Sulfonamide-Based Azaheterocyclic Schiff Base Derivatives as Potential Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors: Synthesis, Cytotoxicity, and Enzyme Inhibitory Kinetics

Abas, Mujahid; Rafique, Hummera; Shamas, Shazia; Roshan, Sadia; Ashraf, Zaman; Iqbal, Zafar; Raza, Hussain; Hassan, Mubashir; Afzal, Khurram; Rizvanov, Albert A.; Asad, Muhammad Hassham Hassan Bin

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8104107

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 | Article ID 8104107 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8104107

Sulfonamide-Based Azaheterocyclic Schiff Base Derivatives as Potential Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors: Synthesis, Cytotoxicity, and Enzyme Inhibitory Kinetics

Mujahid Abas,¹Hummera Rafique,²Shazia Shamas,³Sadia Roshan,³Zaman Ashraf,¹Zafar Iqbal,¹Hussain Raza,⁴Mubashir Hassan,⁵Khurram Afzal,⁶Albert A. Rizvanov,⁷and Muhammad Hassham Hassan Bin Asad^7,8

Academic Editor: Stefano Curcio

Received02 Aug 2019

Revised06 Jan 2020

Accepted14 Jan 2020

Published21 Feb 2020

Abstract

A series of sulfonamide-bearing azaheterocyclic Schiff base derivatives 3(a-j) were synthesized as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. The substituted benzene sulfonyl chlorides 1(a-d) were reacted with N₂H₄ to get aromatic sulfonyl hydrazides 2(a-d). The intermediate hydrazides 2(a-d) were treated with substituted aldehydes to afford azaheterocyclic sulfonamide Schiff bases 3(a-j). The spectral data of synthesized compounds confirmed the formation of the final products. The inhibitory effects of 3(a-j) on carbonic anhydrase activity were determined, and it was found that derivative 3c exhibited the most potent activity with IC₅₀ among all other derivatives and is also more active than standard acetazolamide (IC₅₀). The enzyme inhibitory kinetics results determined by Lineweaver-Burk plots revealed that compound 3c inhibits the enzyme by noncompetitive mode of inhibition with value 8.6 μM. The molecular docking investigations of the synthesized analogues 3(a-j) were evaluated which assured that synthesized compounds bind well inside the active binding site of the target enzyme. Cytotoxicity on human keratinocyte (HaCaT) and MCF-7 cell lines was performed, and it was found that most of the synthesized analogues were nontoxic on these cell lines and the toxic effects follow the dose-dependent manner. Based on our investigations, it was suggested that analogue 3c may serve as core structure to project carbonic anhydrase inhibitors with greater potency.

1. Introduction

Carbonic anhydrase (CA) (EC#: 4.2.1.1) is a metal group containing enzymes that hydrate CO₂ to bicarbonate ions and vice versa [1]. Various CA isoforms are classified by their structures. Based upon their hosts, they are further categorized as α-CAs and are observed primarily in algae, plants, and vertebrates; β-CAs are expressed in bacteria, fungi, and algae; γ-carbonic anhydrase appears in bacteria and archaea [2]. Two minor isoforms of CA, δ and ζ, are primarily expressed in marine diatoms and η in protozoans, respectively [3]. For their catalytic domains, crystal structures of all isoforms were studied and submitted to the Protein Data Bank (PDB) [4].

The α-CAs’ catalytic area consists of 10 stranded β sheets and seven α helices around the surface [5]. The CA catalytic active site is designed conically in which a zinc atom exists on the base that is harmonized with three histidine moieties (His94, His96, and His119) and a hydroxide ion/water [6]. Most structural information in the field of CA emphasize on the universally expressed human CA II, as it is very abundant and effective and is an isoform which can be easily crystallized [7]. The catalytic active site residues of CA II are alienated into hydrophobic and hydrophilic halves, through which the carbon dioxide substrate enters the active site [8]. The mode of enzymatic activity of the carbonic anhydrase consists of two steps [9]. In the hydration procedure, as an initial step, a nucleophilic zinc-bound hydroxyl assaults carbon dioxide and give rise to a zinc-bound bicarbonate particle. The bicarbonate is pitifully bound to the zinc atom and is consequently in this manner replaced by a water molecule. The second step of this enzymatic response is the recovery of the zinc-bound hydroxyl, which happens by means of proton transfer [10].

