Effect of Electrical Stimulation on Ocular Cells: A Means for Improving Ocular Tissue Engineering and Treatments of Eye Diseases

Sanie-Jahromi, Fatemeh; Azizi, Ali; Shariat, Sahar; Johari, Mohammadkarim

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6548554

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusion Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 6548554 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6548554

Effect of Electrical Stimulation on Ocular Cells: A Means for Improving Ocular Tissue Engineering and Treatments of Eye Diseases

Fatemeh Sanie-Jahromi,¹Ali Azizi,¹Sahar Shariat,¹and Mohammadkarim Johari¹

Academic Editor: Milena Raffi

Received14 Aug 2021

Revised25 Sept 2021

Accepted08 Nov 2021

Published17 Nov 2021

Abstract

Tissue engineering is biomedical engineering that uses suitable biochemical and physicochemical factors to assemble functional constructs that restore or improve damaged tissues. Recently, cell therapies as a subset of tissue engineering have been very promising in the treatment of ocular diseases. One of the most important biophysical factors to make this happen is noninvasive electrical stimulation (ES) to target ocular cells that may preserve vision in multiple retinal and optic nerve diseases. The science of cellular and biophysical interactions is very exciting in regenerative medicine now. Although the exact effect of ES on cells is unknown, multiple mechanisms are considered to underlie the effects of ES, including increased production of neurotrophic agents, improved cell migration, and inhibition of proinflammatory cytokines and cellular apoptosis. In this review, we highlighted the effects of ES on ocular cells, especially on the corneal, retinal, and optic nerve cells. Initially, we summarized the current literature on the in vitro and in vivo effects of ES on ocular cells and then we provided the clinical studies describing the effect of ES on ocular complications. For each area, we used some of the most impactful articles to show the important concepts and results that advanced the state of these interactions. We conclude with reflections on emerging new areas and perspectives for future development in this field.

1. Introduction

The cell therapy strategy is rapidly growing for use in the treatment of degenerative ocular diseases [1]. There are numerous studies on the use of stem cell therapy for the treatment of ocular and retinal degenerative diseases [2–4]. Clinical application of stem and progenitor ocular cells has become achievable nowadays. Embryonic stem cells have benefited Stargardt’s macular dystrophy and dry age-related macular and retinitis pigmentosa patients [5]. Optic nerve damaged due to trauma, glaucoma, demyelinating optic neuropathy or toxic optic neuropathy, retinitis pigmentosa (RP), age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and retinal vascular accident-related diseases are the most common retinal diseases that are expected to profit from beneficial effects of stem cell therapy in the near future [6]. Corneal epithelial progenitor cell therapy has also demonstrated a promising approach for corneal regeneration in limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) [7]. The advancement of cell therapies for ocular disorders is due to the ideality of the eye for cell-based therapy [8]. These include easy surgical access, the possibility of a thorough examination of the transplanted tissue after cell therapy, and the relative immunological privilege of the eye. The success of cell therapy depends on the use of appropriate tissue engineering methods for cell processing and the use of biophysical and biochemical agents to stimulate cells to proliferate, migrate, and settle in the exact loci [9]. One of the physical factors that have been considered to stimulate cells is electrical stimulation (ES). ES is a therapeutic technique that uses low-intensity electric current and has successful results in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases [10, 11]. This process does not involve any generation of perceived heat. Instead, the nerve endings are stimulated directly for therapeutic effects [12, 13]. Over the past two decades, the use of ES for eye treatment has been highlighted due to the favorable results in animal models and human experiments. Luu et al. have recently reviewed the history of electrotherapeutics in ophthalmology and introduced the novel ophthalmic instrumentation [14]. The eye is an electric-based organ and the ocular cells, particularly in the retina, use endogenous electrical currents to function [15]. So it seems that ES is a proper biophysical stimulating factor to be used in tissue engineering to alter cell behavior [16]. From the cellular point of view, the cell uses electrical mechanisms to establish and regulate its biological processes including proliferation, migration, and nerve stimulation [17]. Recent studies have shown that ES can increase cell survival, migration of transplanted cells, and improve the formation of axonal regeneration and synapse function [18]. In recent years, the synergy between cell therapy and ES has been considered as a potential candidate for the treatment of degenerative diseases [19]. This study is aimed at reviewing the recent investigations on the effect of ES on ocular cells that could improve corneal and retinal cell behavior for ocular tissue regeneration and treatment.

