X-Ray Equipped with Artificial Intelligence: Changing the COVID-19 Diagnostic Paradigm during the Pandemic

Ghaderzadeh, Mustafa; Aria, Mehrad; Asadi, Farkhondeh

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9942873

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Discussion Conclusions Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 9942873 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9942873

X-Ray Equipped with Artificial Intelligence: Changing the COVID-19 Diagnostic Paradigm during the Pandemic

Mustafa Ghaderzadeh,¹Mehrad Aria,²and Farkhondeh Asadi³

Academic Editor: Alessandro Fancellu

Received23 Mar 2021

Revised16 Jun 2021

Accepted04 Aug 2021

Published26 Aug 2021

Abstract

Purpose. Due to the excessive use of raw materials in diagnostic tools and equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a dire need for cheaper and more effective methods in the healthcare system. With the development of artificial intelligence (AI) methods in medical sciences as low-cost and safer diagnostic methods, researchers have turned their attention to the use of imaging tools with AI that have fewer complications for patients and reduce the consumption of healthcare resources. Despite its limitations, X-ray is suggested as the first-line diagnostic modality for detecting and screening COVID-19 cases. Method. This systematic review assessed the current state of AI applications and the performance of algorithms in X-ray image analysis. The search strategy yielded 322 results from four databases and google scholar, 60 of which met the inclusion criteria. The performance statistics included the area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUC) curve, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Result. The average sensitivity and specificity of CXR equipped with AI algorithms for COVID-19 diagnosis were >96% (83%-100%) and 92% (80%-100%), respectively. For common X-ray methods in COVID-19 detection, these values were 0.56 (95% CI 0.51-0.60) and 0.60 (95% CI 0.54-0.65), respectively. AI has substantially improved the diagnostic performance of X-rays in COVID-19. Conclusion. X-rays equipped with AI can serve as a tool to screen the cases requiring CT scans. The use of this tool does not waste time or impose extra costs, has minimal complications, and can thus decrease or remove unnecessary CT slices and other healthcare resources.

1. Introduction

Upon the emergence of COVID-19, the World Health Organization (WHO) designated the outbreak as a global health emergency and changed the disease state from an epidemic to a pandemic. One year has elapsed since that date, and on March 2, 2021, more than 120 million confirmed cases of COVID-19 have been reported globally. Of these, more than 2.65 million cases died [1]. The symptoms of COVID-19 are nonspecific; based on reports, in individuals and families with asymptomatic infections, CT scans show pneumonia, and the virus pathogenicity test is positive [2, 3]. To stop the spread of COVID-19 and decrease its mortality rate, early detection and effective screening of patients are urgent needs. The gold standard detection method for testing COVID-19 patients is RT-PCR (Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction) testing on respiratory specimens. This test is the most common method for detecting COVID-19, but it has disadvantages such as being manual, complicated, laborious, and time-consuming, and its positive rate is only 63%. In addition, during the pandemic, the low sensitivity of RT-PCR is not acceptable. As a result, infected people may not be identified and promptly treated and, due to the contagious nature of COVID-19, can spread the virus to healthy people [4, 5]. These shortcomings have encouraged healthcare specialists to present an alternative method with high efficiency for the detection and diagnosis of COVID-19. Since the beginning of 2020, based on clinical and paraclinical features of COVID-19, researchers have employed chest radiology modalities as effective tools for detecting, quantifying, and following-up COVID-19 cases. The indicators of infection include abnormalities in the patients’ chest CT and X-ray images [6, 7]. In COVID-19 diagnosis, CT scans are more sensitive and specific than chest X-rays, and in many cases, lung involvement and GGO (Ground Glass Opocity) can be observed on CT scans even before the onset of clinical symptoms and a positive PCR test. However, problems such as high cost and the risk of spreading the disease when using the CT scan equipment may cause serious complications for patients and the healthcare system. Based on the American College of Radiology recommendation, CT scans should not be used as a first-line diagnostic modality. Since COVID-19 attacks the epithelial cells of the respiratory tract, specialists often use X-ray images to check the strength of the lungs and diagnose any kind of lung disease. Nevertheless, X-ray findings ranging from GGO to consolidations overlap other types of pneumonia [6–8]. It seems that, as the pandemic progresses, the medical community will often rely on CXR (Chest X-ray) due to its widespread availability and fewer infection control issues that currently limit the use of CT. Therefore, many researchers have utilized the X-ray modality to detect, diagnose, and classify COVID-19. However, the shortcomings of this imaging method have been mentioned in several texts [9–11]. Accordingly, many researchers turned to AI methods to address these deficiencies. Much effort has been made to develop AI-based medical systems based on the advances of digital image processing, pattern recognition, and computer vision. Such systems are expected to overcome the operator dependency, increase diagnosis efficiency rates, and reduce the need for medical complementary modalities [12, 13].

The present systematic reviews are aimed at introducing the latest technologies discussed in the COVID-19 literature which focuses on AI technologies for detecting/diagnosing the affected areas of the lungs. Instead of merely presenting a brief summary of the included studies, different statistical analyses by using graphs have been performed on various aspects of the system discussed in the selected papers. We present the following article in accordance with the PRISMA reporting checklist.

2. Method

2.1. Search Criteria

This systematic review aimed to identify various studies related to COVID-19 detection based on radiological images and AI classifiers. Specifically, it sought to answer the following research questions: (1)To what extent can the use of AI algorithms improve the common methods of COVID-19 diagnosis?(2)Which AI method is the most effective in analyzing COVID-19 X-ray images?

