Review Article
Comparison between Arm Port and Chest Port for Optimal Vascular Access Port in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Table 2
The subgroup analysis for the selected studies.
| Subgroups | No. of studies | AR [95%CI] | RR [95%CI] | RD [95%CI] | |
| Infection | Comparative | 4 | | 0.58[0.32–1.055] | | 0.074 | Arm | 5 | 0.027[0.003–0.051] | 1.63[0.97–2.75] | 0.02[−0.008–0.049] | 0.064 | Chest | 13 | 0.007[0.002–0.011] | | | | Thrombosis | | | | | | Comparative | 4 | | 2.23[1.04–4.79] | | 0.041 | Arm | 6 | 0.045[−0.002–0.093] | 1.21[1.02–1.43] | 0.003[−0.059–0.065] | 0.029 | Chest | 13 | 0.042[0.028–0.057] | | | |
|
|
AR: absolute risk; RR: risk ratio; RD: risk difference.
|