The Inhibitory Effects of Ficin on <i>Streptococcus mutans</i> Biofilm Formation

Sun, Yan; Jiang, Wentao; Zhang, Mingzheng; Zhang, Lingjun; Shen, Yan; Huang, Shengbin; Li, Mingyun; Qiu, Wei; Pan, Yihuai; Zhou, Liang; Zhang, Keke

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6692328

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Disclosure Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 6692328 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6692328

The Inhibitory Effects of Ficin on Streptococcus mutans Biofilm Formation

Yan Sun,¹Wentao Jiang,²Mingzheng Zhang,²Lingjun Zhang,²Yan Shen,²Shengbin Huang,^2,3Mingyun Li,⁴Wei Qiu,⁵Yihuai Pan,¹Liang Zhou,⁶and Keke Zhang^2,3

Academic Editor: Fernando José Dias

Received03 Oct 2020

Revised15 Feb 2021

Accepted16 Mar 2021

Published23 Mar 2021

Abstract

To investigate the effects of ficin on biofilm formation of conditionally cariogenic Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans). Biomass and metabolic activity of biofilm were assessed using crystal violet assay, colony-forming unit (CFU) counting, and MTT assay. Extracellular polysaccharide (EPS) synthesis was displayed by SEM imaging, bacteria/EPS staining, and anthrone method while acid production was revealed by lactic acid assay. Growth curve and live/dead bacterial staining were conducted to monitor bacterial growth state in both planktonic and biofilm form. Total protein and extracellular proteins of S. mutans biofilm were analyzed by protein/bacterial staining and sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), severally. qRT-PCR was conducted to detect acid production, acid tolerance, and biofilm formation associated genes. Crystal violet assay, CFU counting, and MTT assay showed that the suppression effect of ficin on S. mutans biofilm formation was concentration dependent. 4 mg/mL ficin had significant inhibitory effect on S. mutans biofilm formation including biomass, metabolic activity, EPS synthesis, and lactic acid production (). The growth curves from 0 mg/mL to 4 mg/mL ficin were aligned with each other. There was no significant difference among different ficin groups in terms of live/dead bacterial staining result (). Protein/bacterial staining outcome indicated that ficin inhibit both total protein and biofilm formation during the biofilm development. There were more relatively small molecular weight protein bands in extracellular proteins of 4 mg/mL ficin group when compared with the control. Generally, ficin could inhibit biofilm formation and reduce cariogenic virulence of S. mutans effectively in vitro; thus, it could be a potential anticaries agent.

1. Introduction

Dental caries, a biofilm relevant disease, is caused by destruction of mineralized tooth tissue due to acidic catabolites from the bacterial fermentation of sugars [1]. The Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 revealed that caries of permanent teeth had the greatest prevalence, decayed permanent, and deciduous teeth ranked in second and fifth place, respectively, in highest incidence diseases [2]. Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans), a major extracellular polymeric substances producer, is the most well-known biofilm forming bacteria in oral cavity and was reported as most associated microbe in the transition of oral flora from a healthy one to a cariogenic one [3]. It has been proven that decrease or eradication of S. mutans can diminish or prevent caries development [4]. The major virulence factors of S. mutans include adhesion, acid production, and acid tolerance. Adhesion enables S. mutans to colonize in the oral cavity and form biofilm. Extracellular polymeric substances produced by S. mutans that is composed of extracellular polysaccharides (EPS), extracellular DNA (eDNA), proteins, and lipoteichoic acids provide crucial scaffold for biofilm and are essential for expression of cariogenic virulence [5]. Biofilm, as a natural barrier, could facilitate adhesion of microbes, promote cooperation and communication within microorganisms, obtain oxygen and nutrients more effectively for microbe, and protect microorganism from external environment [6]. Biofilm showed more resistant to antimicrobial agents than that of planktonic microorganism, which could be up to 1000 times [7].

To solve biofilm-associated problems above, current adopted strategies were mainly through antibiotics or antimicrobial-based ways and physical-mechanical approaches [8]. One of the effective antibiofilm strategies is enzymatic degradation of biofilm, which displays a favorable prospect as it is natural, biodegradable, minimally invasive, and is with great advantage of rare resistance [9]. The mechanisms of enzymatic degradation to control dental biofilm vary with different types of enzymes. Human matrix metalloprotease-1 inhibited and disrupted Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) biofilm through bacterial growth inhibition and degradation of biofilm matrix proteins [10]. Proteases such as bromelain, actinidin, papain, proteinase K, and trypsin were also reported to inhibit dental biofilm including single species and multispecies biofilm [11, 12]. Other than proteolytic enzymes, some enzymes targeted polysaccharide components of biofilms. Dispersin B could act on extracellular polysaccharide by cleaving polymers of β (1, 6) N-acetylglucosamine to suppress biofilm formation or promote biofilm dispersal [13, 14]. Mutanases and dextranase were able to control dental biofilms such as S. mutans biofilm effectively by specifically hydrolyzing (1 → 3)-α-glucoside links and (1 → 6)-α-glucosidic linkages, respectively [15, 16]. A chimeric glucanase comprising mutanase and dextranase was proved to prevent dental biofilm formation availably [17]. Besides, nuclease was another option for controlling dental biofilm. DNase I could inhibit S. mutans biofilm formation effectively by digesting eDNA [18, 19]. Currently, a nuclease called DeoC was identified as a S. mutans biofilm dispersal factor and it could facilitate S. mutans flee from neutrophil extracellular traps [20].

