Research Article

Diagnostic Accuracy of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in Sputum-Scarce or Smear-Negative Cases with Suspected Pulmonary Tuberculosis

Table 2

Diagnostic performance of mNGS, conventional tests, and the T-SPOT.TB assay in PTB.

PTBNon-PTBSensitivity (95% CI)Specificity (95% CI)PPV (95% CI)NPV (95% CI)

mNGS89.13 (75.64, 95.93)98.36 (90.02, 99.91)97.62 (85.91, 99.88)92.31 (82.25, 97.13)
 Positive411
 Negative560
Conventional tests67.39 (51.86, 80.03)95.08 (85.40, 98.72)91.18 (75.19, 97.69)79.45 (68.07, 87.68)
 Positive313
 Negative1558
T-SPOT.TB assay76.09 (60.90, 86.92)65.57 (52.22, 76.96)62.50 (48.52, 74.77)78.43 (64.30, 88.25)
 Positive3521
 Negative1140
Conventional tests combined with T-SPOT.TB assay91.30 (78.31, 97.18)63.93 (50.57, 75.54)65.63 (52.61, 76.75)90.70 (76.95, 96.98)
 Positive4222
 Negative439

Abbreviations: mNGS: metagenomic next-generation sequencing; PTB: pulmonary tuberculosis; Non-PTB: non-pulmonary tuberculosis; PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value.