Identification of Preferred Learning Style of Medical and Dental Students Using VARK Questionnaire

Fahim, Ayesha; Rehman, Saba; Fayyaz, Fariha; Javed, Mariyah; Alam, Muhammad Anwaar; Rana, Sadia; Jafari, Fahim Haider; Alam, Mohammad Khursheed

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4355158

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Ethical Approval Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 4355158 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4355158

Identification of Preferred Learning Style of Medical and Dental Students Using VARK Questionnaire

Ayesha Fahim,¹Saba Rehman,²Fariha Fayyaz,²Mariyah Javed,²Muhammad Anwaar Alam,²Sadia Rana,³Fahim Haider Jafari,⁴and Mohammad Khursheed Alam⁵

Academic Editor: Mauro Henrique Nogueira Guimarães Abreu

Received26 Aug 2021

Revised01 Oct 2021

Accepted05 Oct 2021

Published18 Oct 2021

Abstract

Students have unique preferences when it comes to knowledge acquisition, information processing, retention in memory, and recall. This study is aimed at examining the preferred learning styles of medical and dental undergraduate students of Pakistan. It is also aimed at investigating the influence of gender, preclinical or clinical academic year, and academic record on the preferred learning style. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in Pakistan. The learning styles of undergraduate students were identified using visual, aural, read/write, and kinesthetic (VARK) questionnaire. Students were also asked about their satisfaction towards teaching style of their teachers in institute. Descriptive statistics were done to characterize the learning styles of the students. The Fisher test and chi-square test were used to compare the learning preferences between genders and public/private sector students and among preclinical/clinical years. A value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. A total of 1473 students participated in the study. Among the students, 39.37% preferred unimodal learning style whereas 60.62% preferred multimodal style. Kinesthetic (K) and visual (V) were the most preferred unimodal styles. The preferred learning styles of female students are aural (A), visual (V), and kinesthetic (K), whereas male students preferred visual (V) and kinesthetic more (K). Students with lower academic record chose unimodal styles in comparison to high achievers that chose multimodal styles. Students of clinical year preferred multimodal and quadmodal styles in comparison to preclinical year students. An alarming 78% of students were dissatisfied with their teacher’s instructional style. Majority of students prefer multimodal learning styles over unimodal style. Gender, public/private sector, and academic record have influence on the preference of learning styles. Majority of the students are dissatisfied with their teacher’s instructional style and rely on social media platforms for understanding. Academics need to adapt their teaching methods according to student preferences in order to get better graduates.

1. Introduction

Education is the process of facilitating learning, or the acquisition of knowledge, skills, values, beliefs, and habits [1]. The manner in which a student prefers to acquire, process, memorize, and recall information is described as the individuals’ learning style [2]. Each individual has his own unique style of learning. A single student may adapt single or multiple modes of acquiring knowledge [3]. Academics view learning style in terms of factors that affect the learning of students due to individual preferences for physical, social, and the environmental elements in the course of learning [4].

For the past few decades, medical education has been rapidly shifting from teacher-centered passive to student-centered active approach. Thus, awareness about preferred learning style can be useful for both pupils and educators [5]. Instructors can modify their teaching according to learner’s preference by adapting multiple teaching modalities. Student motivation and performance improve when instruction is molded to student learning styles [6]. Similarly, knowing one’s learning style can minimize learning time, enhance student engagement in the process, and increase his learning outcome and efficiency [7].

Different models have been developed over time to indicate students’ overall approaches to learning and their perceptions of the teaching-learning environments. Popular models include Riechman and Grasha learning style [8], Dunn and Dunn learning style [9], Kolb’s learning style [10, 11], Gregorc learning style [11], Reid’s learning style [12], and McCarthy learning style [13].

Various studies have been conducted around the world in different departments to identify learning preference [14]. One of the most commonly used models is the VARK model designed by Fleming and Baume, which categorizes learning preferences into four modes of sensory pathways: visual (V), aural (A), read/write (R), and kinesthetic (K) [15]. These different learning styles were acknowledged after thousands of hours of classroom observation [16]. Every student has his own preference to a particular approach [17].