Ficin, a sulfhydryl protease isolated from the latex of fig trees, can cleave proteins at the carboxyl side of methionine, lysine, arginine, glycine, serine, threonine, valine, asparagines, alanine, and tyrosine [21]. Further, it was proved to be a bifunctional enzyme as it had the intrinsic peroxidase-like activity [21]. Recently, researchers found that ficin disrupted Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis) biofilms and enhanced the antibiofilm effects of antibiotics [22]. Moreover, ficin had no toxic effect on dog adipose derived stem cells and MCF7 carcinoma cells [22]. Ficin is endowed with wider antibiofilm potential as it is a nonspecific sulfhydryl protease and can disrupt the biofilm matrix backbone. So far, there was no report studied the effect of ficin on conditional cariogenic S. mutans biofilm. Therefore, we conducted this study to investigate the antibiofilm activity of ficin against S. mutans biofilm. Concretely, biomass (by crystal violet assay and CFU counting), metabolic activity (by MTT assay), and cariogenic virulence involving EPS (by SEM imaging, bacteria/EPS staining and anthrone method) and acid production (by lactic acid assay) were to value the suppression effect of ficin on S. mutans biofilm. Then, we tested if antibiofilm mechanism of ficin was relevant to bacterial growth inhibition (by growth curve and live/dead bacterial staining) and biofilm extracellular proteins degradation (by protein/bacterial staining and sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis). Finally, expression of acid production, acid tolerance, and biofilm formation-associated genes were monitored by qRT-PCR.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions

S. mutans UA159 was obtained from the Institute of Stomatology, Wenzhou Medical University. Brain-heart infusion (BHI, OXOID, Basingstoke, UK) was used for planktonic S. mutans growth, while BHIS (BHI supplemented with 1% sucrose, ) was used for biofilm formation. The culture condition was 37°C with 5% CO₂.

2.2. Biofilm Susceptibility Assay

Microdilution method was conducted for detecting the effect of ficin (CAS No. 9001-33-6, MP Biomedicals) on biofilm formation. In brief, the total culture volume was 200 μL, twofold serial dilutions of ficin range from 0 mg/mL to 16 mg/mL were prepared in 96-well plate and overnight culture of S. mutans was diluted to final concentration of 10⁶ CFU/mL. 0.12% chlorhexidine (CHX) was used as a positive control group. After incubation for 24 h, the biofilms were tested using crystal violet assay. The biofilms were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and fixed with methanol for 15 min. Then, the biofilms were stained by 0.1% () crystal violet and were quantified by addition of 150 μL 33% acetic acid to each crystal violet-stained well; the absorbance was measured at 590 nm (A590) with a microplate reader (SpectraMax M5, Molecular Devices, USA) [23]. For biofilm qualitative analysis, snapshots of crystal violet-stained biofilms were captured by a stereomicroscope (Nikon SMZ800N, Nikon Corporation, Japan).

The concentration of ficin at 1 mg/mL, 2 mg/mL, 4 mg/mL, and 8 mg/mL was used for following experiments, and 0 mg/mL, 0.12% CHX, protease inhibitor (PI), and PI+4 mg/mL ficin (PI+4) served as control groups. The biofilms were cultured on glass slides in 24-well plates.

2.3. Colony-Forming Unit (CFU)

The 24 h biofilms formed on glass slides in 24-well plate were washed twice with PBS, followed by scraping with sterilized blades and sonication/vortexing in PBS [24]. Then, collected bacterial suspensions were gradient diluted and spread onto BHI agar plates to support S. mutans growth for 48 h. After that, the CFU were analyzed.

2.4. MTT Metabolic Assay

MTT metabolic assay was conducted as described before [25]. The 24 h biofilms on glass slides in 24-well plate were transferred to a new 24-well plate and treated with MTT solution (0.5 mg/mL) for 1 h. Then, the glass slides were put into another 24-well plate and immersed by dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) for 20 min in the dark. Subsequently, 200 μL mixed solution was used for absorbance measurement (A540).

2.5. Lactic Acid Production

The glass slides with 24 h biofilms in 24-well plate were rinsed with cysteine peptone water (CPW) to detach floating bacteria. Then, they were transferred to a new plate containing buffered peptone water (BPW) supplemented with 0.2% sucrose. The whole system was cultured at 5% CO₂, 37°C for 3 h, and BPW was used to equilibrate the pH of the system to ensure acid generation. The lactic acid production was measured by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) with a standard curve method [26].

