BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2021 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 6173143 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6173143

Ahmad Mukifza Harun, Huzaika Awang, Nor Farid Mohd Noor, Nur Mohamad Makhatar, Mohamad Ezany Yusoff, Nor Dalila Nor Affandi, Mohammad Khursheed Alam, "The Photocatalytic Effects of Modified Hydrothermal Nanotitania Extraction on the Skin and Behavior of Sprague-Dawley Rats", BioMed Research International, vol. 2021, Article ID 6173143, 5 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6173143

The Photocatalytic Effects of Modified Hydrothermal Nanotitania Extraction on the Skin and Behavior of Sprague-Dawley Rats

Academic Editor: Sanyog Jain
Received13 Jun 2021
Revised27 Sep 2021
Accepted26 Oct 2021
Published23 Nov 2021

Abstract

Background. Potential antibacterial substances, such as titanium dioxide (TiO2), are being extensively studied throughout the research world. A modified hydrothermal nanotitania extraction was shown to inhibit Staphylococcus aureus growth in the laboratory. However, the toxicity effect of the extract on rats is unknown. In this study, we observed the effects of a modified hydrothermal nanotitania extraction on the skin and behavior of Sprague-Dawley rats. Methods. Sprague-Dawley (Rattus norvegicus) rats were used as the experimental animals. The skin around the dorsum of the tested animals was shaved and pasted with 0.1 mg and 0.5 mg of the nanotitania extraction. The color and condition of the pasted area and the behavior of the animals were observed. Results. 0.1 mg nanotitania extraction application on the dorsum of the rat produced no skin color changes at day 1, day 3, day 5, or day 7 postapplication. There were no changes in their behavior up to day 7 with no skin rashes or skin scratches seen or fur changes. However, 0.5 mg of nanotitania extraction resulted in redness and less fur regrowth at day 7. Conclusions. A 0.1 mg modified nanotitania extraction was observed to have no effect on the skin of Sprague-Dawley rats.

1. Introduction

In the health and medical sector, the bacteria most widely recognized as a skin host and infector of soft tissue is Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) [1]. It is the principal organism associated with catheter-related infections, such as infective endocarditis—a devastating heart condition [2]. Staphylococcus aureus is the main reason for surgical operative infections and postoperative complications in the operating theatre (OT) and clinical settings [3]. Bacterial infection in the blood or septicemia is potentially fatal and related to S. aureus. In short, S. aureus is one of the most prevalent components in hospital-acquired bacteremia [4]. Long-term illnesses connected with the S. aureus infections are respiratory infections such as pneumonia, contagion in the bones, and joint infections. Besides the S. aureus associated with hospital infections, a strain of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) requires intensive treatment [5]. The main sources of S. aureus bacteria are the nasal cavity and throat [6]. In certain medical fields like pediatrics [7], S. aureus is one reason why children end up in wards with respiratory symptoms, typically associated with cystic fibrosis [8].

Titanium dioxide (TiO2) has been extensively researched due to its potential as an antibacterial substance. One study has shown that increasing the density of TiO2 nanoparticles has been known to bring down the replication t rate of bacteria such as Escherichia coli [9]. Furthermore, Martinez-Gutierrez et al. have found that the accumulation of TiO2 with other potential substances such as silver can lead to antimicrobial action [10]. In addition, synthesized TiO2 nanoparticles from an extraction of the Psidium guajava aqueous leaf displayed an antibacterial event on S. aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, E. coli, and Proteus mirabilis [11]. In previous research, the authors determined that modified hydrothermal nanotitania has the potential to control the growth of S. aureus in the microbiology lab [12]. This paper investigates the toxicity effects related to the photocatalytic properties of TiO2. According to Miao et al., titanium dioxide (TiO2), iron oxide, copper oxide, and zinc oxide are semiconductors that have been extensively studied as photocatalysts due to their wide absorbance range [13]. Because of its long durability, chemical and optical stability, strong oxidizing properties, nontoxicity, low cost, and transparency to visible light [14], TiO2 has been used in many photocatalytic applications and is considered the most effective photocatalyst.

