BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2020 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 6759346 |

María Perez-Mendez, Paola Zárate-Segura, Juan Salas-Benito, Fernando Bastida-González, "siRNA Design to Silence the 3UTR Region of Zika Virus", BioMed Research International, vol. 2020, Article ID 6759346, 8 pages, 2020.

siRNA Design to Silence the 3UTR Region of Zika Virus

Academic Editor: Anjali Joshi
Received15 Feb 2020
Revised16 May 2020
Accepted02 Jul 2020
Published03 Aug 2020


The disease caused by the Zika virus (ZIKV) has positioned itself as one of the main public health problems in Mexico. One of the main reasons is it causes microcephaly and other birth defects. The transmission of ZIKV is through Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus mosquitoes, which are found in a larger space of the national territory. In addition, it can also be transmitted via blood transfusion, sexual relations, and maternal-fetal route. So far, there are no vaccines or specific treatments to deal with this infection. Currently, some new therapeutics such as small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) are able to regulate or suppress transcription in viruses. Therefore, in this project, an in silico siRNA was designed for the 3UTR region of ZIKV via bioinformatics tools. The designed siRNA was synthesized and transfected into the C6/36 cell line, previously infected with ZIKV in order to assess the ability of the siRNA to inhibit viral replication. The designed siRNA was able to inhibit significantly () ZIKV replication; this siRNA could be considered a potential therapeutic towards the disease that causes ZIKV and the medical problems generated.

1. Introduction

In 1947 in the Zika Forest, Uganda, Zika virus was isolated for the first time. The spread of ZIKV was not evident until late 2015 and early 2015 when it arrived to the Americas, specifically to Brazil [1, 2]. Later, the virus spread throughout the continent, arriving to Mexico in 2015, so far there are 12,936 confirmed cases of ZIKV from 2015 to epidemiological week 5 of 2020, which 7,135 cases correspond to pregnant women, also 54 confirmed cases of congenital syndrome associated with ZIKV, 10 deaths; and 34 confirmed cases of Guillain-Barre syndrome associated with ZIKV [3].

The main mechanism of transmission of ZIKV is through the bite of mosquitoes of the Aedes species, specifically Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus, as well as blood transfusion, maternal-fetal transmission, and sexual intercourse, causing ZIKV disease, which is asymptomatic in 80% of cases, but is associated to serious complications such as Guillain-Barre syndrome, microcephaly, and other birth defects [2].

ZIKV is structured by a polyprotein that encodes 3 structural proteins: capsid (C), membrane precursor (prM), and envelope (E), in addition to 7 nonstructural proteins (NS1, NS2A, NS2B, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, and NS5) flanked by two untranslated regions (UTR): 5UTR and 3UTR, emphasizing the 3UTR region plays an important role in the viral genome replication and pathogenic processes [4].

Until now, there are no vaccines or antiviral agents against ZIKV disease [5]. RNA interference (RNAi) has been positioned as therapeutic tool due to the fact that it has a mechanism to regulate or suppress transcription, within the interfering RNAis there are the small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) of a size of ~21 nt capable of performing gene silencing [6]. So far, progress has been made in the deliberation of siRNA as therapeutic agents to combat different diseases as well as viruses [7].

In the present work, a siRNA targeting the 3UTR region of ZIKV was designed to reduce or inhibit viral replication and cytopathic effect of the virus. It has been shown that siRNAs can perform specific gene silencing of functional sequences.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. siRNA Design and Validation

Over hundred and twenty-eight sequences from the complete viral genome or the 3UTR region were obtained from the NCBI database. They belong to African, American, and Asian linages of ZIKV. Sequences were aligned trough MEGA 7 and Jalview (version 2.9.0b2) program in order to obtain the 3UTR region and generate groups; then a consensus sequence of each group was determined. Consensus sequences were submitted to 8 different bioinformatics servers (Sidirect 2.0 [8], InvivoGen [911], AsiDesigner [12], DSIR [13], OligoWalk [14], Sfold [15], VIRsiRNA [16] and i-Score Designer [17]), which have specific rules and/or criteria for the efficient design of siRNAs in silico. Selected siRNA was the one which was homolog to the consensus sequences and selected by the eight servers.

