Research Article

Efficacy and Safety of Surgical Ligation versus Endovascular Embolization for Type II Congenital Extrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of patients in both groups.

CharacteristicSurgical group ()Interventional group () value

Age0.68
 Male5 (38.5)8 (80.0)
 Female8 (61.52 (20.0)
CEPS symptoms
 Hepatic encephalopathy6 (46.2)5 (50.0)>0.99
 Gastrointestinal bleeding4 (30.8)2 (20.0)0.66
 Dyspnea1 (7.7)0 (0)>0.99
 Abdominal pain1 (7.7)1 (10.0)>0.99
 Hepatic myelopathy1 (7.7)1 (10.0)>0.99
 Hemoptysis0 (0)1 (10.0)>0.99
 Fatigue2 (15.4)1 (10.0)>0.99
Comorbidity
 Hepatic cirrhosis10 (76.9)5 (50.0)0.22
 Hepatic adenoma2 (15.4)0 (0)0.49
 Pulmonary hypertension1 (7.7)1 (10.0)>0.99
 Hypersplenism1 (7.7)1 (10.0)>0.99
Location of shunt vessels
 Splenorenal shunt5 (38.5)3 (30.0)>0.99
 SMV-IVC shunt3 (23.1)1 (10.0)0.60
 Portal vein-IVC shunt3 (23.1)2 (20.0)>0.99
 SMV-renal vein shunt1 (7.7)1 (10.0)>0.99
 Portal vein-renal vein shunt1 (7.7)1 (10.0)>0.99
 Portal vein-iliac vein shunt0 (0)2 (20.0)0.18

Data are numbers of patients, with percentages in parentheses. SMV: superior mesenteric vein; IVC: inferior vena cava.