal factors such as hyperventilation, hypotension, and stress may also precipitate a VVR in some cases [21]. Alcohol ingestion may predispose individuals to a VVR in the clinical setting [22].

Patients require femoral vein catheter placement before ALSS treatment. Two patients experienced a VVR during this procedure. As reported by other studies, patients who received a vascular interventional examination or therapy were more likely to develop a VVR, which was commonly seen at the time of sheath placement [11]. A poor response to intraoperative local anesthesia, which may increase the patient’s pain sensitivity, and stimulation of the vascular intima by a guide wire or catheter both can cause enhanced excitability of the vascular vagus nerve. On the other hand, patient anxiety or even insomnia may stimulate the pressure transducers in the left ventricle and carotid artery, leading to enhanced vagus nerve excitability [11]. When treatment begins, a portion of the blood flows into the pipeline, which results in relative hypovolemia, similar in some respects to blood donation. In patients with liver failure, toxins typically accumulate in the blood vessels to cause an attenuated vasoconstrictor response. As a result, mobilization of the peripheral venous blood and net fluid absorption from tissues to blood decrease [23].

VVR is an unexpected high-risk condition that may cause irreversible harm including arrhythmias, syncope, myocardial infarction, transient asystole, and seizures even death to patients without timely treatment [710, 24]. Most patients who develop VVR could recover after timely and accurate treatment in previous study [6], the same as we have observed. In our 18 patients, therapy for symptomatic hypotension and bradycardia was administered according to the judgement of the clinician. The treatment measures included stopping the pump of the machine, change in position (supine position with the head turned to one side or the Trendelenburg position), and fluid infusion. The final measure was intravenous injection of atropine, dopamine, aramine, or adrenaline. All patients recovered after timely and appropriate treatment. According to our experience and a literature review, we devised a suggested treatment algorithm. First, operation of the ALSS device should be stopped to reduce stimulation and prevent a further reduction of the circulating blood volume. The patient’s anxiety should be assuaged by reassurance and “talk-esthesia.” [12] Second, reclining the patient rapidly into the Trendelenburg position helps facilitate perfusion to the brain [25]. Hand holding will help increase peripheral resistance and venous return [26]. Third, sufficient fluid infusion is essential. Human albumin and Ringer’s solution are optional. If these measures are ineffective, 0.5 mg atropine should be injected intravenously at an appropriate dosage to reverse vagal cardiac stimulation. If the BP drops markedly, dopamine and aramine should be used. If asystole occurs, the emergency activation system should be initiated.

In an ALSS treatment setting, these steps can be taken to minimize the risk of a VVR as much as possible. It has been reported that during blood donation, the fear of drawing blood was associated with an approximately threefold increase in the odds of experiencing a VVR [27]. Thus, humanistic concern and psychological counseling are beneficial. Before treatment, clinicians should explain the entire ALSS procedure and related complications to the patient in detail to eliminate their fear and anxiety. The support of a family member or trusted friend is integral [12]. Patients should be encouraged to eat regularly and drink adequate fluids while avoiding alcohol before treatment [12]. At the time of femoral vein catheter placement, sufficient local anesthesia may reduce pain stimulation [16]. During ALSS treatment, medical personnel can communicate with the patient to create a nonthreatening and relaxing environment. Furthermore, the BP, HR, and subjective symptoms of the patient should be closely monitored, since early discovery and treatment of VVR can prevent severe outcomes.

The present study has some limitations. In this retrospective analysis, the data were collected in a strict prospective manner utilizing electronic medical records. The number of cases was limited. Furthermore, data following catheter removal were unavailable. A larger-scale prospective study is required to validate our findings.

5. Conclusions

To conclude, a VVR is a rare complication that can occur before or during ALSS treatment for liver failure, including during catheter placement. Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of a VVR and take the appropriate measures to prevent its occurrence.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Ethical Approval

This study was conducted in compliance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the ethics committee of the hospital.

Informed consent from the patient was obtained.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Authors’ Contributions

Shanshan Ma and Zhongyang Xie contributed equally to this work.


This study was supported by the Key Research and Development Project of Department of Science and Technology of Zhejiang Province (2017C03051) and Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81721091).