The photoactivity of a photocatalyst depends on the rate of photogenerated electrons in the conduction band (CB) by light absorbance and the formation of holes in the valence band (VB) [15]. Figure 1 shows the overall of the general photocatalysis process. The wavelength response in TiO2 needed to generate electrons in CB is limited to the light in the UV region (10–400 nm) due to its relatively large bandgap (3.0–3.2 eV) [16]. In addition, the lifetime of the electron hole pair required to perform the oxidation and reduction reactions is very short and the electron hole can be recombined within a few nanoseconds [17]. As a result, several studies have been conducted to determine a way to extend the wavelength responses and overcome recombination rate issues. According to Mohammad et al., modifying the TiO2 structure in the form of nanotitania, nanotubes, nanomembranes, nanofilms, and other structures will increase surface area and electron hole pair active sites and be a tunable structural property that can act as an excellent catalyst in various applications [13, 18]. Numerous modifications to the TiO2 structure have been implemented, including doping with metal and nonmetal ions, dye sensitization, and semiconductor coupling [17]. Due to the antibacterial properties of TiO2 and the significance of silver in medical applications, silver-doped titania has been regarded as a potential photocatalyst in various applications. It is mainly used in the manufacture of coated sanitaryware, medical instruments, food preparation surfaces, and air conditioning filters among others [13]. According to Choi et al., silver can trap electrons from TiO2 and leave holes for organic species degradation reactions [19]. In addition, the ability of silver to extend the wavelength response in nanotitania towards ultraviolet has been successfully shown [19]. The silver in nanotitania promotes the phase transformation from anatase to rutile, which enhances its surface area and electron hole pairing and improves its photoactivity performance [17].

Previous studies by the authors have shown some promising results with modified hydrothermal TiO2 extraction [7, 20, 21], including demonstrating its ability to eradicate respiratory bacteria and fungus through self-disinfection [12, 22, 23]. Previous experiments with nanotitanium dioxide have also resulted in the suppression of its mutagenic capability [23] and its toxicological properties [24, 25]. Other results of manipulating the photocatalytic properties have been the development of dye-sensitized solar cells [26, 27]. The photocatalytic effect has been reported in the nanotitania ability to eradicate the growth of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae [28].

From previous results, the authors concluded that this substance has the potential to inhibit the growth of bacteria in the real world. It was decided to first test the extraction on an animal skin. In this study, the effects of modified hydrothermal nanotitania extraction (attributed to the photocatalytic properties of TiO2) on the skin and behavior of Sprague-Dawley rats were observed.

2. Materials and Methods

This test is aimed at documenting the effect of modified hydrothermal nanotitania on rat skin and physical and behavioral changes of the rats after having the substance pasted on their bodies. Male and female Sprague-Dawley (Rattus norvegicus) rats (20 rats) aged between 10 and 12 weeks and weighing 250 g–400 g were chosen. Sprague-Dawley rats were chosen because of their availability in the lab. The animals were maintained with a twelve-hour light/dark cycle at room temperature and kept in polypropylene cages with access to a standard pellet diet and water ad libitum. The rats were maintained with a twelve-hour light/dark cycle at room temperature and were kept in polypropylene cages consisting of 3 rats per cage. In this experiment, 20 rats were used, which was divided into three groups: 10 rats for the control and another 10 rats for the skin test (5 rats for 0.1 mg and 5 rats for 0.5 mg nanotitania extraction).