A systematic review was conducted to identify all the published studies in which AI algorithms had been utilized to detect/classify the X-ray images of suspected COVID-19 cases. Several electronic databases, including Scopus (http://www.scopus.com), Elsevier ScienceDirect (http://www.sciencedirect.com), PubMed (http://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), and Web of Science (http://www.wosg.ir), were searched from 2020 to January 2021. The following search keywords were used: “COVID-19,” “X-ray,” “artificial intelligence,” “machine learning,” “deep learning,” “detection,” “classification,” “computer-aided diagnosis,” “computer-aided detection,” and “computer-aided diagnosis.” The largest possible number of publications was investigated; still, some related studies may have been accidentally ignored.

2.2. Eligibility Criteria

The following are the eligibility criteria: (1)Being written in English(2)Using AI techniques to detect GGO and consolidation in COVID-19 patients(3)Examining COVID-19 detection and diagnosis based on X-ray images(4)Using AI algorithms for X-ray image analysis

2.3. Data Extraction

Two authors (FA and MG) independently extracted the data and, after modifying the Cochrane standardized data extraction table based on the research questions, used it to assess the risk of bias for each study. The forms filled out by each author were compared, and the differences were resolved through researching, analysis, and discussion with the senior author as the final arbitrator. For predictive models, the data were extracted from the CHARMS checklist modified for the purpose of this study, which also includes an assessment of the risk of deviation [14]. This checklist is designed to evaluate all major predictive modeling research, including ANN (Artificial Neural Networks) and other types of ML (machine learning). After duplicate removal, 269 studies were identified. Next, 66 potentially relevant studies were selected by title/abstract screening, of which 60 remained after the full-text screening. Figure 1 displays the PRISMA flowchart that summarizes the study selection procedure [15]. Note that many articles contained more than one AI algorithm, and they were all counted when forming this diagram.

3. Result

For each article, the data were extracted regarding (i) the country of the author team, (ii) the aim of the research, (iii) data volume, (iv) feature engineering, (v) AI methods and algorithms used, and (vi) efficiency.

Due to the wide range of AI algorithms, the studies had different ideas for using these algorithms to analyze X-ray images. Many of the studies were binary, meaning they dealt with only two classes of COVID-19 patients and non-COVID-19 patients. But some researchers have processed data from more than two data classes using machine learning concepts. Their data class included patients with COVID-19, patients with various types of pneumonia, people suspected of having COVID-19 but without lung involvement and completely healthy.

Based on the initial review of the relevant research, it was found that the AI methods were based on two techniques. The first technique is the application of traditional ML algorithms, and the second methodology was the utilization of DL algorithms for X-ray image analysis.

A number of studies utilized the classical concepts of ML [16–20] and even compared the performance of these classical algorithms with DL (deep learning) algorithms for COVID-19 diagnosis and classification [20, 21]. Many of them employed hybrid methods and more than one algorithm for processing and classifying the COVID-19 data; however, in many of them, several models and architectures were compared, and the model with the highest efficiency was extracted from these comparisons [22–26]. In an overview of the studies, almost all of these studies used pretrained networks. The use of these networks stems from a concept called transitional learning.

3.1. Transfer Learning

A concept that has received attention in many studies is transfer learning, according to which the knowledge extracted from large datasets is extracted by deep learning methods and is then transferred to a smaller but related dataset [27]. In the models employed to detect and classify COVID-19 using X-rays, the values of the efficient hyperparameters are transferred from the processed state of the art to the current problem [28, 29]. This is because large datasets are required to process the X-ray images of COVID-19 with the deep learning method, and such datasets do not exist. Therefore, pretrained models to apply the concept of transfer learning are used [30–40].

Shibly et al. and Zhang et al. altered the structure of these efficient pretrained architectures, which eventually led to better results in COVID-19 classification and diagnosis. Many researchers developed new models by developing pretrained models, which led to excellent results [33, 41–43]. Furthermore, in some of these studies, the aggregation of several pretrained networks, models, and techniques is used to perform high-quality feature extraction. By combining several well-known and efficient models, these studies provide the best performance of feature engineering [33, 44].

Based on the used X-ray datasets, several studies differentiated the data into two classes of patients with COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients [21, 24, 25, 29, 36, 39, 40, 42, 45, 46]. In others, the database included more than two classes, e.g., viral pneumonia, bacterial pneumonia, and normal and COVID-19 cases [17, 23, 30–35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 47–50]. Through the synthesis of the data, four domains of AI applications in X-ray analysis were identified:

3.2. AI Application Domain in COVID-19 Chest X-Ray Image Analysis

Through data synthesis, four applications of artificial intelligence in the analysis of X-ray images of the chest of people suspected of COVID-19 were identified. Detection (diagnosis), classification, lesion visualization, and segmentation and detection are four categorizations that had been used frequently in studies. Many studies have not distinguished semantic, lexical, and practical differences between these terminologies. The categorization made in this four areas is based solely on the terms used in the text of the study. The purpose of many studies was to combine several categories to achieve applied analysis.

3.2.1. Detection and Diagnosis

Upon examining the existing texts and lexicons and seeking advice from radiologists and epidemiologists, detection is defined as part of the real entity that can be seen or whose existence can be proved or rejected. In medical texts, detection is considered a prelude to diagnosis. Cases have been identified in many studies aiming at identifying COVID-19 and its initial impact on lung tissue in its early stages. In these studies, the main purpose is to use early chest X-ray results to identify infection cases from other suspicious or normal cases. Twenty-eight studies aiming for detection used a spectrum of ML techniques for COVID-19 identification by X-ray image analysis [21, 22, 25, 27–49]. Another term that is very similar in function to detection is diagnosis. Although the two terms differ in clinical application, they are used interchangeably in various studies. Upon distinguishing these two terms from each other, detection is considered distinguishing the cases infected with COVID-19 and cases not infected with COVID-19; this means that there is no information about the class of non-COVID-19, and the group can have different types of bacterial pneumonia, viruses, or other coronavirus diseases, except for COVID-19. On the other hand, diagnosis distinguishes COVID-19 from other infectious lung diseases (e.g., different types of pneumonia) [17, 21, 24, 31, 34, 39, 40, 61, 62].

