Review Article

Breast Cancer Segmentation Methods: Current Status and Future Potentials

Table 4

Summary of reviewed works on deep learning models.

SubcategoryRelated worksYearTechniqueFilterDatabaseEvaluation metric

DL[160]2015CRFINbreast and DDSM-BCRP89.0% of Dice
DL[157]2018Adversarial FCN-CRFINbreast and DDSM-BCRP97.0% accuracy
DL[158]2018FrCNINbreast92.97 segmentation accuracy, 92.69% Dice and MCC of 85.93%
DL[174]2018CRU-NetINbreast and DDSM93.66% of Dice for INbreast and 93.32% for DDSM
DL[161]2019ResCU-Net and MS-ResCU-NetINbreast91.78% of Dice, 94.16% accuracy, and Jac of 85.12% based on MS-ResCU-Net
DL[162]2019U-Net and AGSDDSM82.24% -score, 77.89% sensitivity, and 78.38% accuracy
DL[169]2019RU-NetcLare filterINbreast and DDSM-BCRP98.0% of Dice, 94.0% of IOU, and 98.0% accuracy
DL[170]2019U-NetLaplace filterDDSM97.80% of Dice and 98.50% of -score
DL[171]2019AUNetINbreast and DDSM81.80% of Dice for DDSM and DI of 79.10% for INbreast
DL[163]2020Mask RCNNINbreast88.0% of Dice
DL[164]2020FrCNINbreast92.69% of Dice, 92.97% accuracy, and Jac of 86.37%
DL[165]2020U-NetAdaptive medianINbreast and DDSM89.0% of Dice and mean IOU of 90.90%
DL[159]2020DS-U-NetcLare filterINbreast and DDSM82.7% of Dice, Jac of 99.7%, and accuracy of 83.0%
DL[166]2020cGANMedian filterINbreast88.0% of Dice, Jac of 78.0%, and 98.0% accuracy
DL[167]2020cGANMorphological filterDDSM94.0% of Dice and IOU of 87.0%
DL[168]2020Mask RCNN and DeepLabSavitzky Golay filterMIAS and DDSM80.0% accuracy
DL[175]2020Mask RCCN-FPNDDSM91.0% accuracy and 84.0% precision
DL[176]2020U-NetDDSM79.39% of Dice, AUC of 86.40%, and 85.95% of accuracy
DL[172]2021U-NetDDSM88.0% accuracy
DL[173]2021U-NetMIAS and DDSM98.87% of Dice, AUC of 98.88%, and -score of 97.99%