Review Article
Use of Narrow-Diameter Implants in Completely Edentulous Patients as a Prosthetic Option: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Table 6
Estimated implant survival rate and MBL at 5 years for the included studies.
| Author | Implant survival rate reported | Estimated survival rate at 5 years (%) | MBL reported | Estimated mean MBL at 5 years | Prosthesis survival rate |
| Abbas H. et al. | 95.8% | 94.8% | 1.25 mm | 1.56 mm | NR | Aunmeungtong W. et al. | 100% | 100% | 0.56 mm | 2.82 mm | NR | El-Sheikh AM et al. | 100% | 100% | 0.8 mm | 2 mm | 100% | Jawad S. et al. | 100% | 100% | NR | NR | 100% | Ma et al. | 84.7% | 89.88% | 2.45 mm | 1.61 mm | NR | Marcello-Machado et al. | 83.3% | 81.7% | 0 mm | 0 mm | Nr | Morneburg | 95.5% | 96.27% | 1.1 mm | 0.92 mm | NR | Müller F. et al. | 98.35% | 98.35% | 0.6 mm | 0.6 mm | NR | Zweers et al. | 100% | 100% | 0.48 mm | 0.8 mm | 100% | | | Estimated cumulative survival rate at 5 years (%) Weighted mean 96.75%, median 98.35%, 95% CI: 90.87%, 100% | | Estimated cumulative MBL at 5 years (%) Weighted mean 1.40 mm, median 1.24 mm, 95% CI: 0.55 mm, 2.03 mm | |
|
|