In the past two years, medical education in Pakistan has rapidly shifted to online and blended (part online, part on-campus) education. In the recent past, even with technological advancement, students mainly relied on textbooks for gaining new knowledge in the traditional education system [18]. With the advent of online education system, teachers have to modify the teaching learning to adapt to student’s increasing educational demands [19]. Thus, to make an effective educational curriculum, it is important to identify students’ learning style preferences. In the field of healthcare sciences, teaching is a combination of cognitive and practical elements, which enhances student participation utilizing various sensory inputs to equip students with the knowledge and practice of patient handling. Single teaching modality is never enough. Thus, it is imperative that educators identify preferred learning styles of undergraduate medical and dental students.

This study is aimed at examining the preferred learning styles of medical and dental undergraduate students of Pakistan. It is also aimed at investigating the influence of gender, academic year, and preclinical or clinical and academic record on the preferred learning style.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Design

A descriptive cross-sectional study was done from April to June 2021, to determine learning preferences of students of medical and dental colleges of Pakistan. The study was undertaken according to the principles of ethics of Declaration of Helsinki, and ethical approval was obtained from institutional review board (ANDC/RAC/34/06) of Azra Naheed Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan.

2.2. Instrument

To determine whether a particular teaching method might enhance student’s learning process, a survey was conducted in Pakistan using anonymous online questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of three parts: (1)Initial introduction and objectives of the study were explained followed by the statement of consent. Participant information sheet was provided which stated that student participation is purely voluntary, and it will not affect their assessment or performance in anyway. Student’s demographics include age, gender, specialty of study MBBS/BDS, degree program (public/private), year of study, and obtained percentage in the last professional exam (%). Years 1, 2, and 3 of MBBS and years 1 and 2 of BDS were considered preclinical years, and the last two professional years were considered clinical years. Students’ names and names of institutions were not asked to maintain anonymity of research and maintain participant confidentiality(2)The 14 questions of VARK questionnaire version 8.01. “VARK” is used to describe four modalities of student learning that were described in a 1992 study by Fleming and Mills [20], i.e., visual, auditory, reading/writing, or kinesthetic. Each question is aimed at placing respondents in a “learning” situation. The respondents were permitted to choose two or more options if appropriate. The distribution of the VARK preferences was calculated according to the guidelines mentioned on the VARK website (https://vark-learn.com/). Accordingly, learning preferences were categorized as unimodal (V, A, R, or K), bimodal (VA, VR, AR, VK, AK, and RK), trimodal (VAR, ARK, VRK, and VAK), or quadmodal (VARK).(3)A yes/no question asking student satisfaction regarding current teaching modality in institute

All items were entered into Google Forms (Google LLC) and distributed online to students via WhatsApp, social media accounts of institutes, and email in three waves of invitation: wave 1 (1st May), wave 2 (1st June), and wave 3 (1st July 2021). Data collection was stopped on 20^th July due to time saturation.

2.3. Data Collection

Students at undergraduate medical and dental colleges, studying in private/public institutes of Pakistan, were invited to participate in the study through virtual snowballing technique. Educational outcome was calculated by GPA, accessed from students’ academic record history by getting their student’s allotted numbers. Students in Pakistan are awarded percentages instead of traditional GPA, so their percentages were converted into grades as follows: A (80-100%), B (70-79%), C (60-69%), and D (50-59%). Secondly, VARK questionnaire was asked. The student’s educational outcome was also analyzed and correlated with the student’s learning preferences. The sample was collected until time and data saturation was reached.

2.4. Data Analysis

The data was screened for inaccuracies. Forms with incomprehensible answers to open-ended questions (age, percentage obtained in last professional exam) were excluded. All responses on Google Forms were made mandatory to avoid missed data. Descriptive statistics were done on the overall sample [21]. All analyses were done using IBM SPSS statistical software, version 24 (IBM Corporation, New York, New York), and Microsoft Excel 2013 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington). The Fisher test and chi-square test were used to compare the learning preferences between genders and public/private sector students and among preclinical/clinical years. Student characteristics were used as predictors for probability reporting of each learning style in comparison to unimodal style. A value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.

3. Results

A total of 1473 out of 1651 students completed the questionnaire with 98.12% response rate with 42.9% male and 57% female respondents. The demographic data of respondents is represented in Table 1. In terms of academic rank, most of the students were of C grade (37.6%), followed by grade B (30%), A (27.5%), and lastly D (4.8%).

