Review Article
A State-of-the-Art Review for Gastric Histopathology Image Analysis Approaches and Future Development
Table 2
Classification-based gastric cancer image analysis.
| Aim | Year | Reference | Team | Dataset | Method | Evaluation |
| Machine learning | 2015 | [27] | Sharma et al. | 5,541 30x and 3,730 40x images | Adaboost | | 2017 | [32] | Sharma et al. | 795 images | Random forest | | 2018 | [47] | Liu et al. | 560 cancer and 140 noncancer | CNN and SVM | |
| Deep learning | 2017 | [22] | Garcia et al. | 3,275 images | DCNN | | 2017 | [23] | Sharma et al. | 21,000 images | Proposed CNN | Accuracy of cancer classification is 69.9%; accuracy of necrosis detection is 81.4% | 2018 | [24] | Li et al. | 560 cancer and 140 noncancer | Proposed CNN | Accuracy of patch level classification is 97.93%; accuracy of slice level classification is 100% | 2018 | [48] | Liu et al. | 1.2 million images | ResNet | | 2019 | [51] | Wang et al. | 608 whole slide images | ResNet | | 2020 | [52] | Song et al. | 2,123 digital slides | DeepLab-V3 and ResNet | , , |
|
|