Effects of Natural Products on Bacterial Communication and Network-Quorum Sensing

Yang, Min; Meng, Fanying; Gu, Wen; Li, Fengjiao; Tao, Yating; Zhang, Zhengyang; Zhang, Fan; Yang, Xingxin; Li, Jingping; Yu, Jie

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8638103

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Background Conclusions Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 | Article ID 8638103 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8638103

Effects of Natural Products on Bacterial Communication and Network-Quorum Sensing

Min Yang,¹Fanying Meng,¹Wen Gu,¹Fengjiao Li,¹Yating Tao,¹Zhengyang Zhang,¹Fan Zhang,¹Xingxin Yang,¹Jingping Li,¹and Jie Yu¹

Academic Editor: Stanley Brul

Received09 Feb 2020

Revised29 Mar 2020

Accepted18 Apr 2020

Published27 May 2020

Abstract

Quorum sensing (QS) has emerged as a research hotspot in microbiology and medicine. QS is a regulatory cell communication system used by bacterial flora to signal to the external environment. QS influences bacterial growth, proliferation, biofilm formation, virulence factor production, antibiotic synthesis, and environmental adaptation. Through the QS system, natural products can regulate the growth of harmful bacteria and enhance the growth of beneficial bacteria, thereby improving human health. Herein, we review advances in the discovery of natural products that regulate bacterial QS systems.

1. Background

Until the 1980s, it was believed that bacteria individually grow and multiply with no communication between cells [1]. It is now accepted that a common exchange of information exists between bacteria and that individuals of the same or different species compete or cooperate through quorum sensing (QS). In this review, we will discuss the underlying molecular mechanisms of QS and highlight its role in human health. We then summarize the regulatory role of natural products in QS systems and probe their potential value in disease prevention, diagnosis, and disease treatment.

2. Regulatory Mechanisms of Quorum Sensing

In 1970, the marine bacteria Photobacterium fischeri was found to secrete a substance that controlled the luminescence of cells [2]. Subsequent studies revealed that this substance regulated bacterial density. The bacterium releases signaling molecules (AI, autoinducers) that stimulate the bioluminescence system at a high population density [3]. This environmental sensing mechanism is also common to other marine organisms [4]. In the 1980s, scientists identified the bioluminescence producing gene-Luminescence (lux) in Vibrio fischeri, and subsequently, the AI in Photobacterium fischeri as an -(3-oxohexanoyl)-DL-homoserine [5–7]. This laid the material foundation for QS. In 1994, Fuqua first proposed the concept of QS, in which bacterial phenotypes are regulated according to the concentration of chemical signals produced by individuals or colonies of bacteria [8].

Bacterial QS from a medical perspective had received increasing research focus. QS regulates the microbe balance, which is closely linked to the occurrence and development of diseases such as intestinal inflammation [9], pneumonia [10], immune system [11], and even metabolic syndrome [12, 13].

2.1. Quorum-Sensing System

Bacteria release chemical AIs through the action of QS that accumulate within the bacterial environment. Through detecting changes in AI concentrations, bacteria exchange information. A range of signaling molecules related to bacterial QS has been discovered. Dependent on the type of signaling and sensor systems, the QS of bacteria can be classified. In Table 1, we summarize the pathways associated with each QS system and its distribution in bacteria [14–33].

(1) Acyl-homoserine lactone (AHL) was the earliest discovered signaling molecule produced by Gram-negative bacteria. A typical feature of AHL molecules is the inclusion of homoserine lactone rings and -acyl chains. The AHL produced by bacteria is of varying lengths and side-chain modifications [14].

(2) Gram-positive bacteria produce autoinducing peptides (AIP) as signaling molecules. Precursor peptides are synthesized in the ribosome, and the precursor peptides undergo a series of modifications during outward transport leading to the formation of mature AIP. Due to the complexity and specificity of the synthetic process, the structural information on AIP is sparse [19, 23].

(3) LuxS/autoinducer-2 (LuxS/AI-2) was first discovered in the marine bioluminescent bacterium Vibrio harveyi, with its active structure being furanosyl borate diester [34]. Studies show that LuxS/AI-2 is widely distributed in Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, forming specific signaling molecules for intra- and interspecies exchange. This is generally considered a universal signaling molecule for bacterial communication.

(4) In addition to the described signaling pathways, other signaling molecules have been discovered, including AI-3 [29], diffusible signal factor (DSF) [30], and Pseudomonas quinolone signal (PQS) [30].

QS promotes the exchange of information between individuals through signaling molecules, thereby triggering the expression of a series of genes to complete QS mechanisms. In Gram-negative bacteria, one species bacterial QS system often contains multiple structures AHL molecules. Moreover, there are differences in the structure of AHL molecules in different species of bacteria, and the quorum-sensing mechanism is also different. Therefore, AHL molecules are often used for intraspecific communication of Gram-negative bacteria. AIP exists in the quorum-sensing system of Gram-positive bacteria, and each kind of bacteria secretes unique AIP that different from other bacteria. Therefore, the QS system mediated by AIP is a way of intrabacterial communication. AHL molecules have not been found in Gram-positive bacteria. The AI-2 signal molecule can be synthesized by a variety of bacteria, including Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, so AI-2 can be used for interspecific communication.

In addition, multiple QS systems are present in the same bacteria. For example, two interrelated QS systems (Las and Rhl) and PQS systems in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, SdiA, Lsr, and AI-3 QS are present in E. coli, whilst LuxS/AI-2 systems have been identified in Staphylococcus aureus. Whether these regulatory systems in bacteria interfere with other processes requires further investigation. In addition, other microbial QS systems are still to be identified, and their identification forms a key aspect of QS systems.

2.2. Quorum-Quenching Systems

There is evidence that QS allows bacteria to harmonize their behavior. Accordingly, organisms have developed strategies to counteract QS. Such mechanisms are termed quorum quenching (QQ) [35].