Of the study group, 39.37% (580) of the students preferred a unimodal learning style (either visual, auditory, reading/writing, or kinesthetic) and 60.62% (893) preferred multimodal style. Students had bimodal (20.71%), trimodal (18.05%), and quadmodal (21.86%) learning preferences, respectively. The most preferred unimodal learning style was kinesthetic (K), followed by visual (V), aural (A), and read/write (R). The most preferred bimodal style was VK (visual and kinesthetic), and the most preferred trimodal style was VAK (visual, aural, and kinesthetic) (Figure 1).

Between genders, the multinomial regression revealed a statistically significant difference between male and female students. Male students had higher probability of choosing unimodal learning style (K) whereas female students had a higher probability of choosing trimodal (VAK) learning style (relative ) (Figure 2). When considering academic performance of students, C and D grade students are less likely to choose trimodal and quadmodal learning styles in comparison to A grade students (relative 4) (Figure 3).

Learning style preference of preclinical and clinical year students was also compared. Students of clinical years prefer kinesthetic (K) and visual (V) learning styles, whereas students of clinical year are more inclined towards audio (A) and visual (V) learning style. Students of preclinical year had lesser probability of choosing multimodal over unimodal when compared to students of clinical years (relative ) (Figure 4). There was no significant difference between choice of MBBS and BDS students. There was no significant difference between opinions of public sector and private sector students. Finally, when asked about the student satisfaction on current teaching methodology, an alarming 78% of respondents expressed dissatisfaction.

4. Discussion

Quite a number of studies have been done to investigate the learning style preferences of undergraduate medical and dental students, but all of those were conducted during face-to-face traditional teaching phase. Due to COVID-19, however, there has been a paradigm shift in the higher education of Pakistan forcing students and teachers to adapt online learning. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study undertaken in the midst of technologically driven online education system.

Students were approached via social media websites, WhatsApp groups, and emails. Participation in the study is voluntary, and most of the participants were females. This is in contrast to several previous studies [22, 23]. This may be explained due to increased number of registered female students in medical and dental institutions in all provinces of Pakistan [24].

More than 60% students preferred multimodal learning style with no significant difference between bimodal, trimodal, and quadmodal preferences. Results of previous studies are in agreement with multimodal style being the dominant learning preference [3, 5, 22]. Adult learners prefer to acquire knowledge through different modalities. With the incorporation of online learning in higher education, the role of multimedia has increased substantially. Cognitive load theory supports the fact that information acquired through various sensory inputs helps transfer of information into long-term memory [25]. A vast number of students preferred unimodal style among which kinesthetic (K) was most common followed by visual (V). This result differs with previous studies. In Barbados, students preferred read/write (R) followed by kinesthetic (K) learning style [5]. In Saudi Arabia, dental students preferred aural (A) followed by kinesthetic (K) learning styles [22]. Similar result was seen in Iranian students [2]. A previous study done in Pakistan revealed that the preferred learning style of medical students was kinesthetic (K) followed by aural (A) [26]. Students might have begun to rely on web-based tools to enhance their learning. Studies reveal that 83.9% of medical students use YouTube as a learning tool [27–29]. Kinesthetic (K) has been a preferred style in several studies [30, 31] which demonstrates that students prefer active learning strategies. The shift in the preference of medical and dental students predominantly from aural (A) to visual (V) could be due to the increased use of online learning. However, further studies are required to postulate a direct impact of online learning on learning preference style of these students. The field of healthcare requires critical thinking and problem-solving techniques to treat patients effectively. Kinesthetic style inculcates active thinking in students [32]. Similar reason could account for the difference in learning preference style of preclinical and clinical year students. Students in the preclinical years are not dealing with patients; they acquire and retain information for the sake of passing their academic year. Thus, they are content with a single learning style in comparison to clinical year students.

When considering association of genders with learning style preference, there was a significant difference between the styles of both. Male students were more likely to choose unimodal style (K), whereas female students were more likely to choose multimodal learning style. This result negates few earlier studies where male students preferred multimodal style more than female students [5, 33]. Some studies revealed no significant difference in gender learning style preference [34], and a few studies had similar results to ours [22, 35]. Female students perhaps depend on a variety of different styles because they are notably more creative and are not satisfied with a single modality, due to which they switch to alternate styles of learning for a single topic.