Using a proton donor/acceptor His64 residue and well-ordered network of water molecules in the active site of CA II, the transfer of proton is enabled [11]. Depending on the protonation state, His64 represents two conformations: a conformation in which His64 appears inside the active site to receive a proton called “in,” while a conformation called “out” where the proton containing His64 residue faces away from active place of the active site to allow transferring of proton toward the bulk solvent [12]. A wide variety of activities have been associated with CAs, and a lot of pharmacological functions have been found to have close relationship with activation or inhibition of CA [13]. Antiglaucoma, antitumor, antiobesity, and anticonvulsant drugs are examples of such pharmacological drugs [14]. Those inhibitors which affect hCA II, IV, XII, and XIV serve as diuretic medications [15]. While inhibitors which can affect hCA II, IV, and XII act as antiglaucoma drugs. Inhibitors affecting hCA II, VII, and XIV perform antiepileptic activities [16]. Presently, hCA IX and XII have shown their role as an investigative source to imaging and curing the hypoxic tumors by using a sulfonamide (SLC-0111) in Phase I/II clinical trials to treat growing metastatic breast cancers [17]. CA inhibition has been widely explored using aromatic heterocycles containing Schiff bases [18]. Aromatic heterocycles with Schiff bases are very valuable for having dual character in ditopic interactions in the enzymatic active sites, achievable during the event of dimeric carbonic anhydrases [19]. Multitopic carbonic anhydrase inhibitors of the sulfonamides have been investigated to hold an improved inhibition for several isoforms of carbonic anhydrase which comprise dimeric, trimeric, or tetrameric associations [20, 21].

Based upon the importance of sulfonamide-based aromatic heterocycles, the present research is designed to synthesize novel substituted azaheterocyclic sulfonamide Schiff bases as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. The computational studies were also carried out to check the binding affinity of the synthesized compounds against target protein PDBID 1V9E. The in vitro carbonic anhydrase inhibitory activity was determined, and kinetic mechanism of the most active compound was also investigated. The cytotoxicity of the synthesized compounds against human keratinocyte (HaCaT) and MCF-7 cell lines was also studied.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Instruments

All the chemicals and carbonic anhydrase enzyme (EC#: 4.2.1.1) used have been obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. The FTIR studies have been performed using a Shimadzu FTIR e8400S spectrometer (Kyoto, Japan, y, cm^-1). Results of ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectral data (DMSO-d₆) and (CDCl₃) have been obtained from a Bruker (400 MHz) spectrometer. The chemical shift values () have been shown in ppm downfield using TMS (tetramethylsilane) as an internal standard. Purity of synthesized analogues has been determined by using TLC (thin layer chromatography) with ethyl acetate and petroleum ether as mobile phase. The complete procedure to synthesize these target derivatives has been shown in the scheme below.

2.2. Synthesis of Aromatic Sulphonyl Hydrazides 2(a-d)

Aromatic sulphonyl chlorides 1(a-d) (0.01 mol) in liquid state were stirred with hydrazine in a 100 mL flask for one hour. On completion, the mixture contents were allowed to mix with cold water. Precipitates of aromatic sulphonyl hydrazides 2(a-d) formed were collected and dried which were characterized by their IR spectral data.

2.3. Synthesis of Azaheterocyclic Sulfonamide Schiff Bases 3(a-j)

Aromatic sulphonyl hydrazides 2(a-d) (10 mmol) and p-substituted benzaldehydes in equimolar ratio in 10 mL of dry ethanol were taken in a flask. Contents of the reaction mixture were refluxed for 12 hours, and reaction was monitored by TLC using (petroleum ether : ethyl acetate 3 : 1) as eluants. On completion of reaction, the reaction mixture was dropped in ice-cool water. Precipitates of Schiff bases 3(a-j) that appeared were collected, dried, and crystallized using aqueous ethanol. By using the already-reported method [22], the title compounds 3(a-j) were synthesized with certain modifications as shown in Scheme 1.

2.3.1. (E)-N-(pyridin-3-ylmethylene)benzenesulfonohydrazide (3a)

Solid; reaction time, 12 h; yield, 45%; melting point: 176–178°C; 0.47 (ethyl acetate : pet. ether 1 : 3); FTIR cm¹: 3356 (NH), 3035 (sp² CH), 1676 (CN), 1421 (C=C aromatic). HPLC result of product: Daicel CHIRALPAK® AD-H column; 30% ethyl acetate in pet. ether; 1.0 mL/min; retention time: 33.9 min; 99.3% pure; ¹H NMR (CDCl₃, ppm, Hz); 7.07 (, , 2H, H-3, H-4), 7.01 (, , 2H, H-2, H-5), 6.92 (s, 2H, H-3, H-5), 6.74 (s, 1H, CH), 3.74 (s, 1H, NH), 2.14 (s, 3H, CH₃), 2.07 (s, 6H, CH₃). ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃, ppm); 145.1 (CH), 144.4 (C-1), 142.9 (C-1), 142.3 (C-2, C-5), 139.4 (C-4), 132.4 (C-3, C-4), 129.8 (C-3, C-5), 129.3 (C-2, C-6), 127.4 (C-3, C-5), 22.4 (CH₃), 21.3 (CH₃). LCMS (H+) calculated for C₁₂H₁₁N₃O₂S [M–H]⁺: 262.06, found: 262.30; anal. calculated (%): C, 55.16; H, 4.24; N, 16.08. Found: C, 55.01; H, 4.16; N, 16.10.

