Treatment of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome in a Mouse Model by Cannabidiol, an Angiogenesis Pathway Inhibitor

Tahermanesh, Kobra; Hakimpour, Sahar; Govahi, Azam; Keyhanfar, Fariborz; Kashi, Abolfazl Mehdizadeh; Chaichian, Shahla; Shahriyaripour, Roya; Ajdary, Marziyeh

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1111777

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Ethical Approval Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 1111777 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1111777

Treatment of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome in a Mouse Model by Cannabidiol, an Angiogenesis Pathway Inhibitor

Kobra Tahermanesh,¹Sahar Hakimpour,²Azam Govahi,¹Fariborz Keyhanfar,³Abolfazl Mehdizadeh Kashi,¹Shahla Chaichian,¹Roya Shahriyaripour,¹and Marziyeh Ajdary¹

Academic Editor: Nauman Rahim Khan

Received10 Oct 2022

Revised04 Dec 2022

Accepted09 Dec 2022

Published21 Dec 2022

Abstract

Studies suggest that ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) can be treated by reducing the level of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). However, due to the side effects of commercially available VEGF-reducing drugs, they can be ruled out as a suitable treatment for OHSS; therefore, researchers are looking for new medications to treat OHSS. This study is aimed at investigating the effects of cannabidiol (CBD) in an OHSS model and to evaluate its efficacy in modulating the angiogenesis pathway and VEGF gene expression. For this purpose, 32 female mice were randomly divided into four groups (eight mice per group): control group, group 2 with OHSS induction, group 3 receiving 32 nmol of dimethyl sulfoxide after OHSS induction, and group 4 receiving 30 mg/kg of CBD after OHSS induction. The animals’ body weight, ovarian weight, vascular permeability (VP), and ovarian follicle count were measured, and the levels of VEGF gene and protein expression in the peritoneal fluid were assessed. Based on the results, CBD decreased the body and ovarian weights, VP, and corpus luteum number compared to the OHSS group (). The peritoneal VEGF gene and protein expression levels reduced in the CBD group compared to the OHSS group (). Also, CBD caused OHSS alleviation by suppressing VEGF expression and VP. Overall, CBD downregulated VEGF gene expression and improved VP in OHSS.

1. Introduction

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is the most serious iatrogenic complication of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) with exogenous gonadotropins in assisted reproductive techniques (ARTs) [1, 2]. In OHSS, ovarian enlargement occurs, and protein-rich fluid extravasation is induced from the vascular space toward the peritoneal cavity. A high amount of the fluid causes abdominal distention, weight gain, and intravascular emptying. In severe OHSS, this fluid is detectable in the pericardial and pleural cavities [3, 4].

The incidence of mild, moderate, and severe types of OHSS is 3-10% in all ART cycles. Nevertheless, in high-risk women, the incidence rate is estimated at 20% [4]. The pathophysiology of this condition remains unknown. Acute vascular permeability (VP), because of exposure to endogenous and/or exogenous human placental gonadotropin (hCG), is the main pathophysiological mechanism, leading to the fluid transfer from the intravascular space toward the third space [5].

Hypovolemia in the vascular system causes reduced organ perfusion, hydrothorax, electrolyte imbalance, diffuse intravascular coagulation (DIC), ascites, blood concentration, and renal and hepatic insufficiencies. Besides, venous thrombosis causes morbidity and mortality due to OHSS [6]. It is known that HCG-dependent elevation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which can regulate VP, is the leading cause of major pathophysiological processes in OHSS. Therefore, VEGF targeting has been widely considered in the treatment of OHSS complications and reducing the possible clinical challenges.

Increased serum hCG levels induce VEGF mRNA expression in ovarian granulosa cells. Capillary and VP leaks occur in endothelial cells after VEGF binding to its receptor (VEGFR2) [7]. The absorption and development of large numbers of antral follicles can enhance VEGF formation in ART cycles. The level of VEGF expression is associated with some biological features of capillary leakage and blood concentration [8]. Cellular functions, such as extracellular matrix degradation, endothelial cell migration and proliferation, and morphological differentiation of endothelial cells, are involved in angiogenesis. To perform these functions and form a vessel, a precise balance between the stimulus and inhibitor signals is required. The stimulus signals include growth factors, such as VEGF, angiopoietins, integrins, and chemokines [9–11], while the inhibitory signaling molecules include interferons, thrombospondin, and other cytokines, as well as other endogenous inhibitors of angiogenesis that can directly or indirectly target endothelial cells.

