Spinous Process Inclination in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Individuals

Abbas, Janan; Peled, Natan; Hershkovitz, Israel; Hamoud, Kamal

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8875217

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 | Article ID 8875217 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8875217

Spinous Process Inclination in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Individuals

Janan Abbas,^1,2Natan Peled,³Israel Hershkovitz,¹and Kamal Hamoud^2,4,5

Academic Editor: Parisa Azimi

Received28 Sept 2020

Revised22 Nov 2020

Accepted30 Nov 2020

Published15 Dec 2020

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the sagittal inclination of lumbar spinous processes (SPs) in individuals with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS). It is a retrospective computerized tomography (CT) study including 345 individuals divided into two groups: control (90 males, 90 females) and stenosis (80 males and 85 females. The SP inclination was measured in the midsagittal plane from L1 to L5 levels. Stenosis males (L3-L5) and females (L1, L4) manifested significantly greater SP inclination compared to their counterparts in the control group. Males had significantly horizontal SP orientation compared to females (L1, L2). We also found that SP inclination became steeper as we descend caudally. This study indicates that SP inclinations are significantly associated with DLSS.

1. Introduction

Lumbar spinous process (SP) morphometry has become an interesting issue for application in spine surgery. Surgical procedures associated with the SPs are supposed to be easy and quick, with minimal blood loss and soft-tissue disturbance. Previous studies regarding SP morphometry have focused essentially on age-related bony changes [1, 2], gender discrepancy, and the differences between lumbar levels [3–5]. Others have investigated SP biomechanical properties [6, 7] and their morphology regarding the spine devices and surgical techniques [8–10].

Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) is a common disorder in the elderly population related to degeneration of the spine segment. Additionally, it may narrow the spinal canal and the neural foramen leading to compression of the neural elements [11, 12]. One of the surgical treatments proposed to those with mild clinical presentation of DLSS is the minimally invasive interspinous devices [13, 14]. Although the insertion of these devices depends on the orientation and size of lumbar SPs, few studies have addressed this issue. We also believe that information regarding SP inclination may improve the efficacy of interspinous process devices and shed light on degenerative changes of the posterior elements of the spine.

The aims of this study were (1) to determine the sagittal inclination of lumbar SPs in individuals with DLSS compared to the general population and (2) to establish whether SP inclination is associated with age, gender, and lumbar levels.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

This was a retrospective study including 165 individuals with DLSS-related symptoms who were enrolled between 2008 and 2012. The age range was 40-88 years (sex ratio: 80 M/85 F) with one or more levels with stenosis (cross section area of dural sac < 100 mm²) [15]. The diagnostic criteria for DLSS were based on the combination of clinical symptoms and signs together with the computerized tomography (CT) findings [16]. The exclusion criteria were individuals under 40 years of age as well as those with congenital stenosis () [17], fractures, spondylolysis, tumors, Paget’s disease, steroid treatment, severe lumbar scoliosis (>20 degrees), and iatrogenic conditions.

A control group () without spinal stenosis-related symptoms were referred at the same period to the Department of Radiology, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel, for abdominal CT scans due to abdominal problems. The age range was 40-99 years (sex ratio: 90 M/90 F).

2.2. Computed Tomography (CT) Scans

A high-resolution CT image (Brilliance 64, Philips Medical Systems; voltage: 120 kV; slice thickness: 0.9–3 mm; current: 150–570 mA) was utilized which enabled scan processing in all planes. All the CT images for both groups were taken in supine position with extended knee. This research was approved by the ethical committee of the Carmel Medical Center (0083-07-CMC).

2.3. Spinous Process Inclination (SPI)

Spinous process inclination was measured in the midsagittal plane and defined as the angle between the longitudinal axis of the spinous process and the posterior border of the same vertebral body (Figure 1).

The cross-sectional area of the dural sac [18], lumbar lordosis, and intervertebral disc height [19] were also evaluated in the current study.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The statistical analyses were calculated via SPSS version 20. Independent -test analysis was used for each gender separately to compare between the study groups (stenosis and control) for age, BMI, and SP inclination. One-way ANOVA and Pearson’s correlation tests were performed to determine the association between SP inclination and lumbar levels, lumbar lordosis, and disc height, respectively. A logistic regression analysis via the “Forward LR” method (separately for gender) was also used to determine the association between SP inclination and DLSS (dependent variable: DLSS; independent variable: SP inclination, age, and BMI).

The intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficients were calculated to determine the intratester and intertester reliability of the measurements taken (repeated measurements of 20 individuals). Intratester reliability of the measurements was assessed by one of the authors (JA) who took the measurements twice within intervals of 3-5 days. Intertester reliability involved two testers (JA and KH), who took the measurements within an hour of each other. Both testers were blinded to the results of the measurements. Significant difference was set at .

3. Results

The intratester and intertester reliability results for all the measurements were high: 0.984 to 0.933 and 0.942 to 0.890, respectively.

3.1. SP Inclination in the Study Groups (Control vs. Stenosis)

The mean values of age and BMI in the study groups for each gender separately are presented in Table 1.

In all participants, we found that SP inclination angles were significantly greater in the stenosis males (L3-L5) and females (L1-L5) compared to their counterparts in the control group (Table 1). It is noteworthy that this trend was maintained when we did the comparison only for older subjects (>60 year); however, significant differences in females were observed only on the L1 level (Table 1). The outcomes of the logistic regression analysis (adjusted for age and BMI) revealed that more horizontal SP inclinations in males (L3, L5) and females (L1, L4) are significantly associated with DLSS (Table 2).

3.2. SP Inclination and Age, Gender, Lumbar Levels, Disc Height, and Lumbar Lordosis

Analysis in the control group () revealed that males had significantly greater SP inclination (more horizontal) than females at the L1 ( vs. , ) and L2 ( vs. , ) levels.

In general, SP inclinations for males (L1, L2) and females (L3, L5) became more horizontal with increasing age (Table 3). At nearly all lumbar levels, the inclination of SPs was found to be more vertical/steep as we descend caudally; however, the difference achieved significance only for the male group: L2 and L3, L4 and L5 levels (). In addition, SP inclination was neither correlated with lumbar lordosis nor with adjacent disc height.

4. Discussion

Our results indicate that lumbar SP inclinations (adjusted for BMI and age) for both males (L3, L5) and females (L1, L4) are significantly associated with DLSS. We found that SP inclinations in DLSS individuals were remarkably horizontally oriented relative to the posterior vertebral border compared to the control. Our results also showed that the differences in SP inclination for each gender seem to be age-related variations. For example, the greater differences in SP inclination for males were seen in subjects above 60 years, whereas those for females were supposed to be in subjects between 40 and 60 years old. We believe that this result could support the notion that gender dimorphism affects the prevalence and severity of lumbar spine degeneration [20, 21].

Even though lumbar SP morphology information (e.g., height and width) has been used previously for interspinous process devices, we have found no study in the literature that has addressed the SP inclination in lumbar spinal stenosis individuals. Therefore, others could not confirm our results.

DLSS is correlated with degenerative changes in the three-joint complex and ligamentum flavum thickness [11, 22]. Moreover, the prevalence of this phenomenon increases with age [12, 23]. Intermittent claudication is the main symptom of DLSS that usually worsens in extension and walking and improves in flexion or sitting [24, 25].

The lumbar spinous process is one of the posterior elements of the spine that protects the neural structures in the dural canal and stabilizes the spine unit segment [26]. The interspinous process decompression devices (e.g., XSTOP) provide a minimally invasive technique for DLSS patients with mild symptoms [27]. These devices reduce extension at the symptomatic level(s), intrathecal pressure, and facet load; stretch the ligamentum flavum; and enlarge the neural foramens, thus improving spinal stenosis symptoms [10, 28, 29]. In 2012, Kim et al. have previously reported a strong association between degenerative spondylolisthesis and SP fractures in patients who underwent X-stop devices [9]. The authors believe that the placement of these devices causes destabilization of lumbar segments affected by degenerative spondylolisthesis. One study has recently reported that disc degeneration and fusion intervention correlate with district kinematic alterations of interspinous processes at the involved level [26]. Moreover, spinous process slope has a direct bearing on the efficacy of interspinous process devices to achieve indirect decompression of the canal and neuroforamina [5]. Accordingly, we assume that variations in SP inclination such as horizontal orientation could harm the spine stability due to alterations on the axial loading between the anterior and posterior column.

Our finding in the control group showed that the lumbar SP inclination angle became smaller from L1 to L5. This result is supported by a previous study in which measurements were based on dry skeletal cadavers (2955 human lumbar vertebrae) and found that SP slope became steeper as we descend caudally [5]. We also believe that this result partially supports the notion that the maximal slope of the L5 SP in the general population makes the surgery at the L4 and L5 levels less effective compared to horizontal SPs (L1 through L4) [5].

