BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2020 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 7231827 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7231827

Bin Wu, Jie-Feng Huang, Bang-Jian He, Chen-Wei Huang, Jian-Hua Lu, "Promotion of Bone Formation by Red Yeast Rice in Experimental Animals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis", BioMed Research International, vol. 2020, Article ID 7231827, 8 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7231827

Promotion of Bone Formation by Red Yeast Rice in Experimental Animals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Academic Editor: Kimimasa Tobita
Received04 Apr 2020
Revised08 Jul 2020
Accepted14 Jul 2020
Published08 Aug 2020

Abstract

Objective. To systematically evaluate the effects of red yeast rice (RYR) and its extract on bone formation in experimental animals and to provide reference data for clinical research on the treatment of osteoporosis. Methods. Chinese and English language databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Elsevier, Google Scholar, SpringerLink, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Weipu Chinese Sci-tech periodical full-text database (VIP), and Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform (Wanfang), were searched from their establishment to February 2020 using the following terms: “hongqu,” “red yeast rice,” “Monascus purpureus-fermented rice,” “bone mineral density,” “osteoblast,” “osteoporosis,” and “animal models.” After excluding nonrelevant articles, Review Manager 5.2 was used to evaluate article quality and to analyze the data. Outcome indicators included bone mineral density (BMD), osteoblast proliferation, and the expression of alkaline phosphatase (ALP). Results. A total of 11 randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis, all of which were animal studies. Six studies included data on BMD, five on osteoblast proliferation, and six on the expression of ALP. The results of the meta-analysis showed that RYR can significantly improve BMD (, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41 to 4.83, ), promote osteoblast proliferation (, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.23, ), and increase ALP expression in rats (, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.80, ). Conclusions. RYR can promote bone formation in experimental animals and may be useful for the treatment of osteoporosis.

1. Introduction

Osteoporosis, a disease characterized by bone loss and bone microstructural changes, affects all bones and is common in women after menopause and elderly men. In osteoporosis, bones show increased brittleness, which makes them prone to fracture, which adversely affects the patient’s ability to perform activities of daily life. The worldwide incidence of osteoporotic fractures is high. In Europe in 2010, osteoporosis accounted for 2% of all cases of noncommunicable disease [1]. The mortality rate of patients is also high, particularly among those with hip fractures [2]. It is important to improve the quality of life and reduce the mortality rate of osteoporosis patients.

Presently, the only drug reported to promote bone formation for the treatment of osteoporosis is teriparatide. However, its safety and side effects are noteworthy. It increases the incidence of osteosarcoma in rats [3], and in a fracture-prevention trial, patients reported a range of side effects, such as nausea, headache, dizziness, arthralgia, and leg cramps [4, 5]. Moreover, it is expensive, with a cost for daily form of $3426.5 for a 28-day supply as of June 2019 [6]. Therefore, effective novel drugs that can promote bone formation are needed.

Red yeast rice (RYR), produced by fermentation of the mycelia of Monascus purpureus Went parasitizing japonica rice, has been used in traditional medicine in Asia for thousands of years. As a traditional Chinese medicine, its main effects include promoting blood circulation to remove blood stasis, strengthening the spleen, and promoting food digestion. In addition, it has shown efficacy for the treatment of injuries, lochia after delivery, indigestion, and other ailments. Statins are widely used to treat hyperlipidemia and cardiovascular diseases. Furthermore, rodent studies have shown that statins stimulate bone formation both in vitro and in vivo [7]. Seven substances isolated from RYR have been used in statins [8]. These studies suggest that RYR has potential as a bone-forming agent. In addition, a meta-analysis of studies using RYR to treat primary hyperlipidemia showed short-term beneficial lipid modifications [9]. The RYR components used in statins are active and may be able to promote bone formation.