The binding of cannabinoids to cannabinoid receptors, including CB2 and/or CB1 (WIN5512-2, HU210, JWH133, and THC), suppresses vascular endothelial cell survival and migration, prevents the spherical proliferation of endothelial cells, and inhibits angiogenesis [12, 13]. Cannabidiol (CBD), which is found in Cannabis sativa, contains about 80 cannabinoids [14]. CBD, as a nonpsychoactive compound, is used to treat neuropathic pain, cancer, and inflammation [15–17]. The effects of CBD on gynecologic disorders have been discussed in the literature. For instance, previous studies have reported the effects of CBD on pain alleviation and management of oxidative stress and inflammation in endometriosis patients [18, 19]. Evidence suggests that CBD has multidirectional properties, including anti-inflammatory, antioxidant [20], immunomodulatory, antiarthritic, neuroprotective, anticonvulsant [21], precognitive [22], antianxiety, antipsychotic, and antiproliferative [22] effects. Accordingly, it has been used to treat hypertension [23, 24], neurodegenerative diseases (e.g., multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease, Huntington’s disease, and Parkinson’s disease), epilepsy [22, 25], neuropsychiatric disorders (e.g., anxiety disorders, depression, schizophrenia, and posttraumatic stress disorder after autism spectrum disorders) [22, 26], gastrointestinal diseases (e.g., nausea and vomiting, irritable bowel syndrome, and inflammatory bowel disease) [27], rheumatic disease [23], graft versus host disease, and cancer [25, 28]. Nonetheless, further research on most of these indications is needed to approve the clinical efficacy of CBD. So far, the antiangiogenic properties of CBD have not been fully investigated in OHSS models. Because of its highly favorable toxicological and pharmacological properties, the antiangiogenic properties of CBD were assessed in an OHSS model. The present findings indicated the antiangiogenic effects of CBD on VEGF gene expression in an OHSS model and supported the hypothesis that CBD can be used to treat OHSS.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

This study was performed on 32 Syrian female NMRI mice (age, five weeks), weighing 30-35 g. They were maintained in cages in a 12 : 12 h dark/light cycle at °C and had ad libitum access to food. This research was approved by the Ethics Committee of Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR.IUMS.REC.1400.278). For the experiments, female mice, aged five weeks (30-35 g), were randomly assigned to four groups (): (i)Group 1 (control), receiving saline (0.1 mL) intraperitoneally for four consecutive days(ii)Group 2 (OHSS), receiving 10 IU of pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG, Folligon®-Intervet, Schering-Plow Animal Health Ltd., India) subcutaneously and 30 IU of hCG peritoneum (Chorulon®-Intervet, Schering-Plow Animal Health Ltd., Netherlands) on day 4(iii)Group 3 (OHSS+DMSO), receiving DMSO (32 nmol) via oral gavage two hours before PMSG injection for four consecutive days and two hours before hCG administration on the final day(iv)Group 4 (OHSS+CBD treatment), receiving CBD (30 mg/kg) dissolved in 1 mL of DMSO via oral gavage two hours before PMSG injection for four consecutive days and also two hours before hCG administration on the final day

A standard protocol was applied for the OHSS model [1]. All studies were carried out in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Institute of Health Publication No. 80-23, revised in 1996) and approved by the Research and Ethics Committee of Iran University of Medical Sciences (Tehran, Iran) (IR.IUMS.REC.1400.278).

2.2. Permeability Assessment

The mice were anesthetized with ketamine-xylazine (Alfazyme, Ege Vet, Alfasan International BV, Netherlands). Forty-eight hours after hCG administration, weight gain and VP were assessed. VP was measured according to previous protocols [29]. Next, 0.2 mL of Evans Blue (EB) dye (5 mM, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) dissolved in distilled water was injected intravenously (IV) into the femoral vein with an insulin syringe. A saline solution (0.9% NaCl, 5 mL) was used to fill the peritoneal cavity and shaken at 21 rpm for 30 seconds after 30 minutes of waiting time. The peritoneal lavage fluid was then gently aspirated through a vascular catheter with no tissue damage. The rinsing fluids were collected for VP evaluation.