Afterwards, validation was made, consisting in calculating the folding energy (ΔGF) of the siRNA by its secondary structure using the Mfold web [18] and RNAstructure servers [19]. To calculate the binding energy (ΔGB) between the siRNA and its target sequence, the server RNAcofold program [20] was used; also, the breaking energy (ΔGR) of the 3UTR region where the target sequence is found, was calculated with the Sfold program [15]. Finally, the siRNA was aligned with the human genome through blast tool (NCBI) to avoid off-targets (87 siRNA 3D model design and validation).

Obtained siRNA was modelled by its secondary structure via Vienna format; subsequently, it was submitted to the RNAComposer server [21, 22]. The model obtained was validated with the MOLProbity server [23], analyzing all-atom contacts and geometry, RNA sugar puckers, RNA backbone conformations, hydrogen bonds, and Van der Waals force. Wrong RNA sugar puckers and RNA backbone conformations were fixed manually with RNA rotator Tool with KiNG 2.22 [24] and reevaluated with MOLProbity to find the most accurate 3D model.

2.2. Cell Culture

C6/36-HT cell line was used. Cells were maintained in minimum essential medium (MEM) supplemented with vitamins, 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 0.034% sodium bicarbonate, streptomycin (100 μg/mL), and penicillin (100 U/mL). They were incubated at 35°C without CO2.

2.3. Viral Replication

The viral strains of ZIKV, dengue virus 1 (DENV-1), and chikungunya virus (CHIKV) were kindly donated by the National School of Medicine and Homeopathy. A multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.001 was used. C6/36-HT cells were infected for 1 hour before siRNA transfection.

2.4. Experimental Groups

Five different groups were carried out for the study. The assay was performed in a 12-well plate, in triplicate for the 3 viruses (ZIKV, DENV-1, and CHIKV). The following are the five groups: group 1—C6/36 cells infected with either one of the virus as positive control; group 2—C6/36 cells infected with either one of the virus adding Lipofectamine® 2000 Reaction Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA); group 3—C6/36 cells infected with either one of the virus and transfected with the siRNA at a concentration of 0.5 μg; group 4—C6/36 cells infected with either one of the virus and transfected with the siRNA at a concentration of 1 μg; and group 5—C6/36 cells infected with either one of the virus and transfected with the siRNA at a concentration of 2 μg. The groups were compared to measure the efficiency of the siRNA to inhibit viral replication. Negative control with noninfected cells was also carried out in triplicate.

2.5. Viral Infection and Transfection

C6/36 cells were seeded in a 12-well plate ( cells/well) adding 1 mL of medium and incubated overnight in the conditions previously described. The next day, at a confluence, ~80% were infected with ZIKV, DENV, or CHIKV at a MOI of 0.001. The infection was carried out for 1 h with gentle shaking at 37°C. Then, the virus was removed, cells were washed with 1 mL of phosphate buffer saline , and 1 mL of medium was added to each well. Immediately, the transfection was performed with the 3 concentrations of siRNA (0.5 μg, 1 μg, and 2 μg) via Lipofectamine® 2000 Reaction Reagent (Thermo Fisher SCIENTIFIC, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. C6/36 cells were incubated for 3 days as indicated above.

2.6. Viral RNA Extraction

Viral RNA extraction was performed 3 days post infection (dpi), using QIAmp® Viral RNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Germany) following the manufacturer’s protocol.

2.7. RT-qPCR Viral Detection

Viral detection was performed with a Trioplex [25], for the detection of the 3 viruses.

The relative viral quantity of each group was represented with the CT values; the change between each group compared to the control was calculated using ΔCT ().

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Student’s -test was used to compare the control group with the 3 siRNA concentration.

A was considered significant. Statistical analysis was done with Sigma Plot (version 14.0) program.

