Thickness of the Deltoid Muscle and Location of the Anterior Branch of the Axillary Nerve and the Posterior Circumflex Humeral Artery for Deltoid Injections

Kim, Ye-Gyung; Chung, Yoon-Hee; Ahn, Hee-Jun; Jeon, Anna; Kim, Yi-Suk; Hwang, Kun; Han, Seung-Ho

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1784572

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 1784572 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1784572

Thickness of the Deltoid Muscle and Location of the Anterior Branch of the Axillary Nerve and the Posterior Circumflex Humeral Artery for Deltoid Injections

Ye-Gyung Kim,¹Yoon-Hee Chung,¹Hee-Jun Ahn,¹Anna Jeon,²Yi-Suk Kim,²Kun Hwang,³and Seung-Ho Han⁴

Academic Editor: Fu-Ming Tsai

Received05 Feb 2022

Revised26 Oct 2022

Accepted12 Nov 2022

Published15 Dec 2022

Abstract

This study investigated the thickness of the deltoid muscle and the location of the anterior branch of the axillary nerve (AAN) and posterior circumflex humeral artery (PCHA), with the goal of maximizing the effectiveness of deltoid injections. Forty specimens from 22 adult Korean cadavers were used. A reference line was identified, connecting the anterior point of the deltoid muscle (AP) and the posterior point of the deltoid muscle (PP) on the surface. The midpoint between the AP and PP was used as the origin point (OP). The line connecting the OP and the lowest point of the deltoid tuberosity (DP) was used as the -axis. The mean distance of the reference line from the AP to PP was . The vertical mean length of the deltoid muscle from the OP and DP was . At the 3, 5, and 7 cm sites, the thickness of the deltoid muscle was , , and , respectively. Most of the branches of the axillary nerve were concentrated in the third section (4-6 cm, 51%), while the branches of the PCHA were predominantly found in the fourth section (6-8 cm, 69%). The peripheral branches of the AAN entering the muscle were distributed between 2.2 and 9.8 cm from the acromion. The mean number of the peripheral branches of the AAN was . In the deltoid muscle, the mean number of peripheral branches of the PCHA was . Administering deltoid injections 5-6 cm below the OP is recommended to avoid axillary nerve injury.

1. Introduction

Deltoid intramuscular injections are a common procedure [1–3]. The mass of the deltoid muscle is smaller than that of other intramuscular injection sites such as the gluteus maximus or the vastus lateralis muscle [4].

To identify the proper location for injection, it is necessary to understand the anatomy of the neurovascular structures beneath the muscle. In particular, to avoid errors in injections into the deltoid muscle, it is necessary to accurately identify the location of the anterior branch of the axillary nerve and PHCA, as well as the thickness of the deltoid muscle itself [5–7].

Anatomical studies of the deltoid muscle have examined the size and shape of the muscle belly and the location of the axillary nerve, and studies on botulinum toxin (BTX) injection have also been conducted [8–14]. However, there are few studies on the relative distribution of the arteries and nerves in the deltoid muscle or the thickness of the deltoid muscle relating to deltoid injections [15, 16].

The aim of this study was to determine the thickness of the deltoid muscle and to identify the location of the anterior branch of the axillary nerve and PHCA, in order to optimize deltoid injections.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Forty specimens from Korean adult embalmed and nonembalmed cadavers (11 male, 11 female; 10 embalmed, 12 nonembalmed; age range: 49 to 93 years; mean age: 76 years) were used in this study. Specimens without a history of shoulder surgery or fractures were chosen. After removing the skin and subcutaneous tissue overlying the deltoid muscle, a detailed dissection was performed in all specimens, while taking extreme care to avoid damaging the axillary nerve. In this study, we focused on the acromial part of the deltoid muscle.

