Research Article

The Natural History and Reperfusion Therapy Outcomes of Acute Ischemic Stroke due to Isolated M2 Occlusions

Table 3

Efficacy and safety outcomes according to treatment methods.

CharacteristicNRTIVTEVTUnadjusted value (95% CI); valueAdjusted value (95% CI): value

Primary efficacy outcome
 Delta NIHSS score, median (IQR)-1 (-2.5 to 0)-3 (-6 to 0)-5 (-10.25 to -3.75)-0.98 (-3.18 to 1.22);
-4.26 (-6.71 to -1.81); #
-3.28 (-5.69 to -0.87);
-0.40 (-2.89 to 2.09);
-4.01(-6.60 to -1.43); #
-3.61 (-6.45 to -0.77);
 90-day mRS score, median (IQR)4 (1, 5)2 (1, 3)1 (1, 2)-1.13 (-2.04 to -0.22);
-1.64 (-2.66 to -0.63); #
-0.52 (-1.52 to 0.48);
-0.67 (-1.65 to 0.32);
-1.42 (-2.43 to -0.40); #
-0.75 (-1.87 to 0.37);
Secondary efficacy outcomes
 90-day mRS score 0-2 (%)11 (44.00)20 (74.07)16 (88.89)3.64 (1.13-11.69);
10.18 (1.92-54.02); #
2.80 (0.51-15.38);
2.23 (0.51-9.64);
8.73 (1.43-53.24); #
6.38 (0.41-99.12);
 FIV, median (IQR), ml50.93 (8.55, 112.75)30.77 (8.75, 55.270)26.08 (6.78, 53.63)-43.28 (-72.97 to -13.59);
-37.24 (-70.32 to -4.17); #
6.04(-26.52 to 38.59);
-8.63 (-37.67 to 20.41);
-29.66 (-59.73 to 0.42); #
-21.03 (-54.12 to 12.07);
 90-day mortality rate (%)6 (24)2 (7.41)0NANA
(%)--16 (88.89)NANA
Safety outcomes
 sICH (%)04 (14.81)0NANA
 Procedure-related complications (%)--1 (5.56)NANA

Abbreviations: NRT: no reperfusion therapy; IVT: intravenous thrombolysis treatment; EVT: endovascular intervention; NIHSS: National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; IQR: interquartile range; mRS: modified Rankin Scale; sICH: symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage; aICH: asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage; mTICI: modified thrombolysis in cerebral ischemia score; FIV: final infarct volume (within 2-7 days after symptom onset); NA: not applicable; delta NIHSS score: change in the NIHSS score from baseline to 24 h. Model adjusted for age, admission NIHSS score, and time from onset to treatment. A comparison was conducted between the NRT and IVT groups, and #comparison conducted between the NRT and EVT groups. A comparison was conducted between the IVT and EVT groups.