2. The Effect of ES on Stem Cells

One of the characteristics of stem cells is their ability to be differentiated into various cell types based on their microenvironment including the biochemical and biophysical stimuli applied to them [20, 21]. Electrical stimulation seems to be a promising tool for modifying stem cell behavior. It has been shown that vascular endothelial progenitor cells were affected by a direct current of electric field signals, and their migration was guided through the establishment of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor signaling cascade in vitro. This study confirmed the role of ES in the control of endothelial cell migration that is important both in the wound healing process and tissue engineering [22]. Examination of murine adipose-derived stromal cells (mASCs) in direct current (DC) fields showed that the mASCs migrated to the cathode in the electric field and were arranged perpendicular to the field vector. It was also shown that ES caused a transient increase in cytosolic calcium [23]. The analysis of migration in human neural stem cells treated with DC electrical fields (EFs) also confirmed the directional migration of neural stem cells toward the cathode in a time and voltage-dependent manner. This study showed that neural stem cell migration was not dependent on Rho/ROCK and SDF-1/CXCR-4 signaling pathway [24]. The migration of Schwann cells in the electric field was surveyed in another study, and it was shown that Schwann cells migrate toward the anode in the electric field. This study provided a comprehensive gene analysis that used next-generation RNA sequencing to evaluate the genes and signaling pathways that were involved in EF-stimulated cell migration. According to the results, 21 downregulated and 10 upregulated pathways were identified in the control of ES-induced cell migration. The cascades had a role in controlling the actin cytoskeleton, focal adhesion, and PI3K-Akt pathways [25]. This study and other similar studies showed that ES could affect cellular activities and behavior of stem cells such as division, migration, and cell death by initiating intracellular molecular pathways. Among the tissue sources for stem cell extraction that have always been of interest to researchers are ocular tissues such as the cornea, retina, and ciliary bodies. Ocular cells have distinct electrical properties that might be helpful for the invention of novel ES-based therapeutic applications and methods of tissue engineering. In a study by Klyce, it was demonstrated that corneal epithelial cells have a distinct electrical profile, membrane potential, and membrane resistance that are based on the ion diffusion around cell membrane [26]. Moreover, it was shown that electric fields in the vicinity of corneal epithelial wounds are different from normal corneal tissues [27] that are indicative of the role of ES in the process of corneal wound healing [28–30]. The role of calcium and potassium in establishing electrical currents in the lens cells was also confirmed previously [31]. ES exerts galvanotropic effect on RGC axon growth and provides a helpful means for cell therapy of optic nerve degenerations [32]. Due to the electrical features of ocular cells, it seems that ES can be suitably applied for modification of the ocular cell behavior.

3. The Effect of ES on the Ocular Cell In Vitro and In Vivo

Due to its ability for noninvasive penetration to the cell, ES seems to be a promising candidate both as a therapeutic tool and an aid to tissue engineering. Various studies have shown the effect of ES on cells, tissues, and biological processes including embryogenesis, wound healing, and repair [23], as well as on cell migration, DNA synthesis, DNA repair, and gene expression [33–35]. Different issues were under the study of tissue engineers, among them are stimulation of cell proliferation and direction of cell migration [36–38]. ES is a cost-effective and durable stimulating factor and is easy to reproduce. ES has been shown to relieve pain, strengthen blood circulation, and have unparalleled clinical effects in the treatment of disease [39]. Also, many studies are available that report the effect of ES on the manipulation of cellular behaviors in vitro and in vivo [40, 41]. ES stimulates cells to initiate intracellular signaling pathways, thereby leading to direct cell activity and function [16, 42]. There are numerous reports on the effect of ES on ocular cells, especially on the corneal and retinal cells. Hu et al. have recently demonstrated that ES could significantly promote the proliferation activity of dorsal root ganglion cells (DRGs) and inhibited cell apoptosis. The results of this study also showed that ES could activate the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway and exert a protective effect on the injured DRGs [43]. Recently, it has been reported that ES increases the expression of mRNA of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and consequently its protein level in the Müller cell in vitro [44]. Also, it is reported that ES can increase the number of surviving retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in vivo due to the increased level of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) produced by Müller cells [45]. Increased expression of ciliary nerve trophic factor (CNTF), B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) expression [46], and fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) [46, 47] after ES treatment in cultured retinal Müller cells has also been reported. Type L calcium channels are shown to have a role in the upregulation of FGF2 expression [44, 48]. Table 1 provides a brief description of the in vitro and in vivo studies focusing on the effect of ES on the intracellular mechanisms of retinal and corneal cells (see references (44–59)). As demonstrated in Table 1, an investigation of 16 in vitro and in vivo studies revealed ES as a role player in cell migration. The migration was directional, i.e., toward the cathode pole of the electric field. The ES-induced migration is then hypothesized to accord with a similar electrical mechanism in vivo which conveys healing cells toward the defected ocular area. In addition, ES upregulates some intrinsic factors comprise of pSrc, bFGF, BDNF, IGF-1, BCL-2, and CNTF in ocular cells. These pathways altogether stimulate cell proliferation and the expression of progenitor cell markers which lead to advanced activity of retinal ganglion cells (mostly Müller cells). This phenomenon brings ES a regenerative potential and delay ability to hamper photoreceptor degeneration. The efficacy of ES was reported to depend on the electric field strength and the cooperation of medium ingredients for instance growth factors and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). All in all, the studies suggested ES be a potentially safe and beneficial trend for in vitro tissue engineering application as well as and in vivo healing procedures.