2.2. Landmarks and Axis

The anterior point of the acromion (AP), the posterior point of the acromion (PP), and the acromion were identified before dissection. The origin point (OP) was defined as the midpoint of a reference line (-axis) connecting the AP and PP at the acromion level, and a vertical line (-axis) was formed by connecting the OP to the lowest point of the deltoid tuberosity (DP) (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Illustration of the reference lines used to measure the thickness of the deltoid muscle and length of the bony landmark. The line connecting the OP and DP was equally divided into 8 equal sections. The average value of each section was about 2 cm. AP: the anterior point of the acromion; PP: the posterior point of the acromion; OP: the origin point of the reference line; blue line: thickness measurement point of the deltoid muscle; -axis: line connecting the AP and PP; DP: the lowest point of the deltoid tuberosity; -axis: line connecting the OP and DP.

2.3. Methods of Measuring the Thickness of the Deltoid Muscle, Skin, and Soft Tissue

The thickness of the deltoid muscle, skin, and soft tissue was measured using digital calipers (resolution 0.01 mm, CD-20PSX, Mitutoyo, Japan) at the 3, 5, and 7 cm distance from the OP.

2.4. Location of the Anterior Branch of the Axillary Nerve and the Posterior Circumflex Humeral Artery

The distribution of the branches of the axillary nerve and the PCHA was investigated to determine how many branches were located in each area, after dividing the branches into eight equal sections on the -axis. Since the anterior branch of the axillary nerve is the main nerve in the acromial part of the deltoid muscle, we excluded the posterior branch of the axillary nerve from our study and focused only on the anterior branch of the axillary nerve.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel (Excel 2016, Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA). The -test was used to compare the variables of interest according to sex, and values less than 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. The present study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chung-Ang University (IRB No: 1041078-201903-BRBM-089-01).

3. Results

3.1. Landmarks and the Muscle

The mean length of the reference line from the AP to PP was (maximum, 6.4 cm; minimum, 3.2 cm). The mean vertical length of the deltoid muscle from the OP and DP was (maximum, 18.3 cm; minimum, 14.7 cm) (Table 1).

The thickness of the deltoid muscle was (range, 0.51–0.84 cm), (range, 0.64–0.96 cm), and (range, 1.15–1.40 cm) at 3, 5, and 7 cm above the -axis, respectively (Table 2).

3.2. Location of the Anterior Branch of the Axillary Nerve and the PCHA

The main branches of the axillary nerve and the PCHA were located in the transverse area of the surgical neck of the humerus at the deltoid muscle. To analyze the distribution of the nerve and artery, we divided the region into eight horizontal compartments, with 2 cm intervals on the -axis (from the OP to the DP) (Figure 1).

The axillary nerve and the PCHA were distributed at and from the -axis, respectively. Most of the main branches of the axillary nerve (observed during macroscopic investigations) were concentrated in the third section (4-6 cm, 51%), with the branches of the PCHA in the fourth section (6-8 cm, 69%) (Table 3 and Figure 2). The PCHA ran 0.5 cm below the axillary nerve on average, with no statistically significant difference by sex (, -test).

3.3. Entry Points of the Peripheral Branches of the Axillary Nerve and the PCHA

The peripheral branches of the axillary nerve, which entered the muscle, were distributed between 2.2 and 9.8 cm from the acromion. The mean number of peripheral branches of the axillary nerve was , and the peripheral branches of the axillary nerve entering the deltoid muscle were distributed as follows: ≤5 branches: 5 specimens (17%); 6 to 10 branches: 11 specimens (37%); and 11 to 15 branches: 14 specimens (46%).

The number of the PCHA branches entering the deltoid muscle ranged from 2 to 13. In the deltoid muscle, the mean number of peripheral branches of the PCHA was , and the branches entering the deltoid muscle were distributed as follows: ≤5 branches: 4 specimens (15%); 6 to 10 branches: 17 specimens (65%); and 11 to 15 branches: 5 specimens (20%).

The number of peripheral branches of the axillary nerve was most often between 11 and 15, and the number of peripheral branches of the PCHA was most often between 6 and 10 (Figure 3 and Table 4).

3.4. The Main Branching Pattern of the PCHA

The PCHA passed through the deltoid muscle after bifurcating into one branch or two branches. The pattern bifurcating into two branches was the most common (type A, 60%). In types B and C, it was divided into inferior (type B, 35%) and superior (type C, 5%) branches, respectively.