QQ disrupts the communication between bacteria, thereby inhibiting group behaviors, including the production of virulence factors. QQ is now known to play a role in the competitive inhibition and degradation of signaling molecules through (1) inhibition of signaling molecule generation: The QS process is inseparable from the generation and participation of signaling molecules. By inhibiting related enzymes in the signaling molecule synthesis pathway, the generation of signal molecules can be blocked and QS can be inhibited. For example, Triclosan can inhibit enoyl-ACP reductase (an important protein in the AHL generation process) [36]. (2) Competitive inhibition: By synthesizing some structural analogs of signaling molecules, they can competitively bind with corresponding receptor proteins, and block the binding of signal molecules to receptors, thereby affecting the transmission of signal molecules. For example, halogenated furanones (AHL structural analogs) can inhibit quorum sensing [37]. (3) Degradation signal molecules: By using degradation enzymes to degrade signal molecules, the concentration of signal molecules is lower than the threshold, thereby destroying the QS system. For example, MacQ is an AHL acylase which can mediate QQ [38].

In summary, bacteria prevent the accumulation of signaling molecules through QQ, thereby blocking signal exchange and the expression of QS-related genes. Bacteria adjust QS and QQ to maintain the microecological balance of organisms that regulate group behavior. On the one hand, exploring the relationship between bacterial QQ and QS provides new avenues of prevent and treat bacterial disease.

3. Quorum Sensing and Quorum Quenching in Human Health

Bacteria are essential components of the human ecosystem. Bacteria are abundant on the surface of the human body, mouth, respiratory tract, intestine, and vagina. The total numbers of bacteria in healthy individuals exceed 100 trillion and achieve a dynamic balance through a network of interactions between microbes. When this balance is broken, pathogenic infections, loss of immunity, and inflammation result. Herein, we summarize the relationship between bacterial QS and human health, providing new directions for the treatment of disease.

3.1. Quorum Sensing Mediates the Probiotic Properties of Bacteria

Probiotics are taken to improve immune health, but their effects on QS are poorly defined. Bifidobacterium that inhabits the mammalian intestinal tract is known to improve human health. LuxS/AI-2 QS systems have been identified in Bifidobacterium, and QS-signaling molecules including AI-2 promote biofilm formation in Bifidobacterium [39]. Carbohydrates (mannose, fructose, sucrose, and lactose) significantly improve the secretion of AI-2 from the Bifidobacterium. The concentration of AI-2 has increased by 4.49~89.45% following the addition of carbohydrates to the Bifidobacterium [40]. Mice infected with Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) O157:H7 show strong anti-infective activity following the intake of the Bifidobacterium breve strain in Yakult. Further studies have shown that B. breve produced high concentrations of acetic acid (56 mM) and lower intestinal pH (to pH 6.75), inhibiting the production of STEC O157:H7 toxin Stx [41]. QS can promote the growth and colonization of bacteria, and quorum sensing can increase the relative abundance of Bifidobacterium in the intestine and improve the body’s immunity. On the other hand, according to the Asahara’s study, we think that the increase in the relative abundance of Bifidobacterium may inhibit the toxins of some pathogenic bacteria, reduce the risk of infection by pathogenic bacteria. From the above two aspects, it can be considered that the quorum sensing of Bifidobacteriummay improves human health.

Lactobacillus maintains the microecological balance of the intestine and vagina. The LuxS/AI-2 system in Lactobacillus plantarum and the production of bacteriocin regulate the QS system [42]. Lactobacillus plantarum inhibits the pathogens associated with wound infections through QQ (Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1/ATCC 27853, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 43300, and hospital-derived strains) [43]. L. plantarum inhibits the production of P. aeruginosa AHLs, and the virulence factors controlled by these signaling molecules, including elastase and biofilms. When mouse models with burns infected with P. aeruginosa were treated with L. plantarum, it inhibited the colonization in P. aeruginosa [44]. In in vivo assays, the AI-2 activity of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli was significantly inhibited following the administration of Lactobacillus acidophilus in weaning pigs, demonstrating that L. acidophilus regulates the intestinal microflora of pigs through QQ [45]. In other studies, Streptococcus mutans was shown to promote dental caries, and its growth and virulence are inhibited by Lactobacillus sp. (including L. casei subspecies casei (ATCC 393), L. reuteri (ATCC 23272), L. plantarum subsp. Plantarum (ATCC 14917) and L. salivarius (ATCC 11741)) [46]. Lactobacillus may promote self-growth by enhancing QS, inhibiting the proliferation of pathogenic bacteria, and subsequently improving human health.

Clostridium difficile is an intestinal flora in newborns. The LuxS/AI-2 system has been found in C. difficile where it regulates virulence gene (tcdA, tcdB, tcdE) expression [47]. Pediococcus acidilactici is a widely used probiotic. The lactic acid produced by Pediococcus acidilactici M7 strains inhibits short-chain HSL production and swarming-swimming-twitching motility, elastase, protease, pyocyanin, and biofilm production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa [48].

Escherichia coli Nissle is a widely used probiotic for the treatment of common gastrointestinal diseases. E. coli Nissle produces AI-2, whilst the luxs gene in the AI-2 system affect the expression of proinflammatory cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-6, and TNF-α) in mouse models of acute colitis [49]. Soluble and cellular fractions of Enterococcus (E.) faecium CMGB16 also interfere with the adherence capacity and antibiotic susceptibility of enteropathogenic Escherichia (E.) coli strains [50].

3.2. Quorum Sensing Influences the Pathogenic Characteristics of Bacteria

Pathogens use the QS system to regulate biofilm formation, exopolysaccharide production, bacterial virulence, and motility. Streptococcus pneumoniae is a common pathogen that causes otitis media, sinusitis, and pneumonia. S. pneumoniae is colonized by the biofilm in the nasopharynx. The LuxS/AI-2 system regulates the transcript levels of lytA (which encodes an autolysin previously implicated in biofilm formation), and the transcript levels of ply (which encodes pneumococcal pneumolysin), that regulates biofilm formation in S. pneumoniae [51]. In further studies, cDNA microarrays were used to investigate the global gene expression of S. pneumoniae regulated by LuxS/AI-2. The LuxS/AI-2 QS system is necessary for biofilm formation and the colonization of the ear epithelium through its regulation of genes mediating virulence and bacterial fitness during pneumococcal biofilm formation [52].

Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a conditional pathogen, directly controls the expression of multiple virulence factors through the QS-related protein MvfR [53]. Moreover, P. aeruginosa uses the QS system to activate the expression of genes involved in the bacterial CRISPR-Cas autoimmune system, thereby increasing bacterial immunity [54].