3. Results and Discussion

ZIKV, discovered in 1947, has two lineages: African and Asian [26]. A total of 128 sequences from the complete genome or from the 3UTR region of both lineages of Zika virus were obtained from the NCBI database. Sequences were aligned, and the 3UTR region was obtained via MEGA 7. A phylogenetic tree (Figure 1) was made through MEGA 7. The two lineages can be distinguished, with also a subgroup within the African strain [27]. In the first demarcation sequences, Asia and America strains can be distinguished; thus, circulating ZIKV in America is of Asian origin. Phylogenetic and molecular clock analyses were performed where it is shown that a single introduction of ZIKV to America was made, estimated in May 2013 and December 2013, which weakens the hypothesis that the 2014 Soccer World Cup (June 2 to July 13, 2014) and the Va’a canoe event (August 12-17, 2014) were the origin of the epidemic in America [28]. A total of 10 groups were made, and their consensus sequences were obtained through MEGA 7. These consensus sequences were submitted to the 8 siRNA bioinformatics servers. A final siRNA with a length of 21 nt was generated, homologous in the 8 servers and in the 10 consensus sequences.

siRNA validation is important to ensure efficient silencing of the given area in of the viral genome. The Reynolds rules [29] are contemplated in 3 of the servers used as well as the other number of rules or parameters given in each server to guarantee a functional siRNA. The first validation was G/C content; designed siRNA had a G/C content of 42.1%; according to the specified rules, an optimal G/C content between 36% and 52% is adequate [29], given that if it has a higher G/C content, it will decrease the splitting of the dsRNA by the helicase associated with the RISC complex and could generate a secondary structure that prohibits the union of the recognition and hybridization between the target and the siRNA and the efficient binding of Ago2 [30]; siRNA also showed a low stability (uracil) in the 5UTR of the antisense chain; it has been shown that a low internal stability of the dsRNA at the end of the 5UTR side of the antisense chain is a prerequisite for effective silencing and efficient entry of the chain mentioned to the RISC [17, 30].

The second validation was focused on the Minimum Free Energy (MFE) for folding (ΔGF); it is obtained by means of the secondary structure of the siRNA, which plays an important role in its efficiency. There is evidence suggesting that the secondary structure can cause an inhibition of RNAi and has influence into the efficiency of the siRNA-target interaction [31, 32]. Two secondary structures were given by the two servers resulting in two ΔGF:   1.5 kcal/mol (Figure 2(a)) and 0.3 kcal/mol (Figure 2(b)).

The RNA molecule also must have stability; assessments have been carried out demonstrating that molecules with positive or near zero energies can be more accessible to the target site and can have a greater power in the binding to carry out gene silencing [33]; both values represent positive energies. Posteriorly, energy between the target and the siRNA was calculated resulting in a ΔGB of 34.7 kcal/mol (Figure 2(c)); the interaction between siRNA and target generates binding energy, so a favorable thermodynamic organization of the duplex is a prerequisite for silencing [34]; it has been shown that high negative (ΔGB) values reflect a stable internal structure; the silencing efficiency correlates with the binding energies of the siRNA, and its target [33, 35] results indicate a high negative union.

The next steps consisted in the rupture energy (ΔGR); ΔGR obtained was between 6.8 and 9.65 kcal/mol, due to two ZIKV lineages and 10 SC obtained; the breaking energy ΔGD was calculated for each one. The rupture energy refers to the accessibility of the target. Although the designed siRNA has the necessary rules and characteristics, it will not necessarily be functional if it cannot be efficiently joined with a highly structured target; a increases the efficiency of silencing [36]. Therefore, the different conformations of the CS of the 3UTR can be efficiently accessible to the siRNA. Finally, the siRNA was BLAST with human genome throwing a ; the design of a siRNA of 21 nt and its alignment with the human genome is essential to prevent the activation of the immune response by dsRNA-dependent protein kinase (PKR), which was identified as a sensor for ; MDA5 also can detect dsRNA (~21 nt) when a sequence dependent of the human genome is identified inducing the activation of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α) [37].