4. The Most Recent Clinical Studies on the Effect of ES on Ocular Diseases

A review of existing studies shows that ES is a noninvasive tool for the treatment of some retinal and optic nerve diseases. There are several strategies for applying ES; including stimulation through the cornea, transorbital, and transpalpebral, also stimulations by implantations of the retinal prosthesis through subretinal, epiretinal, and transchoroidal pathways, as well as the direct stimulation of the optic nerve or brain. The most important mechanisms of action of ES seem to be the increased production of neurotrophic factors, improved blood circulation, and inhibition of proinflammatory cytokines [60]. The first report of the use of ES in the eye was made in 1755 (by Charles LeRoy) for a blind patient with cataracts [61]. Since then, many different studies have been performed on animal models and clinical trials that have yielded promising results (see below). The researchers have shown that subthreshold currents could not only improve vision in retinitis pigmentosa (RP) patients but also induce neuroprotective factors by inducing expression [62]. These studies led to an interest in research on the effects of ES in animal experiments and later in clinical trials for the treatment of blindness. Different animal models of mice, cats, and rabbits have been studied to evaluate the optimal effects of ES on the retina and optic nerve [63–66], and promising outcomes were reported such as increased survival of RGCs in rats [45] and increased expression of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) in Müller and inner retinal cells [67]. It was also shown that repeated stimulation of ES had a greater effect on improving optic nerve function [67]. At the time of writing, twenty-two ES-based clinical trials for eye disease have been registered at http://clintrials.gov/. According to the details provided by http://clintrials.gov/, in these studies, different methods have been used to apply ES to the eye. Most of these experiments are still ongoing, and the results published so far have been promising. Table 2 shows a list of ongoing studies in this area. Below, we have provided a brief description of the completed and recruiting clinical trials on ES application for the treatment of ocular complications.

NCT01282827: in this study, Sabel et al. investigated the visual function recovery in optic nerve damaged individuals by applying a noninvasive transorbital alternating current stimulation (ACS). Their double-blind study comprised 22 patients (12 treated with ACS and 10 stimulated with placebo). ACS applied 40 minutes each episode for ten days. Visual outcomes and EEG (electroencephalogram) were measured before and after the procedure. The results demonstrated significant improvement of a visual field (VF) detection deficit and visual acuity (VA). The alpha-band changes in the EEG indicated increased synchronization in posterior brain regions. Patients’ visual improvements were reported stable for almost two months [68].

NCT00804102: this study assessed transcorneal electrical stimulation (TES) safety and its effect on the visual function of RP patients. In this work, 24 patients were treated by TES (5 ms biphasic pulses; 20 Hz; DTL electrodes, 30 minutes per week for six consecutive weeks). Individuals underwent either sham or TES. Based on the study, VA, VF, electroretinography, dark-adaptation (DA), color discrimination, and electrical phosphine threshold (EPT) were assessed four times. Results showed the safety of TES for RP patients. VF area and scotopic b-wave amplitude were reached statistically significant. However, a larger sample size was needed for further definition of optimal stimulation parameters [69].

NCT01280877: this study was run to assess the effect of repetitive transorbital alternation current stimulation (rtACS) in partially blind individuals with optic neuropathy. Forty-five patients were treated with rtACS and 37 patients were stimulated with the Sham procedure. Daily setting applied for 50 min in a duration of 10 weekdays. Study measurements include primary outcome (super-threshold visual fields 48 hrs after the last treatment day and two months follow-up) and secondary outcome (near-threshold visual fields, reaction time, VA, and resting-state EEGs). VF improved in the rtACS-treated patients. EEG revealed signs of neuromodulation which was suggested as probable brain plasticity modulation. In this work, rtACS was reported as a safe and effective therapy for restoring vision [70].

NCT01835002: safety assessment of TES application was investigated in Jolly et al.’s work. TES was induced in a total of 105 patients with RP. Weekly TES was applied for six months on one eye, followed by another six months of no stimulation. Outcome measurements include safety (frequency and severity of adverse events), intraocular pressure (IOP), and central retinal thickness. The study reported transient dry eye symptoms and no other serious adverse events post TES. The safety profile of TES was then confirmed [71].

NCT01847365: Wagner et al. demonstrated the role of TES in a total of 14 patients with RP. In this trial, weekly TES was performed for six months followed by another six months of observation. Patients were examined every other 3 months. Primary outcome measurements were TES safety and adverse effects. Secondary outcomes are explored as the measurement of structural and functional efficacy. This study showed the safety and well tolerance of TES application. However, no significant difference in VF improvement was reported [72].

NCT02086890: this clinical trial was started in 2014, and it is still active. There are three articles published so far information. Though, the final investigations are yet to come. Bittner and Seger assessed the TES effects on RP subjects. In this small-scale study, at first, four of seven patients demonstrated improved VA, quick contrast sensitivity function (qCSF), and VF post-TES. TES was induced weekly for a total of six weeks. The second step was monitoring three of these well-responded participants longitudinally. The aim was the investigation of potential visual function declination due to the natural RP process. The duration of their responses and administered retreatments was then determined. These participants received three to six TES courses over 29-35 months. Each course included six weekly sessions. These episodes occurred every four to 16 months in this prospective work. The results showed significant improvement in VA and VF and no significant decline for VA and qCSF from baseline. Altogether, this study suggested TES as prevention for slowly diminishing vision in RP patients. The authors indicated a larger scale of study for the confirmation [73]. In another report, post-TES changes in visual function and ocular and retinal blood flow (RBF) were investigated among RP patients. Twenty-one participants randomly received TES or electro-acupuncture for half-hour sessions during six weeks. Control group treated with inactive laser acupuncture as sham-operated. The outcome measurements were VA, qCSF, VF, AdaptDx scotopic sensitivity, spectral flow, color Doppler imaging of the central retinal artery (CRA), and RBF in macular capillaries pre and post the study. Results showed significant improvement in retrobulbar CRA mean flow velocity, RBF, and VA in both electrically stimulated groups. In summary, this report recommended electro-stimulation as an inducer factor for retinal blood flow and visual function improvements in RP patients [74]. The third study was conducted to investigate whether reduced blood flow in the retrobulbar CRA is related to the degree of visual function loss in RP patients. Eighteen participants were assessed with VA, qCSF, VF, and dark-adaptation with the AdaptDx; multifocal electroretinography (mfERG), CRA peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end-diastolic velocity (EDV), and mean flow velocity (MFV). Each eye was examined twice in two visits within a month. The outcome confirmed MFV changes do affect visual function suggesting the application of therapies that have such indirect impact [75].