2.6. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

SEM was used to observe the structure of S. mutans biofilms. For biofilm formation, S. mutans () in BHIS supplemented with 0 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL, 2 mg/mL, 4 mg/mL, and 8 mg/mL of ficin, 0.12% CHX, protease inhibitor, both protease inhibitor, and 4 mg/mL ficin, severally. After 24 h, biofilms formed on glass slides in 24-well plate were rinsed and fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 12 h. Then, the specimens underwent dehydration of gradient ethanol and examined by scanning electron microscope (SEM, Quanta 200, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) at magnifications of 5,000x [27].

2.7. Extracellular Polysaccharides Assay

The bacteria/extracellular polysaccharides (EPS) were stained by fluorescein to observe the architecture [27]. At the beginning of culturing biofilms, 2.5 μM Alexa Fluor 647-dextran conjugate (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen Corp., Carlsbad, CA, USA) was supplemented into the culture media. After 24 h, the biofilms formed on glass slides in 24-well plate were stained with 2.5 μM SYTO 9 (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen Corp., Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 30 min. The bacteria were stained green by SYTO 9 (excitation/emission channel are 480 nm/500 nm) and the polysaccharides were stained red by Alexa Fluor 647-dextran conjugate (excitation/emission channel are 650 nm/668 nm). The stained images were captured by confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM, Nikon A1, Nikon Corporation, Japan), a 60x objective lens. The ratio between EPS and bacteria was calculated according to the coverage using Image pro plus 6.0 (Media Cybernetics, Inc., Silver Spring, MD, USA) [28].

Anthrone method was used to quantify the water-insoluble exopolysaccharides [29]. Briefly, the 24 h biofilms formed on glass slides in 24-well plate were collected and resuspended in 0.4 mol/mL NaOH. After centrifugation, the supernatant reacted with anthrone reagent at 95°C for 6 min, followed by reading the optical density (OD) at 625 nm.

2.8. Live/Dead Bacterial Viability Assay

The BacLight live/dead bacterial viability kit (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) was used to detect bacterial viability. The 24 h biofilms formed on glass slides in 24-well plate were stained with 2.5 μM SYTO 9 and 2.5 μM propidium iodide for 30 min severally, following manufacturer’s instructions. Live bacteria were stained green (excitation/emission channel are 480 nm/500 nm), and dead bacteria were stained red (excitation/emission channel are 490 nm/635 nm) using CLSM (Nikon A1, Nikon Corporation, Japan). Each sample was obtained at five randomly selected views with a 60x objective lens. The ratio between live and total bacteria was analyzed on the basis of coverage with software Image pro plus 6.0 (Media Cybernetics, Inc., Silver Spring, MD, USA) as mentioned above.

2.9. Protein and Bacterial Staining

Protein and bacterial staining was conducted according to previous study [30]. We monitored the changes in protein at a series of time points (2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 16 h, and 24 h) during the biofilm development in 24-well plate. 20 μM SYTO 63 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) was added to specimen for 30 min to stain bacteria (excitation/emission channel are 657 nm/673 nm); subsequently, the specimen was incubated with 100 μg/mL FITC (excitation/emission channel are 495 nm/525 nm) for 1 h to stain proteins. The bacteria were stained red while proteins were stained green. The biofilms formed on glass slides were examined by CLSM (Nikon A1, Nikon Corporation, Japan) with a 60x objective lens.

2.10. Extracellular Proteins Isolation and SDS-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (PAGE) Analysis

The biofilm extracellular proteins were isolated as previously reported [31]. Briefly, the biofilm formed on glass slides in 24-well plate was handled with 0.1 mol/L NaOH with 1 mM EDTA and incubated at 0°C for 1 h. After centrifugation at 3000 g and 4°C for 30 min, the supernatant was collected, 3 volume of precooled acetone were added and incubated at -20°C overnight. After centrifugation again at 3000 g and 4°C for 30 min, the sediment was used for further SDS-PAGE analysis. 50 μg of extracted proteins were loaded, and 10% separating gel was used for electrophoresis. After stained with Coomassie blue, the protein bands were captured by a camera.

2.11. RNA Extraction and Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR)

S. mutans was collected from 24 h biofilm formed on glass slides in 24-well plate by centrifugation, and RNA was extracted using a Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) [32]. The RNA concentration and purity were determined by a nanodrop 2000, while the RNA integrity was detected by agarose gel electrophoresis. cDNA was synthesized by a PrimeScript™ RT Master Mix (Perfect Real Time) kit (Takara, Japan). qRT-PCR was analyzed by TB Green™ Premix Ex Taq™ II (Tli RNaseH Plus) kit (Takara, Japan) in a Step One Plus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). The volume of reaction mixture was set as 20 μL (10 μL 2× TB Green Premix Ex Taq II, 0.4 μL 50× ROX Reference Dye, 2 μL cDNA, 0.8 μL Forward Primer, 0.8 μL Reverse Primer, 6 μL H₂O). The reaction conditions were 95°C for 30 s, 40 cycles (95°C for 5 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s). The gene expression was normalized with reference gene 16S using method. Primers were listed in Table 1.

