Research Article
Beneficial Effects of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field during Cast Immobilization in Patients with Distal Radius Fracture
Table 3
Differences in wrist mobility and global grip strength between the PEMF and control groups after therapy.
| | PEMF group (n = 27) | Control group (n = 25) | between groups |
| Range of wrist dorsal flexion (°) | Broken limb | 26 ± 10.60 | 15 ± 6.85 | 0.0001 | Unaffected limb | 50 ± 0.0 | 50 ± 0.0 | 0.9927 |
| Range of palmar flexion (°) | Broken limb | 29.5 ± 9.17 | 19.8 ± 5.79 | 0.0003 | Unaffected limb | 60 ± 0.0 | 60 ± 0.0 | 0.9927 |
| Global grip strength (kg) | Broken limb | 4.5 ± 3.14 | 2.2 ± 1.52 | 0.0012 | Unaffected limb | 25.4 ± 10.72 | 19.4 ± 7.04 | 0.0344 |
|
|
PEMF: pulsed electromagnetic fields.
|