There are additional 16 clinical trial studies which either still recruiting or did not have published results. The aim of their studies and excised methodologies and also primary outcomes are reported below.

NCT01600300: this randomized, quadruple-blinded trial is completed; however, the results have not been published yet. The aim was to evaluate the effect of external ES on the VA of patients with AMD. Forty subjects were involved in this trial receiving either ES with Tesmac device twice daily for 10 days or sham-operated. V/A changes were the outcome measurements.

NCT01630291: this trial is completed with no published results found. This nonrandomized study included four patients with severe dry eye. The purpose was to evaluate the effect of ES of the tear gland-related nerve on tear production. Measurements were assessed by the Schirmer test.

NCT02019927: this trial is completed with no published results found. The study design was randomized double-blinded and was to evaluate the effect of TES on visual function. Ninety-seven participants were included: patients with ocular trauma, patients with optic neuritis associated with MS, patients with nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAAION), and sham-operated groups. V/A, VF, IOP, and OCTs were assessed during the process.

NCT04008589: this randomized, controlled trial is completed with no published results found. The aim was to evaluate the effects of ES of the brain on visual functions in patients with stroke-related field deficits. These forty-five patients were divided into either ES or sham-operated groups. The outcome measurements were assessed by visual field perimetry and EEG.

NCT02405143: This work’s recruitment status is unknown. Fifty individuals with occipital stroke-related hemianopia underwent either transcranial electrical stimulation or sham stimulation. The purpose was to evaluate the ES effects on VF improvements. The study was run randomized, double-blind, and the high-resolution perimetry was used for outcome measurements.

NCT02495935: this randomized, triple-blinded trial is still in progress. The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate applied TES on visual functions of adult patients with amblyopia. Forty subjects were treated either with TES or Sham TES. The treatment was 30 minutes of weekly TES (20 Hz) for twelve weeks. The same intervals were undergone for the sham group with no ES application. The outcome measurements were V/A changes pre and post the trial.

NCT02699216: this study is withdrawn. The aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of transpalpebral microcurrent ES on the visual function of dry macular degeneration patients. The ES set was 5 Hz to 80 Hz during each spot (40 sec), 200 micros A voltage. V/A and microperimetry were the outcome measurements.

NCT03239418: This study’s recruitment status is unknown. The trial was randomized and triple blinded. The purpose was to investigate the impact of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on eye opening and closure in patients with blepharoptosis or lagophthalmos (CN III or CN VII palsy). Sixty participants were divided into NMES treated groups or sham-operated. NMES protocol was 30 min per day for five days with the same intervals for the sham group. Investigation of eyelid function was the outcome measurement.

NCT02548572: this study is withdrawn as they could not recruit subjects. The aim was to investigate the effect of TES on the visual deterioration of RP patients. Participants were supposed to undergo weekly TES for one year.

NCT04042363: this study is still in progress. It was designed as a randomized, interventional, controlled, and blinded trial which targets the effect of transorbital electrical stimulation on nerve remyelination and neuroprotection. The study participants had MS with an acute episode of retrobulbar optic neuritis. Forty-five patients were recruited including TES and sham-operated group. The TES/sham intervention was applied in 10 sessions during two consecutive weeks and a total of 14 visits.

NCT04010994: This study is enrolling by invitation. Fifty glaucoma patients were included in this study. The aim was to evaluate the effect of ES on VF as a home treatment. All the patients had optical neuropathy and underwent TES using 8-12 Hz with 0.5-1.5 mA intensity, during the first two weeks 1/day, after 2/week for 10 weeks. In addition, further interfering factors were assessed: the role of mental stress (or stress resilience), the status of biomarkers, such as the systemic stress hormone levels and blood supply to the eye and brain (specifically vascular dysregulation), and the influence of personality, anxiety, depression, and lifestyle. Perimetry, EEG, and dynamic vessel analysis were used for outcome measurements.

NCT04017234: this randomized, single-blinded trial is still recruiting. The aim was to assess the effect of TES on the prevention of myopia progression (PMP). Twenty-seven elementary school students will be treated eye exercise, and TES as an experimental group or only will receive health education as a controlled group. The treatment frequency will be three times per week for four weeks. The outcome measurement will be eyeball diopter detection.

NCT02540148: this randomized, single-blinded study is still recruiting. Sixty individuals with dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD) will be divided into two groups of either receiving ES or sham-operated. The aim is to evaluate the impact of microcurrent ES on the VA of the subjects. ES will be applied in weeks 1, 2, 14, and 26 with the Nova Oculus device. The control group will be treated with the same intervals by a nonfunctional device. V/A will be assessed pre and post the trial.