3.2.2. Classification

Image classification is one of the earliest fields where ML has made a significant contribution to medical image analysis. Since the introduction and development of ML methods, numerous studies have adopted them for disease classification. In the field of radiological image analysis, considerable research has been conducted in the past years with the aim of classification. The main purpose of research aiming at classifying COVID-19 is to differentiate it from other diseases such as pneumonia by introducing an ML-based classification. In these studies, classification is performed to diagnose and detect COVID-19. In the literature, there are 27 studies for classification purposes, and COVID-19 infections are classified from other types of pneumonia and lung diseases. In such research, GGO and consolidation regions are classified from other suspected regions [18, 20, 55–59].

3.2.3. Lesion Visualization

Object classification usually focuses on classifying a small, previously determined part of a medical image into two or more classes (e.g., nodule classification in lung X-ray). For many of these tasks, local information about the appearance of the lesion and global contextual information about the location of the lesion is required for accurate classification. To diagnose and classify COVID-19, many studies have extracted and displayed lung regions via radiographic images and used AI technology for this purpose. In these studies which mainly use the attention technique, the infected lungs are approximately shown. Some researchers who employed the X-ray technology to diagnose COVID-19 performed object detection, where the object was a lesion caused by COVID-19, showing the visual processing of the affected area of the lung. The difference between this and the segmentation method is that segmentation cannot transparently show the boundary of the lesion, and it roughly separates these areas from the texture. Attention map and heat map techniques were also employed to visualize CXR images so that the GGO region could be easily displayed using these technologies [23, 31, 37, 39, 44, 47, 54, 66, 67].

3.2.4. Segmentation and Detection

Lung segmentation and COVID-19 disease are the removal of irrelevant regions on the image of lung tissue or the removal of normal areas of the lung, which play an important role in diagnosing diseases and displaying abnormal parts. Some studies have used other techniques, such as bounding boxes, to display and diagnose a healthy lung from an infected lung. Numerous studies have shown that segmentation, as one of the steps before COVID-19 classification, increases efficiency in disease detection. Watershed as a most popular segmentation technique is a transformation performed on grayscale images, used to segment different areas on the basis of geological watersheds to separate adjacent watersheds. It is like a topographic map, where the brightness of each point represents its height, and then find the line through the top of the ridge. In medical image segmentation, the watershed algorithm provides a complete division to separate meaningful feature regions for diagnosis [22, 60–65].

Researchers have analyzed radiographic images to achieve one of these goals. The extent to which these goals have been attained in the literature is presented in Figure 2.

Since the 1950s, computer scientists have made efforts in the field of ML; however, in recent years, there has been a revolution in AI leading to the emergence of DL. As a subset of ML, DL is an end-to-end procedure whereby feature extraction is performed completely automatically [66].

In these methods, the building blocks of convolutional neural networks (including convolution and pooling layers) process the values corresponding to pixels. In this way, features can be automatically extracted. Then, the features are classified by feeding them into a layer containing one or more classifiers. These methods extract important features while ignoring secondary features. A review of research demonstrates that, to extract and process radiological image features for COVID-19 detection, many studies have adopted DL methods and algorithms and their latest models. Since researchers are dealing with radiological images in the diagnosis of COVID-19, and the volume of image data is very large; DL methods, especially CNN algorithms, yield better results. Based on the review of research on the COVID-19 diagnosis since its inception, many studies have utilized various DL algorithms to extract the features of radiological images. In all of these studies, DL methods have been employed to extract the features, and these features have been automatically extracted by CNN algorithms.

In terms of effectiveness, one of the main characteristics of deep neural networks is the architecture they adopt. Some deep neural network architectures demonstrate an extraordinary ability to perform multiple functions for multiple data types. Various studies have been conducted on COVID-19 with different DL architectures, in which the diagnosis rate when detecting COVID-19 is compared by using several types of architectures (El Asnaoui & Chawki, 2020). The prevalent CNN architectures used in these studies can be seen in Figure 3. The CNN architectures have shown high performance in COVID-19 diagnosis based on CXR, and their performance differed based on the types of architecture and the predetermined model. Figure 3 illustrates the rate of use of these architectures. In the reviewed articles, the VGGNet architecture has played the greatest role. Nevertheless, some studies with different VGG16 architectures have achieved the best results in COVID-19 detection and diagnosis, while other studies have utilized other VGG19 versions to maximize the efficiency of analyzing radiological images for COVID-19 diagnosis. Newer and more developed architectures are found to be more effective in diagnosing COVID-19.

The list of the included articles and the most relevant characteristics and findings are presented in Table 1, including detection, diagnostic, and classification studies, in which in several studies the lesion visualization are presented in their research.

4. Discussion

This study reviewed the role of AI techniques in analyzing CXR images of COVID-19 suspected cases and described the employed algorithms by critically reviewing their performances. This systematic review presented 60 articles published on AI to improve the results of radiographic image analysis and lead to a more accurate diagnose, locate the affected lung area (GGO), and enhance the visual image of the lung of suspected COVID-19 cases.

4.1. A Review of the Shortcomings of These Studies

Despite the effectiveness of artificial intelligence methods in detecting COVID-19 using X-ray images, these methods have drawbacks and shortcomings that researchers have used techniques to escape these defects. Disadvantages of these methods include lack of balance datasets and lack of sufficient data for machine learning-based research.