After siRNA validation, 3D structure of the siRNA was obtained (Figure 3) via the RNAComposer server and validated with MOLProbity. The validation results were as follows: nonclash score atoms were shown, 3 bad backbone conformations were identified after manual correction was done with an RNA rotator with KiNG 2.22 tool, goal is a , also, nonbad bones or bad angles were identified, and nonbad sugar puckers were identified. In contrast with proteins, just a small amount of RNAs have been evaluated by X-ray crystallography, RMN spectroscopy, and cryoelectronic microscopy (cryo-EM) and added to base date; thus, a homology model cannot be employed with the siRNA designed, that is why prediction methods have been designed to provide secondary and tertiary structures of RNA [21]; the success of the algorithm prediction is based on experimental data, evolutive information, and the experts to selection and positioned tertiary noncanonical characteristics in the final models [38]; importance of predicting these tertiary structures fall in showing how the 3D structure of the RNAi is shown and how the structure is revealed when joining its target [39]; the structure designed was the most suitable to the reality although some penalties in the modelled designed are observed.

After validation of the siRNA, it was synthesized and transfected into C6/36 cells infected with ZIKV, DENV, or CHIKV; ZIKV is deposited in the epidermis and dermis, through the bite of a mosquito. Due to the presence of fibroblasts, keratinocytes, and dendritic cells, the virus can have easy access to the host through cellular receptors, which causes the entry of viral RNA to the cytoplasm [40], being an accessible target for the siRNA since the machinery to perform the silencing—RISC complex—and generate the siRNA from a dsRNA is found in the cytoplasm [41]. Cell line C6/36 has a Dicer (Dcr2) deficient, although it can generate a functional RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). The defective RNAi pathway of C6/36 cells produces the inability to the cell line to have an effective antiviral defense against virus causing a greater viral infection than other cell lines. In addition, it is essential that the precursor of the siRNA has 21 nt long due to the fact that C6/36 cells do not have the ability to generate long dsRNA siRNAs; however, there is a reduction in the expression of Dcr2 in the C6/36 cell line compared with its simile the Aag2 cell line from Aedes aegypti; the magnitude of reduction does not seem to be enough to consider a complete lack of Dicer activity. It has also been suggested that this cell line has a backup, using the piwi-RNA (piRNA) pathway as a compensation for the processing of exogenous double stranded RNA (dsRNA) [42], indicating that efficient gene silencing can be performed with this cell line 3 dpi and transfection a nonuniform and lower growth in cells infected and transfected with siRNA which was showed (Figure 4); it has been previously described that C6/36 cells do not show an important cytopathic effect when infected with Zika virus [43]. In the other hand, transfection was elaborated through cationic liposomes; these have emerged as a possible promising alternative of therapy instead of viral vectors thanks to their safety and versatility; in addition, they are effective in mediating the delivery of polynucleotides; numerous trials have been reported in vivo in the literature of these molecules focusing on pharmacokinetics and biodistribution, as well as their toxicity and immunogenicity, and in clinical trials, although the efficacy of this delivery compared to vectors is still far away [44].

RNA was extracted from the cells, and the presence of the viral genome was determined by RT-qPCR (Table 1); the first group and the second group obtained a CT value of , the 3rd with 0.5 μg of siRNA (CT: ), the 4th with 1 μg of siRNA (CT: ), and the last group with 2 μg of siRNA (CT: ) (Table 1). A statistical significance () between the control group and the siRNA at 1 μg and the siRNA at 2 μg was obtained using Student’s -test.

Negative controlPositive controlsiRNA (0.5 μg)siRNA (1 μg)siRNA (2 μg)


Statistical significance ().