The rats had been acclimatized by daily body weight measuring for 5 days. Their skin was shaved at the dorsum using a hair shaver. The shaved area was pasted with a modified nanotitania extraction of 0.1 mg in a dilution with saline water, while a control substance was pasted on the control rat’s skin. The extract was pasted at the right side of the shaved area to compare the reactions at both the applied and nonapplied sites of the same animal. The paste was applied directly to the skin without mixing to make sure that the maximum effect could be observed and to avoid bias caused by contact with other substances. Changes to the skin were observed on day 1, day 3, day 5, and day 7. The researchers looked out for any color changes in the shaved skin area, behavioral changes, such as being restlessness in the cage, or changes in eating behavior. Any skin reactions (e.g., rashes) or scratch marks were noted, and photos were taken on alternate days in accordance with the observation schedule. The same test was repeated with another group of rats using 0.5 mg of modified nanotitania extraction. The control rat group is the shaved dorsum of the rat without any substance pasted on it.

This experiment was reviewed and approved by Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (USM IACUC) USM/IACUC/2019/(121)(1041). This test was conducted in Universiti Sains Malaysia.

3. Results

The condition of the rats and their skin of the shaved site was observed on alternate days in accordance with the test schedule. The results are presented in a table for easy evaluation. Our application of 0.1 mg nanotitania extraction on the dorsum of the rats produced no skin color changes such as reddening or darkening at day 1, day 3, day 5, or day 7 postapplication (Table 1). No skin rashes were noted throughout the observation period. The rats displayed no changes in their behavior (daily food consumption/eating and movement routine in the cage) up to day 7. Furthermore, no skin rashes or scratches or changes to the condition of the fur were noted (Table 1). Similar regrowth of fur at the shaved site was evident at days 2 and 3 postapplication. A photo of the shaved area after the application of the substance at the rat dorsum is shown in Figure 2.


Skin observation/daysDay 1Day 3Day 5Day 7

Color changesNoNoNoNo
Animal behaviorNormalNormalNormalNormal
Skin rashesNoNoNoNo
Skin scratchesNoNoNoNo
Fur changesNoNoNoNo

In contrast, the application of 0.5 mg nanotitania extraction on the dorsum of rats resulted in skin color changes observed at day 1, day 3, day 5, and day 7 postapplication (Table 2). Redness of the skin was noted, especially at the site of the application. The fur at the shaved site (application site) also showed reduced growth compared to that at the nonapplied site. However, the rats displayed no changes in their behavior (eating and movement) and no skin rashes or skin scratches were evident throughout the observation window. The photo of the shaved area or dorsum of the rat is shown in Figure 2 comparing with the control rat group. Noted that histopathological evaluation was not done in this study as the aim is at detecting any gross changes over rat the skin.


Skin observation/daysDay 1Day 3Day 5Day 7

Color changesYesYesYesYes
Animal behaviorNormalNormalNormalNormal
Skin rashesNoNoNoNo
Skin scratchesNoNoNoNo
Fur changesYesYesYesYes

4. Discussions

The aim of this test was at checking the reaction of the modified nanotitania extraction with the skin of the rats. The fur at the dorsum of the animal was shaved, and the substance was directly applied on to it at the right side of the shaved area, while the left side of the shaved area was left undisturbed to make sure that direct comparison could be made. The behavior of the animals was also observed, specifically their eating and movement patterns inside the cage. The growth and condition of the fur throughout the observation were also noted. The nanotitania extraction produced no skin changes after application of 0.1 mg of the substance on the dorsum of the skin. No skin color changes were seen. The fur regrew normally at the shaved area. The rats’ behavior did not change in terms of movement and eating habits up to day 7. The animals’ skin displayed no reactions to the applied substance, such as scratch marks or rashes. It appears that 0.1 mg substance has no effect on the skin and produces no animal reaction. The animal may not realize that the substance has been applied as no behavioral changes were seen. It is therefore suggested that 0.1 mg is safe for application to the mammalian skin, specifically that of rats.

In contrast, 0.5 mg of the substance resulted in skin color changes, i.e., redness at the applied site. No scratch marks or rashes were seen and no reaction was observed from the rats in terms of daily behavior. Although the rats may not have noticed the application of the substance, skin change was observed at the shaved site.