2.12. Data Analysis

All the experiments were repeated three times. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to identify the significant effects of variables, followed by the Tukey’s multiple comparison test ( value of 0.05) with the SPSS software 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Ficin Decreased the Biomass, CFU, and Metabolic Activity of S. mutans Biofilm

The crystal violet results revealed that suppression effect of ficin on S. mutans biofilm formation was dose-dependent, and 4 mg/mL ficin had megascopic inhibitory effect on S. mutans biofilm formation (Figure 1). The CFU results showed that there was no significant difference between 0 mg/mL ficin group, 1 mg/mL ficin group, 2 mg/mL ficin group, PI group, and PI+4 group (Figure 2(a), ). While 4 mg/mL ficin group and 8 mg/mL ficin group reduced by 1.9 log₁₀ CFU and 4.1 log₁₀ CFU, respectively, when compared with 0 mg/mL ficin group (Figure 2(a), ). The CHX group showed the least CFU, reaching to 2.4 log₁₀ CFU (Figure 2(a)). The biofilm metabolic activity revealed by MTT assay showed similar trend (Figure 2(b)). The OD values in 4 mg/mL ficin group, 8 mg/mL ficin group, and CHX group reduced significantly when compared with 0 mg/mL ficin group ().

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 2

(a) CFU of S. mutans biofilm; (b) metabolic activity of S. mutans biofilm revealed by MTT assay; (c) SEM images of S. mutans biofilm; i-v represent S. mutans biofilm under effect of 0, 1, 2, 4, and 8 mg/mL ficin, respectively; vi-viii represent CHX group, PI group, and PI+4 group, severally. CHX represents 0.12% chlorhexidine, PI represents protease inhibitor, and PI+4 represents protease inhibitor+4 mg/mL ficin. . Data are presented as , and values with dissimilar letters are significantly different from each other ().

3.2. Ficin Degraded Polysaccharide Production of S. mutans Biofilm

Through the SEM images, there was aggregated S. mutans being wrapped in numerous extracellular polysaccharides in 0 mg/mL ficin group, 1 mg/mL ficin group, 2 mg/mL ficin group, PI group, and PI+4 group, forming robust biofilms (Figure 2(c)). While for 4 mg/mL and 8 mg/mL ficin group, there were bare extracellular polysaccharides, and biofilms showed had relatively loose structure (Figure 2(c)). In CHX group, there were plenty of swollen and broken bacteria, only few thallus with complete structure in biofilm (Figure 2(c)). The extracellular polysaccharides in this group were also much less than those of 0 mg/mL ficin group, 1 mg/mL ficin group, 2 mg/mL ficin group, PI group, and PI+4 group (Figure 2(c)).

The bacteria/extracellular polysaccharides staining result presented the same trend as that of water insoluble glucan result (Figure 3). Extracellular polysaccharides stained red and bacteria stained green. The bacteria in 0 mg/mL ficin, 1 mg/mL ficin, 2 mg/mL ficin, PI, and PI+4 groups were wrapped in abundant polysaccharides, while in 4 mg/mL, 8 mg/mL ficin and 0.12% CHX groups showed much less bacteria and polysaccharides (Figure 3(a)). The ratio between polysaccharides and bacteria revealed by quantitative analysis verified there was no significant difference among all the groups except the 8 mg/mL ficin group which had lowest ratio (Figure 3(b)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

The bacterial water insoluble glucan in biofilms were detected by anthrone method. In general, 4 mg/mL ficin group, 8 mg/mL ficin group, and CHX group synthesized remarkably less water insoluble glucan, down to 11.2%, 5.3%, and 11.7% of 0 mg/mL ficin group, respectively (Figure 3(c), ).

3.3. Ficin Reduced Lactic Acid Production of S. mutans Biofilm

The lactic acid production results displayed that 4 mg/mL ficin group, 8 mg/mL ficin group, and CHX group produced less lactic acid than other groups (Figure 4, ). 4 mg/mL ficin group and 8 mg/mL ficin group reduced lactic acid production to 72.2% and 18.3% of 0 mg/mL ficin group (Figure 4).

