Review Article

Tear Levels of Inflammatory Cytokines in Keratoconus: A Meta-Analysis of Case-Control and Cross-Sectional Studies

Table 2

Study characteristics of all articles included in meta-analysis.

Study yearCountryMean age, Yrs (SD)
KC vs. controls
Male (%)
KC vs. controls
No. of eyes
KC vs. controls
Representativeness of the case (%)Design of studiesMaterialsTest methodsOutcomeContact lens worn (%)
KC vs. controls

Lonescu 2018Romania23.35 (11.8) vs. 28.66 (3.03)64.71% vs. 40%17 vs. 15Stage I (18%)
Stage II (29%)
Stage III (24%)
Stage IV (29%)
Observational cross-sectional studyTear fluidsLICAIL-1β, INF-γ, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α0
Pásztor 2016American44.2 vs. 44.5NR55 vs. 24NRCross-sectionalTear fluidsCBAIL-6, IL-10, MMP-9, NGFNR
Sorkhabi 2015Iran24.09 (6.50) vs. 24.43 (4.55)57.14% vs. 43.33%42 vs. 30Mild (33.3%)
Moderate (33.3%)
Severe (33.3%)
Prospective case-controlled studyTear fluidsELISAIL-1β, IL-6, IL-100
Balasubramanian 2012Australia27.4 (6.0) vs. 29.8 (8.9)64% vs. 40%25 vs. 20NRCross-sectional studyTear fluidsCytokine antibody arrayIL-1β, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-αNR
Lema 2009Spain27.1 (8.1) vs. 22.6 (6.6)70% vs. 47.8%30 vs. 20NRCase-control studyTear fluidsELISAIL-6, TNF-α, MMP-956.7 vs. 0
Lema 2008Spain22.8 (6.6) vs. 22.6(6.6)53.6% vs. 25%28 vs. 20NRCase-control studyTear fluidsELISAIL-6, IL-10, TNF-α0
Lema 2005Spain22.4 (6.5) vs. 22.6 (6.6)47.8% vs. 52.3%28 vs. 20Mild (21.4%)
Moderate (50%)
Severe (28.6%)
Case-control studyTear fluidsELISAIL-4, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, MMP-90