There have been recent reports regarding the effects of RYR on bone formation [10, 12], but the outcome indicators differed among the studies. This prompted us to perform the present meta-analysis. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis of the effects of RYR on bone formation in experimental animals. We examined the outcome indicators of relevant literature studies and analyzed the data to provide reference information for future clinical studies.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Literature Retrieval

Chinese and English language databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Elsevier, Google Scholar, SpringerLink, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Weipu Chinese Sci-tech periodical full-text database (VIP), and Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform (Wanfang), were searched from their establishment to February 2020 using the following terms: “hongqu,” “red yeast rice,” “Monascus purpureus-fermented rice,” “bone mineral density,” “osteoblast,” “osteoporosis,” and “animal models.” The search terms used were adjusted to ensure efficient literature retrieval. For example, the terms used for PubMed were (1) (“hongqu” OR “red yeast rice” OR “Monascus purpureus-fermented rice”); (2) (“bone mineral density” OR “osteoblast” OR “osteoporosis”); (3) animal models; and (4) (1) AND (2) AND (3).

2.2. Inclusion Criteria

The inclusion criteria are as follows: (1) an RYR experimental group and a vehicle-treated, saline, or placebo control group and (2) clearly defined outcome indicator and outcome data that could be readily extracted.

2.3. Exclusion Criteria

The exclusion criteria are as follows: (1) review or conference report, (2) duplicate articles (only the most complete article was included in the analyses), and (3) data that could not be extracted from the article.

2.4. Data Extraction

After eliminating duplicate articles, two researchers independently screened and extracted the data; differences were resolved by discussion. The data extracted included first author, publication year, sample size, intervention measures, intervention time, and main outcome indicators.

2.5. Data Analyses

Review Manager 5.2 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK) was used to analyze the data. As the measurement methods and units for the main outcome indicators differed among studies, standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for continuous outcomes. The statistic was used as an index of the heterogeneity of the included studies. % suggest significant heterogeneity. In such cases, a random-effect model was used in the analyses. When there was no obvious heterogeneity, the fixed-effect model was used. In cases of heterogeneity, sensitivity analyses were performed by excluding articles one by one to find the source thereof. Funnel plots were used to determine whether there was publication bias; asymmetry in these plots indicates the presence of bias.

3. Results

3.1. Literature Screening

A total of 128 articles were retrieved. Eighty-seven duplicated articles were removed, and the titles and abstracts of the remaining articles were read. After excluding papers that did not meet the inclusion criteria, 11 randomized controlled studies were included in the analyses after careful screening. The article screening process is shown in Figure 1.

3.2. Basic Information of the Included Articles

The 11 articles included in the analyses all described animal experiments. The experimental groups received RYR or extracts thereof, while the control groups typically received saline or distilled water. The basic information of the included articles is shown in Table 1.


Included studiesGroup sizeIntervention measuresIntervention timeOutcome indicators
RYRControlRYRControl

Wang et al. 2015 [11]10106.24 g/kg RYR extract10 mL/kg saline20 w(1)
Wong and Rabie 2008 [12]88RYR mediumBlank control medium48 h(2)(3)
Cho et al. 2010 [13]66RYR mediumBlank control medium5 d(2)(3)
Lu et al. 2006 [14]8810 mL/kg RYR extract10 mL/kg saline10 d(2)(3)
Lu et al. 2017 [15]101010 mL/kg RYR extract10 mL/kg distilled water12 w(1)(3)
Lu et al. 2004 [16]101010 mL/kg RYR extract10 mL/kg saline12 w(1)
Lu et al. 2005 [17]101010 mL/kg RYR extract10 mL/kg saline12 w(2)
Shen et al. 2018 [18]101010 mL/kg RYR extract10 mL/kg 0.9% sodium chloride solution12 w(1)
Lv et al. 2016 [19]990.5 RYR capsule/kg5 mL/kg distilled water60 d(1)
Yang and Zhang 2012 [20]88RYR extractSaline12 w(1)(3)
Ye and Yang 2007 [21]66RYR mediumBlank control medium72 h(2)(3)

(1): bone mineral density (BMD); (2): osteoblast proliferation; (3): alkaline phosphatase (ALP) expression.
3.3. Evaluation of the Quality of Included Articles

The 11 articles included were all randomized controlled animal studies. No study described the randomization procedures; allocation concealment, blinding of the participants, and blinding of outcome assessment were not mentioned. Two articles with incomplete data were considered to have high risk of bias. The missing data on standard deviation (SD) were evenly distributed among the groups, and the reasons for its loss were similar. It was insufficient to influence the effect size estimation, so it was kept. The risk for bias for all articles is shown in Figure 2.