Two types of QS systems are present in Staphylococcus aureus: the Agr system based on the autoinducing peptide AIP and the LuxS/AI-2 system. S. aureus inhibits the biofilm regulatory factor rbf through LuxS/AI-2, which in turn regulates biofilm formation [55]. Bacillus interferes with the QS of S. aureus by secreting fenvalin fengycins, preventing the colonization of S. aureus in the intestine. This provides direct mechanistic evidence of how probiotics can inhibit the colonization of pathogenic bacteria [56].

Pathogenic Escherichia coli causes bloody diarrhea and hemolytic-uremic syndrome through QS systems such as LuxS/AI-2. QS regulates biofilm and the expression of virulence factors in enterohemorrhagic E. coli [57, 58]. Lactobacillus plantarum and Bacillus spp., when used with EPS at an appropriate concentration (>1 mg/ml), inhibit E. coli ATCC35218 biofilm formation and reduce efflux pumps implicated in bacterial adhesion and antimicrobial resistance [59]. Elaeed-exopolysaccharides (r-EPS) from Lactobacillus acidophilus A4 similarly suppress biofilm formation through its influence on genes related to curli production (crl, csgA, and csgB) and chemotaxis (cheY) through transcriptome analysis [60]. The supernatants of Enterococcus faecium strains influence the growth, adhesion, and biofilm formation of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAggEC) [61].

Enterococcus faecalis are Gram-positive bacteria that cause a variety of nosocomial infections of which urinary tract infections are most common. The Fsr and LuxS/AI-2 systems were identified in E. faecalis. The faecal induction-related gene fsrB of E. faecalis is associated with bacterial toxicity in rabbit models of endophthalmitis [62]. In addition, the luxS gene in the LuxS/AI-2 system is closely related to biofilm formation in Enterococcus faecalis [63].

Vibrio cholerae infection leads to severe diarrhea and even death, with epidemics persisting in many countries. The QS autoinducer of V. cholerae, cholera autoinducer 1 (CAI-1), AI-2, and the central regulator LuxO influence the expression of EPS, which in turn affects bacterial biofilm formation [64]. Vibrio cholerae was inhibited by probiotics including Lactococcus lactis in mice models through its ability to produce lactic acid in the intestine. These results highlight the ability of probiotics to transform the intestinal environment to induce the resistance to pathogenic bacteria colonization [65].

Salmonella typhimurium infection leads to typhoid fever, an intestinal infectious disease. S. Typhimurium responds to two different AHL QS signals (C6-AHL and C8-AHL) [66]. AHLs are recognized by SdiA, believed to be a sensor of AHLs produced by other bacteria. The QS regulator SdiA in S. typhimurium regulates the outer membrane protein Rck [67].

4. Quorum-Sensing Substances from Natural Products

Natural products have been studied for their therapeutic value in traditional medical practice, but interests in their ability to regulate bacterial microecology have intensified. The use of QS agents is now considered an effective mechanism to treat microbial-related diseases through their ability to inhibit antibiotic resistance.

The rates of drug-resistance nosocomial pathogenic bacterial infections are increasing annually. Bacterial infection can be inhibited by preventing QS. We now summarize the QS agonists or antagonists from natural sources to further understand these effects.

4.1. Regulation of Natural Products in Bacterial Biofilms

Biofilm is a self-protecting form of bacterial colonization that occurs on the surface of host receptors to resist adverse growth. QS plays a vital role in the formation of bacterial biofilms. The QS between bacteria promotes the formation of probiotic biofilms and improves the resistance of strains, promotes bacterial growth, and enhances probiotic effects. In addition, the bacterial QS system can be used to inhibit biofilm formation in pathogenic bacteria, reducing the risk of infection and avoiding bacterial resistance.

In screening for QS active substances, studies have paid more attention to medicinal plant resources. The methanol extract of Psoralea corylifolia L. reduces the QS activity of pathogenic bacteria (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Serratia marcescens, and Aeromonas hydrophila). Further molecular docking results show that bakuchiol of the extracts binds to QS-related proteins and inhibits biofilm formation [68]. Methanolic extracts of the Indian medicinal plant Cuminum cyminum also promote the loosening of the biofilm architecture and powerfully inhibits in vitro biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, Proteus mirabilis, and Serratia marcescens at sub-MIC levels. The results of molecular docking analysis showed that methyl eugenol (ME) in C. cyminum mediates quorum-sensing inhibitors (QSI) activity [69]. Liriodendron tulipifera, Aralia spinosa, and Quercus alba are medicinal plants native to the southern United States. These plant extracts inhibit the biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus [70].

Food materials are rich in natural products. The screening process of natural QS substances in natural products derived from food has attracted attention due to their known safety. Corilagin from the fruit of Terminalia chebula Retz is widely used as a food supplement in China. The extract of T. chebula and its phenolic acid, corilagin, show antivirulence activity against Staphylococcus aureus. Corilagin also reduces the transcription of genes related to quorum sensing (staphylococcal accessory regulator A, intercellular adhesion accessory gene regulator A, and RNAIII) [71]. Water-soluble extracts from the North American cranberry could inhibit V. cholerae biofilms during the development/maturation stage by reducing the biofilm matrix production and secretion [72]. The phenolic extracts of the edible plant Rubus rosaefolius inhibit pigment production, cluster movement, and biofilm formation in Chromobacterium violaceum 12472 [73].

Small molecule compounds have been isolated from medicinal plants that inhibit the QS system. Curcumin is the main active ingredient of Curcumae longae L. and Arhizoma erubescens (Wall.) Schott inhibits biofilm formation and movement in Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, Proteus mirabilis, and Serratia marcescens, and has QSI effects on a variety of bacteria, acting as a broad-spectrum QQ [74]. Quercetin, apigenin, and luteolin inhibit biofilm formation in Chromobacterium violaceum (strain ATCC 12472). These compounds are effective against Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 [75]. A halogenated furanone (C₅H₃BrO₃) isolated from the Australian edible macroalga Delisea pulchra inhibits the formation of biofilms in P. aeruginosa sensing systems. Green-fluorescent protein (GFP) penetrates microcolonies and blocks signaling and QS in biofilms [76]. Coumarin has an aromatic odor and is widely distributed in plants. Coumarin and its derivatives show extensive QS activity and both coumarin and umbelliferone inhibit biofilm formation in E. coli O157:H7. Transcriptional analysis showed that coumarin inhibits curli and the motor gene of E. coli O157:H7. In addition, esculetin inhibits Shiga-like toxins stx2 in E. coli O157:H7 and attenuates its virulence in nematodes Caenorhabditis elegans [77].