4.1.1. X-Ray Dataset Limitation

Due to the emergence of COVID-19 disease and the lack of bulk and suitable datasets for the applications of artificial intelligence, the researchers resorted to published datasets. But these datasets had variations in image angles, a limited number of images from different classes, and sometimes low-quality X-ray images. On the other hand, most artificial intelligence methods that input images, such as deep neural networks, depend on the size and number of images, and the larger the number of images and the size of the dataset, the better the results in image analysis. Numerous studies have shown that a small number of images lead to poor generalization and over fitting. Therefore, to solve this problem, many studies have used the data augmentation technique. The augmentation technique artificially inflates the training dataset size by either data warping or oversampling. Data augmentations transform existing images such that their label is preserved. This encompasses augmentations such as geometric and color transformations, random erasing, adversarial training, and neural style transfer. Oversampling augmentations create synthetic instances and add them to the training set. The augmentation technique artificially inflates the training dataset size by either data warping or oversampling. Data augmentations transform existing images such that their label is preserved. This encompasses augmentations such as geometric and color transformations, random erasing, adversarial training, and neural style transfer. Oversampling augmentations create synthetic instances and add them to the training set. Due to the limited data on COVID-19, almost all studies have used the data augmentation technique [25, 30, 31, 43, 45, 64, 89–91].

4.1.2. Imbalance X-Ray Datasets

In many studies, while dealing with real datasets, they face the fundamental problem of nonclass balance distribution. Classifiers usually solve the problem to minimize global errors. These classifiers are more likely to consider majority classes when dealing with unbalanced datasets. Therefore, finding the wrong patterns will lead to incorrect labels. In the case of medical data and diseases, this imbalance is enormous. Studies have shown that this imbalance of data is the predominant problem in the emerging disease of COVID-19, which has occurred in almost all studies. Examining the datasets used in the studies, it can be seen that the data were unbalanced and included a smaller number of cases. And this reduced the sensitivity in diagnosing cases. Also, in studies that had a higher ratio of noninfected cases to infected cases, it led to a decrease in the specificity rate in diagnosing noninfected cases. In the real world, it is known that the number of cases of pneumonia and pulmonary disease is higher than the number of cases of COVID-19 and imbalance dataset COVID-19 X-ray images cause problems for research validation.

In order to solve the problem of unbalanced classification datasets, several methods have been proposed in the literature, and data-level solutions are the most famous and commonly used technology. The main goal of these techniques is to rebalance the class distribution by resampling the dataset to reduce the impact of class imbalance, that is, preprocessing the dataset before the training phase. One of the methods to solve the problem of data imbalance is the resampling method. Resampling methods can be subdivided into two categories: oversampling and undersampling. Both are used to adjust the class distribution of the dataset, that is, the ratio between different classes in the dataset. In the undersampling method, in order to balance the distribution of samples, some instances are deleted from the majority class. In the oversampling technique, some instances of the minority class are copied or synthesized to balance the distribution of the classes. There are several methods for resampling. Table 2 shows some of these methods.

4.2. Radiologist vs. Artificial Intelligence in X-Ray Image Analysis

In the context of a global pandemic, infections may spread widely in the community. So far, studies have only evaluated the imaging of confirmed infections. Lack of CT scan devices in some geographical locations, the time-consuming tests of these devices, and the side effects due to their high dose are all factors motivating the presentation of alternative tests such as CXR. Despite the extensive use of CXR for other abnormalities, its specificity and sensitivity in the diagnosis of COVID-19, and how imaging features correlate with severity, are still unknown. Not much research has been conducted on the efficiency of the X-ray modality for COVID-19 detection. It is believed that this lack of acceptance is due to the nature and the low resolution of the images. In this imaging method, the radiology dose is very low; the radiation dose in CXR is 30-70 times lower, and naturally, the image quality is not acceptable compared to CT scans [96–99].

In a study conducted in 2020 by examining the electronic health record of patients with COVID-19, by comparing the diagnostic performance metrics of the two modalities of CT scan and X-ray, the efficiency of these common radiological methods in diagnosing cases of COVID-19 was calculated. The study showed that the sensitivity of the CXR method in diagnosing cases with COVID-19 was 0.56%. In the present review study, by examining all the researches of the research community that used artificial intelligence methods with the aim of diagnosing and identifying COVID-19 disease, their performance was extracted with three criteria of Sensetivity, specificity, and Accuracy. Table 3 shows the performance rate obtained from the analysis of CXR images with artificial intelligence versus manual methods and by an expert in radiography and CT scans. The findings indicated that the sensitivity of the CXR method in diagnosing COVID-19 cases was 0.56%. In the present systematic review, by examining all the studies utilizing AI methods for COVID-19 diagnosis and identification, their performance was extracted with three criteria of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Table 3 shows the performance rate obtained from the analysis of CXR images with AI in COVID-19 cases versus other detection methods used by specialists in X-ray, CT scans, and PCR.

The efficiency metrics of all 60 studies were extracted and surveyed. Based on the comparison of common methods for COVID-19 diagnosis such as lung CT, RT-PCR, and X-ray equipped with AI algorithms, it can be concluded that AI is a strong and acceptable method for improving the detection coefficient and reducing diagnostic error in X-ray images. Using these algorithms, the visual defects of X-ray images can be overcome, and a high degree of detection of the GGO in the lung can be achieved. Furthermore, by using AI algorithms such as CNN, the exact patterns of lung involvement caused by COVID-19 can be classified from other forms of pneumonia. Since X-ray images are image-oriented and AI algorithms deal with pixel values, the use of DL methods such as CNN in extracting image features leads to better results in extracting the involved areas. Based on the review of 60 studies, more than 97% of them employed various DL algorithms to extract the features of X-ray images.