At the present, there are not in vitro or in vivo assays of siRNAs raised against Zika virus; however, there are other studies carried out with other flaviviruses. A designed siRNA targeting the membrane glycoprotein (prM) precursor gene of DENV showed an increase in Ct, from 14.56 to 19.91, with a statistical significance () and a transfection efficiency of 66% with the siRNA at 1 μg using the HiPerFect Transfection reagent in C6/36 cells transfected before infection with DENV-1 at 100 TCID50 [45]. The design of different siRNAs against the genome of each of the Dengue virus serotypes (DENV1-4), at an amount of 1 to 10 μM transfected with 1 μL of RNAiMAX in Huh7 cells, which were subsequently infected with the virus at an MOI of 0.2 or 0.5 for 2 h, resulted in a 10- to 100-fold reduction in viral infection corresponding to a marked reduction in viral protein levels. In addition, an in vivo assay was performed in intravenously infected AG129 mice with 109 genomic equivalents (equivalent to 20,000 PFU, measured by plaque assay in BHK cells); a mixture of Silencer In Vivo Ready siRNA (10 mg/kg) and Invivofectamine 2.0 was used with the siRNA. The administration was intravenously retroocularly, 24 hours before, or 24 hours and 72 hours after infection. A 15-day survival was observed in the group that received the siRNA compared to the control group with an average of 5 days [46]. For West Nile virus (WNV), two siRNAs were designed, one directed to the NS2B region and another to the NS5, in addition to a construction of a bifunctional siRNA joining the motif 5-UGUGU-3 at the end of both siRNAs (NSA2A-is siRNA and NS5-is siRNA). An in vitro test was performed on Vero cells at different concentrations of siRNA (5-100 nM), transfecting them with the siPORT Amine reagent for 4 h, and subsequently, viral infection was performed at an MOI of 0.1 for 90 minutes, resulting in a partial inhibition of the virus at 20 nM of the siRNA directed at NS5, 100 nM for the siRNA directed at NS2A, and 10 nM for NSA2A-is siRNA and NS5-is siRNA, with a reduction with these siRNAs of 98.99% of the viral titer at 48 hpi [47]. Previous trials showed positive effects towards the protection of cells transfected with siRNAs and subsequently infected with the virus, as well as preventing postinfection viral replication. It will be interesting to analyze the effect of our siRNA using an in vivo model such as a mosquito vector. This approach will be a successful tool to avoid ZIKV transmission.

siRNA specificity was conducted with other arboviruses, one flavivirus (DENV) and an alphavirus (CHIKV). As it is shown in Table 1, CT values did not show a significant change with these viruses indicating that the siRNA was specific to ZIKV, probably because the siRNA is directed to a sequence present in the 3UTR that is not shared by other close-related viruses. However, since 3UTR is a conserved sequence among flaviviruses, it will be interesting to design a siRNA directed against a common sequence present in several important flaviviruses such as yellow fever virus (YFV), WNV, DENV, and Japanese Encephalitis virus (JEV) 323.

4. Conclusion

Transfection of 1 and 2 ug of siRNA was able to reduce CTs significantly () in C6/36 cells after infection with ZIKV at a MOI of 0.001 for 1 hour. Its effect is specific for ZIKV and not for other arboviruses such as DENV and CHIKV. This siRNA could be considered a potential therapeutic towards the disease that causes ZIKV and the medical problems generated.

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the published article. The raw data files are available upon request to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.