3.4. Meta-Analysis Results
3.4.1. Bone Mineral Density

Bone mineral density (BMD) outcomes were reported in six articles (57 cases each in the RYR and control groups). The value in the heterogeneity test was 86% (). The random-effect model indicated that RYR significantly improved the BMD of rats compared to control animals (, 95% CI 1.41 to 4.83, ). showed little change after exclusion of articles (one by one) in sensitivity analyses, and no particular source of heterogeneity was found. The results are shown in detail in Figure 3.

3.4.2. Osteoblast Proliferation

Osteoblast proliferation was assessed in five studies (38 cases each in the RYR and control groups). The value in the heterogeneity test was 0% (), indicating no significant heterogeneity. Thus, a fixed-effect model was used for the analyses. The results suggested that RYR significantly promoted osteoblast proliferation compared to the controls (, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.23, ). The results are shown in detail in Figure 4. The funnel plot was symmetrical, indicating no obvious publication bias (Figure 5).

3.4.3. Expression of Alkaline Phosphatase

Six trials assessed alkaline phosphatase (ALP) expression (38 cases each in the RYR and control groups). The value in the heterogeneity test was 74% (). The random-effect model indicated no significant difference between the RYR and control groups in ALP expression (). Sensitivity analyses indicated that one article was the source of the heterogeneity. After removing this article, the value was 0% (), and the fixed-effect model showed indicated a significant difference in ALP expression between the groups (, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.80, ). The results obtained after excluding the article responsible for the heterogeneity are shown in Figure 6. The funnel plot was relatively symmetrical, indicating no obvious publication bias (Figure 5).

4. Discussion

The interaction between osteoblasts and osteoclasts is important for bone formation and bone absorption. Under the regulation of various cytokines and through complex molecular mechanisms, these two cell types jointly maintain the balance of bone metabolism. When osteoblasts are active, bone formation predominates over bone resorption. The process of bone formation can be divided into several stages, i.e., osteoblast proliferation, extracellular matrix maturation, matrix mineralization, and osteogenesis. These processes are regulated by various factors, and osteoblasts serve as important functional cells. Stem cells, as immature and incompletely differentiated cells, can differentiate into various cell types under the control of regulatory factors. Osteoblasts are also differentiated from mesenchymal stem cells [22]. Two signaling pathways play important roles in the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells into osteoblasts, i.e., the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway and the BMP-2/Smad signaling pathway. Activation of the Wnt signaling pathway can increase the expression of BMP-2 [23]. Some groups have also demonstrated that the Wnt signaling pathway can be regulated by activation of the BMP signaling pathway [24]. Runx2 is expressed in both pathways and acts on key regulators and plays an important role in differentiation.

ALP is a glycoprotein widely distributed in various tissues in the body. ALP levels are higher in newborn and growing children, and ALP is highly expressed during osteoblast differentiation [25]. Increased Runx2-regulated ALP activity in the Wnt signaling pathway is an important marker for differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells into osteoblasts [26]. High ALP expression levels reflect the proliferation of osteoblasts, which have many functions including the synthesis and secretion of bone matrix, and mineralization of bone matrix to form new bone. Osteoblasts secrete bone matrix (mainly type I collagen) to control the flow of calcium, phosphorus, and magnesium and in turn regulate mineralization. ALP can promote mineralization, has been shown to release inorganic phosphorus during hydrolysis of organophosphorus, and is considered to play an important role in the removal of inorganic pyrophosphate, which is an effective inhibitor of mineralization [27]. Matrix mineralization is a marker of osteoblast differentiation and maturation. BMD is an indicator of bone strength; osteoporosis occurs when BMD is below normal, increasing the risk of fracture. When the process of extracellular matrix mineralization is complete and new bone has formed, BMD also increases.

Osteoporosis has a high incidence and mortality rate, so its prevention and treatment are important. The guidelines for diagnosing and treating primary osteoporosis specify basic measures, drug interventions, and rehabilitation as the main strategies. Osteoporosis is treated with drugs that inhibit bone resorption and promote bone formation, among other actions.