Similar to the latter study, we also demonstrate significant correlations (on some levels) between SP inclination and age. Although the correlation values are weak (range: 0.221-0.291, ), it seems that SP inclination became more horizontal in advanced age. We believe that this association could in part be from age-related changes in SP morphology the same as for height and width [1, 2, 30]. With regard to gender, females manifest smaller SP inclination angle at the L1 and L2 levels. Indeed, this trend was noted previously, when Shaw et al. reported that female specimens had generally steeper SP slope than males [5].

It is noteworthy that our SP measurements have some superiority, as the posterior vertebral border (axis reference) is not prone to any age-related changes such as osteoporotic changes of the vertebral body or degenerative changes of the upper end plates that could influence the orientation of the SP, relative to the upper end plate.

Finally, although it is unclear whether the variation of SP inclination in subjects with DLSS is a primary manifestation or secondary process due to aging, we assume that this unique characteristic has a role in the pathogenesis of DLSS. However, the mechanism of SP orientation resulting in DLSS has not been elucidated in detail.

4.1. Clinical Implication

As males (L3, L5) and females (L1, L5) with DLSS are candidates for horizontally oriented lumbar SPs, this implies that the efficacy of interspinous devices could be greater at these levels; in addition, spinal/epidural injections could be easier to perform compared with other levels. We also believe that surgeons should take into consideration the fact that SP orientation could be different in subjects with herniated nucleus pulposis, disc disease, lumbar instability, and spinal stenosis when using different interspinous devices [27, 31, 32].

4.2. Limitation of the Study

This is a retrospective study, and the outcomes should be supported by well-established prospective studies with large numbers of participants with DLSS. In addition, SP measurements for height, thickness, and width are needed to shed light on the development of DLSS.

5. Conclusion

Our results indicate that SP inclinations for both males (L3, L5) and females (L1, L4) are significantly associated with DLSS. Additionally, SP inclinations (on some levels) are dependent for age, gender, and lumbar level.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Dan David Foundation, the Israel Science Foundation (Grant number 1397/08), and the Tassia and Dr. Joseph Meychan Chair for the History and Philosophy of Medicine, for funding this research. We also thank Mrs. Margie Serling Cohn and Mr. Chaim Cohen for their editorial assistance.

