Review Article

Manual Therapy as a Management of Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review

Table 2

Study characteristics.

StudySubjects, no. (M/F)
[Age range]
Selection criteriaInterventionProtocolOutcomesMain results

Afzal (2019)40 (17/23)Unilateral pain in upper limb, paraesthesia w/o numbness. RMN
3 of 4 items +: Spurling, facet distraction, ULTT1, ipsilateral
EMG/ENG: no
G1: openings
G2: manual cervical traction
G3:
Treatment: 3 ssn/3 weeks
G1: 10 reps/3 series
G2:10 sec traction/5 sec rest (10 min)
All: 15 min heat before
Follow-up: ending
NDI
NPRS
Cervical ROM
Patient-specific PSFS
Statistically significant improvement in the 3 groups in all the outcomes

Bukhari (2016)42 (-)
[20-70]
“Evident symptoms of cervical radiculopathy”
EMG/ENG: no
G1: mechanical traction
G2: manual traction
Both: segment mobilisation & exercises
Treatment: 3 ssn/6 weeks
G1: 10 sec traction/5 sec rest (10 min)
G2: 10 sec traction/5 sec rest (10 reps)
Anteroposterior mobilisation: 5 sec/10 reps
Follow-up: ending
NPRS
NDI
Significant changes in both groups
, no comparison between groups

Cui (2017)359 (25%/75%)
[18-65]
Neurologist diagnosis. Pain in 1 or more dermatomes, weakness, & hyporeflexia
EMG/ENG: No
G1: mobilisation plus Shi-style cervical manipulation
G2: mechanical cervical traction
Treatment: 6 ssn in 2 weeks
Mobilisation plus Shi-style cervical manipulation: neck, back, thoracic massage, & UL movement (30 sec/point)
Mechanical cervical traction: 20 min
Follow-up: ending, weeks 2, 10, & 22 postfinal Tx
NDI
VAS
SF-36
Statistically significant improvement in both groups, G1 > G2 in VAS & NDI
NDI difference disappears at 22 weeks
VAS: difference disappears at 10 weeks

Eldesoky (2019)50 (-)
[18-60]
Unilateral hernia diagnosis in C5 or C6 confirmed using RMN
Pain, paraesthesia, or numbness in the C6 or C7 dermatome. Cervical or periscapular pain, cervical rigidity, alteration in dermatome sensitivity, weakness, & muscular atrophy in myotome. Lack of tendon reflexes for more than 3 months
G1: (MC)
G2: conventional Tx
Treatment: 3ss/4 weeks
Conventional Tx: ultrasound & strengthening
MC: posteroanterior & oscillatory rotations in C6 & C7 (10 reps/30 sec/technique)
Follow-up: upon ending Tx & at 4 weeks post-Tx
VAS
NDI
SEP
Both groups: statistically significant improvement in all the outcomes; G1 statistically superior

Hassan (2020)40 (27/13)
[30-70]
Neck pain less than 8 on NPRS & numbness/paraesthesia and/or pain in the arm or the hand. Positive findings of cervical radiculopathy on X-rays
3 of 4 items +: Spurling, facet distraction, ULTT1, ipsilateral
EMG/ENG: no
G1: (Maitland)
G2: of static stretching (Kaltenborn)
Treatment: 7 ssn/2 weeks
G1: ( reps)
G2: mobilisation (3 series)
Follow-up: ending
NPRS
NDI
Cervical ROM
Significant improvements in all variables in both groups
: significant differences for all the outcomes except for NPRS & inclinations

Ibrahim (2019)40 (-)
[20–40]
Radiated pain in 1 of the arms
3 of 4 items +: Spurling, facet distraction, ULTT1, ipsilateral
EMG/ENG: no
G1: conventional Tx
G2:
Treatment: 3 ssn/3 weeks
Conventional Tx:
Neurodynamic Tx: ULTT gliding (10 reps) + ULTT tensioning (10 sec) x 2
Follow-up: ending
VAS
Pressure strength
Statistically significant changes in both groups, without significant differences between them

Khan (2016)100 (50/50)
[25-55]
Cervical radiculopathy neurologist’s diagnosis
3 of 4 items plus: Spurling, facet distraction, ULTT1, ipsilateral
EMG/ENG: no
G1: conventional Tx
G2:
Treatment: 6 ss/week. 12ss
Conventional Tx: exercises (25 reps/twice a day)
Continuous TENS (20 min)
Heat
Cervical traction: 10 sec/5 sec rest (20 min)
Follow-up: ending
VAS in VAS

Kim (2017)30
[25-60]
Pain radiation in 1 of the ULs
3 of 4 items +: Spurling, facet distraction, ULTT1, ipsilateral
EMG/ENG: no
G1:
G2: manual cervical traction
Treatment: 3 ss/8 weeks
Both: heat (20 min) & TENS (15 min)
Cervical traction: 1 min/30 sec rest (10 min)
Neural mobilisation: median gliding exercises (combines flexion-extension in wrist & elbow) (10 min)
Follow-up: weeks 4 & 8 post-Tx
NPRS
NDI
ROM
FME
Statistically significant improvement in the 2 groups. statistically significant in all the outcomes