5. Conclusions

The control of a pandemic depends on the speed of contagion, which, in turn, largely depends on the ability and speed for reliably identifying the infected patients (a low false-positive rate). Local authorities in every country are currently facing the problem of reducing transmission, limiting the excessive use of medical facilities, and the number of virus-related deaths. In the pandemic, the main problem is that nasal swabs are only performed on people who show symptoms. Therefore, people currently infected with COVID-19 who are asymptomatic cannot be detected unless there are special circumstances [31, 105]. As a result, researchers looked for a cheaper, more affordable method with fewer side effects and found the answer in the use of X-rays. Still, this method was riddled with visual problems, so AI specialists provided computers with the ability to analyze X-ray images via learning-based solutions. AI provides an accurate and fast interpretation of complex data in large amounts and overcomes possible human error and/or bias. This progressively developing method can learn and gain experience and will continue to increase its success in accurate decision-making in the future. A wider application of AI in medical and infectious disease detection improves medical imaging interpretation, avoids wasting healthcare resources, and ultimately enhances the quality of patient care and outcome. The researchers suggest that a model based on deep learning algorithms should be implemented and developed in radiography (X-ray). In the entry of this model, all people are suspected of having COVID-19. If the proposed model confirms COVID-19 using X-ray images of the suspect, the physician will be advised to refer the patient for a CT scan or molecular test for further examination. During the COVID-19 pandemic, due to the great availability of radiographic devices, the X-ray method equipped with AI can be available in all healthcare centers to perform continuous and periodic testing of the entire community. This wide coverage will bring about a faster diagnosis and decrease the use of healthcare resources.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

This study is based on project no. 1400 at the Student Research Committee, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. The authors appreciate the Student Research Committee and Research & Technology Chancellor at Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences for their financial support of this study.

