Research Article

Analysis of Cervical Spine Alignment Change after Modified Kurokawa Cervical Laminoplasty in the Patients with Cervical Myelopathy and Straight Cervical Spine

Table 1

Cervical radiological parameter changes.

Preoperative2 years follow-upChange value

Cervical alignment (°)0.0098
C2/3 IVDA (°)0.0114
C3/4 IVDA (°)0.0024
C4/5 IVDA (°)0.0328
C5/6 IVDA (°)0.0477
C6/7 IVDA (°)0.7358
ROM0.0024
Flexion C2-7 Cobb angle (°)0.0001
C2/3 flexion IVDA (°)0.0294
C3/4 flexion IVDA (°)0.0091
C4/5 flexion IVDA (°)0.0038
C5/6 flexion IVDA (°)0.0013
C6/7 flexion IVDA (°)0.0083
Extension C2-7 Cobb angle (°)0.6561
C2/3 extension IVDA (°)0.2050
C3/4 extension IVDA (°)0.0394
C4/5 extension IVDA (°)0.9373
C5/6 extension IVDA (°)0.0579
C6/7 extension IVDA (°)0.9851
C2/3 ROM (°)0.0094
C3/4 ROM (°)<0.0001
C4/5 ROM (°)0.0236
C5/6 ROM (°)0.2035
C6/7 ROM (°)0.0183
T1 slope angle (°)0.1036
T1 slope flexion angle (°)0.9749
T1slope extension angle (°)0.1447
Neutral C1-2 angle (°)0.0052
Flexion C1-2 angle (°)0.3521
Extension C1-2 angle (°)0.0361
C2-C7 SVA (mm)0.0113

The data was presented as ,” means , and there was a significant statistical difference between different time points.