3.4. Ficin Inhibited S. mutans Biofilm Formation Not Mainly through Affecting Bacterial Vitality

To study whether ficin suppressed S. mutans biofilm formation was through influencing bacterial activity, growth curve and live/dead bacterial staining in biofilms were managed (Figure 5). The live/dead bacterial staining in biofilms showed the bacterial vitality seemed uninfluenced by ficin (Figure 5(a)). There was no significant difference between different ficin groups in live/dead bacterial staining result according to quantitative analysis (Figure 5(b), ). The growth curves of 0 mg/mL ficin group, 1 mg/mL ficin group, 2 mg/mL ficin group, 4 mg/mL ficin group, and 8 mg/mL ficin group were aligned with each other roughly (Figure 5(c)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

3.5. Ficin Inhibited S. mutans Biofilm Formation and Reduced Protein during the Biofilm Development

We stained the total protein during the biofilm development and found 4 mg/mL ficin-reduced bacteria (stained red) and total protein (stained green) in biofilm when compared with 0 mg/mL ficin group in 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 16 h, and 24 h (Figure 6(a)). From these results, ficin could reduce total protein in biofilm and inhibit biofilm formation and during the biofilm development (Figure 6(a)). Further protein staining results revealed by Coomassie blue staining showed that there were more relatively small molecular weight protein bands in 4 mg/mL ficin group when compared with 0 mg/mL ficin group in extracellular protein (Figure 6(b)).

(a)

(b)

3.6. Ficin Changed Gene Expression of S. mutans in Biofilm

Compared with 0 mg/mL ficin group, acid production and tolerance-associated ldh and atpD were upregulated significantly in 4 mg/mL ficin group (Figure 7, ). Polysaccharide- and biofilm-related genes gtfB, gtfC, and gtfD were about 3.0-fold (), 2.1-fold (), and 1.0-fold () in 4 mg/mL ficin group, respectively (Figure 7). The expression of other biofilm-associated genes brpA, gbpA, gbpB, gbpC, spaP, lusX, comDE, comX, and vicR in 4 mg/mL ficin group were also upregulated notably () except gbpD (Figure 7, ).

4. Discussion

In this study, we investigated the effects of ficin on biofilm formation of S. mutans. Our results showed that ficin suppressed the biofilm formation of S. mutans as well as acid production and EPS synthesis evidently in a dose-dependent manner. We also found that ficin inhibited biofilm formation during the biofilm development. Besides, the total protein was reduced, and there was more relatively small molecular weight extracellular protein under effect of 4 mg/mL ficin. Ficin seemed not influence bacterial vitality markedly under our test, while most of biofilm-associated genes of S. mutans detected were upregulated observably when treated with 4 mg/mL ficin.

Acid production is one of the most important cariogenic virulence factors of S. mutans. Lactate dehydrogenase encoded by ldh plays an important role in the process of carbohydrate metabolism [34]. We found lactic acid production in 4 mg/mL ficin group decrease by 27.8% while the expression of ldh was upregulated by 2 times when compared with 0 mg/mL ficin group. The CFU in 4 mg/mL ficin group was reduced by 1.9 log₁₀CFU when compared with 0 mg/mL ficin group. Taken these results together, we speculated that ficin could reduce the total lactic acid production of biofilm, while the reduced total lactic acid production of biofilm in 4 mg/mL ficin group may mainly result from the reduction of biofilm biomass. The expression of atpD gene which encoded F0F1-H/F-ATPase β subunit of the F1 protein was about 2-fold in 4 mg/mL ficin group when compared to 0 mg/mL ficin group. The F0F1-ATPase facilitated the survival of S. mutans under acidic environment through removal of protons from the cell to maintain the cytoplasmic pH which was closely related with acid tolerance [39]. We conjectured that ficin upregulated the expression levels of acid tolerance-linked gene atpD might respond to the upregulation of acid production gene ldh.

EPS, particularly glucans, make great contribution to cariogenicity of S. mutans. Water-insoluble glucans among glucans are identified as major components of EPS in S. mutans biofilms [40]. EPS can promote adhesion and accumulation of bacteria, provide mechanical stability for extracellular polymeric substances of biofilm, guard bacteria within biofilm from adverse environment, stockpile energy source, a strict substance spread, condense iron, and nutrients in biofilm [41]. The EPS was decreased prominently when the concentration of ficin were 2 mg/mL or higher. While the expression of EPS-related gene gtfB and gtfC raised dramatically excepted gtfD. Gtfs being able to convert sucrose to glucan have three distinct protein, GtfB (encoded by gtfB), GtfC (encoded by gtfC), and GtfD (encoded by gtfD) produce water insoluble glucan, a mixture of insoluble and soluble glucans, and soluble glucan, severally [42]. It was reported that expression of EPS was necessary for adhesion under stress [43]. The upregulated gtfB and gtfC might result from protection mechanism of S. mutans which increased the expression of EPS-associated gene to response to ficin stress.