  1. R. Lowe, C. Barcellos, P. Brasil et al., “The zika virus epidemic in Brazil: from discovery to future implications,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 96, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. D. Musso and D. J. Gubler, “Zika Virus,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 487–524, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. de Salud, “Casos confirmados de enfermedad por virus del Zika,” D Of La Fed, vol. 2, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
  4. G. Kuno and G. J. J. Chang, “Full-length sequencing and genomic characterization of Bagaza, Kedougou, and Zika viruses,” Archives of Virology, vol. 152, no. 4, pp. 687–696, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. S. da Silva, D. Oliveira Silva Martins, and A. C. Gomes Jardim, “Virus Treatment,” Viruses, vol. 10, pp. 1–18, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. N. Agrawal, P. V. N. Dasaradhi, A. Mohmmed, P. Malhotra, R. K. Bhatnagar, and S. K. Mukherjee, “RNA interference: biology, mechanism, and applications,” Microbiol Mol Biol Rev, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 657–685, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. C. Chakraborty, A. R. Sharma, G. Sharma, C. G. P. Doss, and S. S. Lee, “Therapeutic miRNA and siRNA: moving from bench to clinic as next generation medicine,” Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids, vol. 8, pp. 132–143, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. Y. Naito, J. Yoshimura, S. Morishita, and K. Ui-Tei, “SiDirect 2.0: updated software for designing functional siRNA with reduced seed-dependent off-target effect,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. V. Hornung, M. Guenthner-Biller, C. Bourquin et al., “Sequence-specific potent induction of IFN-α by short interfering RNA in plasmacytoid dendritic cells through TLR7,” Nature Medicine, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 263–270, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. A. D. Judge, V. Sood, J. R. Shaw, D. Fang, K. McClintock, and I. MacLachlan, “Sequence-dependent stimulation of the mammalian innate immune response by synthetic siRNA,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 457–462, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. T. Lan, M. R. Putta, D. Wang et al., “Synthetic oligoribonucleotides-containing secondary structures act as agonists of Toll-like receptors 7 and 8,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 386, no. 3, pp. 443–448, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Y. K. Park, S. M. Park, Y. C. Choi, D. Lee, M. Won, and Y. J. Kim, “AsiDesigner: exon-based siRNA design server considering alternative splicing,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 36, suppl_2, pp. W97–103, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. J. P. Vert, N. Foveau, C. Lajaunie, and Y. Vandenbrouck, “An accurate and interpretable model for siRNA efficacy prediction,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. Z. J. Lu and D. H. Mathews, “Efficient siRNA selection using hybridization thermodynamics,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 640–647, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. Y. Ding, C. Y. Chan, and C. E. Lawrence, “Sfold web server for statistical folding and rational design of nucleic acids,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 32, no. Web Server, pp. W135–W141, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. Qureshi, N. Thakur, and M. Kumar, “VIRsiRNApred: a web server for predicting inhibition efficacy of siRNAs targeting human viruses,” Journal of Translational Medicine, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 305–312, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. Ichihara, Y. Murakumo, A. Masuda et al., “Thermodynamic instability of siRNA duplex is a prerequisite for dependable prediction of siRNA activities,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 35, no. 18, pp. e123–e123, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. Zuker, “Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 31, no. 13, pp. 3406–3415, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. S. Bellaousov, J. S. Reuter, M. G. Seetin, and D. H. Mathews, “RNAstructure: web servers for RNA secondary structure prediction and analysis,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 41, no. W1, pp. W471–W474, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. A. R. Gruber, R. Lorenz, S. H. Bernhart, R. Neubock, and I. L. Hofacker, “The Vienna RNA Websuite,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 36, no. Web Server, pp. W70–W74, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. Popenda, M. Szachniuk, M. Antczak et al., “Automated 3D structure composition for large RNAs,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 40, no. 14, pp. e112–e112, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. Antczak, M. Popenda, T. Zok et al., “New functionality of RNAComposer: application to shape the axis of miR160 precursor structure,” Acta Biochimica Polonica, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 737–744, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. C. J. Williams, J. J. Headd, N. W. Moriarty et al., “MolProbity: more and better reference data for improved all-atom structure validation,” Protein Science, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 293–315, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. V. B. Chen, I. W. Davis, and D. C. Richardson, “KING (Kinemage, next generation): a versatile interactive molecular and scientific visualization program,” Protein Science, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 2403–2409, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. G. A. Santiago, J. Vázquez, S. Courtney et al., “Performance of the