In this analysis, we found that RYR and its extract promote the proliferation of osteoblasts, which is important in bone formation. It may activate the signaling pathway by increasing the BMP content of mesenchymal stem cells, causing them to differentiate into osteoblasts. We found that RYR could also increase the expression of ALP, which is related to the proliferation of osteoblasts. RYR-induced improvement in BMD may be related to the promotion of bone matrix mineralization by osteoblasts. Compared to most bone absorption inhibitors used to treat osteoporosis, RYR has the advantages of promoting the proliferation of osteoblasts, thereby promoting bone formation, and increasing the mass and strength of bone tissue. Therefore, it should become a new drug for promoting bone formation.

Parathyroid analogs are representative promoters of bone formation and have been shown to bind to Runx2 and upregulate its transcription [28]. Intermittent use of small doses of these drugs can increase the activity of osteoblasts and thus promote bone formation. Teriparatide [rhPTH(1–34)] is the only drug currently available that promotes bone formation, through the active fragment of human endogenous parathyroid hormone. This drug directly stimulates osteoblasts to produce new bone tissue, thereby increasing bone mass and strength [29]. It can significantly reduce the risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in postmenopausal women [30, 31]. In addition, it is often used to treat postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Compared to teriparatide, RYR, as a natural compound, has few side effects and costs only $1.27 per kilogram in Chinese market, which makes it suitable for the development of new drugs that may contribute to the treatment of osteoporosis in the future.

5. Conclusion

The results of this meta-analysis showed that RYR and its extract can promote BMD, osteoblast proliferation, and ALP expression in rats and thus, by extension, bone formation. All of the articles included in this meta-analysis were randomized controlled animal studies, with high evidence and reliability levels. The results indicate that RYR promotes bone formation and therefore has potential for the treatment of osteoporosis. However, the articles included were in different languages and the sample size was small; thus, further clinical studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of RYR.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Bin Wu and Jie-Feng Huang are co-first authors.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation (LY20H270012).