Adhesion that can facilitate colonization and biofilm formation is another cariogenicity of S. mutans. Apart from gtfB, gtfC, and gtfD mentioned above, we detected adhesion-associated genes under the effect of ficin including spaP, gbpA, gbpB, gbpC, and gbpD. Most of these genes including spaP, gbpA, gbpB, and gbpC were upregulated signally except gbpD. SpaP (encoded by spaP) is a critical adhesin that mediates initial sucrose independent adherence of S. mutans to tooth surface by interacting specifically with salivary agglutinin [44]. Then, the stronger adherence, sucrose-dependent adherence, is mediated by glucosyltransferases (Gtfs) and glucan-binding proteins (Gbps). Gtfs, especially GtfB and GtfC, support early attachment and aggregation of bacteria at the early-biofilm phase. Gbps, which cover GbpA (encoded by gbpA), GbpB (encoded by gbpB), GbpC (encoded by gbpC), and GbpD (encoded by gbpD), mediate the binding of bacteria to glucans and biofilm formation of S. mutans especially GbpB and GbpC [36]. Besides, the gene expression of brpA in ficin containing group was also upregulated significantly. Cell surface-associated biofilm regulatory protein BrpA (encoded by brpA) played a key role in environmental stress responses and efficient biofilm formation of S. mutans [33].

Complex signal regulation systems are involved in biofilm formation. Quorum sensing (QS) that can sense microbial numbers, environmental stresses, and carbohydrate alteration is vital in initial adherence and biofilm maturation [45]. QS-associated genes luxS, comDE, and comX were all upregulated when administered by ficin. luxS is responsible for autoinducer-2 synthesis which is involved in interspecies communication, and its deficiency will weaken biofilm formation [37]. comDE and comX take part in competence-stimulating peptide- (CSP-) induced signal cascade for development of genetic competence and intraspecies communication. comDE encodes competence-stimulating peptide (CSP) receptor (comD) and response regulator (comE), while comX, also known as sigX, is a sigma factor and is identified as the master regulator of competence development of S. mutans [45]. It has been reported that comD-, comE-, and comX-deficient mutants formed biofilms with decreased biomass and lacked architectural integrity [46]. The expression of VicR, a response regulator of VicRK two component system that can regulate biofilm formation, was also upregulated under ficin [45]. The upregulation of most genes above which could facilitate biofilm formation or necessary for robust biofilm formation including adhesion and signal regulation systems relevant might result from similar reason as that of EPS-associated genes. Under stress of ficin, S. mutans upregulated biofilm-associated genes to promote biofilm formation [39].

Antibiofilm mechanism was dissimilar depending on different type of protease. According to previous report, ficin suppressed staphylococcal biofilm by degradation of the protein backbone of biofilm without bactericidal effect [22]. We tested if the antibiofilm effect of ficin on S. mutans was through bacterial activity repression, while our data showed that bacterial activity of both planktonic cells, and bacteria in biofilms were not inhibited markedly which was consistent with previous reports [22]. The total protein and extracellular protein in biofilm were reduced, and there were more small molecular proteins under influence of ficin. Hence, the inhibitory effect of ficin on S. mutans biofilm formation might also be via degradation of biofilm matrix proteins. It should be noted that ficin inhibited S. mutans biofilm formation throughout the whole process of biofilm development. This might be attributed to the degradation of biofilm formation-related protein or polypeptide by ficin. The actual molecular mechanisms of ficin on S. mutans biofilm needed to be further studied.

Chlorhexidine, a commonly used oral cavity cleanser, showed toxic towards cells even at concentration that much lower than clinical use. By comparison, previous study used MCF7 cells and dog adipose-derived stem cells to cytotoxicity of ficin; they found ficin was safe for potential biomedical applications [22]. Exploring cocktail treatment that combined ficin with bactericide which had synergetic effect could be ideal antibiofilm strategy in which ficin was used for antibiofilm while bactericide was used for killing residual biofilm and planktonic bacteria. However, lots of work should be done for further application of ficin. For example, dental plaque is more than complex; other biofilm model such as saliva biofilm or animal experiment in vivo were also recommended for further application of ficin in oral cavity. Moreover, as a nonspecific protease, broader antibiofilm effect of ficin was recommended to explore. What is more, potential application of ficin in material modification or tissue engineering such as modify ficin on the surface of materials or incorporate ficin into scaffold could be further studied. For example, recent research showed both antibiofilm and wound-healing properties of chitosan-immobilized ficin [47].

5. Conclusions

Based on the fact that ficin had suppressed biofilm formation and cariogenic virulence of S. mutans including acid production and EPS synthesis significantly, ficin may be a potential antibiofilm agent to control dental caries.

Data Availability

The datasets generated and analyzed to support the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Disclosure

The abstract of this article was presented in The 2nd International Symposium on Biofilms.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors of this article declared no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Yan Sun, Wentao Jiang, and Mingzheng Zhang contributed to this article equally.

Acknowledgments

We thank Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Medical Genetics for their CLSM support. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China grant (grant numbers 82001041 and 81700960), Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers LGF19H140004 and LGF20H140001), and Wenzhou Technology Bureau Project (grant numbers Y20190487 and Y20180163).

