Acetabular Fractures with Central Hip Dislocation: A Retrospective Consecutive 50 Case Series Study Based on AO/OTA 2018 Classification in Midterm Follow-Up

Table 1

Distribution of age, sex, and clinical report in study subjects.

Patient characteristics	Total number (%)	Survival to THA (%)	Conversion to THA (%)	value^1
Sex				0.046
Female	23 (46.0%)	21 (53.9%)	2 (18.2%)
Male	27 (54.0%)	18 (46.2%)	9 (81.8%)
BMI				0.91
<24	28 (56.0%)	22 (56.4%)	6 (54.5%)
≥24	22 (44.0%)	17 (43.6%)	5 (45.5%)
AO/OTA classification				0.31
62B	30 (60.0%)	25 (64.1%)	5 (45.5%)
62C	20 (40.0%)	14 (35.9%)	6 (54.5%)
Infra/juxta/transtectal				0.57
1	2 (4.0%)	1 (2.56%)	1 (9.09%)
2	17 (34.0%)	14 (35.9%)	3 (27.3%)
3	31 (62.0%)	24 (61.5%)	7 (63.6%)
Marginal impaction				0.02
No	26 (52.0%)	24 (61.5%)	2 (18.2%)
Yes	24 (48.0%)	15 (38.5%)	9 (81.8%)
Bladder injury				0.17
No	43 (86.0%)	34 (89.7%)	8 (72.7%)
Yes	7 (14.0%)	5 (10.3%)	3 (27.3%)
Sciatic nerve injury				0.03
No	46 (92.0%)	38 (97.4%)	8 (72.7%)
Yes	4 (8.0%)	1 (2.56%)	3 (27.3%)
Central dislocation type				0.15
1	15 (30.0%)	14 (35.9%)	1 (9.09%)
2	22 (44.0%)	17 (43.6%)	5 (45.5%)
3	13 (26.0%)	8 (20.5%)	5 (45.5%)
Matta reduction criteria				0.055
Anatomical	22 (44.0%)	19 (48.7%)	3 (27.3%)
Imperfect	21 (42.0%)	17 (43.6%)	4 (36.4%)
Poor	7 (14.0%)	3 (7.69%)	4 (36.4%)
Age, y, mean (Q1, Q3)	54.5 (37, 66)	52.5 (37, 66)	55 (32, 72)	0.90^2
ISS, mean (Q1, Q3)	16 (10, 20)	16 (10, 20)	18 (16, 20)	0.52^2

¹Chi-square test/Fisher’s exact test; ²Wilcoxon rank-sum test.