2.3.2. (E)-2,4,6-trimethyl-N-(pyridin-3-ylmethylene)benzenesulfonohydrazide (3b)

Solid; reaction time, 12 h; yield, 43%; melting point: 173–176°C; 0.44 (ethyl acetate : pet. ether 1 : 3), FTIR cm¹: 3149 (NH), 3062 (sp² CH), 1622 (CN), 1442 (C=C aromatic). HPLC result of product: Daicel CHIRALPAK® AD-H column; 30% ethyl acetate in pet. ether; 1.0 mL/min; retention time: 26.8 min; 97% pure; ¹H NMR (CDCl₃, ppm, Hz); 10.11 (s, 1H, CH), 8.89 (, , 2H, H-2, H-5), 8.53 (, , 2H, H-2, H-6), 7.82 (, , 2H, H-3, H-4), 7.31 (, , 2H, H-3, H-5), 4.51 (s, 1H, NH), 1.18 (s, 3H, -CH₃), 2.07 (s, 6H, -CH₃). ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃, ppm); 193.8 (CH), 151.5 (C-1), 149.9 (C-2, C-6), 148.9 (C-3, C-5), 148.2 (C-1), 122.5 (C-4), 122.9 (C-2, C-5), 122.1 (C-3, C-4), 15.4 (CH₃). LCMS (H+) calculated for C₁₅H₁₇N₃O₂S [M–H]⁺: 304.38, found: 304.19; anal. calculated (%): C, 59.38; H, 5.65; N, 13.85. Found: C, 59.29; H, 5.46; N, 13.60.

2.3.3. (E)-4-methyl-N-(pyridin-3-ylmethylene)benzenesulfonohydrazide (3c)

Solid; reaction time, 12 h; yield, 47%; melting point: 168–171°C; 0.43 (ethyl acetate : pet. ether 1 : 3), FTIR cm¹: 3379 (NH), 2972 (sp² CH), 1612 (CN), 1427 (C=C aromatic). HPLC result of product: Daicel CHIRALPAK® AD-H column; 30% ethyl acetate in pet. ether; 1.0 mL/min; retention time: 25.4 min; 99.5% pure; ¹H NMR (DMSO-d₆, ppm, Hz); 11.24 (s, 1H, CH), 10.92 (s, 1H, NH), 7.77 (, , 2H, H-2, H-6), 7.37 (, , 1H, H-4), 7.37 (, , 2H, H-3, H-5), 6.85 (, , 1H, H-2), 6.35 (s, 1H, NH), 6.06 (, , 4.0, 1H, H-3), 2.36 (s, 3H, -CH₃). ¹³C NMR (DMSO-d₆, ppm); 143.6 (CH), 140.9 (C-1), 136.7 (C-4), 129.9 (C-2, C-6), 127.7 (C-3, C-5), 126.8 (C-3), 122.7 (C-2), 113.5 (C-1), 109.5 (C-4), 21.9 (CH₃). LCMS (H+) calculated for C₁₃H₁₃N₃O₂S [M–H]⁺: 275.02, found: 275.19; anal. calculated (%): C, 56.71; H, 4.76; N, 12.56. Found: C, 56.43; H, 4.86; N, 13.10.

2.3.4. (E)-N-(4-((2-(pyridin-3-ylmethylene)hydrazinyl)sulfonyl)phenyl)acetamide (3d)

Solid; reaction time, 12 h; yield, 59%; melting point: 181–184°C; 0.42 (ethyl acetate : pet. ether 1 : 3), FTIR cm¹: 3300 (NH), 3132 (sp² CH), 1531 (CN), 1419 (C=C aromatic). HPLC result of product: Daicel CHIRALPAK® AD-H column; 30% ethyl acetate in pet. ether; 1.0 mL/min; retention time: 19.5 min; 100% pure; ¹H NMR (CDCl₃, ppm, Hz); 11.27 (s, 1H, CH), 11.01 (s, 1H, NH), 7.91 (, , 2H, H-2, H-6), 7.75 (, , 1H, H-4), 7.57 (m, 3H, H-3, H-4, H-5), 6.85 (, , 1H, H-2), 6.36 (s, 1H, NH), 6.06 (, , 4.0, 1H, H-3), 2.36. ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃, ppm); 162.9 (CH), 140.9 (C-1), 131.3 (C-4), 129.9 (C-2, C-6), 126.9 (C-3), 122.6 (C-2), 114.6 (C-3, C-5), 113.3 (C-1), 109.5 (C-4). LCMS (H+) calculated for C₁₄H₁₄N₄O₃S [M–H]⁺: 319.08, found: 319.35; anal. calculated (%): C, 52.82; H, 4.43; N, 17.60. Found: C, 52.79; H, 4.16; N, 17.40.