References

WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard, “WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard,” 2021, https://covid19.who.int/?gclid=Cj0KCQiAmfmABhCHARIsACwPRAA3nlP59H4CkD7SRbrMjXKix1CoJT5CeFQczhwwO4zqhcPHzP0cwJAaAmjfEALw_wcB.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Chen, M. Zhou, X. Dong et al., “Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study,” The Lancet, vol. 395, no. 10223, pp. 507–513, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Wang, B. Hu, C. Hu et al., “Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus–infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China,” JAMA, vol. 323, no. 11, pp. 1061–1069, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Wang, Y. Xu, R. Gao et al., “Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in different types of clinical specimens,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 323, no. 18, pp. 1843-1844, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Xu, X. Jiang, C. Ma et al., “A deep learning system to screen novel coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia,” Engineering, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 1122–1129, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. K. Sethy, S. K. Behera, P. K. Ratha, and P. Biswas, “Detection of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) based on deep features and support vector machine,” International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 643–651, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Y. F. Wong, H. Y. S. Lam, A. H.-T. Fong et al., “Frequency and distribution of chest radiographic findings in patients positive for COVID-19,” Radiology, vol. 296, no. 2, pp. E72–E78, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
“ACR Recommendations for the use of Chest Radiography and Computed Tomography (CT) for Suspected COVID-19 Infection|American College of Radiology,” 2021, https://www.acr.org/Advocacy-and-Economics/ACR-Position-Statements/Recommendations-for-Chest-Radiography-and-CT-for-Suspected-COVID19-Infection.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Jacobi, M. Chung, A. Bernheim, and C. Eber, “Portable chest X-ray in coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19): a pictorial review,” Clinical Imaging, vol. 64, pp. 35–42, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Leichter, R. Lederman, S. Buchbinder, P. Bamberger, B. Novak, and S. Fields, “Optimizing parameters for computer-aided diagnosis of microcalcifications at mammography,” Academic Radiology, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 406–412, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Bhattacharya, P. K. Reddy Maddikunta, Q.-V. Pham et al., “Deep learning and medical image processing for coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic: a survey,” Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 65, article 102589, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ghaderzadeh, F. Asadi, R. Jafari, D. Bashash, H. Abolghasemi, and M. Aria, “Deep Convolutional Neural Network–Based Computer-Aided Detection system for COVID-19 using multiple lung Scans: Design and Implementation Study,” Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 23, no. 4, p. e27468, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ghaderzadeh, F. Asadi, A. Hosseini, D. Bashash, H. Abolghasemi, and A. Roshanpour, “Machine learning in detection and classification of leukemia using smear blood images: a systematic review,” Scientific Programming, vol. 2021, Article ID 9933481, 14 pages, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. G. M. Moons, J. A. H. de Groot, W. Bouwmeester et al., “Critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews of prediction modelling studies: the CHARMS checklist,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 11, no. 10, article e1001744, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D. G. Altman, and The PRISMA Group, “Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 6, no. 7, article e1000097, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. A. Albadr, S. Tiun, M. Ayob, F. T. Al-Dhief, K. Omar, and F. A. Hamzah, “Optimised genetic algorithm-extreme learning machine approach for automatic COVID-19 detection,” PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 12, p. e0242899, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Brunese, F. Martinelli, F. Mercaldo, and A. Santone, “Machine learning for coronavirus covid-19 detection from chest x-rays,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 176, pp. 2212–2221, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Z. Khuzani, M. Heidari, and S. A. Shariati, “COVID-classifier: an automated machine learning model to assist in the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection in chest x-ray images,” Scientific Reports, vol. 11, no. 1, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Gomes, V. A. F. Barbosa, M. A. Santana et al., “IKONOS: an intelligent tool to support diagnosis of COVID-19 by texture analysis of X-ray images,” Res Biomed Eng, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Varela-Santos and P. Melin, “A new approach for classifying coronavirus COVID-19 based on its manifestation on chest X-rays using texture features and neural networks,” Information Sciences, vol. 545, pp. 403–414, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Ismael and A. Şengür, “The investigation of multiresolution approaches for chest X-ray image based COVID-19 detection,” Health Information Science and Systems, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 29, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Mostafiz, M. S. Uddin, N. A. Alam, M. Mahfuz Reza, and M. M. Rahman, “Covid-19 detection in chest X-ray through random forest classifier using a hybridization of deep CNN and DWT optimized features,” Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Ucar and D. Korkmaz, “COVIDiagnosis-Net: deep Bayes-SqueezeNet based diagnosis of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from X-ray images,” Medical Hypotheses, vol. 140, article 109761, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. F. Ohata, G. M. Bezerra, J. V. S. Chagas et al., “Automatic detection of COVID-19 infection using chest X-ray images through transfer learning,” IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, pp. 1–10, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Mohammadi, M. Salehi, H. Ghaffari, A. A. Rohani, and R. Reiazi, “Transfer learning-based automatic detection of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from chest x-ray images,” Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 559–568, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Saha, M. S. Sadi, and M. M. Islam, “EMCNet: automated COVID-19 diagnosis from X-ray images using convolutional neural network and ensemble of machine learning classifiers,” Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, vol. 22, article 100505, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Rajaraman and S. Antani, “Weakly labeled data augmentation for deep learning: a study on COVID-19 detection in chest X-rays,” Diagnostics, vol. 10, no. 6, p. 358, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. D. Apostolopoulos and T. A. Mpesiana, “Covid-19: automatic detection from X-ray images utilizing transfer learning with convolutional neural networks,” Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 635–640, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Mahmud, M. A. Rahman, and S. A. Fattah, “CovXNet: A multi-dilation convolutional neural network for automatic COVID-19 and other pneumonia detection from chest X-ray images with transferable multi- receptive feature optimization,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 122, article 103869, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Waheed, M. Goyal, D. Gupta, A. Khanna, F. Al-Turjman, and P. R. Pinheiro, “CovidGAN: data augmentation using auxiliary classifier GAN for improved Covid-19 detection,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 91916–91923, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Martínez, F. Martínez, and E. Jacinto, “Performance evaluation of the NASNet convolutional network in the automatic identification of COVID-19,” International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 662, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Loey, G. Manogaran, M. H. N. Taha, and N. E. M. Khalifa, “A hybrid deep transfer learning model with machine learning methods for face mask detection in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic,” Measurement, vol. 167, article 108288, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Turkoglu, “COVIDetectioNet: COVID-19 diagnosis system based on X-ray images using features selected from pre-learned deep features ensemble,” Applied Intelligence, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 1213–1226, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Dorr, H. Chaves, M. M. Serra et al., “COVID-19 pneumonia accurately detected on chest radiographs with artificial intelligence,” Intelligence-based Medicine, vol. 3-4, article 100014, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Jain, D. Mittal, D. Thakur, and M. K. Mittal, “A deep learning approach to detect Covid-19 coronavirus with X-ray images,” Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 1391–1405, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Jain, M. Gupta, S. Taneja, and D. J. Hemanth, “Deep learning based detection and analysis of COVID-19 on chest X-ray images,” Applied Intelligence, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 1690–1700, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
