Review Article
Exploring the Use of Brain-Computer Interfaces in Stroke Neurorehabilitation
Table 1
Comparison of BCI pivot signal acquisition methods and their advantages and disadvantages.
| Nerve-signal acquisition methods | Event monitoring | Time resolution | Spatial resolution | Safety | Advantage | Disadvantage |
| Electroencephalogram (EEG) | Electrical signals | ~0.05 s | ~10 mm | Noninvasive | High temporal resolution, relatively low cost, high portability, low risk to users | Poor signal quality | Magnetoencephalography | Magnetic signals | ~0.05 s | ~5 mm | Noninvasive | High temporal and spatial resolution, less training time, and more reliable communication | Technology is too large and expensive | Electrocorticography | Electrical signals | ~0.003 s | ~1 mm ~0.5 mm (LEP) | Invasive | High temporal and spatial resolution and low artefact vulnerability | Electrode mesh implanted in craniotomy, harmful to health | Intracortical point signal acquisition | Electrical signals | ~0.003 s | ~0.1 mm (MUA) ~0.05 mm (SUA) | Invasive | High spatial and temporal resolution | Signal quality and sensitivity diminish with time | Functional MRI | Metabolism | ~1 s | ~1 mm | Noninvasive | High spatial resolution | Very low time resolution, too large to carry | Near-infrared spectroscopy | Metabolism | ~1 s | ~5 mm | Noninvasive | Low cost, high portability, and acceptable time resolution on the order of 100 milliseconds | Very low spatial resolution |
|
|