Review Article

Intra-Articular Steroid Injection for Patients with Hip Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 2

Results of the included trials.

Author/yearPain outcome extractedHip painSide effectsPotential predictorsConclusion
BaselineShort term <8 weeksLong term ≥8 weeks

Atchia/2011NRS: worst pain#Placebo: 6.55 ± 0.68
Steroid: 5.99 ± 0.62
1 week: placebo: 5.9 ± 0.96; steroid: 3.06 ± 1.2 ()
4 weeks: placebo: 6.42 ± 1.08; steroid: 3.89 ± 1.39 ()
8 weeks: placebo: 6.98 ± 0.89; steroid: 5.06 ± 1.23 ()NA(1) Synovitis
(2) Changes in medications
(1) IAST is highly efficacious in pain relief
(2) Synovitis is the single predictor in weeks 4 and 8
(3) No differences between NSAIDs and paracetamol or paracetamol/weak opioid groups during the trial

Kullenberg/2004Total VASPlacebo: NA
Steroid: 12.2 ± 2.2
3 weeks: placebo: 12 ± 1; steroid: 3.8 ± 2.6 ()12 weeks: placebo: 12.4 ± 1.8; steroid: 7.9 ± 3.9 ()NANAIAST might improve pain and range of motion

Lambert/2007WOMAC pain scoresPlacebo: 314.3 ± 76.2
Steroid: 310.1 ± 54.6
1 month: placebo: 276.4 ± 129; steroid: 149.6 ± 113 ()2 months: placebo: 306.5 ± 121.2; steroid: 157.4 ± 127.2 ()One deep vein thrombosis at 3 months in the steroid group; one patient in the placebo group and 3 patients in the steroid group reported rebound pain(1) Age
(2) Severity of hip OA
(1) IAST is an effective treatment in pain relief
(2) The efficacy of IAST remained significant with age as a covariate
(3) No association between the severity of OA and the responder status

Qvistgaard/2006VAS (walking pain)#Placebo: 42.4 ± 19.17
Steroid: 44.0 ± 19.17
2 weeks: placebo: 45.52 ± 19.17; steroid: 32.38 ± 19.17 ()
4 weeks: placebo: 42.51 ± 19.17; steroid: 29.52 ± 19.17 ()
12 weeks: placebo: 38.32 ± 19.17; steroid: 35.85 ± 19.17 ()NA(1) Degree of OA
(2) Effusion in the joint
(3) Age
(1) IAST provided significant improvement in pain within 3 mo
(2) Not related to the severity of OA, effusion in the joint, and age

Micu/2010VAS (walking pain)Control: 8.66 ± 0.79
Steroid: 8.17 ± 0.86
1 month: control: NA; steroid: 2.77 ± 0.79 ( vs. baseline)3 months: control: 7.02 ± 0.53; steroid: 3.66 ± 0.79 ( vs. baseline)Transient facial rash was present in 16 patients during the first 24–48 h after injectionSeverity of synovitis(1) IAST is an efficacious and safe treatment in pain relief
(2) Severity of synovitis was not significantly related to pain relief

Flanagan/1988Grades 1–5NAPositive responders: week 4: 9Positive responders: week 8: 4; week 24: 3; week 36: 2; week 48: 1NA(1) Severity of OA
(2) Time of the symptoms was present
(3) Concentric type of arthritis
(1) The patients had good pain relief within months but not longer than 1 year
(2) Patients with severer symptoms had a longer response
(3) Concentric type of arthritis does not respond to IAST

Margules/2001NANANAPain relief responders: week 8: severe group: 9% (21/234); moderate group: 58% (131/226); mild group: 90% (46/51)NASeverity of OA(1) IAST is an efficacious and safe treatment in pain relief
(2) Patients with a slighter grade severity of OA had a higher positive responder rate on pain relief

Deshmukh/2011VASPositive responders: 150Positive responders: 15–20 min: 148; week 2: 155NANA(1) Severity of OA
(2) Gender and age
(1) Pain relief following IAST related to radiographic severity of OA
(2) Neither gender nor age was a predictor

Robinson/2007WOMAC pain scores40 mg: 12 (2–20)
80 mg: 12 (2–20)
6 weeks: 40 mg: 10 (1–20) (); 80 mg: 8 (1–20) ()12 weeks: 40 mg: 12 (1–20) (); 80 mg: 10 (1–20) ()NA(1) Dose
(2) Stiffness at baseline
(3) BMI
(4) Severity of OA
(1) The 80 mg dose had longer efficacy in week 12
(2) The responders had less stiffness at baseline
(3) Not associated with BMI and severity of OA

Subedi/2015OHSNANAPositive responders: 82 (all grades of osteoarthritis)NASeverity of OAIAST is a highly effective therapeutic measure for hip osteoarthritis across all grades of disease severity

Walter/2019EQ5D-VAS0<8 weeks: Δ in EQ5D-VAS: 1 ± 18.32 ()≥8 weeks: Δ in EQ5D-VAS: 0.25 ± 20.58 ()NA(1) Days from injection to surgery
(2) Dose, sex, short/long-term follow-up, age, and BMI
(1) No improvements in pain at short- and long-term intervals up to 6 months
(2) Positive correlation with the number of days to surgery and patient-reported outcomes
(3) Not related to dose, sex, age, and BMI

Young/2012WOMAC pain scoresLow volume: 12.2
High volume: 12.3
NA3 months’ Δ in pain: low volume: 8.8 (−28%); high volume: 8.9 (−28%)One episode of temporary hyperglycaemia in a type 1 diabetic, one facial flush, one patient reported soft-tissue swelling, and two patients reported a temporary increase in painInjection volumeIAST is an effective therapeutic measure across volume of 3–12 ml

NRS: numerical rating scale; NA: not available; IAST: intra-articular steroid therapy; NSAIDs: nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs; VAS: visual analog scale; OA: osteoarthritis; WOMAC: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index; US: ultrasound; BMI: body mass index; EQ5D-VAS: EuroQol 5-domain visual analog scale; OHS: the Oxford hip score; Δ: change from baseline. #The pain score data were extracted from the accompany graph in the included studies.