M. J. Horry, S. Chakraborty, M. Paul et al., “COVID-19 detection through transfer learning using multimodal Imaging data,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 149808–149824, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Narayan Das, N. Kumar, M. Kaur, V. Kumar, and D. Singh, “Automated deep transfer learning-based approach for detection of COVID-19 infection in chest X-rays,” IRBM, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Toğaçar, B. Ergen, and Z. Cömert, “COVID-19 detection using deep learning models to exploit Social Mimic Optimization and structured chest X-ray images using fuzzy color and stacking approaches,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 121, article 103805, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Z. Islam, M. M. Islam, and A. Asraf, “A combined deep CNN-LSTM network for the detection of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) using X-ray images,” Informatics Med Unlocked, vol. 20, article 100412, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. H. Panahi, A. Rafiei, and A. Rezaee, “FCOD: fast COVID-19 detector based on deep learning techniques,” Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, vol. 22, p. 100506, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Vaid, R. Kalantar, and M. Bhandari, “Deep learning COVID-19 detection bias: accuracy through artificial intelligence,” International Orthopaedics, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 1539–1542, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Zhang, Z. Guo, Y. Sun et al., “COVID19XrayNet: a two-step transfer learning model for the COVID-19 detecting problem based on a limited number of chest X-ray images,” Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 555–565, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. I. Khan, J. L. Shah, and M. M. Bhat, “CoroNet: A deep neural network for detection and diagnosis of COVID-19 from chest x-ray images,” Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, vol. 196, article 105581, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. A. Saiz and I. Barandiaran, “COVID-19 detection in chest X-ray images using a deep learning approach,” International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 4, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Vaid, C. Cakan, and M. Bhandari, “Using Machine Learning to Estimate Unobserved COVID-19 Infections in North America,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 102, no. 13, article e70, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Rajaraman, S. Sornapudi, P. O. Alderson, L. R. Folio, and S. K. Antani, “Analyzing inter-reader variability affecting deep ensemble learning for COVID-19 detection in chest radiographs,” PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 11, article e0242301, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Ozturk, M. Talo, E. A. Yildirim, U. B. Baloglu, O. Yildirim, and U. Rajendra Acharya, “Automated detection of COVID-19 cases using deep neural networks with X-ray images,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 121, p. 103792, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Elaziz, K. M. Hosny, A. Salah, M. M. Darwish, S. Lu, and A. T. Sahlol, “New machine learning method for image-based diagnosis of COVID-19,” PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 6, article e0235187, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ghaderzadeh and F. Asadi, “Deep learning in the detection and diagnosis of COVID-19 using radiology modalities: A systematic review,” Journal of Healthcare Engineering, vol. 2021, Article ID 6677314, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Das, K. C. Santosh, and U. Pal, “Truncated inception net: COVID-19 outbreak screening using chest X-rays,” Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 915–925, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Afshar, S. Heidarian, F. Naderkhani, A. Oikonomou, K. N. Plataniotis, and A. Mohammadi, “COVID-CAPS: a capsule network-based framework for identification of COVID-19 cases from X-ray images,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 138, pp. 638–643, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Wang, J. Mo, G. Zhou, L. Xu, and Y. Liu, “An efficient mixture of deep and machine learning models for COVID-19 diagnosis in chest X-ray images,” PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 11, article 0242535, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. H. Shibly, S. K. Dey, M. T.-U. Islam, and M. M. Rahman, “COVID faster R-CNN: A novel framework to Diagnose Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) in X-Ray images,” Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, vol. 20, article 100405, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. D. Apostolopoulos, S. I. Aznaouridis, and M. A. Tzani, “Extracting possibly representative COVID-19 biomarkers from X-ray images with deep learning approach and image data related to pulmonary diseases,” Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 462–469, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Hussain, M. Hasan, M. A. Rahman, I. Lee, T. Tamanna, and M. Z. Parvez, “CoroDet: a deep learning based classification for COVID-19 detection using chest X-ray images,” Chaos Solitons Fractals, vol. 142, article 110495, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Gupta, G. S. Anjum, S. Gupta, and R. Katarya, “InstaCovNet-19: a deep learning classification model for the detection of COVID-19 patients using Chest X-ray,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 99, article 106859, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Murugan and G. Tripti, “E-DiCoNet: extreme learning machine based classifier for diagnosis of COVID-19 using deep convolutional network,” Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 8887–8898, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Moujahid, B. Cherradi, O. E. Gannour, L. Bahatti, O. Terrada, and S. Hamida, “Convolutional neural network based classification of patients with pneumonia using X-ray lung images,” Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 167–175, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Oulefki, S. Agaian, T. Trongtirakul, and A. Kassah Laouar, “Automatic COVID-19 lung infected region segmentation and measurement using CT- scans images,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 114, p. 107747, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Abdel-Basset, V. Chang, and R. Mohamed, “HSMA_WOA: A hybrid novel slime mould algorithm with whale optimization algorithm for tackling the image segmentation problem of chest X-ray images,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 95, p. 106642, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. El-bana, A. Al-Kabbany, and M. Sharkas, “A multi-task pipeline with specialized streams for classification and segmentation of infection manifestations in COVID-19 scans,” PeerJ Computer Science, vol. 6, p. e303, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Chakraborty and K. Mali, “SuFMoFPA: a superpixel and meta-heuristic based fuzzy image segmentation approach to explicate COVID-19 radiological images,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 167, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D.-P. Fan, T. Zhou, G.-P. Ji et al., “Inf-Net: automatic COVID-19 lung infection segmentation from CT images,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 2626–2637, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Cattabriga, M. A. Cocozza, G. Vara, F. Coppola, and R. Golfieri, “Lung CT segmentation to identify consolidations and ground glass areas for quantitative assesment of SARS-CoV pneumonia,” Journal of Visualized Experiments, vol. 166, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. P. Shinde and S. Shah, “A review of machine learning and deep learning applications,” in In: 2018 Fourth International Conference on Computing Communication Control and Automation (ICCUBEA), pp. 1–6, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Yousri, M. Abd Elaziz, L. Abualigah, D. Oliva, M. A. A. Al-qaness, and A. A. Ewees, “COVID-19 X-ray images classification based on enhanced fractional-order cuckoo search optimizer using heavy-tailed distributions,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 101, p. 107052, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Brunese, F. Mercaldo, A. Reginelli, and A. Santone, “Explainable deep learning for pulmonary disease and coronavirus COVID-19 detection from X-rays,” Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, vol. 196, p. 105608, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. M. Pereira, D. Bertolini, L. O. Teixeira, and C. N. Silla, “COVID-19 identification in chest X-ray images on flat and hierarchical classification scenarios,” Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, vol. 