References

H. S. Bawaskar and P. H. Bawaskar, “Oral diseases: a global public health challenge,” Lancet, vol. 395, no. 10219, pp. 185-186, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. I. Hay, A. A. Abajobir, K. H. Abate et al., “Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 333 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016,” Lancet, vol. 390, no. 10100, pp. 1260–1344, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Xiong, X. Chen, H. Hu, H. Hou, P. Gao, and L. Zou, “Antimicrobial effect of a peptide containing novel oral spray on Streptococcus mutans,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2020, Article ID 6853652, 13 pages, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Scharnow, A. E. Solinski, and W. M. Wuest, “Mutansbiofilms: a perspective on preventing dental caries,” Medchemcomm, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1057–1067, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Wang, Y. Wang, Y. Wang et al., “Theaflavin-3,3-digallate suppresses biofilm formation, acid production, and acid tolerance in Streptococcus mutans by targeting virulence factors,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 10, p. 1705, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Høiby, T. Bjarnsholt, M. Givskov, S. Molin, and O. Ciofu, “Antibiotic resistance of bacterial biofilms,” International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 322–332, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. F. Haney, M. J. Trimble, J. T. Cheng, Q. Vallé, and R. E. W. Hancock, “Critical assessment of methods to quantify biofilm growth and evaluate antibiofilm activity of host defence peptides,” Biomolecules, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 29, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Koo, R. N. Allan, R. P. Howlin, P. Stoodley, and L. Hall-Stoodley, “Targeting microbial biofilms: current and prospective therapeutic strategies,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 740–755, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Pleszczyńska, A. Wiater, T. Bachanek, and J. Szczodrak, “Enzymes in therapy of biofilm-related oral diseases,” Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 337–346, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Kumar, C. R. Cox, and S. K. Sarkar, “Matrix metalloprotease-1 inhibits and disrupts Enterococcus faecalis biofilms,” PLoS One, vol. 14, no. 1, article e0210218, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Niazi, D. Clark, T. Do et al., “The effectiveness of enzymic irrigation in removing a nutrient-stressed endodontic multispecies biofilm,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 756–768, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. C. Praveen, A. Rajesh, M. Madan, V. R. Chaurasia, N. V. Hiremath, and A. M. Sharma, “In vitro evaluation of antibacterial efficacy of pineapple extract (bromelain) on periodontal pathogens,” Journal of International Oral Health, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 96–98, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
E. A. Izano, H. Wang, C. Ragunath, N. Ramasubbu, and J. B. Kaplan, “Detachment and killing of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans biofilms by dispersin B and SDS,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 86, no. 7, pp. 618–622, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Stacy, J. Everett, P. Jorth, U. Trivedi, K. P. Rumbaugh, and M. Whiteley, “Bacterial fight-and-flight responses enhance virulence in a polymicrobial infection,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 111, no. 21, pp. 7819–7824, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. M. Yang, D. Jiang, Y. X. Qiu et al., “Effects of combined exogenous dextranase and sodium fluoride on Streptococcus mutans 25175 monospecies biofilms,” American Journal of Dentistry, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 239–243, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Pleszczyńska, A. Wiater, M. Janczarek, and J. Szczodrak, “(1 -> 3)-α-d-Glucan hydrolases in dental biofilm prevention and control: a review,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 79, pp. 761–778, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Otsuka, S. Imai, T. Murata et al., “Application of chimeric glucanase comprising mutanase and dextranase for prevention of dental biofilm formation,” Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 59, 1, no. 1, pp. 28–36, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Liao, M. I. Klein, K. P. Heim et al., “Streptococcus mutans extracellular DNA is upregulated during growth in biofilms, actively released via membrane vesicles, and influenced by components of the protein secretion machinery,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 196, no. 13, pp. 2355–2366, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Ye, C. Shao, X. Zhang et al., “Effects of DNase I coating of titanium on bacteria adhesion and biofilm formation,” Materials Science & Engineering. C, Materials for Biological Applications, vol. 78, pp. 738–747, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Liu, L. Sun, W. Liu et al., “A nuclease from Streptococcus mutans facilitates biofilm dispersal and escape from killing by neutrophil extracellular traps,” Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, vol. 7, p. 97, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Yang, D. Shen, Y. Long, Z. Xie, and H. Zheng, “Intrinsic peroxidase-like activity of ficin,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, article 43141, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. R. Baidamshina, E. Y. Trizna, M. G. Holyavka et al., “Targeting microbial biofilms using Ficin, a nonspecific plant protease,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, article 46068, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Peeters, H. J. Nelis, and T. Coenye, “Comparison of multiple methods for quantification of microbial biofilms grown in microtiter plates,” Journal of Microbiological Methods, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 157–165, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Qiu, X. Zheng, Y. Wei et al., “d-Alanine metabolism is essential for growth and biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans,” Molecular Oral Microbiology, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 435–444, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Han, B. Li, X. Zhou