References

  1. E. Hernlund, A. Svedbom, M. Ivergård et al., “Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden,” Archives of Osteoporosis, vol. 8, no. 1-2, p. 136, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. N. R. Fuggle, E. M. Curtis, K. A. Ward, N. C. Harvey, E. M. Dennison, and C. Cooper, “Fracture prediction, imaging and screening in osteoporosis,” Nature Reviews Endocrinology, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 535–547, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. L. Vahle, M. Sato, G. G. Long et al., “Skeletal changes in rats given daily subcutaneous injections of recombinant human parathyroid hormone (1–34) for 2 years and relevance to human safety,” Toxicologic Pathology, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 312–321, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. B. M. Obermayer-Pietsch, F. Marin, E. V. McCloskey et al., “Effects of two years of daily teriparatide treatment on BMD in postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis with and without prior antiresorptive treatment,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 1591–1600, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. S. Minisola, C. Cipriani, G. D. Grotta et al., “Update on the safety and efficacy of teriparatide in the treatment of osteoporosis,” Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease, vol. 11, p. 1759720X1987799, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. IBM, “Micromedex RED BOOK,” June 2019, http://truvenhealth.com/Products/Micromedex/Product-Suites/Clinical-Knowledge/RED-BOOK. View at: Google Scholar
  7. G. Mundy, R. Garrett, S. Harris et al., “Stimulation of bone formation in vitro and in rodents by statins,” Science, vol. 286, no. 5446, pp. 1946–1949, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. J. Ma, Y. Li, Q. Ye et al., “Constituents of red yeast rice, a traditional Chinese food and medicine,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 5220–5225, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. Liu, J. Zhang, Y. Shi, S. Grimsgaard, T. Alraek, and V. Fønnebø, “Chinese red yeast rice (Monascus purpureus) for primary hyperlipidemia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials,” Chinese Medicine, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 4, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. G. E. Gutierrez, B. Mundy, G. Rossini, I. R. Garrett, S. T. Chen, and G. R. Mundy, “Red yeast rice stimulates bone formation in rats,” Nutrition Research, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 124–129, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. Y. F. Wang, W. T. Liu, C. Y. Chen et al., “Anti-osteoporosis activity of red yeast rice extract on ovariectomy-induced bone loss in rats,” Genetics and Molecular Research, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 8137–8146, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. R. W. K. Wong and B. Rabie, “Chinese red yeast rice (Monascus purpureus-fermented rice) promotes bone formation,” Chinese Medicine, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 4, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. Y.-E. Cho, E. Alcantara, S. Kumaran et al., “Red yeast rice stimulates osteoblast proliferation and increases alkaline phosphatase activity in MC3T3-E1 cells,” Nutrition Research, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 501–510, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. H. Lu, W. J. Wang, and B. Chen, “Effects of hongqu on the proliferation, cell differentiation and mineralization of the osteoblast cultured in vitro,” Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics, vol. 2, pp. 41–45, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  15. J. H. Lu, Y. C. Lu, H. T. Jin et al., “Effect of red yeast rice on the expression of serum ALP and TRAP, TNF-α and RANK of bone tissue in ovariectomized osteoporosis rats,” Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 5–8, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  16. J. H. Lu, C. L. Wu, W. J. Wang, J. Wang, L. Yang, and B. Chen, “The experimental study of hongqu on serum hormone levels and bone mineral density and biodynamics of overiectomized rats,” Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics, vol. 4, pp. 22–25, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  17. J. H. Lu, C. L. Wu, G. B. Ni et al., “Effects of Hongqu on BMP-2 expression and osteoblastic proliferation in ovariectomized rats,” China J Orthop & Trauma, vol. 1, pp. 29–31, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  18. J. F. Shen, J. H. Lu, X. P. Xu et al., “Effects of hongqu on protein and mRNA expression of RANKL, OPG in bone tissue of ovariectomized rats,” China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 1370–1372, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  19. S. Lyu, Q. Yu, Y. Situ, J. Sun, L. Cui, and T. Wu, “Protective effect of red yeast rice capsule containing coenzyme Q10 on osteoporosis in rats induced by ovariectomy combined with D-galactose,” Chinese Pharmacological Bulletin, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 1253–1259, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  20. D. Yang and J. Y. Zhang, “Effects of ethanol extract of Monascus on osteoporosis in ovariectomized rats,” Journal of Shanxi Medical University, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 191–194, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  21. B. YE and Z. L. Yang, “Study of fermented red yeast rice extract on osteoblast in vitro,” Acta Chinese Medicine and Pharmacology, vol. 3, pp. 10–12, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  22. G. Thanabalasundaram, N. Arumalla, H. D. Tailor, and W. S. Khan, “Regulation of differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells into musculoskeletal cells,” Current Stem Cell Research & Therapy, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 95–102, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. Zhu, D. Tang, Q. Wu et al., “Activation of β-catenin signaling in articular chondrocytes leads to osteoarthritis-like phenotype in adult β-catenin conditional activation mice,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 12–21, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. R. Zhang, B. O. Oyajobi, S. E. Harris, C. T. Di Chen, H.-W. Deng, and M. Zhao, “Wnt/β-catenin signaling activates bone morphogenetic protein 2 expression in osteoblasts,” Bone, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 145–156, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. J. R. Farley and B. Stilt-Coffing, “Apoptosis may determine the release of skeletal alkaline phosphatase activity from human osteoblast-line cells,” Calcified Tissue International, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 43–52, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. B. M. Abdallah, C. H. Jensen, G. Gutierrez, R. G. Leslie, T. G. Jensen, and M. Kassem, “Regulation of human skeletal stem cells differentiation by Dlk1/Pref-1,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 841–852, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. C. A. Sharp and P. Magnusson, “Isoforms of bone alkaline phosphatase, stem cells, and osteoblast phenotypes,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 857-858, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. C. Fazenda, B. Simoes, R. N. Kelsh, M. L. Cancela, and N. Conceicao, “Dual transcriptional regulation by runx2 of matrix Gla protein in Xenopus laevis,” Gene, vol. 450, no. 1–2, pp. 94–102, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. E. Canalis, A. Giustina, and J. P. Bilezikian, “Mechanisms of anabolic therapies for osteoporosis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 357, no. 9, pp. 905–916, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. R. M. Neer, C. D. Arnaud, J. R. Zanchetta et al., “Effect of parathyroid hormone (1-34) on fractures and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 344, no. 19, pp. 1434–1441, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. D. L. Kendler, F. Marin, C. A. F. Zerbini et al., “Effects of teriparatide and risedronate on new fractures in post-menopausal women with severe osteoporosis (VERO): a multicentre, double-blind, double- dummy, randomised controlled trial,” Lancet, vol. 391, no. 10117, pp. 230–240, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Bin Wu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views364
Downloads233
Citations

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.