2.3.5. (E)-2,4,6-trimethyl-N-(pyridin-4-ylmethylene)benzenesulfonohydrazide (3e)

Solid; reaction time, 12 h; yield, 51%; melting point: 160–164°C; 0.29 (ethyl acetate : pet. ether 1 : 3), FTIR cm¹: 3319 (NH), 3023 (sp² CH), 1662 (CN), 1441 (C=C aromatic). HPLC result of product: Daicel CHIRALPAK® AD-H column; 30% ethyl acetate in pet. ether; 1.0 mL/min; retention time: 21.2 min; 99.5% pure; ¹H NMR (CDCl₃, ppm, Hz); 11.24 (s, 1H, CH), 10.92 (s, 1H, NH), 7.77 (, , 2H, H-2, H-6), 7.37 (, , 1H, H-4), 7.37 (, , 2H, H-3, H-5), 6.85 (, , 1H, H-2), 6.35 (s, 1H, NH), 6.06 (, , 4.0, 1H, H-3), 2.36 (s, 3H, -CH₃). ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃, ppm); 143.6 (CH), 140.9 (C-1), 136.7 (C-4), 129.9 (C-2, C-6), 127.7 (C-3, C-5), 126.8 (C-3), 122.7 (C-2), 113.5 (C-1), 109.5 (C-4), 21.9 (CH₃). LCMS (H+) calculated for C₁₅H₁₇N₃O₂S [M–H]⁺: 304.11, found: 304.19; anal. calculated (%): C, 59.38; H, 5.65; N, 13.85. Found: C, 59.19; H, 5.65; N, 13.85.

2.3.6. (E)-4-methyl-N-(pyridin-4-ylmethylene)benzenesulfonohydrazide (3f)

Solid; reaction time, 12 h; yield, 63%; melting point: 148–152°C; 0.36 (ethyl acetate : pet. ether 1 : 3), FTIR cm¹: 3298 (NH), 3035 (sp² CH), 1598 (CN), 1453 (C=C aromatic). HPLC result of product: Daicel CHIRALPAK® AD-H column; 30% ethyl acetate in pet. ether; 1.0 mL/min; retention time: 30.1 min; 88% pure; ¹H NMR (CDCl₃, ppm, Hz); 11.26 (s, 1H, CH), 10.83 (s, 1H, NH), 7.83 (, , 2H, H-2, H-6), 7.74 (, , 1H, H-4), 7.08 (, , 2H, H-3, H-5), 6.84 (, , 1H, H-2), 6.34 (s, 1H, NH), 6.06 (, , 4.0, 1H, H-3), 3.82 (s, 3H, -OCH₃). ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃, ppm); 167.9 (CH), 140.9 (C-1), 131.3 (C-4), 129.9 (C-2, C-6), 126.9 (C-3), 122.6 (C-2), 114.6 (C-3, C-5), 113.3 (C-1), 109.5 (C-4), 56.0 (OCH₃). LCMS (H+) calculated for C₁₃H₁₃N₃O₂S [M–H]⁺: 276.07, found: 276.33; anal. calculated (%): C, 56.71; H, 4.76; N, 15.26. Found: C, 56.69; H, 4.69; N, 15.10.

2.3.7. (E)-4-methyl-N-(pyridin-2-ylmethylene)benzenesulfonohydrazide (3g)

Solid; reaction time, 12 h; yield, 53%; melting point: 159–161°C; 0.53 (ethyl acetate : pet. ether 1 : 3), FTIR cm¹: 3281 (NH), 3031 (sp² CH), 1671 (CN), 1411 (C=C aromatic). HPLC result of product: Daicel CHIRALPAK® AD-H column; 30% ethyl acetate in pet. ether; 1.0 mL/min; retention time: 25.3 min; 97.9% pure; ¹H NMR (CDCl₃, ppm, Hz); 7.67 (s, 1H, CH), 7.39 (, , 2H, H-2, H-6), 7.34 (, , 2H, H-2, H-5), 7.30 (, , 2H, H-3, H-4), 7.13 (m, 3H, H-3, H-4, H-5), 6.19 (s, 1H, NH), 2.11 (s, 1H, CH₃). ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃, ppm); 149.1 (CH), 146.3 (C-1), 143.4 (C-1), 141.5 (C-2, C-5), 139.2 (C-4), 129.2 (C-3, C-4), 126.7 (C-3, C-5), 126.1 (C-2, C-6), 125.2 (C-3, C-5), 21.3 (CH₃). LCMS (H+) calculated for C₁₈H₁₈N₃O₂S₃Cl [M–H]⁺: 276.07, found: 276.09; anal. calculated (%): C, 56.71; H, 4.76; N, 15.26. Found: C, 56.79; H, 4.56; N, 15.54.