4.2. Regulation of Natural Products on Bacterial Virulence

Bacterial virulence factors cause bacterial disease. Recent studies have shown that QS controls the expression of bacterial virulence. Increasing attention has been paid to the use of QS for inhibiting the virulence of bacteria.

In natural products extracts, Forsythia suspense (thunb.) Vahl could inhibit QS-regulated virulence factors production and biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa in a concentration-dependent manner. Elastase activity and pyocyanin production were inhibited at a maximum of 40.97% and 47.58% when P. aeruginosa was grown in the presence of 0.25 g/mL water extract [78]. Distillation products from a medicinal formulation (Artemisia argyi Levi.et Vant., Dictamnus dasycarpus Turcz., and Solanum nigrumL.) markedly attenuated the production of virulence factors of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, including phenazine pyocyanin, siderophore pyoverdine, and biofilm formation. Distillation products inhibit binding of the PQS receptor MvfR to the corresponding pqsA promoter to inhibit the QS system, and the Pseudomonas quinolone-signaling (PQS) system [79]. Methanol-soluble extracts from Ganoderma lucidum inhibited QS in Chromobacterium violaceum CV026 [80]. Syzygium aromaticum extracts inhibited QS-regulated phenotypes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA01, including the expression of virulence factor (pyocyanin) [81]. Purified fractions (EA) from the leaf extracts of Syzygium cumini (L.) Skeels, a traditional Indian drug used to treat diabetes, inhibit biofilm formation and virulence factors in P. aeruginosa and S. aureus. Bioactive compounds detected by GC-MS were shown to interact with RhlG/NADP active-site complex (PDB ID: 2B4Q), LasR-TP4 complexes (PDB ID: 3JPU), and Pseudaminidase (PDB ID: 2W38) [82]. Extracts of three Indian medicinal plants, Astilbe rivularis, Fragaria nubicola, and Osbeckia nepalensis, show a dose-dependent inhibition of violacein production in Chromobacterium violaceum MTCC 2656 and pyocyanin in Pseudomonas aeruginosa MTCC 2297 [83]. Melicope lunuankenda (Gaertn.) T. G. Hartley, an endemic plant in Malaysia, interferes with violacein production in Chromobacterium violaceum CV026; reduces bioluminescence expression in E. coli [pSB401], disrupts pyocyanin synthesis, swarming motility and the expression of lecA::lux in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 [84]. Musa acuminata peel (MAM) is known for its healing and antiseptic properties and is common in South Asia and Africa. MAM significantly inhibits the biofilms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and inhibits QS-mediated virulence. The anti-QS activity of MAM is mediated by 5-hydroxymethylfurfural [85]. Water extracts of Nymphaea tetragona significantly lower the levels of violacein of Chromobacterium violaceum. The swarming motility of P. aeruginosa was also inhibited [86].

Low concentrations of honey inhibit the expression of lsrA/tnaA, a gene induced by enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli, that inhibits the expression of curli, a biofilm-forming gene, and reduces the adhesion and virulence of E. coli in intestinal epithelial cells [87]. Liquorice, celery, cayenne pepper, and aniseed show high anti-QS potential, the chief active compound from celery, isolated and identified as 3--butyl-4,5-dihydrophthalide (sedanenolide) [88]. Extracts of Castanea sativa leaves inhibit the expression of the QS regulatory gene (agr) in Staphylococcus aureus and inhibit the virulence of Staphylococcus aureus [89].

Some small molecules also influence QS activity. Punicalagin, an active ingredient in the Chinese herbal medicine Punica granatum L., downregulates the expression of Serratia marcescens virulence-related genes and the expression of QS-related genes (sdiA and srgE), reducing the invasion of colon cells by S. marcescens [90]. Trans-cinnamaldehyde (CA) and salicylic acid (SA) in Cinnamomum cassia Presl also effectively downregulate both the las and rhl QS systems and significantly reduce virulence phenotypes at both the transcriptional and extracellular levels in P. aeruginosa PAO1 [91]. Zeaxanthin, an active constituent of Chinese herbal medicine Lycium barbarum L., reduces the expression of the virulence factors of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by QS [92]. Sodium houttuyfonate, derived from the Chinese herbal medicine Houttuynia cordata Thunb., inhibits the production of virulence factors (pyocyanin) in Pseudomonas aeruginosa through downregulating the expression of the AHL biosynthesis gene lasl and the transcription factor lasR, exerting inhibitory effects related to biofilm formation [93]. Tea polyphenols inhibit the production of the Chromobacterium violaceum 12472 virulence factor violacein with an almost 98% reduction at 3.125 mg/mL. Violacein is directly related to AHL and exhibited inhibitory effects on virulence phenotypes (proteolytic activity, elastase, swarming motility, and biofilm formation) regulated by QS in Pseudomonas aeruginosa [94]. Quercetin, a flavonol found in onions, interferes with the production of violacein and swarming motility in Chromobacterium violaceum [95].

Many QS actives are currently found in natural products. QS actives mainly exist in the methanol extraction part of the extract. In addition, in small molecule actives with well-defined structures, we find that these compounds often contain aldehyde and ketone structures and that these small molecule compounds are often also active ingredients of the natural product. The structural analogs of these compounds can guide the discovery of QS active substances. The composition of most QS actives is complex and further screening of single and high-efficiency QS active substances is required.

5. Conclusions

Bacteria regulate gene expression in a population-dependent manner by sensing the levels of autoinducer molecules that modulate the external environment. QS plays a vital role in bacterial biofilm formation, virulence factor regulation, and antibiotic formation. Natural compounds regulate QS between bacteria by controlling gene expression, biofilm formation, and the production of virulence factors.