Consequently, it is not recommended that the substance be applied beyond 0.1 mg as it may affect the skin color, although it is unlikely to cause rashes or reactions such as scratching.

This experiment was scheduled after our modified nanotitania extraction was found to inhibit the growth of Staphylococcus aureus in our microbiology lab [14]. The ability of this substance to prevent the growth of S. aureus shown its potential to be used as an antibacterial substance. S. aureus is one of the main bacteria causing many health problems in human specifically skin-related problem. This experiment shows the probable function of this substance as a physical barrier for bacterial growth in the next step of the study. The histopathological test was not done in this test as the initial aim is to see the gross changes over the rat skin as other experiments which histopathological test is essential [15]. In addition, we found that this substance was not nontoxic to the cells [16] and noncarcinogenic [17].

5. Conclusions

No skin or behavioral changes were evident in the laboratory specimens after applying the 0.1 mg modified nanotitania extraction. It is noted that our extraction of nano-TiO2 by the hydrothermal process caused a photocatalytic reaction to occur that does not harm the skin of rats or alter their behavior.

Data Availability

All data are available within the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by Universiti Malaysia Sabah.

References

  1. D. Nathwani, M. Dryden, and J. Garau, “Early clinical assessment of response to treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections: how can it help clinicians? Perspectives from Europe,” International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 127–136, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. C. Lata, L. Girard, M. Parkins, and M. T. James, “Catheter-related bloodstream infection in end-stage kidney disease: a Canadian narrative review,” Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 115, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. T. Inui and D. F. Bandyk, “Vascular surgical site infection: risk factors and preventive measures,” SEMIN VASC SURG, vol. 28, no. 3-4, pp. 201–207, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. A. Morris and C. Russell, “Enhanced surveillance of _Staphylococcus aureus_ bacteraemia to identify targets for infection prevention,” Journal of Hospital Infection, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 169–174, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. A. S. Van Eperen and J. Segreti, “Empirical therapy in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus infections: an up-to-date approach,” Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 351–359, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. N. S. Marzec and M. T. Bessesen, “Risk and outcomes of methicillin-resistant _Staphylococcus aureus_ (MRSA) bacteremia among patients admitted with and without MRSA nares colonization,” American Journal of Infection Control, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 405–408, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. A. Mukifza, S. Yusof, H. Awang, and E. M. Farid, “Synthesis and characterization of titanium dioxide using a caustic hydrothermal with moderate molarity and ratio from synthetic rutile waste,” European Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 127–130, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  8. N. S. Harik, G. Com, X. Tang, M. Melguizo Castro, M. E. Stemper, and J. L. Carroll, “Clinical characteristics and epidemiology of methicillin-resistant _Staphylococcus aureus_ (MRSA) in children with cystic fibrosis from a center with a high MRSA prevalence,” American Journal of Infection Control, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 409–415, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. R. Ahmad and M. Sardar, “TiO 2 nanoparticles as an antibacterial agent against E. coli,” International Journal of Innovative Science Engineering and Technology, vol. 2, pp. 3569–3574, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  10. F. Martinez-Gutierrez, P. L. Olive, A. Banuelos et al., “Synthesis, characterization, and evaluation of antimicrobial and cytotoxic effect of silver and titanium nanoparticles,” Nanomedicine, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 681–688, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. T. Santhoshkumar, A. A. Rahuman, C. Jayaseelan et al., “Green synthesis of titanium dioxide nanoparticles using _Psidium guajava_ extract and its antibacterial and antioxidant properties,” Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 968–976, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. N. F. M. Noor, A. M. Harun, S. Yusof, M. E. Yusoff, and