Kumar (2010)30 (10/20)
[25-68]
Diagnosis by neurologist or traumatologist
Spontaneous pain in the neck, with radiation in the arm, forearm, hand
EMG/ENG: no
G1: McKenzie mobilisation
G2: neural mobilisation
G3: diathermia & mechanical cervical traction
Treatment: 10 sessions in 3 weeks
G1: 10-15 openings (1 rep/5 sec)
G2: 100 Hz/50 μs/30 min
G3: 6-8 sec/rep, 5 reps (flexion, extension, inclination, rotation)
Heat: 20-25 min cervical posterior
Follow-up: weeks 3 & 6 post-Tx
VAS
Cervical ROM: scalar method
VAS: all with statistically significant reduction ()
ROM: improvement in the 3
Adverse effects: not reported

Langevin (2014)36
[18-65]
Pain in superior or periscapular limb, paraesthesia or meses
3 of 4 items +: Spurling, facet distraction, ULTT1, ipsilateral
EMG/ENG: no
G1: TM & exercise to open intervertebral foramen
G2: TM & exercise
Treatment: 8 ss in 4 weeks
G1: MT 10 reps/30 sec→+ at-home exercise
G2: equal to G1 without foramen opening objective
Follow-up: weeks 4 & 8
NDI
NPRS
QuickDASH
Statistically significant difference in both groups in the 3 outcomes. No differences between groups

Ojo Ojoawo (2016)25 (15/12)
[-]
Traumatologist diagnosis
EMG/ENG: no
G1:
G2: conventional Tx
Treatment: 3ss/4 weeks.
Conventional Tx:
TOP: 20 sec/3 reps
Follow-up: weeks 2 & 4
VAS
NDI
Significant improvement in both groups. statistically significant in VAS

Ojo Ojoawo (2018)75 (40/35)
[-]
Cervical pain radiated in the arm.
Positive test in: Pinched nerve, posteroanterior pressure, Spurling test & positive Valsalva
EMG/ENG: No
G1: cervical traction (CT)
G2: transversal oscillatory pressure (TOP)
G3: exercise + cryotherapy
Treatment: 2 ss/week/6 weeks
G1: TC 15 min
G2: TOP 20 sec/3 reps
G3: 3 ss/week/6 weeks
Follow-up: weeks 3 & 6 Tx
VAS
NDI
Statistically significant improvements in all groups
VAS: G2 change quicker (weeks) & greater at 6 weeks
NDI: no statistically significant differences; yes, greater percentage of change in G1 & G3

Prabhakar (2011)75 (48%/52%)
[20–50]
Diagnosis of cervical spondylosis with subacute radiated pain in upper limb
EMG/ENG: no
G1:
G2:
G3:
Treatment: 10 sessions in 3 weeks
G1: 10-15 (1rep/5 sec)
G2: 100 Hz/50 μs/30 min
G3: 6-8 sec/rep, 5 reps (flexion, extension, inclination, rotation)
Heat: 20-25 min cervical posterior
Follow-up: weeks 3 & 6 post-Tx
VAS
ROM elbow extension in median NDT
NPQ
NPS
SF-MPQ
G1 & G2: statistically significant improvement in all the outcomes
NPQ, SF-MPQ: in 3 weeks. (reduced radicular pain & functional improvement)
Adverse effects: not reported

Savva (2020)66 (32/34)
[20-75]
Unilateral pain in upper limbs, together with sensory and/or motor symptoms
3 of 4 items +: Spurling, facet distraction, ULTT1, ipsilateral
EMG/ENG: no
G1:
G2: neural mobilisation
G3: control
Treatment: 3 ss/week/4 weeks
G1: 12-15 min;  sec, rest 30
G2: 12-15 min;  sec, rest 30
G3: no
Follow-up: ending
NDI
NPRS
PSFS
Pressure strength
Cervical ROM
Statistically significant improvement of the groups in all the outcomes except for pressure strength, active flexion, & inclinations
: NDI, NPRS, & contralateral rotation
: NPRS

Shafique (2019)31 (12/19)
[20-60]
3 de 4 items +: Spurling, facet distraction, ULTT1, ipsilateral
EMG/ENG: no
G1: spinal mobilisation with movement of Tx
G2: conventional Tx:
Treatment: 2 ss/3 weeks
G1: cervical mobilisation-transversal gliding (10 reps in 1st ssn) (30 reps/3 series in following ssn)
G2: conventional Tx: (6-10 sec/20 reps)
Neurodynamics: 10 gliding exercises/ssn
Manual traction: 10 sec/5 sec rest (10 min)
Follow-up: finalisation
NPRS
NDI
ROM
in the 3 variables. Statistically significant

Waqas (2016)100 (63/37)
[20-60]
Referred by surgeon or traumatologist for unilateral cervical radiculopathy, due to a disk prolapse. Spurling test, ULTT, cervical distraction, & positive evocation tests
EMG/ENG: no
G1: thoracic manipulation
G2: cervical mobilisation
Both: cervical traction & exercises
Treatment: 3 ss/4 weeks
G1: no specific dose
G2: no specific dose
Cervical traction: 10 min
Follow-up: weeks 2 & 4
NDI
NPRS
Both groups experience statistically significant improvement in the 2 outcomes. G1 obtained better, statistically significant results

Young (2019)43
[18-65]
3 de 4 items +: Spurling, facet distraction, ULTT1, ipsilateral
EMG/ENG: no
G1: thoracic manipulation
G2: placebo manipulation
Treatment: 1 ssn
Follow-up: finalisation & 48/72 h post-Tx
NPRS
NDI
ROM
FME
GROC
neck NPRS not in arm
in NDI, FME, GROC & ROM except inclination to asymptomatic side