Following centrifugation (, 12 min), the EB level was calculated using a spectrophotometer at 600 nm. The concentration of dye extracted from the collected liquid is expressed as g/100 g body weight. Finally, after sacrificing the animals, their ovaries were bilaterally removed and weighed carefully. The macroscopic images of the ovaries of examined mice are presented in Figure 1.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

2.3. Follicle Count

After the animals were sacrificed, ovarian specimens were collected and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) and then in a 20% sucrose solution. Next, the tissues were implanted in Tissue-Tek® (O.C.T.™ Compound; Sakura, Netherlands), followed by freezing overnight at -80°C and cutting into 6 μm sections. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was carried out using approved histological techniques. To assess the ovarian morphology, all 12 sections were mounted on a glass slide, and the number of follicles and corpus luteum was counted [30, 31].

2.4. Real-Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) Assay

RNA extraction was performed using TRIzol reagent. For this purpose, 500 μL of TRIzol was added to the peritoneal fluid, and a NanoDrop spectrophotometer was used to evaluate the quality of extracted RNA. In reverse transcription (RT), a complementary mRNA strand (cDNA) was created. In this study, a SuperScript II Single-Strand cDNA Kit was used, which contains Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (M-MLV RT).

For cDNA synthesis from RNA, an oligo (dT) primer was used, which specifically binds to template mRNA and allows RNA transcription by the reverse transcription enzyme in the presence of dNTP. In the present study, a Thermo Fisher Scientific kit was used for cDNA synthesis. According to the kit protocol, all the following steps were performed for cDNA synthesis. Specific primers of VEGF and β-actin genes, which were designed using Gene Runner and PerlPrimer programs, were used. To confirm 100% efficiency, an online blast was also performed on the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) website (Table 1).

Real-time qPCR was performed with cDNA obtained from the peritoneal RNA deposition in each stage of the experiment. The qPCR reactions were conducted in triplicate at a final volume of 10 μL, containing 250 ng of cDNA, 5 pmol of gene-specific primers, and Applied Biosystems SYBR Green Reagent, with ROX dye as a passive control dye for signal intensity. The materials were added according to the kit instructions. For real-time PCR, a primer designed for the studied gene was used; to normalize gene expression, a β-actin primer was employed as the internal control. The whole reaction was repeated in 40 cycles, and three different technical replicates were performed for each experimental group. In each qPCR cycle, a negative control tube was inserted, which contained sterile deionized water rather than cDNA. Moreover, the melting curve analysis determined the specificity of PCR products. All melting curves indicated one peak per product.

Additionally, the comparative CT method was employed to analyze the qPCR findings. In brief, the difference in cycle time () was defined as the difference in the number of cycles needed for replication of the target gene and internal control (mouse β-actin). The was determined based on the difference between the groups, and the fold change (FC) in expression was calculated using the following formula:

The PCR efficiency of primers was 95-100% in this study.

2.5. Western Blotting (WB) Analysis

Considering the materials used in this study, the WB analysis was performed (25). Briefly, after removing the peritoneal fluid, it was frozen and kept at -80°C. After homogenizing the samples with a Complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche, Germany), they were subjected to centrifugation, and protein levels were calculated using a bisynchronous acid protein (BCA) assay (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). The total protein (30 mg) was dissolved on SDS-PAGE gel (8-10%), followed by transfer to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes, using an electrophoretic transfer system (Bio-Rad, Germany).