et al., “Anti-caries effects of dental adhesives containing quaternary ammonium methacrylates with different chain lengths,” Materials (Basel), vol. 10, no. 6, p. 643, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Wang, Y. Ge, X. Zhou et al., “Effect of anti-biofilm glass-ionomer cement on _Streptococcus mutans_ biofilms,” International Journal of Oral Science, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 76–83, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Wang, K. Zhang, X. Zhou et al., “Antibacterial effect of dental adhesive containing dimethylaminododecyl methacrylate on the development of Streptococcus mutans biofilm,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 12791–12806, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Zheng, K. Zhang, X. Zhou et al., “Involvement of gshAB in the interspecies competition within oral biofilm,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 92, no. 9, pp. 819–824, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Ren, T. Cui, J. Zeng et al., “Molecule targeting glucosyltransferase inhibits Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation and virulence,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 126–135, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Y. Chen, D. J. Lee, J. H. Tay, and K. Y. Show, “Staining of extracellular polymeric substances and cells in bioaggregates,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 467–474, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. F. Paes Leme, C. M. Bellato, G. Bedi, A. A. Cury, H. Koo, and J. A. Cury, “Effects of sucrose on the extracellular matrix of plaque-like biofilm formed in vivo, studied by proteomic analysis,” Caries Research, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 435–443, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E.-H. Kim, S.-Y. Kang, B.-I. Park et al., “Chamaecyparis obtusa suppresses virulence genes in Streptococcus mutans,” Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine: eCAM, vol. 2016, article 2396404, 8 pages, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Feldman, I. Ginsburg, A. Al-Quntar, and D. Steinberg, “Thiazolidinedione-8 alters symbiotic relationship in C. albicans-S. mutans dual species biofilm,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 7, p. 140, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wang, X. Wang, W. Jiang et al., “Antimicrobial peptide GH12 suppresses cariogenic virulence factors of Streptococcus mutans,” Journal of Oral Microbiology, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 1442089, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. T. Wen, D. Yates, S. J. Ahn, and R. A. Burne, “Biofilm formation and virulence expression by Streptococcus mutans are altered when grown in dual-species model,” BMC Microbiology, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 111, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Huang, M. Li, and R. L. Gregory, “Nicotine promotes _Streptococcus mutans_ extracellular polysaccharide synthesis, cell aggregation and overall lactate dehydrogenase activity,” Archives of Oral Biology, vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 1083–1090, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. He, J. Liang, Z. Tang, R. Ma, H. Peng, and Z. Huang, “Role of the luxS gene in initial biofilm formation by Streptococcus mutans,” Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 60–68, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Chakraborty and R. A. Burne, “Effects of arginine on Streptococcus mutans growth, virulence gene expression, and stress tolerance,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 83, no. 15, article e00496-17, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Gabe, T. Kacergius, S. Abu-Lafi et al., “Inhibitory effects of ethyl gallate on Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation by optical profilometry and gene expression analysis,” Molecules, vol. 24, no. 3, p. 529, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Sun, Y. Pan, Y. Sun et al., “Effects of norspermidine on dual‐species biofilms composed of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sanguinis,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2019, Article ID 1950790, 9 pages, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Koo, J. Xiao, and M. I. Klein, “Extracellular polysaccharides matrix--an often forgotten virulence factor in oral biofilm research,” International Journal of Oral Science, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 229–234, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. H. Bowen and H. Koo, “Biology of Streptococcus mutans-derived glucosyltransferases: role in extracellular matrix formation of cariogenic biofilms,” Caries Research, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 69–86, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. M. Decker, C. Klein, D. Schwindt, and C. von Ohle, “Metabolic activity of _Streptococcus mutans_ biofilms and gene expression during exposure to xylitol and sucrose,” International Journal of Oral Science, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 195–204, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Yang, D. Deng, B. W. Brandt et al., “Diversity of SpaP in genetic and salivary agglutinin mediated adherence among _Streptococcus mutans_ strains,” Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 19943, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Lu, L. Cheng, Y. Huang et al., “Resumptive Streptococcus mutans persisters induced from dimethylaminododecyl methacrylate elevated the cariogenic virulence by up-regulating the quorum-sensing and VicRK pathway genes,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 10, p. 3102, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. H. Li, N. Tang, M. B. Aspiras et al., “A quorum-sensing signaling system essential for genetic competence in Streptococcus mutans is involved in biofilm formation,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 184, no. 10, pp. 2699–2708, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. R. Baidamshina, V. A. Koroleva, E. Y. Trizna et al., “Anti-biofilm and wound-healing activity of chitosan-immobilized Ficin,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 164, pp. 4205–4217, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Yan Sun et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1748

Downloads

1475

Citations