S. Mohamad, “Effects of modified hydrothermal nanotitania on the viability of Staphylococcus aureus,” Archives of Orofacial Science, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  13. R. Miao, Z. Luo, W. Zhong et al., “Mesoporous TiO2 modified with carbon quantum dots as a high-performance visible light photocatalyst,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 189, pp. 26–38, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S. A. Bakar and C. Ribeiro, “Nitrogen-doped titanium dioxide: an overview of material design and dimensionality effect over modern applications,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews, vol. 27, pp. 1–29, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. Banerjee, J. Gopal, P. Muraleedharan, A. K. Tyagi, and B. Raj, “Physics and chemistry of photocatalytic titanium dioxide: visualization of bactericidal activity using atomic force microscopy,” Current Science, vol. 90, no. 10, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  16. A. Mustafa, B. G. Lougou, Y. Shuai, Z. Wang, and H. Tan, “Current technology development for CO2 utilization into solar fuels and chemicals: A review,” Journal of Energy Chemistry, vol. 49, pp. 96–123, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. K. Seery, R. George, P. Floris, and S. C. Pillai, “Silver doped titanium dioxide nanomaterials for enhanced visible light photocatalysis,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, vol. 189, no. 2-3, pp. 258–263, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. Shahadat, T. T. Teng, M. Rafatullah, and M. Arshad, “Titanium-based nanocomposite materials: a review of recent advances and perspectives,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, vol. 126, pp. 121–137, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. E. Bae and W. Choi, “Highly enhanced photoreductive degradation of perchlorinated compounds on dye-sensitized metal/TiO2under visible light,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 147–152, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. H. Awang, A. Mukifza, S. Yusof, C. Ongkudon, and E. M. Farid, “Effect of acid concentration and time on synthesizing the titanium dioxide from synthetic rutile waste,” International Journal of Recent Research in Physics and Chemical Science, vol. 3, pp. 60–66, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  21. H. Ahmad Mukifza, H. B. Awang, S. Yusof, and E. M. Farid, “Experimental analysis of titanium dioxide synthesis from synthetic rutile waste using a moderate acid concentration and temperature,” Acta Physica Polonica A, vol. 132, no. 3-II, pp. 833–835, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. A. M. Harun, N. F. M. Noor, M. E. Yusoff, R. Abas, and M. K. Alam, “The result of modified hydrothermal nanotitania extract to the Escherichia coli growth,” Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 705–709, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. N. F. M. Noor, M. E. Yusoff, M. A. A. Rahman, M. K. Alam, and A. M. Harun, “The disinfectant effect of modified hydrothermal nanotitania extract on Candida albicans,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2021, Article ID 6617645, 5 pages, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. A. M. Harun, N. B. A. Ghani, N. F. Mohd Noor, R. Abas, and M. K. Alam, “Mutagenic properties of modified hydrothermal nanotitania extract,” Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 159–162, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. A. M. Harun, N. F. M. Noor, R. Shaari, L. X. Ying, M. E. Yusoff, and M. K. Alam, “The toxicology properties of modified hydrothermal nanotitania extraction,” Archives of Medical Science, pp. 1–4, 2021. View at: Google Scholar
  26. M. J. Jimmy and N. A. Ludin, “Comparative study of Dye-Sensitized solar cell utilizing seaweed and rose Bengal sensitizer: influence of dye concentration,” International Journal of Electrochemical Science, vol. 15, pp. 3219–3231, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. V. G. Martin, A. M. Harun, and M. Y. A. Rahman, “Dye-sensitized solar cell utilizing Degussa P25 and Anatase TiO2 films: comparative study of photovoltaic performance: effect of N719 dye concentration,” International Journal of Electrochemical Science, vol. 15, pp. 1643–1654, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. A. M. Harun, N. F. M. Noor, A. Zaid et al., “The antimicrobial properties of nanotitania extract and its role in inhibiting the growth of Klebsiella pneumonia and Haemophilus influenza,” Journal of Antibiotics, vol. 10, no. 8, p. 961, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Ahmad Mukifza Harun et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views56
Downloads137
Citations

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.