To date, progress has been made regarding the development of drugs based on QS. For example, libraries of nonnative AHLs have been designed and synthesized. Modulators of the R protein of A. tumefaciens, P. aeruginosa, and V. fischeri have been identified. The structural characteristics of these proteins should lead to the development of related drugs [96]. Altering the structure of these derivatives can overcome the problem of species specificity. A synthetic analog (QS0108) was synthesized based on the molecular structure of P. aeruginosa, which when conjugated to ciprofloxacin, significantly inhibited the nascent and mature biofilms of P. aeruginosa [97]. A1-2 analogs bearing aromatic rings have also been synthesized in C-5 aromatic substituted furanones that inhibit biofilm formation and virulence production in P. aeruginosa [37].

In addition, key proteins in the QS system have been studied. Nonnatural triaryl series LasR ligands can be screened through the combination of structure-activity relationships and computational modeling. Strategies to induce LasR antagonism were proposed, and the key structural characteristics of this ligand class were defined [98].

Studies have confirmed that RNAIII-inhibiting peptide (RIP) prevents experimental Staphylococcal (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis) infections. These act as effective staphylococcus inhibitors. Virtual screening of RIP-based pharmacophores was performed through a database, and 2,5-di-O-galloyl-d-hamamelose (hamamelitannin) was selected as a nonpeptide analog of RIP. Further studies confirmed that hamamelitannin reduces the colonization of memeticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis strains in mice. Hamamelitannin can be used as an inhibitor of staphylococcal infections. An in-depth investigation of quorum-sensing control may lead to the development of such novel antipathogenic drugs [99].

Natural products are lead compounds in drug discovery. Natural products regulate QS and alter the group behavior of some bacteria, but the material basis and mechanisms of action that alleviate human disease remain unclear, and its specific target and mode of action for regulating bacterial QS are poorly defined. Most natural product QS actives are complex extracts, not single compounds. The specific mechanism of these components in the QS system is still unclear. Which of these complex components has better activity on the QS system needs further research. Moreover, how natural products with vastly different structures and physicochemical properties act on QS genes remains unclear. Therefore, we believe that research in this field should focus on the screening of high-efficiency QS active substances from natural product, explore their influence on key nodes of QS, and clarify the specificity of active substances and their targets.

At present, studies on bacterial biofilms and virulence factors by natural products have received increasing attention, such as controlling the formation of biofilms and the production of virulence factors by affecting the expression of related genes and through competitive binding with signaling molecules. Whether natural products participate in other biological aspects of QS, such as the formation of bacterial antibiotics, DNA transfer, and bioluminescence, are less well studied. Moreover, studies on the natural products of QS remain in their. Most studies have focused on in vitro experiments, but the natural products on QS must be assessed in complex organisms. At present, both quorum sensing and quorum quenching are research hotspots. In the future, we should pay attention to the application of QS inhibitors and QS agonists. The widespread application of QS to clinical therapeutics and production and living is the focus of future research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conficts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 81660684, 81760733, and 81960710), the Application and Basis Research Project of Yunnan China (Grants 2018FF001-(005)), and the Key research and development projects of Yunnan China (Grants 2019IB009).