2.3.8. (E)-N-((1H-pyrrol-2-yl)methylene)benzenesulfonohydrazide (3h)

Solid; reaction time, 12 h; yield, 58%; melting point: 156–158°C; 0.37 (ethyl acetate : pet. ether 1 : 3), FTIR cm¹: 3296 (NH), 3088 (sp² CH), 1611 (CN), 1475 (C=C aromatic). HPLC result of product: Daicel CHIRALPAK® AD-H column; 30% ethyl acetate in pet. ether; 1.0 mL/min; retention time: 20.4 min; 99.9% pure; ¹H NMR (CDCl₃, ppm Hz); 7.73 (s, 1H, CH), 7.47 (, , 2H, H-2, H-6), 7.44 (, , 2H, H-2, H-5), 7.40 (, , 2H, H-3, H-4), 7.14 (, , 2H, H-3, H-5), 6.31 (s, 1H, NH), 3.31 (s, 1H, OCH₃). ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃, ppm); 151.1 (CH), 147.5 (C-1), 143.6 (C-1), 142.6 (C-2, C-5), 140.6 (C-4), 133.3 (C-3, C-4), 128.7 (C-3, C-5), 126.2 (C-2, C-6), 125.3 (C-3, C-5), 51.4 (OCH₃). LCMS (H+) calculated for C₁₁H₁₁N₃O₂S [M–H]⁺: 250.06, found: 250.01; anal. calculated (%): C, 53.00; H, 4.45; N, 16.86. Found: C, 53.09; H, 4.36; N, 16.70.

2.3.9. (E)-N-((1H-pyrrol-2-yl)methylene)-4-methylbenzenesulfonohydrazide (3i)

Solid; reaction time, 12 h; yield, 67%; melting point: 146–148°C; 0.42 (ethyl acetate : pet. ether 1 : 3), FTIR cm¹: 3287 (NH), 3135 (sp² CH), 1576 (CN), 1461 (C=C aromatic). HPLC result of product: Daicel CHIRALPAK® AD-H column; 30% ethyl acetate in pet. ether; 1.0 mL/min; retention time: 24.7 min; 99% pure; ¹H NMR (CDCl₃, ppm, Hz); 11.34 (s, 1H, CH), 11.23 (s, 1H, NH), 8.39 (, , 2H, H-2, H-6), 8.15 (, , 2H, H-3, H-5), 7.77 (, , 1H, H-4), 6.88 (, , 1H, H-2), 6.40 (s, 1H, NH), 6.08 (, , 1H, H-3). ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃, ppm); 175.1 (CH), 142.5 (C-1), 134.8 (C-4), 129.6 (C-2, C-6), 126.8 (C-3), 125.1 (C-2), 123.3 (C-3, C-5), 118.4 (C-1), 114.0 (C-4). LCMS (H+) calculated for C₁₂H₁₃N₃O₂S [M–H]⁺: 264.07, found: 264.09; anal. calculated (%): C, 54.74; H, 4.98; N, 15.96. Found: C, 54.69; H, 4.86; N, 15.80.

2.3.10. (E)-N-((1H-pyrrol-3-yl)methylene)-4-methoxybenzenesulfonohydrazide (3j)

Solid; reaction time, 12 h; yield, 65%; melting point: 176–179°C; 0.41 (ethyl acetate : pet. ether 1 : 3), FTIR cm¹: 3291 (NH), 3093 (sp² CH), 1626 (CN), 1473 (C=C aromatic). HPLC result of product: Daicel CHIRALPAK® AD-H column; 30% ethyl acetate in pet. ether; 1.0 mL/min; retention time: 29.3 min; 85.7% pure; ¹H NMR (CDCl₃, ppm, Hz); 7.77 (s, 1H, CH), 7.50 (, , 2H, H-2, H-6), 7.44 (, , 1H, H-3), 7.25 (, , 1H, H-4), 7.22 (, , 1H, H-5), 7.17 (, , 1H, H-6), 7.14 (, , 2H, H-3, H-5), 6.28 (s, 1H, NH), 2.31 (s, 1H, CH₃). ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃, ppm); 145.5 (CH), 145.4 (C-1), 142.6 (C-1), 138.5 (C-6), 136.5 (C-4), 130.3 (C-5), 128.6 (C-3, C-5), 127.6 (C-3), 125.9 (C-2, C-6), 124.6 (C-4), 21.7 (CH₃). LCMS (H+) calculated for C₁₂H₁₃N₃O₂S [M–H]⁺: 280.31, found: 280.09; anal. calculated (%): C, 51.60; H, 4.69; N, 15.04. Found: C, 51.79; H, 4.86; N, 15.10.

2.4. Carbonic Anhydrase (CA) Assay

CA inhibition has been determined using some reported methods with a few modifications [23]. This method has been based on a principle which shows that para-nitrophenyl acetate upon hydrolysis by carbonic anhydrase produces yellow para-nitrophenol that has been measured using spectrophotometric technique. In brief, 120 microliters of 50 mM Tris-Sulfate buffer (with a pH 7.6 comprising 0.1 mM ZnCl₂), twenty μL of (50 U) bovine enzyme, and 20 μL of inhibitor per well makes the reaction mixture. Mixture contents were mixed well before preincubation for ten minutes at 25°C. Para-nitrophenyl acetate substrate (6 mM stock solution by using <5% acetonitrile present in buffer and has been used fresh each time) and forty microliters were taken I each well to reach 0.6 mM concentration per well. The volume of the reaction mixture was diluted to 200 μL. Contents were well mixed after thirty-minute incubation at 25°C, and absorbance results were determined at 348 nm with a microplate reader (SpectraMax ABS, USA). Standard used was acetazolamide. Experiments were performed in triplicate with each concentration. GraphPad Prism 5.0 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA) has been used to calculate IC₅₀ by nonlinear regression. Inhibition , where and are the absorbances of the samples and blank.

