Research Article

Early Learning Curve in the Assessment of Deep Pelvic Endometriosis for Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Table 2

Agreement with experts and laparoscopy.

Trainee–expert agreementTrainee–laparoscopy/histology agreement
UltrasoundMRIUltrasoundMRI

Patients in 3 blocks (total number of lesions)1st block2nd block3rd block1st block2nd block3rd block1st block2nd block3rd block1st block2nd block3rd block
 Frozen pelvis overall290.8000.9410.9330.7210.6090.8360.3510.7130.8000.0440.0270.267
 Uterosacral ligaments250.3570.5710.3940.9030.583-0.023 (NS)0.2310.1000.191 (NS)0.4740.4890.083 (NS)
 Bowel (R, RS)190.330 (NS)0.6571.0000.6570.667 (NS)0.6210.333 (NS)0.6570.5600.471 (NS)0.833 (NS)0.298 (NS)
 Endometriomas180.6970.4670.760.8171.0000.6810.6970.6470.7830.8140.6250.681
 Adenomyosis90.571 (NS)0.800 (NS)1.000 (NS)0 (NS)0.400 (NS)0.421 (NS)Not computerised
 Vagina10Not computerised
 Rectovaginal septum4Not computerised
 Total pelvis0.5830.7080.7350.7840.6270.5920.3970.5420.4830.4790.5920.474
Patients in 2 blocks1st block2nd block1st block2nd block1st block2nd block1st block2nd block
 Bladder81.0001.0000.8241.0000.6671.0000.6671.000

DE: deep endometriosis; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; R: rectum; RS: rectosigmoid. NS: statistically not significant result (). Adenomyosis was not assessed against surgical reference standard because only 1 patient had a hysterectomy, vaginal DE not was computerised since none of the 10 lesions were detected on the trainee imaging, and rectovaginal septum DE not was computerised due to low prevalence (2 nodules in the 1st block, 1 lesion in the 2nd block, 1 lesion in the 3rd block).