References

M. Whiteley, S. P. Diggle, and E. P. Greenberg, “Progress in and promise of bacterial quorum sensing research,” Nature, vol. 551, no. 7680, pp. 313–320, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. H. Nealson, T. Platt, and J. W. Hastings, “Cellular control of the synthesis and activity of the bacterial luminescent system,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 313–322, 1970.
View at: Google Scholar
K. H. Nealson, “Autoinduction of bacterial luciferase. Occurrence, mechanism and significance,” Archives of Microbiology, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 73–79, 1977.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. P. Greenberg, J. W. Hastings, and S. Ulitzur, “Induction of luciferase synthesis in Beneckea harveyi by other marine bacteria,” Archives of Microbiology, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 87–91, 1979.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Engebrecht, K. Nealson, and M. Silverman, “Bacterial bioluminescence: isolation and genetic analysis of functions from Vibrio fischeri,” Cell, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 773–781, 1983.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Engebrecht and M. Silverman, “Identification of genes and gene products necessary for bacterial bioluminescence,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 81, no. 13, pp. 4154–4158, 1984.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Eberhard, A. L. Burlingame, C. Eberhard, G. L. Kenyon, K. H. Nealson, and N. J. Oppenheimer, “Structural identification of autoinducer of Photobacterium fischeri luciferase,” Biochemistry, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 2444–2449, 1981.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. C. Fuqua, S. C. Winans, and E. P. Greenberg, “Quorum sensing in bacteria: the LuxR-LuxI family of cell density-responsive transcriptional regulators,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 176, no. 2, pp. 269–275, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Arthur, E. Perez-Chanona, M. Mühlbauer et al., “Intestinal inflammation targets cancer-inducing activity of the microbiota,” Science, vol. 338, no. 6103, pp. 120–123, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Liu, L. Yang, Y. Han, W. Ouyang, W. Yin, and F. Xu, “Mast cells participate in regulation of lung-gut axis during Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia,” Cell Proliferation, vol. 52, no. 2, article e12565, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Kishida, Y. Kato-Mori, and K. Hagiwara, “Influence of changes in the intestinal microflora on the immune function in mice,” The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 440–446, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Kaliannan, R. C. Robertson, K. Murphy et al., “Estrogen-mediated gut microbiome alterations influence sexual dimorphism in metabolic syndrome in mice,” Microbiome, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 205, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Yan, W. Wei, W. Shan et al., “Linking gut microbiota, metabolic syndrome and economic status based on a population-level analysis,” Microbiome, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 172, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Ran, C. Zhou, L. Xu et al., “Initial detection of the quorum sensing autoinducer activity in the rumen of goats in vivo and in vitro,” Journal of Integrative Agriculture, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 2343–2352, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. M. Waters and B. L. Bassler, “Quorum sensing: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria,” Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 21, pp. 319–346, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Vadakkan, A. A. Choudhury, R. Gunasekaran, J. Hemapriya, and S. Vijayanand, “Quorum sensing intervened bacterial signaling: pursuit of its cognizance and repression,” Journal, Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 239–252, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Mhedbi-Hajri, P. Malfaetti, J. Pédron, S. Gaubert, S. Reverchon, and F. Van Gijsegem, “PecS is an important player in the regulatory network governing the coordinated expression of virulence genes during the interaction between Dickeya dadantii 3937 and plants,” Environmental Microbiology, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 2901–2914, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Slater, M. Crow, L. Everson, and G. P. Salmond, “Phosphate availability regulates biosynthesis of two antibiotics, prodigiosin and carbapenem, in Serratia via both quorum-sensing-dependent and -independent pathways,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 303–320, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Kjaerulff, A. Nielsen, M. Mansson et al., “Identification of four new agr quorum sensing-interfering cyclodepsipeptides from a marine Photobacterium,” Marine Drugs, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 5051–5062, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. T. Rutherford and B. L. Bassler, “Bacterial quorum sensing: its role in virulence and possibilities for its control,” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, vol. 2, no. 11, article a012427, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Rieu, S. Weidmann, D. Garmyn, P. Piveteau, and J. Guzzo, “Agr system of Listeria monocytogenes EGD-e: role in adherence and differential expression pattern,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 73, no. 19, pp. 6125–6133, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Ali, M. U. Goraya, Y. Arafat, M. Ajmal, J. L. Chen, and D. Yu, “Molecular mechanism of quorum-sensing in Enterococcus faecalis: its role in virulence and therapeutic approaches,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 18, no. 5, p. 960, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. H. J. Sturme, M. Kleerebezem, J. Nakayama, A. D. L. Akkermans, E. E. Vaughan, and W. M. Vos, “Cell to cell communication by autoinducing peptides in Gram-positive bacteria,” Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, vol. 81, no. 1-4, pp. 233–243, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. T. Miller, K. B. Xavier, S. R. Campagna et al., “Salmonella typhimurium recognizes a chemically distinct form of the bacterial quorum-sensing signal AI-2,” Molecular Cell, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 677–687, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Guo, S. Gamby, Y. Zheng, and H. O. Sintim, “Small molecule inhibitors of AI-2 signaling in bacteria: state-of-the-art and future perspectives for anti-quorum sensing agents,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 17694–17728, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Ma, L. Hao, H. Ke et al., “LuxS/AI-2 in Streptococcus agalactiae reveals a key role in acid tolerance and virulence,” Research in Veterinary Science, vol. 115, pp. 501–507, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Zhang, X. Ku, X. Zhang et al., “The AI-2/ luxS quorum sensing system affects the growth characteristics, biofilm formation, and virulence of Haemophilus parasuis,” Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, vol. 9, no. 62, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. E. Torres-Cerna, J. A. Morales, and E. A. Hernandez-Vargas, “Modeling quorum sensing dynamics and interference on Escherichia coli,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 10, p. 1835, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Walters and V. Sperandio, “Autoinducer 3 and epinephrine signaling in the kinetics of locus of enterocyte effacement gene expression in enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 74, no. 10, pp. 5445–5455, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. W. He and L. H. Zhang, “Quorum sensing and virulence regulation in Xanthomonas campestris,” FEMS Microbiology Reviews, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 842–857, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Ling, L. Zhou, G. Wu, Y. Zhao, T. Jiang, and F. Liu, “The AHL quorum-sensing system negatively regulates growth and autolysis in Lysobacter brunescens,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 10, p. 2748, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Papenfort and B. L. Bassler, “Quorum sensing signal-response systems in Gram-negative bacteria,” Nature Reviews. Microbiology, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 576–588, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Lee, J. Wu, Y. Deng et al., “A cell-cell communication signal integrates quorum sensing and stress response,” Nature Chemical Biology, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 339–343, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. L. Bassler, M. Wright, R. E. Showalter, and M. R. Silverman, “Intercellular signalling in Vibrio harveyi: sequence and function of genes regulating expression of luminescence,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 773–786, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Fleitas Martínez, P. O. Rigueiras, Á. D. S. Pires et al., “Interference with quorum-sensing signal biosynthesis as a promising therapeutic strategy against multidrug-resistant pathogens,” Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, vol. 8, p. 444, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. L. Fischer, R. J. White, K. F. Mares, D. E. Molnau, and J. J. Donato, “ucFabV requires functional reductase activity to confer reduced Triclosan susceptibility