NCT04634383: this trial is still recruiting. The purpose was to introduce artificial vision in participants with blindness by wireless ES implanted in their visual cortex. The responses of patients to the ES were assessed. Five patients will take brain surgery and have the wireless floating microelectrode arrays (WFMAs). ES will then be induced, and visual percepts will be assessed. The testing will occur weekly in a one to three-year period.

NCT04648085: this study is in progress to date. Forty-two individuals with dry eye were treated by TES for 20 minutes at a frequency of 100 Hertz (Hz). This prospective, single-arm pilot study was aimed at assessing the effect of TES on corneal nerves and chronic ocular pain.

5. The Effect of ES on Ocular Function in the Real World

Recently, ES has been investigated for treating multiple ophthalmological and neurologic diseases that apply a low current (range of μA) stimulus to activate injured tissues and nerves. Glaucoma, AMD, retinal vasculopathy, such as diabetic retinopathy or retinal vascular obstructions, and RP are leading causes of irreversible blindness in the developed world. The studies show that patients with RP demonstrate significant improvements in color discrimination, visual field area, and scotopic ERG parameters [69, 76, 77]. AMD is another eye disease that affects a person especially in old age and causes the loss of photoreceptor cells in the macula and eventually blindness. In patients with AMD, ES was shown to improve both visual function and best-corrected visual acuity in both wet and dry AMD, although it was more effective in dry type than wet type [78–80]. ES was found to improve both VA and VF in some patients with central or branch retinal artery obstruction. Multifocal ERGs demonstrated that the implicit time and amplitudes of all waves significantly improved after the ES treatment, suggesting that ES impressed favorable effects on both the inner and outer retinal neurons in these patients [81–83].

Glaucoma is a progressive optic neuropathy that is due to increased IOP and results in RGCs lost with concomitant VF limitation; ES exhibited improvement in glaucomatous VF defects and effective hypotensive response in subjects with glaucoma [84, 85]. Prospective dimensions of this technology in the future should be considered the availability of the mobile instruments for whole patients with the less invasive and easier to apply method. As it has been proved that eye electrical stimulation is a safe method, it is suggested that more developed and distinguished devices could lead the teleophthalmology therapies. Patients may benefit from adjustable eye pads whose ES dosage and duration would be regulated or prescribed remotely by an ophthalmologist. This procedure reduces patients’ referrals to the eye clinics, and it is a time and cost-benefit matter. However, the safety and indication of such devices should be investigated more precisely. The value ES promises would be improvements in visual fields, optic nerve, and retinal revival and as a hole improving vision and sight in the aforesaid patients.

6. Conclusion

ES has provided tangible assistance not only to manipulate ocular cell behavior but also to individuals with ocular impairments for decades. This technology has allowed injured cells to react and restore their functions in the neuro-ophthalmologic pathway. The amount of evidence for restoring visual function in various diseases using ES is rapidly growing. Today, ES is an important tool available both to clinicians working in the field of neuro-ophthalmology rehabilitation and researchers working in the field of ocular tissue engineering. It is expected that the prevalence of ES will likely increase in the next decades with an increase in the aging population, age is the main risk factor for the development of several eye diseases such as AMD, retinal vascular disease, and glaucoma, so with these changes in population demographic states, rehabilitation with ES technology may highlight its role in future. A new understanding of the specific stimulation settings provides an opportunity to see further increases in the efficacy of this intervention.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

F. Sanie-Jahromi-J, A. Azizi, M. Johari, and S. Shariat were involved in the conception and design of the study, acquisition of data, analysis, and interpretation of data, drafting the manuscript, and final revision.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the directors of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences for supporting this research.

