Research Article

Radial Undersampling-Based Interpolation Scheme for Multislice CSMRI Reconstruction Techniques

Table 3

Comparison of the proposed EiCS technique with CS, FiCS, and iCS for different undersampling ratios.

Average undersampling ratioInterpolation techniqueUndersampling techniqueSSIMFSIMMSEPSNRCORRSIPIQE

9%iCS1D-VRDU0.72260.97330.005823.7790.9522501.6430.91

7%CSUniform angle radial0.83770.94640.0005632.5320.9653303.4868.65
Golden angle radial0.83220.94330.000632.1740.963220.6276.48
FiCSUniform angle radial0.860.97050.0003834.2080.9764449.1954.5
Golden angle radial0.86080.96490.0003934.0570.9756516.6561.76
EiCSUniform angle radial0.85590.97640.0003434.6580.9787462.5249.15
Golden angle radial0.86270.97330.0003334.8060.9795442.7450.82

5%CSUniform angle radial0.79950.92010.0008430.7380.9476175.0672.57
Golden angle radial0.76690.9150.0010429.7970.935846.0779.57
FiCSUniform angle radial0.83880.95930.0004733.2210.9703267.6354.58
Golden angle radial0.83390.95160.0005232.7780.9671276.4465.97
EiCSUniform angle radial0.84950.96810.0003734.2320.9765476.9845.33
Golden angle radial0.8450.96730.000433.9130.9748338.0150.94

3%CSUniform angle radial0.70030.87680.0017627.5370.888720.60780.9
Golden angle radial0.69220.87940.0017127.6650.89519.4487.34
FiCSUniform angle radial0.81640.94370.0006332.0030.9606229.1670.39
Golden angle radial0.80270.93180.0007231.3970.9546183.7377.5
EiCSUniform angle radial0.82220.95120.0005332.7580.9671251.0556.84
Golden angle radial0.82350.94520.0005332.6840.9666305.4866.56