It was found that the main trunk of the PCHA was distributed below the axillary nerve in all samples (Figure 4).

(a)

(b)

(c)

4. Discussion

The deltoid muscle is widely used for intramuscular injections and as an injection point in the fields of anesthesia and vaccination [2, 3, 17, 18], as well as in rehabilitation medicine for injections to treat shoulder pain or muscle sprains [19]. From our observations, the axillary nerve and PCHA distributed in the deltoid muscle ran closely to each other along the surgical neck of the humerus, as two structures were about 0.5 cm apart. In our study, the positional relationship between the axillary nerve and the PCHA was studied through cadaveric dissection to identify effective injection points in the deltoid muscle.

In our study, there was a significant difference in the length between the AP and PP, which is a bony landmark between males and females (, -test). Nicholson et al. also reported that there was a significant difference in the length of the acromion between males and females, and multiple regression analysis revealed no significant changes in any dimension with increasing age. Our results agree with those of the study by Nicholson et al. [20].

A study by Nakajima et al. described the location of the nerves and arteries distributed in the deltoid muscle and reported a safe point for intramuscular injection [2]. They recommended that the safest point for deltoid muscle injections was the periphery of the deltoid tuberosity (about 9.9-12.0 cm), which is located far away from the nerves and arteries. In contrast, in the present study, the axillary nerve and arteries were mainly distributed in the third (51%) and fourth (45%) sections, respectively. Therefore, for safe injections into the deltoid muscle, one must inject along the axillary nerve in a horizontal direction from about 5–6 cm below the -axis along the surface of the humerus. The deltoid muscle and skin are thickest at the 7 cm point. We suggest that deltoid muscle injections could be performed safely unless the injection is performed too deeply. In deltoid muscle contouring, a small dose should be spread out and injected widely into the superficial layer of the muscle in consideration of the spread of BTX, and care should be taken not to damage the arteries. Anatomical variations are commonly found and are statistically predictable, and multiple observations can help to overcome the researcher subjectivity [21, 22].

In comparison with the Nakajima et al.’s study, the distribution location of the PCHA in males was different from our study. In Nakajima et al.’s study and in our study, the PCHA in males were and below the midacromion, respectively. We observed that the PCHA in male is present below in Nakajima et al.’s study. In Nakajima et al.’s study, the length of the PCHA in the male was significantly longer (, -test). However, no significant difference was found between the Korean and the Japanese in humerus length (, -test) [23, 24]. The difference in the length of the deltoid muscle, even though there was no difference in the humerus, identified that there was a difference between the two races regardless of the humerus.

In this study, the distribution pattern varied according to the specimen. The location of the entry point of the peripheral branch that entered the muscle was between 2.2 and 9.8 cm below the -axis (AP-PP line). In particular, the fourth section (69%) should be avoided for injections because the main branches of the PCHA are distributed in that region. The locations of the main branches of the axillary nerve and the PCHA were found to be and away from the AP-PP line, respectively. From the AP and PP lines, the main branch of the PCHA was located at , and the peripheral branches were located at , mainly distributed in sections 4 and 5 in the entire deltoid muscle.

The findings of this study have important implications for maximizing the effectiveness of injections and reducing complications. If Sihler’s staining of the deltoid muscle is performed in a follow-up study, it will be possible to resolve the limitations of macroscopic anatomy by revealing the innervation of the muscle. The identification of the exact location of the distribution patterns of nerves and arteries in the deltoid muscle is very important for injections into the deltoid muscle; hence, the information obtained in this study is of value.

Data Availability

The underlying data supporting the results of our study can be found in the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

K Hwang was responsible for research design, data collection, and manuscript writing. SH Han was responsible for research design and statistical analysis. YG Kim was responsible for data collection and manuscript writing. YH Chung was responsible for manuscript writing and editing. HJ Ahn was responsible for data collection and statistical analysis. AN Jeon was responsible for data collection and statistical analysis. YS Kim was responsible for data collection and project development. Ye-Gyung Kim, Yoon-Hee Chung, Kun Hwang, and Seung-Ho Han contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Chung-Ang University Research Scholarship Grants in 2020. This work was supported by the Ewha Womans University Research Grant of 2021. The authors sincerely thank those who donated their bodies to science so that anatomical research could be performed. Results from such research can potentially increase mankind’s overall knowledge that can then improve patient care. Therefore, these donors and their families deserve our highest gratitude [25].