Subsequently, the membranes were blocked, and incubation was performed using specific primary antibodies at 4°C overnight. The primary antibodies were loaded onto a mouse VEGF monoclonal antibody (1 : 500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA) and a mouse β-actin monoclonal antibody (1 : 500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA). The membranes were washed using 0.05% phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with Tween 20 (PBS-T), followed by incubation with the corresponding horseradish peroxidase- (HRP-) conjugated secondary antibodies (1 : 1000) at 4°C for four hours. To detect target antigens, the blots received a substrate HRP solution (3,3-diaminobenzidine and H₂O₂). Following staining, the band intensities were measured using ImageJ (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/) after subtracting the background and normalizing the tape density.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was performed in GraphPad Prism 8.1 (USA). Values are expressed as . The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was performed to evaluate the normal distribution of data. Also, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s post hoc test, was conducted. A value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

The body weight of the OHSS group significantly increased compared to the controls (). The CBD group experienced a significant reduction in body weight compared to the OHSS group () (Figure 2(a)). The ovarian weight significantly increased in the OHSS group compared to the control group (), while the ovaries of CBD mice weighed less than that of the OHSS group () (Figure 2(b)). The VP significantly increased in the OHSS group compared to the control group (), while it significantly decreased in the CBD group compared to the OHSS group () (Figure 2(c)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

3.1. Measurement of Follicle Count

According to Figure 3, the number of antral, preantral, and preovulatory follicles was lower in the OHSS group compared to the controls (). Also, the number of preovulatory follicles was significantly lower in the CBD group compared to the OHSS group (). Based on the findings, the number of corpus luteum was higher in the OHSS group compared to the control group (), while it was significantly lower in the CBD group compared to the OHSS group ().

3.2. Peritoneal Gene Expression

The mean VEGF mRNA expression level was significantly higher in the OHSS group compared to the control group (), while the mean VEGF mRNA expression was significantly lower in the CBD group compared to the OHSS group () (Figure 4).

3.3. Confirmation of Real-Time PCR Findings Based on the WB Analysis

The real-time PCR findings were approved using a WB analysis of proteins (Figure 5). The VEGF gene expression significantly increased in female mice in the OHSS group compared to the control group (), while it significantly reduced in the CBD group relative to the OHSS group ().

4. Discussion

Based on the current findings, CBD reduced body weight, VP, ovarian weight, and number of corpus luteum compared to the OHSS group. It also reduced VEGF gene expression in the peritoneal fluid in the OHSS model. Generally, the main known risk factors for OHSS include a history of OHSS, young age, polycystic ovarian syndrome, increased antral follicle count, high levels of antimullerian hormone (AMH), and high concentrations of hCG [32].

The management of OHSS is very important in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) and also for physicians dealing with traumas in the emergency department. Several infertility strategies have been employed to prevent OHSS in ART cycles. In these strategies, the IVF cycles are sometimes terminated, exogenous gonadotropin is avoided, and hCG administration is delayed until the serum estradiol (E2) level drops to a safe level (coasting). Besides, the GnRH agonist is used to initiate the final egg maturation stage, albumin is injected during the oocyte retrieval, and all embryos are matured in vitro despite preventive methods. However, no clear mechanism can fully explain how these factors are involved in OHSS, although vasoactive substances released from the ovaries into the circulatory system under hCG induction are associated with this syndrome [1, 33].

The symptoms of OHSS are mainly attributed to fluid leakage from the capillaries, stimulated by an ovarian permeability agent. The formation of this fluid is increased by gonadotropic hormones, which are prescribed for fertility [34–36], and then secreted from enlarged ovaries. An increase in VP mainly results in peritoneal fluid accumulation, edema, and sometimes hypovolemia. Intravascular volume loss contributes to the complications and occasional mortality of OHSS [35]. The development of OHSS is well associated with the ovarian response to gonadotropic hormones, which involves numerous stimulated follicles and increased serum E2 levels [37, 38].

The level of vasoactive substances in the arteries or ovaries has been linked to the temporal growth of OHSS. Consequently, different substances inside and outside the ovaries contribute to OHSS, including histamine, prostaglandins, serotonin, angiotensin, prolactin, and interleukin-2 [39–41]. The present results revealed that VEGF is an ovarian factor, which is generated during hormonal induction and results in an increase in VP; therefore, the expression of VEGF gene is associated with OHSS manifestations. The increasing effect of VEGF gene on VP may be partly related to the effects of other vasoactive agents [42].