2.5. Kinetic Analysis

To determine the kinetic parameters of compound 3c, a sequence of experiments have been done. Compound 3c was selected on the basis of IC₅₀ value which was used at different concentrations (0.0, 7.1, 14.2, and 28.4 μM, respectively); the substrate (p-nitrophenyl acetate) concentrations were varied (2, 1, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, and 0.0625 mM). Other all experimental conditions were just similar as described in the carbonic anhydrase assay segment. The maximum initial velocity has been measured using the starting linear part of absorbance values up to ten minutes at a 1-minute interval. Plots of Lineweaver–Burk on graph between inverse of velocities () and inverse of concentration of substrate mM^-1 were used in order to find enzyme inhibition type. EI dissociation constant was found by the secondary plot of concentrations of inhibitors versus .

2.6. Computational Methodology

2.6.1. Retrieval of Carbonic Anhydrase in Maestro

The target protein/enzyme structure has been recovered using PDB (Protein Data Bank) (http://www.rcsb.org) having PDBID 1V9E. Structure of protein has been prepared using “Protein Preparation Wizard” workflow in Schrödinger Suite. The bond orders were allotted, and H atoms have been added with protein molecule. The water molecules were removed from protein structure. Then, structure was reduced to minimum to get the RMSD (converged root mean square deviation) of 0.30 Å with the OPLS_2005 force field. The prepared structure was employed for further grid and docking analysis.

2.6.2. Grid Generation and Molecular Docking

For grid generation preparation, the enzymatic site of the target protein enzyme has been reached using cocrystallized ligands taken from PDB and the literature data. Grid was generated by specifying the particular residues involved in the active zone of the target protein. After grid preparation, docking experiment was performed against synthesized compounds (3a-3l) against receptor molecule. The synthesized ligands were sketched by 2D sketcher in Maestro interface and utilized in docking procedure. The default docking setup parameters were employed for ligand docking experiment. The binding energies and conformations/positions of ligands have been predicted within the region of activity of protein by glide experiment. The 3D and 2D graphical images of both best scored docking complexes were retrieved using Maestro.

2.6.3. Cell Viability Assay Using HaCaT and MCF-7

The experiment for cell viability studies using MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) setup has been done to find cytotoxic effects of target compounds. The human keratinocyte (HaCaT) and MCF-7 were cultivated separately in 96-well plates (CGP, gamma sterilized, SPL Korea) with use of complete DMEM consisting of ten percent fetal bovine serum and one percent antibiotics. cells per well were incubated for 24 hours before their exposure to a series of dilutions of target derivatives. The analogue 3c was solubilized in DMSO, and DMEM was used for dilution to achieve final concentrations 0, 125, and 250 μM. Then, in the presence of test compounds, cells were incubated again for twenty-four hours at 37 C with 5% carbon dioxide. Now, through the MTT setup, absorbance values at 570 nm were determined by ELISA reader and each experiment was repeated thrice. All data was shown in a pattern, and Student’s -tests were performed to analyze significance of the data. Statistical significance has been assumed ().

3. Results

The carbonic anhydrase inhibitory activity of the synthesized azaheterocyclic Schiff bases (3a-j) was performed, and results are presented in Table 1. The excellent activity was shown by compound 3c with IC₅₀ value better than the standard acetazolamide (IC₅₀). Kinetic results of CA were determined by Lineweaver-Burk plots of versus using different concentrations of target analogues. They produced a set of straight line (Figure 1(a)). To investigate the mechanism of inhibition of target analogues on carbonic anhydrase inhibition, a kinetic study was done. Depending on the best IC₅₀ value, compound 3c was selected to find out the mechanism of an enzyme inhibition. Kinetics of analogue 3c expressed that it intersects within the second quadrant. The analysis expressed that decreased by increasing concentrations of inhibitors while remains same. The Ramachandran plots showed that 93.8% of all remainder was existing in preferred regions (Figure 2). Virtual screening revealed that glide docking energy values were little fluctuated among all ligands (3a-3j) and exhibited well docking energy values, respectively (Figure 3). The comparative results showed that docking energy values of target derivatives were closer to each other. The ligands-protein binding analyses expressed 3c confined in the active site of the target protein as shown in Figures 4 and 5. The 3c receptor complex revealed a good conformation with a better interaction style in the binding pocket of the receptor. Result of 3c receptor docked complex revealed that hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions were found at Asn66 and Glu68, respectively.

(a)

(b)

Furthermore, the present study summarized that derivative 3c caused cytotoxicity in a concentration-dependent manner as shown in Figures 6 and 7. The cytotoxic effects produced by derivative 3c are smaller in case of human keratinocyte (HaCaT) at concentration 250 μM than MCF-7.