194, p. 105532, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. El Asnaoui and Y. Chawki, “Using X-ray images and deep learning for automated detection of coronavirus disease,” Journal of Biomolecular Structure & Dynamics, vol. 39, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. H. Yi, T. K. Kim, and C. T. Lin, “Generalizability of deep learning tuberculosis classifier to COVID-19 chest radiographs: new tricks for an old algorithm?” Journal of Thoracic Imaging, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. W102–W104, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Loey, F. Smarandache, and M. K. NE, “Within the Lack of Chest COVID-19 X-ray Dataset: A Novel Detection Model Based on GAN and Deep Transfer Learning,” Symmetry, vol. 12, no. 4, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Panwar, P. K. Gupta, M. K. Siddiqui, R. Morales-Menendez, and V. Singh, “Application of deep learning for fast detection of COVID-19 in X-Rays using nCOVnet,” Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol. 138, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Heidari, S. Mirniaharikandehei, A. Z. Khuzani, G. Danala, Y. Qiu, and B. Zheng, “Improving the performance of CNN to predict the likelihood of COVID-19 using chest X-ray images with preprocessing algorithms,” International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 144, p. 104284, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Tabik, A. Gomez-Rios, J. L. Martin-Rodriguez et al., “COVIDGR dataset and COVID-SDNet methodology for predicting COVID-19 based on chest x-ray images,” IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 3595–3605, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Fan, M. Jamil, M. T. Sadiq, X. Huang, and X. Yu, “Exploiting multiple optimizers with transfer learning techniques for the identification of COVID-19 patients,” Journal of Healthcare Engineering, vol. 2020, Article ID 8889412, 13 pages, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Shorfuzzaman and M. Masud, “On the detection of covid-19 from chest x-ray images using cnn-based transfer learning,” Computers, Materials & Continua, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 1359–1381, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Phankokkruad, “COVID-19 pneumonia detection in chest X-ray images using transfer learning of convolutional neural networks,” in In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. Association for Computing Machinery, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Tartaglione, C. A. Barbano, C. Berzovini, M. Calandri, and M. Grangetto, “Unveiling COVID-19 from chest x-ray with deep learning: a hurdles race with small data,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 17, no. 18, p. 6933, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Abraham and M. S. Nair, “Computer-aided detection of COVID-19 from X-ray images using multi-CNN and Bayesnet classifier,” Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 1436–1445, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Deng, H. Shao, L. Shi, X. Wang, and T. Xie, “An Classification–Detection Approach of COVID-19 Based on Chest X-ray and CT by Using Keras Pre-Trained Deep Learning Models,” Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 579–596, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. B. Chandra, K. Verma, B. K. Singh, D. Jain, and S. S. Netam, “Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) detection in chest X-ray images using majority voting based classifier ensemble,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 165, p. 113909, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Minaee, R. Kafieh, M. Sonka, S. Yazdani, and S. G. Jamalipour, “Deep-COVID: predicting COVID-19 from chest X-ray images using deep transfer learning,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 65, p. 101794, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Hussain, T. Nguyen, H. Li et al., “Machine-learning classification of texture features of portable chest X-ray accurately classifies COVID-19 lung infection,” Biomedical Engineering Online, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 88, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Rahaman, C. Li, Y. Yao et al., “Identification of COVID-19 samples from chest X-ray images using deep learning: a comparison of transfer learning approaches,” Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 821–839, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Ozturk, U. Ozkaya, and M. Barstugan, “Classification of coronavirus (COVID-19) fromX‐rayandCTimages using shrunken features,” International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 5–15, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Altan and S. Karasu, “Recognition of COVID-19 disease from X-ray images by hybrid model consisting of 2D curvelet transform, chaotic salp swarm algorithm and deep learning technique,” Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol. 140, p. 110071, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Tuncer, S. Dogan, and F. Ozyurt, “An automated Residual Exemplar Local Binary Pattern and iterative ReliefF based COVID-19 detection method using chest X-ray image,” Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, vol. 203, p. 104054, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Imran, I. Posokhova, H. N. Qureshi et al., “AI4COVID-19: AI enabled preliminary diagnosis for COVID-19 from cough samples via an app,” Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, vol. 20, p. 100378, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Wang, X. Deng, Q. Fu et al., “A weakly-supervised framework for COVID-19 classification and lesion localization from chest CT,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 2615–2625, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Shorten and T. M. Khoshgoftaar, “A survey on image data augmentation for deep learning,” Journal of Big Data, vol. 6, no. 1, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. V. Chawla, K. W. Bowyer, L. O. Hall, and W. P. Kegelmeyer, “SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 16, pp. 321–357, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. He, Y. Bai, E. A. Garcia, and L. S. ADASYN, “Adaptive synthetic sampling approach for imbalanced learning,” in In: 2008 IEEE international joint conference on neural networks (IEEE world congress on computational intelligence), pp. 1322–1328, IEEE, 2008..
View at: Google Scholar
H. Han, W.-Y. Wang, and B.-H. Mao, “Borderline-SMOTE: a new over-sampling method in imbalanced data sets learning,” in In: International conference on intelligent computing, pp. 878–887, Springer, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
I. Tomek, AN EXPERIMENT WITH The Edited Nearest-Nieghbor Rule, 1976.
A. Borakati, A. Perera, J. Johnson, and T. Sood, “Diagnostic accuracy of X-ray versus CT in COVID-19: a propensity-matched database study,” BMJ Open, vol. 10, no. 11, p. e042946, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. C. Lin, “Radiation Risk from Medical Imaging,” in In: Mayo Clinic Proceedings, pp. 1142–1146, Elsevier, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Mizumoto, K. Kagaya, A. Zarebski, and G. Chowell, “Estimating the asymptomatic proportion of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases on board the Diamond Princess cruise ship, Yokohama, Japan, 2020,” Eurosurveillance, vol. 25, no. 10, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Arons, K. M. Hatfield, S. C. Reddy et al., “Presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections and transmission in a skilled nursing facility,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 382, no. 22, pp. 2081–2090, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Ai, Z. Yang, H. Hou et al., “Correlation of chest CT and RT-PCR testing for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: a report of 1014 cases,” Radiology, vol. 296, no. 2, pp. E32–E40, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kovács, P. Palásti, D. Veréb, B. Bozsik, A. Palkó, and Z. T. Kincses, “The sensitivity and specificity of chest CT in the diagnosis of COVID-19,” European Radiology, vol. 31, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Himoto, A. Sakata, M. Kirita et al., “Diagnostic performance of chest CT to differentiate COVID-19 pneumonia in non-high-epidemic area in Japan,” Japanese Journal of Radiology, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 400–406, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Cheng, Y. Lu, Q. Cao, Z. P. Le Qin, F. Yan, and W. Yang, “Clinical features and chest CT manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a single-center study in Shanghai, China,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 215, no. 1, pp. 121–126, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Caruso, M. Zerunian, M. Polici et al., “Chest CT features of COVID-19 in Rome, Italy,” Radiology, vol. 296, no. 2, pp. E79–E85, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. Bastolla, How lethal is the novel coronavirus, and how many undetected cases there are? The importance of being tested, 2020.

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Mustafa Ghaderzadeh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

2622

Downloads

1287

Citations