in Escherichia coli,” Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 394–402, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Chang, P. C. Wang, H. M. Ma et al., “Design, synthesis and evaluation of halogenated furanone derivatives as quorum sensing inhibitors in Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 140, article 105058, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Kusada, H. Tamaki, Y. Kamagata, S. Hanada, and N. Kimura, “A novel quorum-quenching N-acylhomoserine lactone acylase from Acidovorax sp. strain MR-S7 mediates antibiotic resistance,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 83, no. 13, p. 13, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Sun, X. He, V. F. Brancaccio, J. Yuan, and C. U. Riedel, “Bifidobacteria exhibit LuxS-dependent autoinducer 2 activity and biofilm formation,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 2, article e88260, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Song, Q. Qin, T. Li et al., “Impact of carbohydrates on autoinducer-2 secretion of Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum BBMN68,” Letters in Applied Microbiology, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 340–346, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Asahara, K. Shimizu, K. Nomoto, T. Hamabata, A. Ozawa, and Y. Takeda, “Probiotic bifidobacteria protect mice from lethal infection with Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157:H7,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 2240–2247, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Li, X. Yang, G. Shi, J. Chang, Z. Liu, and M. Zeng, “Cooperation of lactic acid bacteria regulated by the AI-2/LuxS system involve in the biopreservation of refrigerated shrimp,” Food Research International, vol. 120, pp. 679–687, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Onbas, O. Osmanagaoglu, and F. Kiran, “Potential properties of Lactobacillus plantarum F-10 as a bio-control strategy for wound infections,” Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1110–1123, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Valdéz, M. C. Peral, M. Rachid, M. Santana, and G. Perdigón, “Interference of Lactobacillus plantarum with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in vitro and in infected burns: the potential use of probiotics in wound treatment,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 472–479, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Kim, J. Kim, Y. Kim et al., “Influences of quorum-quenching probiotic bacteria on the gut microbial community and immune function in weaning pigs,” Animal Science Journal, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 412–422, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Wasfi, O. A. Abd El-Rahman, M. M. Zafer, and H. M. Ashour, “Probiotic Lactobacillus sp. inhibit growth, biofilm formation and gene expression of caries-inducing Streptococcus mutans,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 1972–1983, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. S. Y. Lee and K. P. Song, “LuxS/autoinducer-2 quorum sensing molecule regulates transcriptional virulence gene expression in Clostridium difficile,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communicationssss, vol. 335, no. 3, pp. 659–666, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. E. Kiymaci, N. Altanlar, M. Gumustas, S. A. Ozkan, and A. Akin, “Quorum sensing signals and related virulence inhibition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by a potential probiotic strain's organic acid,” Microbial Pathogenesis, vol. 121, pp. 190–197, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. A. Acobi, S. Grundler, C. J. Hsieh et al., “Quorum sensing in the probiotic bacterium Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 (Mutaflor) - evidence that furanosyl borate diester (AI-2) is influencing the cytokine expression in the DSS colitis mouse model,” Gut Pathogens, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 8, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. M. Ditu, M. C. Chifiriuc, E. Bezirtzoglou et al., “Modulation of virulence and antibiotic susceptibility of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli strains by Enterococcus faecium probiotic strain culture fractions,” Anaerobe, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 448–451, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. E. Vidal, H. P. Ludewick, R. M. Kunkel, D. Zähner, and K. P. Klugman, “The LuxS-dependent quorum-sensing system regulates early biofilm formation by Streptococcus pneumoniae strain D39,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 79, no. 10, pp. 4050–4060, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. K. Yadav, J. E. Vidal, Y. Y. Go, S. H. Kim, S. W. Chae, and J. J. Song, “The LuxS/AI-2 quorum-sensing system of Streptococcus pneumoniae is required to cause disease, and to regulate virulence- and metabolism-related genes in a rat model of middle ear infection,” Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, vol. 8, p. 138, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Maura, R. Hazan, T. Kitao, A. E. Ballok, and L. G. Rahme, “Evidence for Direct Control of Virulence and Defense Gene Circuits by the _Pseudomonas aeruginosa_ Quorum Sensing Regulator, MvfR,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, article 34083, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. M. Høyland-Kroghsbo, J. Paczkowski, S. Mukherjee et al., “Quorum sensing controls the Pseudomonas aeruginosa CRISPR-Cas adaptive immune system,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 131–135, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Ma, S. Qiu, Q. Jiang et al., “AI-2 quorum sensing negatively regulates rbf expression and biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus,” International Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 307, pp. 257–267, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Piewngam, Y. Zheng, T. H. Nguyen et al., “Pathogen elimination by probiotic Bacillus via signalling interference,” Nature, vol. 562, no. 7728, pp. 532–537, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. D. Hernandezdoria, “Biofilm formation in Escherichia coli and regulatory gene expression via quorum sensing systems,” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 1582–1587, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
K. H. Oh and S. H. Cho, “Interaction between the quorum sensing and stringent response regulation systems in the enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 EDL933 strain,” Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 401–407, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Mahdhi, N. Leban, I. Chakroun et al., “Use of extracellular polysaccharides, secreted by Lactobacillus plantarum and Bacillus spp., as reducing indole production agents to control biofilm formation and efflux pumps inhibitor in Escherichia coli,” Microbial Pathogenesis, vol. 125, pp. 448–453, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Kim, S. Oh, and S. H. Kim, “Released exopolysaccharide (r-EPS) produced from probiotic bacteria reduce biofilm formation of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 379, no. 2, pp. 324–329, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Miyazaki, S. Kamiya, T. Hanawa et al., “Effect of probiotic bacterial strains of Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Enterococcus on enteroaggregative Escherichia coli,” Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 10–18, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Mahdhi, N. Leban, I. Chakroun et al., “The Enterococcus faecalis fsrB gene, a key component of the fsr quorum-sensing system, is associated with virulence in the rabbit endophthalmitis model,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 70, no. 8, pp. 4678–4681, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. He, J. Liang, W. Zhou et al., “Effect of the quorum-sensing luxS gene on biofilm formation by Enterococcus faecalis,” European Journal of Oral Sciences, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 234–240, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Biswas, P. Mukherjee, T. Manna et al., “Quorum sensing autoinducer(s) and flagellum independently mediate EPS signaling in Vibrio cholerae through LuxO-independent mechanism,” Microbial Ecology, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 616–630, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Mao, A. Cubillos-Ruiz, D. E. Cameron, and J. J. Collins, “Probiotic strains detect and suppress cholera in mice,” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 10, article eaao2586, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. L. Nesse, K. Berg, L. K. Vestby, I. Olsaker, and B. Djønne, “Salmonella Typhimurium invasion of HEp-2 epithelial cells in vitro is increased by N-acylhomoserine lactone quorum sensing signals,” Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, vol. 53, p. 44, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Abed, O. Grépinet, S. Canepa et al., “Direct regulation of the pefI-srgC operon encoding the Rck invasin by the quorum-sensing regulator SdiA in Salmonella Typhimurium,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 254–271, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. M. Husain, I. Ahmad, F. I. Khan et al., “Seed extract of Psoralea corylifolia and its constituent bakuchiol impairs AHL-based quorum sensing and biofilm formation in food- and human-related pathogens,” Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, vol. 8, p. 351, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. A. S. Vasantha Packiavathy, P. Agilandeswari, K. S. Musthafa, S. K. Pandian, and A. V. Ravi, “Antibiofilm and quorum sensing inhibitory potential of Cuminum cyminum and its secondary metabolite methyl eugenol against Gram negative bacterial pathogens,” Food Research International, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 85–92, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Dettweiler, J. T. Lyles, K. Nelson et al., “American Civil War plant medicines inhibit growth, biofilm formation, and quorum sensing by multidrug-resistant bacteria,” Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, article 7692, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Li, X. Han, R. Li et al., “Composition, antivirulence activity, and active property distribution of the fruit of Terminalia chebula Retz,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 84, pp. 1721–1729, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. B. Pederson, Y. Dong, L. B. Blue, S. V. Smith, and M. Cao, “Water-soluble cranberry extract inhibits Vibrio cholerae biofilm formation possibly through modulating the second messenger 3', 5' - Cyclic diguanylate level,” PLoS One, vol. 13, no. 11, article e0207056, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. D. Oliveira, A. C. Rodrigues, B. M. I. Cardoso et al., “Antioxidant, antimicrobial and anti-quorum sensing activities of Rubus rosaefolius phenolic extract,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 84, pp. 59–66, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. A. Packiavathy, S. Priya, S. K. Pandian, and A. V. Ravi, “Inhibition of biofilm development of uropathogens by curcumin - an anti-quorum sensing agent from Curcuma longa,” Food Chemistry, vol. 148, pp. 453–460, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. B. Bali, K. E. Türkmen, D. Erdönmez, and N. Sağlam, “Comparative study of inhibitory potential of dietary phytochemicals against quorum sensing activity of and biofilm formation by Chromobacterium violaceum 12472, and swimming and swarming behaviour of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1,” Food technology and biotechnology, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 212–221, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hentzer, K. Riedel, T. B. Rasmussen et al., “Inhibition of quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm bacteria by a halogenated furanone compound,” Microbiology, vol. 148, no. 1, pp. 87–102, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. H. Lee, Y. G. Kim, H. S. Cho, S. Y. Ryu, M. H. Cho, and J. Lee, “Coumarins reduce biofilm formation and the virulence of Escherichia coli O157:H7,” Phytomedicine, vol. 21, no. 8-9, pp. 1037–1042, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Zhang and W. H. Chu, “Anti-quorum sensing activity of Forsythia suspense on Chromobacterium violaceum and Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” Pharmacognosy Magazine, vol. 13, no. 50, pp. 321–325, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Wei, P. Bhasme, Z. Wang et al., “Chinese medicinal herb extract inhibits PQS-mediated quorum sensing system in Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 248, article 112272, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Zhu, W. Liu, B. Tian, H. Liu, and S. Ning, “Inhibition of quorum sensing in the opportunistic pathogenic bacterium Chromobacterium violaceum by an extract from fruiting bodies of Lingzhi or Reishi medicinal mushroom, Ganoderma lucidum (W.Curt.:Fr.) P. Karst. (higher Basidiomycetes),” International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 559–564, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Krishnan, W. F. Yin, and K. G. Chan, “Inhibition of quorum sensing-controlled virulence factor production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 by Ayurveda spice clove (Syzygium aromaticum) bud extract,” Sensors, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 4016–4030, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Gupta, S. P. Singh, A. K. Manhar et al., “Inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm and virulence by active fraction of Syzygium cumini (L.) Skeels leaf extract: in-vitro and in silico studies,” Indian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 13–21, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. K. Tiwary, R. Ghosh, S. Moktan et al., “Prospective bacterial quorum sensing inhibitors from Indian medicinal plant extracts,” Letters in Applied Microbiology, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 2–10, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Y. Tan, W. F. Yin, and K. G. Chan, “Silencing quorum sensing through extracts of Melicope lunu-ankenda,” Sensors, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 4339–4351, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Vijayakumar and T. Ramanathan, “Musa acuminata and its bioactive metabolite 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural mitigates quorum sensing (las and rhl) mediated biofilm and virulence production of nosocomial pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa in vitro,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 246, article 112242, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Hossain, S. J. Lee, J. Y. Park et al., “Modulation of quorum sensing-controlled virulence factors by Nymphaea tetragona (water lily) extract,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 174, pp. 482–491, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. H. Lee, J. H. Park, J. A. Kim et al., “Low concentrations of honey reduce biofilm formation, quorum sensing, and virulence in Escherichia coli O157:H7,” Biofouling, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 1095–1104, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Cosa, S. K. Chaudhary, W. Chen, S. Combrinck, and A. Viljoen, “Exploring common culinary herbs and spices as potential anti-quorum sensing agents,” Nutrients, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 739, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. L. Quave, J. T. Lyles, J. S. Kavanaugh, K. Nelson, C. P. Parlet, and H. A. Crosby, “Castanea sativa (European Chestnut) leaf extracts rich in ursene and oleanene derivatives block Staphylococcus aureus virulence and pathogenesis without detectable resistance,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 8, article e0136486, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Li, C. Yan, Y. Xu et al., “Punicalagin inhibits Salmonella Virulence factors and has anti-quorum-sensing potential,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 80, no. 19, pp. 6204–6211, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Ş. Doğan, B. Gökalsın, İ. Şenkardeş, A. Doğan, and N. C. Sesal, “Anti-quorum sensing and anti-biofilm activities of Hypericum perforatum extracts against Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 235, pp. 293–300, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Gökalsın, B. Aksoydan, B. Erman, and N. C. Sesal, “Reducing virulence and biofilm of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by potential quorum sensing inhibitor carotenoid: zeaxanthin,” Microbial Ecology, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 466–473, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Wu, W. Huang, Q. Duan, F. Li, and H. Cheng, “Sodium houttuyfonate affects production of N-acyl homoserine lactone and quorum sensing-regulated genes expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 5, p. 635, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Yin, H. Yin, Y. Deng et al., “Tea polyphenols as an antivirulence compound Disrupt Quorum-Sensing Regulated Pathogenicity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, no. 1, article 16158, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. X. V. Quecan, J. T. C. Santos, M. L. C. Rivera, N. M. A. Hassimotto, F. A. Almeida, and U. M. Pinto, “Effect of quercetin rich onion extracts on bacterial quorum sensing,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 10, p. 867, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. D. Geske, J. C. O'Neill, D. M. Miller, M. E. Mattmann, and H. E. Blackwell, “Modulation of bacterial quorum sensing with synthetic ligands: systematic evaluation of N-acylated homoserine lactones in multiple species and new insights into their mechanisms of action,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 129, no. 44, pp. 13613–13625, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Ganguly, R. Wu, M. Ollivault-Shiflett, P. M. Goodwin, L. A. Silks III, and R. Iyer, “Design, synthesis, and a novel application of quorum-sensing agonists as potential drug-delivery vehicles,” Journal of Drug Targeting, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 528–539, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. N. Capilato, S. V. Philippi, T. Reardon et al., “Development of a novel series of non-natural triaryl agonists and antagonists of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa LasR quorum sensing receptor,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 153–165, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. D. Kiran, N. V. Adikesavan, O. Cirioni et al., “Discovery of a quorum-sensing inhibitor of drug-resistant staphylococcal infections by structure-based virtual screening,” Molecular Pharmacology, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 1578–1586, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2020 Min Yang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

2625

Downloads

1627

Citations