References

R. Scapinelli, “Morphological and functional changes of the lumbar spinous processes in the elderly,” Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 129–133, 1989.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. E. Aylott, R. Puna, P. A. Robertson, and C. Walker, “Spinous process morphology: the effect of ageing through adulthood on spinous process size and relationship to sagittal alignment,” European Spine Journal, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1007–1012, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. H. Ihm, I. B. Han, D. A. Shin, T. G. Kim, R. Huh, and S. S. Chung, “Spinous process morphometry for interspinous device implantation in Korean patients,” World Neurosurgery, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 172–176, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Ran, Q. Li, B. Yu, X. Chen, and K. Guo, “Morphometry of lumbar spinous process via three dimensional CT reconstruction in a Chinese population,” International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1129–1136, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
J. D. Shaw, D. L. Shaw, D. R. Cooperman, J. D. Eubanks, L. Li, and D. H. Kim, “Characterization of lumbar spinous process morphology: a cadaveric study of 2,955 human lumbar vertebrae,” The Spine Journal, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 1645–1652, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Xia, S. Wang, P. G. Passias et al., “In vivo range of motion of the lumbar spinous processes,” European Spine Journal, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 1355–1362, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Yao, S. Wang, J. H. Shin, G. Li, and K. Wood, “Motion characteristics of the lumbar spinous processes with degenerative disc disease and degenerative spondylolisthesis,” European Spine Journal, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 2702–2709, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. X. Lin, T.-K. Suen, J. Quillo-Olvera et al., “Dimensions of the spinous process and interspinous space: a morphometric study,” Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 1383–1390, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. H. Kim, N. Shanti, M. E. Tantorski et al., “Association between degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinous process fracture after interspinous process spacer surgery,” The Spine Journal, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 466–472, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Richards, S. Majumdar, D. P. Lindsey, G. S. Beaupré, and S. A. Yerby, “The treatment mechanism of an interspinous process implant for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication,” Spine, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 744–749, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Lurie and C. Tomkins-Lane, “Management of lumbar spinal stenosis,” BMJ, vol. 352, p. h6234, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Arbit and S. Pannullo, “Lumbar stenosis: a clinical review,” Clinical Orthopaedics, vol. 384, pp. 137–143, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. H. Oppenheimer, I. Decastro, and D. E. Mcdonnell, “Minimally invasive spine technology and minimally invasive spine surgery: a historical review,” Neurosurgical Focus, vol. 27, no. 3, article E9, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Talwar, D. P. Lindsey, A. Fredrick, K. Y. Hsu, J. F. Zucherman, and S. A. Yerby, “Insertion loads of the X STOP interspinous process distraction system designed to treat neurogenic intermittent claudication,” European Spine Journal, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 908–912, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. S. R. SCHONSTROM, N. F. BOLENDER, and D. M. SPENGLER, “The pathomorphology of spinal stenosis as seen on CT scans of the lumbar spine,” Spine, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 806–811, 1985.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Suri, J. Rainville, L. Kalichman, and J. N. Katz, “Does this older adult with lower extremity pain have the clinical syndrome of lumbar spinal stenosis?” JAMA, vol. 304, no. 23, pp. 2628–2636, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Verbiest, “Pathomorphologic aspects of developmental lumbar stenosis,” Orthopedic Clinics of North America, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 177–196, 1975.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Abbas, V. Slon, D. Stein, I. Hershkovitz, K. Hamoud, and K. Hamoud, “In the quest for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis etiology: the Schmorl’s nodes model,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorder, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 164, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Abbas, K. Hamoud, N. Peled, and I. Hershkovitz, “Lumbar Schmorl’s nodes and their correlation with spine configuration and degeneration,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2018, Article ID 1574020, 9 pages, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. X. Wang, J. F. Griffith, X. J. Zeng et al., “Prevalence and sex difference of lumbar disc space narrowing in elderly Chinese men and women: osteoporotic fractures in men (Hong Kong) and osteoporotic fractures in women (Hong Kong) studies,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 1004–1010, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. A. Manson, E. J. Goldberg, and G. B. Andersson, “Sexual dimorphism in degenerative disorders of the spine,” The Orthopedic Clinics of North America, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 549–553, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Abbas, K. Hamoud, Y. Masharawi et al., “Ligamentum flavum thickness in normal and stenotic lumbar spines,” Spine, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 1225–1230, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Spivak, “Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, vol. 80, no. 7, pp. 1053–1066, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Fujiwara, H. S. An, T.-H. Lim, and V. M. Haughton, “Morphologic changes in the lumbar intervertebral Foramen due to flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial Rotation,” Spine, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 876–882, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. PENNING and J. T. WILMINK, “Posture-dependent bilateral compression of L4 or L5 nerve roots in facet hypertrophy. A dynamic CT-myelographic study,” Spine, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 488–500, 1987.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Zhang, W. Huang, H. Xia, and X. Feng, “Kinematic characteristics of lumbar spinous processes during axial rotation in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease, lateral lumbar interbody fusion and intervention,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorder, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 141, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. F. Zucherman, K. Y. Hsu, C. A. Hartjen et al., “A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results,” European Spine Journal, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 22–31, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. E. Swanson, D. P. Lindsey, K. Y. Hsu, J. F. Zucherman, and S. A. Yerby, “The effects of an interspinous implant on intervertebral disc pressures,” Spine, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 26–32, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. M. Wiseman, D. P. Lindsey, A. D. Fredrick, and S. A. Yerby, “The effect of an interspinous process implant on facet loading during extension,” Spine, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 903–907, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. J. Sartoris, D. Resnick, R. Tyson, and P. Haghighi, “Age-related alterations in the vertebral spinous processes and intervening soft tissues: radiologic-pathologic correlation,” AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 145, no. 5, pp. 1025–1030, 1985.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Senegas, “Mechanical supplementation by non-rigid fixation in degenerative intervertebral segments: the Wallis system,” European Spine Journal, vol. 11, Supplement 2, pp. 164–169, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Caserta, G. la Maida, B. Misaggi et al., “Elastic stabilization alone or combined with rigid fusion in spinal surgery: a biomechanical study and clinical experience based on 82 cases,” European Spine Journal, vol. 11, no. S2, pp. S192–S197, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2020 Janan Abbas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

644

Downloads

993

Citations