  1. W. M. Lee, “Acute liver failure,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 329, no. 25, pp. 1862–1872, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. Aron, B. Agarwal, and A. Davenport, “Extracorporeal support for patients with acute and acute on chronic liver failure,” Expert Review of Medical Devices, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 367–380, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. W. Allen, T. Hassanein, and S. N. Bhatia, “Advances in bioartificial liver devices,” Hepatology, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 447–455, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. P. S. Russell, “Understanding resource use in liver transplantation,” Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 281, no. 15, pp. 1431-1432, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. B. Carpentier, A. Gautier, and C. Legallais, “Artificial and bioartificial liver devices: present and future,” Gut, vol. 58, no. 12, pp. 1690–1702, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. B. N. Rama, S. M. Mohiuddin, A. N. Mooss et al., “Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled evaluation of atropine to prevent vasovagal reaction during removal of femoral arterial sheaths,” Pharmacotherapy, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 867–873, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  7. J. G. Bourne, “Fainting and cerebral damage; a danger in patients kept upright during dental gas anaesthesia and after surgical operations,” Lancet, vol. 270, no. 6994, pp. 499–505, 1957. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. G. L. Engel, “Psychologic stress, vasodepressor (vasovagal) syncope, and sudden death,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 403–412, 1978. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. Z. Schlesinger, J. Barzilay, D. Stryjer, and C. H. Almog, “Life-threatening "vagal reaction" to emotional stimuli,” Israel Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 59–61, 1977. View at: Google Scholar
  10. R. Tizes, “Cardiac arrest following routine venipuncture,” JAMA, vol. 236, no. 16, pp. 1846-1847, 1976. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. Y. Yang, Z. Zhang, T. Li, Z. Gu, and Y. Sun, “Risk factors for vasovagal reaction associated with cerebral angiography via femoral catheterisation,” Interventional Neuroradiology, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 546–550, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. W. J. Wu, L. H. Goldberg, M. K. Rubenzik, and B. R. Zelickson, “Review of the evaluation and treatment of vasovagal reactions in outpatient procedures,” Dermatologic Surgery, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 1483–1488, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. Artificial, Liver Group, Liver Disease Severe, Liver Group Artificial, Chinese Medical Chinese Society of Hepatology and Medical Association, “Guideline for diagnosis and treatment of liver failure,” Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 18–26, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. D. J. Kennedy, B. Schneider, M. Smuck, and C. T. Plastaras, “The use of moderate sedation for the secondary prevention of adverse vasovagal reactions,” Pain Medicine, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 673–679, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. H. K. Wong, C. K. Lee, J. N. Leung, I. Y. Lee, and C. K. Lin, “Reduction in vasovagal reaction rate in young first-time blood donors by collecting 350 mL rather than 450 mL,” Transfusion, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 2763–2765, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. C. Kiat Ang, D. Y. C. Leung, S. Lo, J. K. French, and C. P. Juergens, “Effect of local anesthesia and intravenous sedation on pain perception and vasovagal reactions during femoral arterial sheath removal after percutaneous coronary intervention,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 116, no. 3, pp. 321–326, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J. L. Winters, “Plasma exchange: concepts, mechanisms, and an overview of the American Society for Apheresis guidelines,” Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, vol. 2012, no. 1, pp. 7–12, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. Takanashi, T. Odajima, S. Aota et al., “Risk factor analysis of vasovagal reaction from blood donation,” Transfusion and Apheresis Science, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 319–325, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. D. T. Graham, J. D. Kabler, and L. Lunsford Jr., “Vasovagal fainting: a diphasic response,” Psychosomatic Medicine, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 493–507, 1961. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. Y. Otomi, T. Shinya, H. Otsuka et al., “Increased (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose accumulation in bilateral adrenal glands of the patients suffering from vasovagal reaction due to blood vessel puncture,” Annals of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 501–505, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. P. Alboni, “The different clinical presentations of vasovagal syncope,” Heart, vol. 101, no. 9, pp. 674–678, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. S. Viski, M. Orosz, K. R. Czuriga-Kovacs, M. T. Magyar, L. Csiba, and L. Olah, “The acute effects of alcohol on cerebral hemodynamic changes induced by the head-up tilt test in healthy subjects,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 368, pp. 113–120, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. J. Skoog, H. Zachrisson, T. Länne, and M. Lindenberger, “Reduced compensatory responses to maintain central blood volume during hypovolemic stress in women with vasovagal syncope,” American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, vol. 312, no. 1, pp. R55–r61, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. M. J. Sreckovic, N. Jagic, V. Zdravkovic et al., “Coronary spasm that caused non-ST elevation myocardial infarction appeared in cath lab due to vasovagal reaction,” Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 138–140, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. D. J. Pavlin, S. Links, S. E. Rapp, M. L. Nessly, and H. J. Keyes, “Vaso-vagal reactions in an ambulatory surgery center,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 931–935, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. A. Taddio, V. Shah, C. M. McMurtry et al., “Procedural and physical interventions for vaccine injections: systematic review of randomized controlled trials and quasi-randomized controlled trials,” The Clinical Journal of Pain, vol. 31, 10 Suppl, pp. S20–S37, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. C. R. France, J. L. France, T. A. Frame-Brown, G. A. Venable, and J. E. Menitove, “Fear of blood draw and total draw time combine to predict vasovagal reactions among whole blood donors,” Transfusion, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 179–185, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Shanshan Ma et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.