References

P. P. Sivan, S. Syed, P.-L. Mok et al., “Stem cell therapy for treatment of ocular disorders,” Stem Cells International, vol. 2016, Article ID 8304879, 18 pages, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Mead, M. Berry, A. Logan, R. A. Scott, W. Leadbeater, and B. A. Scheven, “Stem cell treatment of degenerative eye disease,” Stem Cell Research, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 243–257, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. C. Siqueira, “Stem cell therapy for retinal diseases: update,” Stem Cell Research & Therapy, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 1–10, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Rama, S. Matuska, G. Paganoni, A. Spinelli, M. De Luca, and G. Pellegrini, “Limbal stem-cell therapy and long-term corneal regeneration,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 363, no. 2, pp. 147–155, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Sanie-Jahromi, Z. Emadi, Z. Khajehahmadi, and M. H. Nowroozzadeh, “The role of retinal pigment epithelium in the pathogenesis and treatment of age related macular degeneration,” Journal of Infertility and Reproductive Biology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 65–69, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
R. M. Coco-Martin, S. Pastor-Idoate, and J. C. Pastor, “Cell replacement therapy for retinal and optic nerve diseases: cell sources, clinical trials and challenges,” Pharmaceutics, vol. 13, no. 6, p. 865, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Kolli, S. Ahmad, M. Lako, and F. Figueiredo, “Successful clinical implementation of corneal epithelial stem cell therapy for treatment of unilateral limbal stem cell deficiency,” Stem Cells, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 597–610, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. A. Limb and J. T. Daniels, “Ocular regeneration by stem cells: present status and future prospects,” British Medical Bulletin, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 47–61, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Dzobo, N. E. Thomford, D. A. Senthebane et al., “Advances in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering: innovation and transformation of medicine,” Stem Cells International, vol. 2018, Article ID 2495848, 24 pages, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Korai, F. Ranieri, V. Di Lazzaro, M. Papa, and G. Cirillo, “Neurobiological after-effects of low intensity transcranial electric stimulation of the human nervous system: from basic mechanisms to metaplasticity,” Frontiers in Neurology, vol. 12, p. 3, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Wilson, D. Gunzler, M. Bennett, and J. Chae, “Peripheral nerve stimulation compared with usual care for pain relief of hemiplegic shoulder Pain,” American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, vol. 95, no. 2, p. E29, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Rodriguez-Oroz, J. Obeso, A. Lang et al., “Bilateral deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: a multicentre study with 4 years follow-up,” Brain, vol. 128, no. 10, pp. 2240–2249, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Aydemir, M. Tezer, P. Borman, H. Bodur, and A. Unal, “Treatment of tinnitus with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation improves patients' quality of life,” The Journal of Laryngology and Otology, vol. 120, no. 6, pp. 442–445, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K.-Y. Luu, M. Zhao, and M. J. Mannis, “The use of electrotherapeutics in ophthalmology,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 211, pp. 4–14, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Zhao, L. Chalmers, L. Cao, A. C. Vieira, M. Mannis, and B. Reid, “Electrical signaling in control of ocular cell behaviors,” Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 65–88, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Chen, X. Bai, Y. Ding, and I.-S. Lee, “Electrical stimulation as a novel tool for regulating cell behavior in tissue engineering,” Biomaterials Research, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. L. Manthey, W. Liu, Z. X. Jiang et al., “Using electrical stimulation to enhance the efficacy of cell transplantation therapies for neurodegenerative retinal diseases: concepts, challenges, and future perspectives,” Cell Transplantation, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 949–965, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Hu, X. Wei, L. Zhu et al., “Enhancing proliferation and migration of fibroblast cells by electric stimulation based on triboelectric nanogenerator,” Nano Energy, vol. 57, pp. 600–607, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. A. McLaughlin and M. Levin, “Bioelectric signaling in regeneration: mechanisms of ionic controls of growth and form,” Developmental Biology, vol. 433, no. 2, pp. 177–189, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Li and J. Jiang, “Stem cell niches and endogenous electric fields in tissue repair,” Frontiers of Medicine, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 40–44, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. M. Govey, A. E. Loiselle, and H. J. Donahue, “Biophysical regulation of stem cell differentiation,” Current Osteoporosis Reports, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 83–91, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Zhao, L. Qin, B. Reid, J. Pu, T. Hara, and M. Zhao, “Directing migration of endothelial progenitor cells with applied DC electric fields,” Stem Cell Research, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 38–48, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. E. Hammerick, M. T. Longaker, and F. B. Prinz, “In vitro effects of direct current electric fields on adipose-derived stromal cells,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 397, no. 1, pp. 12–17, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. F. Feng, J. Liu, X. Z. Zhang et al., “Guided migration of neural stem cells derived from human embryonic stem cells by an electric field,” Stem Cells, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 349–355, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Yao, Y. Li, J. Knapp, and P. Smith, “Exploration of molecular pathways mediating electric field-directed Schwann cell migration by RNA-seq,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 230, no. 7, pp. 1515–1524, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Klyce, “Electrical profiles in the corneal epithelium,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 226, no. 2, pp. 407–429, 1972.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Chiang, K. R. Robinson, and J. W. Vanable Jr., “Electrical fields in the vicinity of epithelial wounds in the isolated bovine eye,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 999–1003, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Reid, B. Song, C. D. McCaig, and M. Zhao, “Wound healing in rat cornea: the role of electric currents,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 379–386, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Song, M. Zhao, J. Forrester, and C. McCaig, “Nerve regeneration and wound healing are stimulated and directed by an endogenous electrical field in vivo,” Journal of cell science., vol. 117, no. 20, pp. 4681–4690, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Zhao, B. Song, J. Pu et al., “Electrical signals control wound healing through phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase-γ and PTEN,” Nature, vol. 442, no. 7101, pp. 457–460, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Parmelee, K. Robinson, and J. Patterson, “Effects of calcium on the steady outward currents at the equator of the rat lens,” Investigative ophthalmology & visual science., vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 1343–1348, 1985.
View at: Google Scholar