In vitro, exogenous VEGF is associated with nitric oxide (NO) production from target cells/organs, such as EC [42, 43]. NO increases VP by activation of protein kinase G [44]. It can bind to and disrupt cytoskeletal protein complexes [31, 32] and deplete adenosine 5-triphosphate (ATP), leading to the dilation of tight EC bonds and rearrangement of actin cytoskeletons [45–47]. Moreover, NO modifies cytoskeletal proteins, modulates EC-tight junction (TJ) formation, and modulates the exchange of transendothelial salts. Several proteins are also associated with the formation of dynamic junctions. The association of TJ proteins (ZO-1, ZO-2, and occludin) with actin cytoskeleton [48] and cadherin-catenin complexes plays an important role [49, 50]. Disruptions in the formation of strong EC bonds are attributed to the disruption of actin cytoskeleton [47, 51] and increased VEGF expression [52]. In patients with OHSS, these strong intercellular connections are disrupted, and VEGF expression is elevated [53], resulting in the reduced level of plasminogen (SERPINE1/PAI-1), as an important factor in the extracellular matrix regeneration and angiogenesis [54].

Today, various medicines and agents have been studied to reduce VEGF gene expression. CBD is one of the most recent compounds used to reduce VEGF expression in gynecological disorders. Molecular targets, pharmacokinetics, and abuse/safety liability of CBD have been extensively discussed in the literature [55, 56]. The inhibition of VEGF expression in glioma cells by CBD represents its antineoplastic and antiangiogenic properties [57]. In this regard, Solinas et al. reported CBD-induced human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) migration, in vitro sprouting and invasion, and in vivo angiogenesis in tumor cells; such effects were related to the downmodulation of many angiogenesis-related molecules [58]. This study showed that the antiangiogenic activity of CBD is effective in counteracting OHSS development. Moreover, CBD significantly suppressed two potent angiogenic agents, that is, IL-8 and CXCL16 [59].

By acting on vascular endothelial cells, CBD reduces angiogenesis and abnormalities and reduces VEGF gene expression in cancer cells in vivo. However, the molecular mechanism of the effects of CBD is not known yet [60, 61]. To reduce VEGF gene secretion, suppression of MAPK, ERK1/2, and P38 signaling pathways is required; CBD is one of the effective compounds in suppressing this pathway [62]. Although the incidence of severe OHSS is low, it remains a serious complication of IVF. Due to its pathophysiology, OHSS is managed experimentally. Many approaches have been employed to prevent OHSS. Considering the pivotal role of VEGF gene in the pathogenesis of OHSS, it was targeted in a previous study [63]. Decreased VEGF gene expression in the OHSS model reduced the pathogenesis of disease. In this study, the level of VEGF gene expression increased in the OHSS model, while following CBD treatment, and the expression of this gene decreased significantly in the peritoneal fluid.

5. Conclusion

Based on the present findings, CBD exerts potent antiangiogenic effects by influencing many associated pathways. It led to the alleviation of OHSS by suppressing VEGF gene expression and VP. Also, CBD downregulated VEGF expression and improved VP in OHSS. It is hoped that the current results can help reduce the symptoms and complications of OHSS and prevent the cancellation of IVF cycles.

Data Availability

The underlying data supporting the results of our study can be found in the manuscript.

Ethical Approval

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Experimentation of the Iran University of Medical Sciences.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Authors’ Contributions

K.T., A.M., S. C, and R. S contributed in writing of the original draft and in conceptualization of the work. S.H. and A.G performed the experimental technique. F.K. and M.A. contributed in conceptualization, writing the review, and editing of the paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support by the Iran University of Medical Sciences (99-3-65-19686).