Medical education teaching in Pakistan has been the same for the past 50 years. Only recently, due to COVID-19, educators were forced to include online teaching component. We believe our study provides an insight to the evolved learning preference styles of medical and dental students. It also highlights the influence of gender, academic year, and academic record on learning preference styles of students. Health professional educators can use this information and modify their teaching design to better accommodate today’s student. Similarly, students should also be encouraged to learn from diverse teaching styles.

Limitations of the study include the lack of generalizability due to low sample size. Our study was time-restrained, and thus, we stopped data collection due to time saturation. Follow-up studies with a larger sample size are required to obtain generalizability. Similarly, follow-up qualitative studies are required to further explore the reasons behind this change and to explore any cause-effect relationship between online teaching learning and learning preference style.

5. Conclusion

The majority of medical and dental undergraduate students prefer multimodal learning styles. Gender, academic year, and academic record have a direct influence on the preference style. There was no significant difference between preference styles of medical and dental students. Nor was there a significant difference between students of public and private sector. A vast majority of students are dissatisfied with their current teaching modalities in institution. With this insight in the era of online learning, teachers must take active steps in incorporating multiple teaching modalities. Students with unimodal style should try other modalities as well to enhance their educational experience.

Data Availability

The raw data obtained from the respondents is included within the supplementary information file (available here). All the data generated and analyzed in this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of concerned institution (ANDC/RAC/34/06).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate all the respondents for their time and contribution. We highly acknowledge the continuous efforts and support of Dr. Attique ur Rehman, Assistant Professor of Endodontics, Azra Naheed Dental College.

Supplementary Materials

The supplementary file consists of a tabulation of participant responses on the questionnaire. It contains the demographics of all participants: their gender, age, field of study, year of study, and the type of degree program. It also includes the extracted information of each participant’s regarding learning style preference where “1” means the chosen learning style and “0” indicates the nonchosen learning style of each participant. Finally, the file includes academic grade of each participant and satisfaction towards online learning (yes/no). (Supplementary Materials)