Trioplex real-time RT-PCR assay for detection of Zika, dengue, and chikungunya viruses,” Nature Communications, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 1391, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. K. A. Dowd, C. R. DeMaso, R. S. Pelc et al., “Broadly neutralizing activity of Zika virus-immune sera identifies a single viral serotype,” Cell Reports, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1485–1491, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. S. Shen, J. Shi, J. Wang et al., “Phylogenetic analysis revealed the central roles of two African countries in the evolution and worldwide spread of Zika virus,” Virologica Sinica, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 118–130, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. Z. Gong, Y. Gao, and G. Z. Han, “Zika virus: two or three lineages?” Trends in Microbiology, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 521-522, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. A. Reynolds, D. Leake, Q. Boese, S. Scaringe, W. S. Marshall, and A. Khvorova, “Rational siRNA design for RNA interference,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 326–330, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. S. Petri, A. Dueck, G. Lehmann et al., “Increased siRNA duplex stability correlates with reduced off-target and elevated on-target effects,” RNA, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 737–749, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. B. S. E. Heale, H. S. Soifer, C. Bowers, and J. J. Rossi, “siRNA target site secondary structure predictions using local stable substructures,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. e30–e30, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. A. Belter, D. Gudanis, K. Rolle et al., “Mature MiRNAs form secondary structure, which suggests their function beyond RISC,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 11, p. e113848, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. S. Singh, S. K. Gupta, A. Nischal et al., “Design of potential siRNA molecules for hepatitis delta virus gene silencing,” Bioinformation, vol. 8, no. 16, pp. 749–757, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. H. Addepalli, Meena, C. G. Peng et al., “Modulation of thermal stability can enhance the potency of siRNA,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 38, no. 20, pp. 7320–7331, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. U. Mückstein, H. Tafer, J. Hackermüller, S. H. Bernhart, P. F. Stadler, and I. L. Hofacker, “Thermodynamics of RNA-RNA binding,” Bioinformatics, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1177–1182, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. Y. Shao, C. Y. Chan, A. Maliyekkel, C. E. Lawrence, I. B. Roninson, and Y. Ding, “Effect of target secondary structure on RNAi efficiency,” RNA, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 1631–1640, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. Z. Meng and M. Lu, “RNA interference-induced innate immunity, off-target effect, or immune adjuvant?” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 8, pp. 1–7, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. R. Das and D. Baker, “Automated de novo prediction of native-like RNA tertiary structures,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 104, no. 37, pp. 14664–14669, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. S. Cao and S.-J. Chen, “Physics-based de novo prediction of RNA 3D structures,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B, vol. 115, no. 14, pp. 4216–4226, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. R. Hamel, O. Dejarnac, S. Wichit et al., “Biology of Zika virus infection in human skin cells,” Journal of Virology, vol. 89, no. 17, pp. 8880–8896, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. P. D. Zamore, T. Tuschl, P. A. Sharp, and D. P. Bartel, “RNAi: double-stranded RNA directs the ATP-dependent cleavage of mRNA at 21 to 23 nucleotide intervals,” Cell, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 25–33, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. J. C. Scott, D. E. Brackney, C. L. Campbell et al., “Comparison of dengue virus type 2-specific small RNAs from RNA interference-competent and - incompetent mosquito cells,” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 4, no. 10, p. e848, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. J. F. W. Chan, C. C. Y. Yip, J. O. L. Tsang et al., “Differential cell line susceptibility to the emerging Zika virus: implications for disease pathogenesis, non-vector-borne human transmission and animal reservoirs,” Emerg Microbes Infect, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. S. Simões, A. Filipe, H. Faneca et al., “Cationic liposomes for gene delivery,” Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 237–254, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. X. Wu, H. Hong, J. Yue et al., “Inhibitory effect of small interfering RNA on dengue virus replication in mosquito cells,” Virology Journal, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 270, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. D. A. Stein, S. T. Perry, M. D. Buck et al., “Inhibition of dengue virus infections in cell cultures and in AG129 mice by a small interfering RNA targeting a highly conserved sequence,” Journal of Virology, vol. 85, no. 19, pp. 10154–10166, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. D. Karothia, P. K. Dash, M. Parida, S. Bhagyawant, and J. S. Kumar, “Inhibition of West Nile virus replication by bifunctional siRNA targeting the NS2A and NS5 conserved region,” Current Gene Therapy, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 180–190, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 María Perez-Mendez et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.