K. K. Gokoffski, X. Jia, D. Shvarts, G. Xia, and M. Zhao, “Physiologic electrical fields direct retinal ganglion cell axon growth in vitro,” Investigative ophthalmology & visual science., vol. 60, no. 10, pp. 3659–3668, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. T. Tsai, W. J. Li, R. S. Tuan, and W. H. Chang, “Modulation of osteogenesis in human mesenchymal stem cells by specific pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation,” Journal of orthopaedic research., vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1169–1174, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Sanie-Jahromi and M. Saadat, “Effects of electromagnetic field, cisplatin and morphine on cytotoxicity and expression levels of DNA repair genes,” Molecular biology reports., vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 807–814, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Sanie-Jahromi, H. Mahmoudinasab, and M. Saadat, “Extremely low frequency electromagnetic field in combination with β-Lapachone up-regulates the genes of non-homologous end joining,” Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 389–392, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Ding, P. Kingshott, H. Thissen, M. Pera, and P. Y. Wang, “Modulation of human mesenchymal and pluripotent stem cell behavior using biophysical and biochemical cues: a review,” Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 260–280, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. R. Love, S. Palee, S. C. Chattipakorn, and N. Chattipakorn, “Effects of electrical stimulation on cell proliferation and apoptosis,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 233, no. 3, pp. 1860–1876, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Zhao, “Electrical fields in wound healing--An overriding signal that directs cell migration,” Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 674–682, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. L. Hernández-Bule, M. Á. Trillo, and A. Úbeda, “Molecular mechanisms underlying antiproliferative and differentiating responses of hepatocarcinoma cells to subthermal electric stimulation,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 1, article e84636, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Jaatinen, E. Young, J. Hyttinen, J. Vörös, T. Zambelli, and L. Demkó, “Quantifying the effect of electric current on cell adhesion studied by single-cell force spectroscopy,” Biointerphases, vol. 11, no. 1, article 011004, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kumar, K. Nune, and R. Misra, “Understanding the response of pulsed electric field on osteoblast functions in three-dimensional mesh structures,” Journal of Biomaterials Applications, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 594–605, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E.-t. Wang and Z. Min, “Regulation of tissue repair and regeneration by electric fields,” Chinese Journal of Traumatology (English Edition), vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 55–61, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Hu, L. Hong, S. He, G. Huang, Y. Cheng, and Q. Chen, “Effects of electrical stimulation on cell activity, cell cycle, cell apoptosis and β-catenin pathway in the injured dorsal root ganglion cell,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 2385–2394, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Sato, T. Fujikado, T.-S. Lee, and Y. Tano, “Direct effect of electrical stimulation on induction of brain-derived neurotrophic factor from cultured retinal Müller cells,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 4641–4646, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Morimoto, T. Miyoshi, S. Matsuda, Y. Tano, T. Fujikado, and Y. Fukuda, “Transcorneal electrical stimulation rescues axotomized retinal ganglion cells by activating endogenous retinal IGF-1 system,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 2147–2155, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-q. Ni, D.-k. Gan, H.-d. Xu, G.-z. Xu, and C. D. da, “Neuroprotective effect of transcorneal electrical stimulation on light-induced photoreceptor degeneration,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 219, no. 2, pp. 439–452, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Sato, T.-S. Lee, F. Takamatsu, and T. Fujikado, “Induction of fibroblast growth factor-2 by electrical stimulation in cultured retinal Mueller cells,” Neuroreport, vol. 19, no. 16, pp. 1617–1621, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Sato, T. Fujikado, T. Morimoto, K. Matsushita, T. Harada, and Y. Tano, “Effect of electrical stimulation on IGF-1 transcription by L-type calcium channels in cultured retinal Müller cells,” Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 217–223, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Kucerova, P. Walczysko, B. Reid et al., “The role of electrical signals in murine corneal wound re-epithelialization,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 226, no. 6, pp. 1544–1553, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Yu, S. Enayati, K. Chang et al., “Noninvasive electrical stimulation improves photoreceptor survival and retinal function in mice with inherited photoreceptor degeneration,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 61, no. 4, p. 5, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Saigal, E. Cimetta, N. Tandon et al., “Electrical stimulation via a biocompatible conductive polymer directs retinal progenitor cell differentiation,” in 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), pp. 1627–1631, Osaka, Japan, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Tandon, E. Cimetta, A. Taubman et al., “Biomimetic electrical stimulation platform for neural differentiation of retinal progenitor cells,” in 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), pp. 5666–5669, Osaka, Japan, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
W.-t. Zhou, Y.-q. Ni, Z.-b. Jin et al., “Electrical stimulation ameliorates light-induced photoreceptor degeneration _in vitro_ via suppressing the proinflammatory effect of microglia and enhancing the neurotrophic potential of M uller cells,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 238, no. 2, pp. 192–208, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Ghaffarieh, F. Ghaffarpasand, M. Dehghankhalili, N. Honarpisheh, S. Nirumandi, and N. Tanideh, “Effect of transcutaneous electrical stimulation on rabbit corneal epithelial cell migration,” Cornea, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 559–563, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Soong, W. Parkinson, S. Bafna, G. Sulik, and S. Huang, “Movements of cultured corneal epithelial cells and stromal fibroblasts in electric fields,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 2278–2282, 1990.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Zhao, A. Agius-Fernandez, J. V. Forrester, and C. D. McCaig, “Orientation and directed migration of cultured corneal epithelial cells in small electric fields are serum dependent,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 109, no. 6, pp. 1405–1414, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Gao, V. K. Raghunathan, B. Reid et al., “Biomimetic stochastic topography and electric fields synergistically enhance directional migration of corneal epithelial cells in a MMP-3-dependent manner,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 12, pp. 102–112, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Farboud, R. Nuccitelli, I. R. Schwab, and R. R. Isseroff, “DC electric fields induce rapid directional migration in cultured human corneal epithelial cells,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 667–673, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Zhao, C. D. McCaig, A. Agius-Fernandez, J. V. Forrester, and K. Araki-Sasaki, “Human corneal epithelial cells reorient and migrate cathodally in a small applied electric field,” Current Eye Research, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 973–984, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Sehic, S. Guo, K.