Research Article

Virtual Screening of Phytochemicals by Targeting HR1 Domain of SARS-CoV-2 S Protein: Molecular Docking, Molecular Dynamics Simulations, and DFT Studies

Table 1

Binding energies (kcal/mol) and (μM) of compounds with 2-dimensional plots of ligand-protein interaction.

S. No.CompoundsBinding affinity (kcal/mol) (μM)Interaction plots

1.SilybinC-10.00.046
2.Isopomiferin-9.90.054
3.Lycopene-9.80.064
4.SilydianinB-9.80.064
5.Silydianin-9.70.076
6.Osajin-9.50.107
7.Anthraxin-9.50.107
8.Derrisin-9.50.107
9.SigmoidinA-9.40.127
10.SigmoidinC-9.40.127
11.EuchrenoneB-9.30.150
12.SilybinD-9.30.150
13.IsosilybinA-9.20.177
14.Cannflavin-9.20.177
15.Fumaritine N-oxide-9.10.210
16.SilybinA-9.10.210
17.Diprenyleriodictyol-9.10.210
18.Robustone-9.00.249
19.Mundulinol-9.00.249
20.Narlumicine-8.90.294
21.Papracinine-8.90.294
22.Oxysanguinarine-8.80.349
23.Papraine-8.80.349
24.Paprarine-8.80.349
25.AbyssinoneV-8.80.349
26.TomentodiplaconeB-8.80.349
27.Emodin-8.70.413
28.SigmoidinB-8.70.413
29.SilybinB-8.70.413
30.IsosilybinB-8.70.413
31.SchizolaenoneB-8.70.413
32.EryvarinQ-8.60.489
33.IsoerysenegalenseinE-8.60.489
34.Laburnetin-8.60.489
35.Isomangostin-8.60.489
36.Raddeanine-8.50.579