Research Article
Analysis of Clinical Factors, Bacterial Genotyping, and Drug Resistance for Spinal Tuberculosis in South-Central China
Table 4
Analysis of different MTB genotypes resistance to different ATDs (resistance rate: %).
| Drug species | Beijing type | Nonbeijing type | All strains | Drug-resistant strains | Resistance rate | Drug-resistant strains | Resistance rate | Drug-resistant strains | Resistance rate |
| INH | 17 | 62.96 | 4 | 14.81 | 21 | 37.5 | RFP | 16 | 59.26 | 3 | 11.11 | 19 | 33.93 | SM | 13 | 48.15 | 2 | 6.89 | 15 | 26.79 | EMB | 9 | 33.33 | 2 | 6.89 | 11 | 19.64 | CPM-SO4 | 3 | 11.11 | 1 | 3.70 | 4 | 7.14 | CPFX | 5 | 18.52 | 2 | 6.89 | 7 | 12.50 | OFLX | 4 | 14.81 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 7.14 | PTH | 1 | 3.70 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.79 | INH + RFP + SM | 10 | 37.04 | 2 | 6.89 | 12 | 21.43 | INH + RFP + SM + EMB | 8 | 29.63 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 14.29 | MDR | 15 | 55.56 | 2 | 6.89 | 17 | 30.36 | XDR | 4 | 14.81 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 7.14 |
|
|
Independent sample T test of drug resistance to different ATDs between Beijing and nonBeijing types, . |