4. Discussion

The p-substituted benzene sulphonyl hydrazides 2(a-d) were obtained by condensation of p-substituted benzene sulphonyl chloride with hydrazine. The presence of -NH stretching at 3304 cm^-1 and 3107 cm^-1 in FTIR spectra showed the successful synthesis of intermediate hydrazides. Intermediate hydrazides 2(a-d) were condensed with p-substituted benzaldehydes to reach target compounds 3(a-j). All the target derivatives were characterized using FTIR, ¹H NMR, and ¹³C NMR. The position and type of substitution in the synthesized compounds are the determinant factor of enzyme inhibitory activity. It was observed that derivatives with the pyrrole ring are less active than those which have the pyridine ring. The electron density at the heterocyclic pyridine ring is lesser compared to the five-member pyrrole ring. The presence of the pyridyl ring in compound 3c along with the presence of the para-methyl-substituted phenyl ring plays a vital role in carbonic anhydrase inhibitory activity. The derivative 3c inhibits the CA II noncompetitively to give rise to the enzyme inhibitor complex. The secondary plot of the slope against the doses of inhibitors expressed the enzyme inhibitor dissociation constant () (Figure 1(b)). The kinetic parameters are summarized in Table 2 which shows the noncompetitive mode of inhibition. Carbonic anhydrase II is a (Zn) metal-comprising protein and consists of 259 amino acids. Residual structure of CA II contains 9% helices, 45% β sheets, and 45% coils. The Ramachandran graph and results confirmed the consistency and effectiveness of CA II structure. The comparative results of the docking study enunciated that docking energy values of target derivatives were closer to each other as their basic skeleton was similar in all synthesized compounds. All the compounds were docked against target protein PDBID (1V9E). Based on in vitro results, the 3c docking complex was selected to determine their binding pattern and conformational position in the active site of the target protein (3c confined in the active site of the target protein). The hydrogen atom of the amino group forms a hydrogen bond with His3, whereas the benzene ring forms a partially weak hydrophobic interaction with Trp4 having bond lengths 2.11 and 2.39 Å, respectively. Literature data also favor our docking results, and similar residues were involved in different inhibitors [24–26]. The two-dimensional conformations of each docking complex are mentioned in supplementary data (Figures S1-S10). Based on our findings, the azaheterocyclic Schiff base 3c expressed the most potent carbonic anhydrase inhibition and high binding affinity with carbonic anhydrase enzyme. Viability assay of these derivatives on human keratinocyte (HaCaT) and MCF was performed (Figures 6 and 7).

5. Conclusion

The azaheterocyclic Schiff base derivatives with various hydrophobic or hydrophilic groups have been synthesized to explore their potential in carbonic anhydrase inhibition. The derivative 3c represented comparable carbonic anhydrase inhibition (IC₅₀ 0.84 μM) with standard acetazolamide (IC₅₀ 0.99 μM). The kinetic investigations expressed that derivative 3c exhibited a mixed-type inhibition of carbonic anhydrase enzyme. It expressed less cytotoxic effects on human keratinocyte cell lines (HaCaT) compared to breast cancer cell lines MCF-7. The computational studies also assured that derivative 3c binds well in the active binding site of the target enzyme. The highest binding affinity of 3c confirmed that the methyl group at the phenyl ring and the sulfonamide group in compound 3c play an important role in giving stable ligand–target complex as well as in carbonic anhydrase inhibition.

Data Availability

Present work was a part of Ph.D thesis of a research scholar Mujahid Abas, supervised by Dr. Zaman Ashraf generated at Allama Iqbal Open University, Islamabad and College of Natural Sciences, Kongju National University, Gongju, Korea. Dr. Zaman Ashraf may provide data upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This paper was partially supported by the Russian Government Program of Competitive Growth of the Kazan Federal University. Albert A. Rizvanov was supported by the state assignment 20.5175.2017/6.7 of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation. Authors acknowledge Prof. Dr. Albert A. Rizvanov (KFU, Russia) and Dr. Muhammad Hassham Hassan Bin Asad (KFU, Russia; CUI, Pakistan) for their valuable support to publish this work.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1: docking interaction 3a with target protein PDBID (1V9E). Figure S2: docking interaction 3b with target protein PDBID (1V9E). Figure S3: docking interaction 3c with target protein PDBID (1V9E). Figure S4: docking interaction 3d with target protein PDBID (1V9E). Figure S5: docking interaction 3e with target protein PDBID (1V9E). Figure S6: docking interaction 3f with target protein PDBID (1V9E). Figure S7: docking interaction 3g with target protein PDBID (1V9E). Figure S8: docking interaction 3h with target protein PDBID (1V9E). Figure S9: docking interaction 3i with target protein PDBID (1V9E). Figure S10: docking interaction 3d with target protein PDBID (1V9E). (Supplementary Materials)