-S. Cho, R. M. Corraya, D. F. Chen, and T. P. Utheim, “Electrical stimulation as a means for improving vision,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 186, no. 11, pp. 2783–2797, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. LeRoy, “Où l'on rend compte de quelques tentatives que l'on a faites pour guérir plusieurs maladies par l'électricité,” Hist Acad Roy Sciences Memoires Math Phys., vol. 60, pp. 87–95, 1755.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Y. Chow, V. Y. Chow, K. H. Packo, J. S. Pollack, G. A. Peyman, and R. Schuchard, “The artificial silicon retina microchip for the treatment of visionloss from retinitis pigmentosa,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 122, no. 4, pp. 460–469, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Kanamoto, N. Souchelnytskyi, T. Kurimoto et al., “Proteomic study of retinal proteins associated with transcorneal electric stimulation in rats,” Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 2015, Article ID 492050, 6 pages, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Morimoto, H. Kanda, M. Kondo, H. Terasaki, K. Nishida, and T. Fujikado, “Transcorneal electrical stimulation promotes survival of photoreceptors and improves retinal function in rhodopsin P347L transgenic rabbits,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 4254–4261, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Schatz, B. Arango-Gonzalez, D. Fischer et al., “Transcorneal electrical stimulation shows neuroprotective effects in retinas of light-exposed rats,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 5552–5561, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Wang, X. Mo, D. Li et al., “Neuroprotective effect of transcorneal electrical stimulation on ischemic damage in the rat retina,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 93, no. 5, pp. 753–760, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Morimoto, T. Miyoshi, H. Sawai, and T. Fujikado, “Optimal parameters of transcorneal electrical stimulation (TES) to be neuroprotective of axotomized RGCs in adult rats,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 285–291, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. A. Sabel, A. B. Fedorov, N. Naue, A. Borrmann, C. Herrmann, and C. Gall, “Non-invasive alternating current stimulation improves vision in optic neuropathy,” Restorative Neurology And Neuroscience, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 493–505, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Schatz, T. Röck, L. Naycheva et al., “Transcorneal electrical stimulation for patients with retinitis pigmentosa: a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled exploratory study,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 4485–4496, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Gall, S. Schmidt, M. P. Schittkowski et al., “Alternating current stimulation for vision restoration after optic nerve damage: a randomized clinical trial,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 6, article e0156134, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. K. Jolly, S. K. Wagner, P. Martus et al., “Transcorneal electrical stimulation for the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa: a multicenter safety study of the OkuStim® system (TESOLA-study),” Ophthalmic Research, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 234–243, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. K. Wagner, J. K. Jolly, M. Pefkianaki et al., “Transcorneal electrical stimulation for the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa: results from the TESOLAUK trial,” BMJ Open Ophthalmology, vol. 2, no. 1, article e000096, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. K. Bittner and K. Seger, “Longevity of visual improvements following transcorneal electrical stimulation and efficacy of retreatment in three individuals with retinitis pigmentosa,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 256, no. 2, pp. 299–306, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. K. Bittner, K. Seger, R. Salveson et al., “Randomized controlled trial of electro-stimulation therapies to modulate retinal blood flow and visual function in retinitis pigmentosa,” Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. e366–e376, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Kayser, P. Vargas, D. Mendelsohn et al., “Reduced central retinal artery blood flow is related to impaired central visual function in retinitis pigmentosa patients,” Current Eye Research, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 1503–1510, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Morimoto, T. Fukui, K. Matsushita et al., “Evaluation of residual retinal function by pupillary constrictions and phosphenes using transcorneal electrical stimulation in patients with retinal degeneration,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 244, no. 10, pp. 1283–1292, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Naycheva, A. Schatz, T. Röck et al., “Phosphene thresholds elicited by transcorneal electrical stimulation in healthy subjects and patients with retinal diseases,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 53, no. 12, pp. 7440–7448, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Anastassiou, A.-L. Schneegans, M. Selbach, and S. Kremmer, “Transpalpebral electrotherapy for dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD): an exploratory trial,” Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 571–578, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Chaikin, K. Kashiwa, M. Bennet, G. Papastergiou, and W. Gregory, “Microcurrent stimulation in the treatment of dry and wet macular degeneration,” Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, NZ), vol. 9, p. 2345, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. R. Coleman, C.-C. Chan, F. L. Ferris III, and E. Y. Chew, “Age-related macular degeneration,” The Lancet, vol. 372, no. 9652, pp. 1835–1845, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Inomata, K. Shinoda, H. Ohde et al., “Transcorneal electrical stimulation of retina to treat longstanding retinal artery occlusion,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 245, no. 12, pp. 1773–1780, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Naycheva, A. Schatz, G. Willmann et al., “Transcorneal electrical stimulation in patients with retinal artery occlusion: a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled pilot study,” Ophthalmology and Therapy, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 25–39, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Oono, T. Kurimoto, R. Kashimoto, Y. Tagami, N. Okamoto, and O. Mimura, “Transcorneal electrical stimulation improves visual function in eyes with branch retinal artery occlusion,” Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, NZ), vol. 5, p. 397, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Ota, N. Ozeki, K. Yuki et al., “The efficacy of transcorneal electrical stimulation for the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma: a pilot study,” The Keio Journal of Medicine, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 45–53, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Gil-Carrasco, D. Ochoa-Contreras, M. A. Torres et al., “Transpalpebral electrical stimulation as a novel therapeutic approach to decrease intraocular pressure for open-angle glaucoma: a pilot study,” Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 2018, Article ID 2930519, 6 pages, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Fatemeh Sanie-Jahromi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1239

Downloads

1225

Citations