Review Article

Bacterial Pathogens and Their Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of Inanimate Surfaces and Equipment in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Table 1

Quality assessment of included studies using JBI’s critical appraisal tools.

Studies9-point Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools
Q1Q2Q3Q4Q5Q6Q7Q8Q9Overall scoreInclude

Shiferaw et al., 2016 [3]YYYYYYYYY9
Darge et al., 2019 [28]YYYYNYNYY7
Hailu et al., 2018 [29]YYYYYYYYY9
Workneh et al., 2019 [4]UYYYYYYYY8
Agersew et al., 2015 [39]YYYYYNNYY7
Bodena et al., 2019 [40]NYYYUYYNY6
Mengistu et al., 2018 [41]NNYYNYYYN5
Mengistu et al., 2016 [13]YYYYYYYYY9
Girma et al., 2014 [42]YYYYYYYYY9
Shiferaw et al., 2013 [24]NYYYYYYNY7
Teshale et al., 2018 [43]YYYNYYYYY8
Solomon et al., 2017 [44]YYYYYYYYY9
Kahsay et al., 2019 [45]YYYYYYYYY9
Gebremariam et al., 2015 [46]YYYYYYYYY9
Asser et al., 2018 [47]YNYYYYYYY8
Shemse et al., 2020 [19]YYYUYYNYY7
Diriba et al., 2014 [48]YYYYYYYYY9
Bethelhem et al., 2018 [49]NYYUYYNYY6

Y: yes; N: no; U: unclear; Q: question. The overall score is calculated by counting the number of Y’s in each row (scores of five and above were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis). Q1 = was the sample frame appropriate to address the target population? Q2 = were study participants sampled in an appropriate way? Q3 = was the sample size adequate? Q4 = were the study subjects and the setting described in detail? Q5 = was the data analysis conducted with sufficient coverage of the identified sample? Q6 = were valid methods used for the identification of the condition? Q7 = was the condition measured in a standard, reliable way for all participants? Q8 = was there appropriate statistical analysis? Q9 = was the response rate adequate, and if not, was the low response rate managed appropriately?