References

S. Lindskog, “Structure and mechanism of carbonic anhydrase,” Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. K. Kannan, B. Notstrand, K. Fridborg, S. Lovgren, A. Ohlsson, and M. Petef, “Crystal structure of human erythrocyte carbonic anhydrase B. Three-dimensional structure at a nominal 2.2-A resolution,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 51–55, 1975.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Maresca, A. Scozzafava, D. Vullo, and C. T. Supuran, “Dihalogenated sulfanilamides and benzolamides are effective inhibitors of the three β-class carbonic anhydrases from Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 384–387, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. I. Hassan, B. Shajee, A. Waheed, F. Ahmad, and W. S. Sly, “Structure, function and applications of carbonic anhydrase isozymes,” Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1570–1582, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. T. Supuran, “Carbonic anhydrases: novel therapeutic applications for inhibitors and activators,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 168–181, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. R. Chegwidden, N. D. Carter, and Y. H. Edwards, “The carbonic anhydrases: new horizons,” Birkhäuser, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 735-736, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
R. J. Mallis, B. W. Poland, T. K. Chatterjee et al., “Crystal structure of S-glutathiolated carbonic anhydrase III,” FEBS Letters, vol. 482, no. 3, pp. 237–241, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. T. Supuran, A. Scozzafava, and A. Casini, “Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors,” Medicinal Research Reviews, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 146–189, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Duda, C. Tu, M. Qian et al., “Structural and kinetic analysis of the chemical rescue of the proton transfer function of carbonic anhydrase II,” Biochemistry, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1741–1748, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Fisher, J. A. Hernandez Prada, C. Tu et al., “Structural and kinetic characterization of active-site histidine as a proton shuttle in catalysis by human carbonic anhydrase II,” Biochemistry, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 1097–1105, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Z. Fisher, C. M. Maupin, M. Budayova-Spano et al., “Atomic crystal and molecular dynamics simulation structures of human carbonic anhydrase II: insights into the proton transfer mechanism,” Biochemistry, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 2930–2937, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Aggarwal, B. Kondeti, C. Tu, C. M. Maupin, D. N. Silverman, and R. McKenna, “Structural insight into activity enhancement and inhibition of H64A carbonic anhydrase II by imidazoles,” IUCrJ, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 129–135, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Alterio, A. di Fiore, K. D’Ambrosio, C. T. Supuran, and G. de Simone, “Multiple binding modes of inhibitors to carbonic anhydrases: how to design specific drugs targeting 15 different isoforms?” Chemical Reviews, vol. 112, no. 8, pp. 4421–4468, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Neri, “Cell survival and metastasis regulation by Akt signaling in colorectal cancer,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 767–776, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
C. T. Supuran, “Advances in structure-based drug discovery of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors,” Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 61–88, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Del Prete, D. Vullo, G. M. Fisher et al., “Discovery of a new family of carbonic anhydrases in the malaria pathogen Plasmodium falciparum—the η-carbonic anhydrases,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 24, no. 18, pp. 4389–4396, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Lou, P. C. McDonald, A. Oloumi et al., “Targeting tumor hypoxia: suppression of breast tumor growth and metastasis by novel carbonic anhydrase IX inhibitors,” Cancer Research, vol. 71, no. 9, pp. 3364–3376, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Akdemir, C. de Monte, S. Carradori, and C. T. Supuran, “Computational investigation of the selectivity of salen and tetrahydrosalen compounds towards the tumor-associated hCA XII isozyme,” Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 114–118, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Pacchiano, M. Aggarwal, B. S. Avvaru et al., “Selective hydrophobic pocket binding observed within the carbonic anhydrase II active site accommodate different 4-substituted-ureido-benzenesulfonamides and correlate to inhibitor potency,” Chemical Communications, vol. 46, no. 44, pp. 8371–8373, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Carta, S. M. Osman, D. Vullo et al., “Poly (amidoamine) dendrimers with carbonic anhydrase inhibitory activity and antiglaucoma action,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 4039–4045, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Sonmez, C. Bilen, S. Sumersan et al., “In vitro inhibition effect and structure–activity relationships of some saccharin derivatives on erythrocyte carbonic anhydrase I and II,” Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 118–123, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Qamar, A. Saeed, M. Saeed et al., “Synthesis, carbonic anhydrase inhibitory activity and antioxidant activity of some 1,3-oxazine derivatives,” Drug Development Research, vol. 79, no. 7, pp. 352–361, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Yao, Y. Zhang, F. Xiao, Z. Xia, and J. Rao, “Quantum dot/bioluminescence resonance energy transfer based highly sensitive detection of proteases,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 46, no. 23, pp. 4346–4349, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. A. Friesner, R. B. Murphy, M. P. Repasky et al., “Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 49, no. 21, pp. 6177–6196, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hassan, H. Raza, M. A. Abbasi, A. A. Moustafa, and S. Y. Seo, “The exploration of novel Alzheimer’s therapeutic agents from the pool of FDA approved medicines using drug repositioning, enzyme inhibition and kinetic mechanism approaches,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 2513–2526, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. O. Karataş, H. Uslu, S. Sarı et al., “Coumarin or benzoxazinone based novel carbonic anhydrase inhibitors: synthesis, molecular docking and anticonvulsant studies,” Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 760–772, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2020 Mujahid Abas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1577

Downloads

1388

Citations