References

I. Hortu, E. Karadadas, G. Ozceltik et al., “Oxytocin and cabergoline alleviate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) by suppressing vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in an experimental model,” Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 303, no. 4, pp. 1099–1108, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Humaidan, S. Nelson, P. Devroey et al., “Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: review and new classification criteria for reporting in clinical trials,” Human Reproduction, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1997–2004, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Pfeifer, S. Butts, D. Dumesic et al., “Prevention and treatment of moderate and severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a guideline,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 106, no. 7, pp. 1634–1647, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Zohav, B. Almog, A. Cohen et al., “A new perspective on the risk of hypercoagulopathy in ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome using thromboelastography,” Reproductive Sciences, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1600–1606, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Nastri, D. M. Teixeira, R. M. Moroni, V. M. S. Leitão, and W. P. Martins, “Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: pathophysiology, staging, prediction and prevention,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 377–393, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Hugh, P. Lubna, and S. Emre, Speroff’s Clinical Gynecologic Endocrinology and Infertility, Wolters Kluwer, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2020.
S. R. Soares, “Etiology of OHSS and use of dopamine agonists,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 517–522, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Gómez, H. Ferrero, F. Delgado-Rosas et al., “Evidences for the existence of a low dopaminergic tone in polycystic ovarian syndrome: implications for OHSS development and treatment,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 96, no. 8, pp. 2484–2492, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. S. Chung, J. Lee, and N. Ferrara, “Targeting the tumour vasculature: insights from physiological angiogenesis,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 505–514, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Freimuth, R. Ramer, and B. Hinz, “Antitumorigenic effects of cannabinoids beyond apoptosis,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 332, no. 2, pp. 336–344, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Guindon and A. G. Hohmann, “The endocannabinoid system and cancer: therapeutic implication,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 163, no. 7, pp. 1447–1463, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. M. Noonan, A. De Lerma Barbaro, N. Vannini, L. Mortara, and A. Albini, “Inflammation, inflammatory cells and angiogenesis: decisions and indecisions,” Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 31–40, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Albini, S. Indraccolo, D. M. Noonan, and U. Pfeffer, “Functional genomics of endothelial cells treated with anti-angiogenic or angiopreventive drugs,” Clinical & Experimental Metastasis, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 419–439, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. E. Turner, O. J. Bouwsma, S. Billets, and M. A. Elsohly, “Constituents of Cannabis sativa L. XVIII—electron voltage selected ion monitoring study of cannabinoids,” Biomedical Mass Spectrometry, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 247–256, 1980.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Mechoulam and L. Hanuš, “Cannabidiol: an overview of some chemical and pharmacological aspects. Part I: chemical aspects,” Chemistry and Physics of Lipids, vol. 121, no. 1-2, pp. 35–43, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Mechoulam, L. A. Parker, and R. Gallily, “Cannabidiol: an overview of some pharmacological aspects,” The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 42, no. S1, pp. 11S–19S, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. H. Burstein and R. B. Zurier, “Cannabinoids, endocannabinoids, and related analogs in inflammation,” The AAPS Journal, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 109–119, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Genovese, M. Cordaro, R. Siracusa et al., “Molecular and biochemical mechanism of cannabidiol in the management of the inflammatory and oxidative processes associated with endometriosis,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 23, no. 10, p. 5427, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Whitmore, S. Till, S. As-Sanie, K. Boehnke, and A. Schrepf, “Cannabidiol use, substitution for medications, and perceptions of effectiveness in women with chronic pelvic pain,” Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, vol. 28, no. 11, p. S68, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Atalay, I. Jarocka-Karpowicz, and E. Skrzydlewska, “Antioxidative and anti-inflammatory properties of cannabidiol,” Antioxidants, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 21, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. P. Baron, “Medicinal properties of cannabinoids, terpenes, and flavonoids in cannabis, and benefits in migraine, headache, and pain: an update on current evidence and cannabis science,” Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 1139–1186, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. C. Campos, Z. Ortega, J. Palazuelos et al., “The anxiolytic effect of cannabidiol on chronically stressed mice depends on hippocampal neurogenesis: involvement of the endocannabinoid