References

A. Kravchenko and M. Payunena, Education: a value lost. Jgzyk i tekst w ujgciu strukturalnym i funkcjonalnym [Language and text in structural and functional terms], Olsztyn: Centrum Badan Europy Wschodniej Uniwer-sytetu Warminsko-Mazurskiego w Olsztynie, 2017.
N. Akhlaghi, H. Mirkazemi, M. Jafarzade, and N. Akhlaghi, “Does learning style preferences influence academic performance among dental students in Isfahan, Iran?” Journal of educational evaluation for health professions, vol. 15, pp. 8–8, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. R. Koohestani and N. Baghcheghi, “A comparison of learning styles of undergraduate health-care professional students at the beginning, middle, and end of the educational course over a 4-year study period (2015-2018),” Journal of education and health promotion, vol. 9, no. 1, article 293934, pp. 208–208, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Aslaksen and H. Lorås, “The modality-specific learning style hypothesis: a mini-review,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 9, no. 1538, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Ojeh, N. Sobers-Grannum, U. Gaur, A. Udupa, and M. A. A. Majumder, “Learning style preferences: a study of pre-clinical medical students in Barbados,” Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 185–194, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Samarakoon, T. Fernando, C. Rodrigo, and S. Rajapakse, “Learning styles and approaches to learning among medical undergraduates and postgraduates,” BMC Medical Education, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. X. Li and S. S. Abdul Rahman, “Students' learning style detection using tree augmented naive Bayes,” Royal Society Open Science, vol. 5, no. 7, article 172108, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Freiberg Hoffmann and M. Fernández Liporace, “Grasha–Riechmann student learning style scales: an Argentinian version,” Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 242–257, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Papadatou-Pastou, M. Gritzali, and A. Barrable, “The learning styles educational neuromyth: lack of agreement between teachers' judgments, self-assessment, and students' intelligence,” Frontiers in Education, vol. 3, no. 105, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Khamparia and B. Pandey, “Effects of visual map embedded approach on students learning performance using Briggs–Myers learning style in word puzzle gaming course,” Computers & Electrical Engineering, vol. 66, pp. 531–540, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Min, Y. Chen, N. Liu, and M. Zuo, “A learning style model designed for online learning environments,” International Journal of Information and Education Technology, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 623–627, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. N. Nge and S. Eamoraphan, “A comparative study of students’ perceptual learning style preferences and their academic achievement in learning English as a foreign language at Nelson English Language Centre, Myanmar,” Scholar: Human Sciences, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 181–181, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
A. M. Tatarinceva, N. L. Sokolova, M. G. Sergeeva, N. Bedenko, and I. Samokhin, “The influence of a psychological and a cognitive component of a student's thinking style on his/her success in lifelong learning,” Espacios, vol. 39, no. 2, p. 30, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
I. M. Alkhasawneh, M. T. Mrayyan, C. Docherty, S. Alashram, and H. Y. Yousef, “Problem-based learning (PBL): Assessing students' learning preferences using vark,” Nurse Education Today, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 572–579, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Fleming and D. Baume, “Barratt barks up the right tree,” Educational Developments, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 60-61, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Marcy, “Adult learning styles: how the VARK learning style inventory can be used to improve student learning,” Perspectives on Physician Assistant Education, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 117–120, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. L. Lujan and S. E. DiCarlo, “First-year medical students prefer multiple learning styles,” Advances in physiology education., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 13–16, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Pei and H. Wu, “Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Medical Education Online, vol. 24, no. 1, article 1666538, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Palvia, P. Aeron, P. Gupta et al., “Online education: worldwide status, challenges, trends, and implications,” Journal of Global Information Technology Management, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 233–241, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. D. Fleming and C. Mills, “Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection,” To Improve the Academy, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 137–155, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Scott, S.-H. Jeon, C. M. Joyce et al., “A randomised trial and economic evaluation of the effect of response mode on response rate, response bias, and item non-response in a survey of doctors,” BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Aldosari, A. H. Aljabaa, F. S. al-Sehaibany, and S. F. Albarakati, “Learning style preferences of dental students at a single institution in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, evaluated using the VARK questionnaire,” Advances in Medical Education and Practice, vol. 9, pp. 179–186, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. A. Tyas and M. Safitri, “Kinesthetic learning style preferences: a survey of Indonesian EFL learners by gender,” JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 53–64, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Ali, B. F. Alam, F. Farooqi, K. Almas, and S. Noreen, “Dental and medical students’ knowledge and attitude toward COVID-19: a cross-sectional study from Pakistan,” European journal of dentistry, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. S97–S104, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Sweller, “Cognitive load theory and educational technology,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Mashhood, M. F. Mashhood-uz-Zafar Farooq, and M. K. Fahim, “Medical student’s preferred learning style,” Pakistan Journal of Surgery, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 36–40, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
A. G. Mustafa, N. R. Taha, O. A. Alshboul, M. Alsalem, and M. I. Malki, “Using YouTube to learn anatomy: perspectives of Jordanian medical students,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2020, Article ID 6861416, 8 pages, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Tackett, K. Slinn, T. Marshall, S. Gaglani, V. Waldman, and R. Desai, “Medical education videos for the world: an analysis of viewing patterns for a YouTube channel,” Academic Medicine, vol. 93, no. 8, pp. 1150–1156, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Van den Eynde, A. Crauwels, P. G. Demaerel et al., “YouTube videos as a source of information about immunology for medical students: cross-sectional study,” JMIR medical education, vol. 5, no. 1, article e12605, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Khanal, J. Giri, S. Shah, S. Koirala, and J. Rimal, “Influence of learning-style preferences in academic performance in the subject of human anatomy: an institution-based study among preclinical medical students,” Advances in Medical Education and Practice, vol. 10, pp. 343–355, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Rezigalla and O. Y. Ahmed, “Learning style preferences among medical students in the College of Medicine, University of Bisha, Saudi Arabia (2018),” Advances in Medical Education and Practice, vol. 10, pp. 795–801, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Hudson, “Lessons from the heart: a kinesthetic activity for practical nursing students,” Nursing Education Perspectives, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 195-196, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Choudhary, P. Dullo, and R. Tandon, “Gender differences in learning style preferences of first year medical students,” Pakistan Journal of Physiology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 42–45, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
A. A. Mon, A. Fatini, C. W. Ye, M. A. Barakat, P. L. Jen, and T. K. Lin, “Learning style preferences among pre-clinical medical students,” Journal of Medical & Allied Sciences, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 22, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
M. R. Karim, A. Asaduzzaman, M. H. K. Talukder, K. K. Alam, F. Haque, and S. J. Khan, “Learning style preferences among undergraduate medical students: an experience from different medical colleges of Bangladesh,” Bangladesh Journal of Medical Education, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 26–30, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Ayesha Fahim et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

5331

Downloads

2218

Citations