system,” International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1407–1419, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. M. Tao, C. Yu, W. S. Wang et al., “Heteromers of μ opioid and dopamine D1 receptors modulate opioid-induced locomotor sensitization in a dopamine-independent manner,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 174, no. 17, pp. 2842–2861, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Baranowska-Kuczko, H. Kozłowska, M. Kloza et al., “Vasodilatory effects of cannabidiol in human pulmonary and rat small mesenteric arteries: modification by hypertension and the potential pharmacological opportunities,” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 896–911, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Leishman, M. Manchanda, R. Thelen, S. Miller, K. Mackie, and H. B. Bradshaw, “Cannabidiol's upregulation of N-acyl ethanolamines in the central nervous system requires N-acyl phosphatidyl ethanolamine-specific phospholipase D,” Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 228–241, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Premoli, F. Aria, S. A. Bonini et al., “Cannabidiol: recent advances and new insights for neuropsychiatric disorders treatment,” Life Sciences, vol. 224, pp. 120–127, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Martínez, A. Iriondo De-Hond, F. Borrelli, R. Capasso, M. D. Del Castillo, and R. Abalo, “Cannabidiol and other non-psychoactive cannabinoids for prevention and treatment of gastrointestinal disorders: useful nutraceuticals?” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 21, no. 9, p. 3067, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Kis, F. C. Ifrim, V. Buda et al., “Cannabidiol—from plant to human body: a promising bioactive molecule with multi-target effects in cancer,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 20, no. 23, p. 5905, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Ferrero, C. M. García-Pascual, M. Gaytán et al., “Dopamine receptor 2 activation inhibits ovarian vascular endothelial growth factor secretion in an ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) animal model: implications for treatment of OHSS with dopamine receptor 2 agonists,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 102, no. 5, pp. 1468–1476.e1, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. K. Maurya, C. Sangappa, V. Kumar et al., “Expression and activity of Rac1 is negatively affected in the dehydroepiandrosterone induced polycystic ovary of mouse,” Journal of Ovarian Research, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. S. Kauffman, V. G. Thackray, G. E. Ryan et al., “A novel letrozole model recapitulates both the reproductive and metabolic phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome in female mice,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 93, no. 3, p. 69, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
Z. Rezaei, Z. Dehbashi, F. Hoseini, and H. Amuzegar, “The effects of oral calcium on the prevention of moderate to severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in high-risk patients: a placebo-controlled study,” Cogent Biology, vol. 5, no. 1, article 1668212, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J.-L. Guo, D.-D. Zhang, Y. Zhao et al., “Pharmacologic interventions in preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Polishuk and J. Schenker, “Ovarian overstimulation syndrome,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 443–450, 1969.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Wallach, J. G. Schenker, and D. Weinstein, “Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a current survey,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 255–268, 1978.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Haning Jr., E. Y. Strawn, and W. E. Nolten, “Pathophysiology of the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 220–224, 1985.
View at: Google Scholar
R. V. Haning Jr., C. W. Austin, I. H. Carlson, D. L. Kuzma, S. S. Shapiro, and W. J. Zweibel, “Plasma estradiol is superior to ultrasound and urinary estriol glucuronide as a predictor of ovarian hyperstimulation during induction of ovulation with menotropins,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 31–36, 1983.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. H. Asch, H.-P. Li, J. P. Balmaceda, L. N. Weckstein, and S. C. Stone, “Severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in assisted reproductive technology: definition of high risk groups,” Human Reproduction, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 1395–1399, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Schenker and W. Polishuk, “The role of prostaglandins in ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome,” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 47–52, 1976.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Pride, B. H. Yuen, and Y. Moon, “Clinical, endocrinologic, and intraovarian prostaglandin F responses to H-1 receptor blockade in the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: studies in the rabbit model,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 148, no. 5, pp. 670–674, 1984.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Zaidise, M. Friedman, E. S. Lindenbaum, R. Askenazi, B. A. Peretz, and E. Paldi, “Serotonin and the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome,” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 55–60, 1983.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Wu, Q. Huang, Y. Yuan, and H. J. Granger, “VEGF induces NO-dependent hyperpermeability in coronary venules,” American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 271, no. 6, pp. H2735–H2739, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ziche, L. Morbidelli, R. Choudhuri et al., “Nitric oxide synthase lies downstream from vascular endothelial growth factor-induced but not basic fibroblast growth factor-induced angiogenesis,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 99, no. 11, pp. 2625–2634, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. J. Venema, M. B. Marrero, and R. C. Venema, “Bradykinin-stimulated protein tyrosine phosphorylation promotes endothelial nitric oxide synthase translocation to the cytoskeleton,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 226, no. 3, pp. 703–710, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Clancy, J. Rediske, X. Tang et al., “Outside-in signaling in the chondrocyte. Nitric oxide disrupts fibronectin-induced assembly of a subplasmalemmal actin/rho A/focal adhesion kinase signaling complex,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 100, no. 7, pp. 1789–1796, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. L. Salzman, M. J. Menconi, N. Unno et al., “Nitric oxide dilates tight junctions and depletes ATP in cultured Caco-2BBe intestinal epithelial monolayers,” American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, vol. 268, no. 2, pp. G361–G373, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Bacallao, A. Garfinkel, S. Monke, G. Zampighi, and L. J. Mandel, “ATP depletion: a novel method to study junctional properties in epithelial tissues. I. Rearrangement of the actin cytoskeleton,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 107, no. 12, pp. 3301–3313, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. M. Gumbiner, “Cell adhesion: the molecular basis of tissue architecture and morphogenesis,” Cell, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 345–357, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. R. Haselton and R. L. Heimark, “Role of cadherins 5 and 13 in the aortic endothelial barrier,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 171, no. 3, pp. 243–251, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Tsukamoto and S. K. Nigam, “Tight junction proteins form large complexes and associate with the cytoskeleton in an ATP depletion model for reversible junction assembly,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 272, no. 26, pp. 16133–16139, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Kwon, W. J. Nelson, R. Sibley et al., “Backleak, tight junctions, and cell- cell adhesion in postischemic injury to the renal allograft,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 101, no. 10, pp. 2054–2064, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. G. Roberts and G. E. Palade, “Increased microvascular permeability and endothelial fenestration induced by vascular endothelial growth factor,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 2369–2379, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. G. Kevil, D. K. Payne, E. Mire, and J. S. Alexander, “Vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial cell growth factor-mediated permeability occurs through disorganization of endothelial junctional proteins,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 24, pp. 15099–15103, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Raghu, S. S. Lakka, C. S. Gondi et al., “Suppression of uPA and uPAR attenuates angiogenin mediated angiogenesis in endothelial and glioblastoma cell lines,” PLoS One, vol. 5, no. 8, article e12458, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Gonçalves, T. Rosado, S. Soares et al., “Cannabis and its secondary metabolites: their use as therapeutic drugs, toxicological aspects, and analytical determination,” Medicine, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 31, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Costa, A. E. Trovato, F. Comelli, G. Giagnoni, and M. Colleoni, “The non-psychoactive cannabis constituent cannabidiol is an orally effective therapeutic agent in rat chronic inflammatory and neuropathic pain,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 556, no. 1-3, pp. 75–83, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Solinas, P. Massi, V. Cinquina et al., “Cannabidiol, a non-psychoactive cannabinoid compound, inhibits proliferation and invasion in U87-MG and T98G glioma cells through a multitarget effect,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 10, article e76918, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Solinas, P. Massi, A. Cantelmo et al., “Cannabidiol inhibits angiogenesis by multiple mechanisms,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 167, no. 6, pp. 1218–1231, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. J. Rabquer, P. S. Tsou, Y. Hou et al., “Dysregulated expression of MIG/CXCL9, IP-10/CXCL10 and CXCL16 and their receptors in systemic sclerosis,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. F. Pla, D. Avanzato, L. Munaron, and I. S. Ambudkar, “Ion channels and transporters in cancer. 6. Vascularizing the tumor: TRP channels as molecular targets,” American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, vol. 302, no. 1, pp. C9–C15, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Qiu, G. Wang, J. Hu, Q. Peng, and Y. Zheng, “Id1-induced inhibition of p53 facilitates endothelial cell migration and tube formation by regulating the expression of beta1-integrin,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 357, no. 1-2, pp. 125–133, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Honarmand, F. Namazi, A. Mohammadi, and S. Nazifi, “Can cannabidiol inhibit angiogenesis in colon cancer?” Comparative Clinical Pathology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 165–172, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. R. Soares, R. Gómez, C. Simón, J. A. García-Velasco, and A. Pellicer, “Targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor system to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 321–333, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Kobra Tahermanesh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

580

Downloads

488

Citations