References

W. C. Lippert and E. J. Wall, “Optimal intramuscular needle-penetration depth,” Pediatrics, vol. 122, no. 3, pp. e556–e563, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Nakajima, K. Mukai, K. Takaoka et al., “Establishing a new appropriate intramuscular injection site in the deltoid muscle,” Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 2123–2129, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Malkin, “Are techniques used for intramuscular injection based on research evidence,” Nursing Times, vol. 104, no. 50-51, pp. 48–51, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Hwang, Y. S. Nam, S. H. Han, and S. W. Hwang, “The intramuscular course of the inferior gluteal nerve in the gluteus maximus muscle and augmentation gluteoplasty,” Annals of Plastic Surgery, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 361–365, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Orellana-Donoso, J. J. Valenzuela-Fuenzalida, M. Gold-Semmler, Guernica-Garcia-Gorigoitia, R. Shane-Tubbs, and E. Santana-Machuca, “Neural entrapments associated with musculoskeletal anatomical variations of the upper limb: literature review,” Translational Research in Anatomy, vol. 22, article 100094, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. A. Bergman, A. K. Afifi, and R. Miyauchi, “Illustrated Encyclopedia of Human Anatomic Variation: Opus II: Cardiovascular System: Arteries: Upper Limb,” 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Clarke, A. Mazurek, M. Radek et al., “Superficial brachial artery - a case report with commentaries on the classification,” Translational Research in Anatomy, vol. 23, article 100112, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. M. Kontakis, K. Steriopoulos, J. Damilakis, and E. Michalodimitrakis, “The position of the axillary nerve in the deltoid muscle: a cadaveric study,” Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 9–11, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Moatshe, D. C. Marchetti, J. Chahla et al., “Qualitative and quantitative anatomy of the proximal humerus muscle attachments and the axillary nerve: a cadaveric study,” Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 795–803, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Loukas, J. Grabska, R. S. Tubbs, N. Apaydin, and R. Jordan, “Mapping the axillary nerve within the deltoid muscle,” Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 43–47, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Cetik, M. Uslu, H. I. Acar, A. Comert, I. Tekdemir, and H. Cift, “Is there a safe area for the axillary nerve in the deltoid muscle?” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, vol. 88, no. 11, pp. 2395–2399, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. K. Gurushantappa and S. Kuppasad, “Anatomy of axillary nerve and its clinical importance: a cadaveric study,” Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, vol. 9, no. 3, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. K. Seo, “Body contouring with botulinum toxin,” in Botulinum Toxin for Asians, pp. 141–157, Springer, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
S. H. Shin, S. J. Park, S. H. Yeoum, C. S. Youn, and K. Y. Park, “Efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin injection in reducing deltoid muscle hypertrophy,” Dermatologic Therapy, vol. 34, no. 6, article e15168, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Wysiadecki, M. Polguj, K. Krasucki et al., “Morphology and a proposed model of innervation of the human deltoid muscle: a pilot study,” Folia Morphologica, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 216–223, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Leechavengvongs, T. Teerawutthichaikit, K. Witoonchart et al., “Surgical anatomy of the axillary nerve branches to the deltoid muscle,” Clinical Anatomy, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 118–122, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. M. Davidson and L. Rourke, “Teaching best-evidence: Deltoid intramuscular injection technique,” Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, vol. 3, no. 7, p. 120, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Fujimoto, “The problem of using deltoid muscle for intramuscular injection,” Aino Journal, vol. 6, pp. 49–53, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
K. H. Yang, “Helical plate fixation for treatment of comminuted fractures of the proximal and middle one-third of the humerus,” Injury, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 75–80, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. P. Nicholson, D. A. Goodman, E. L. Flatow, and L. U. Bigliani, “The acromion: morphologic condition and age-related changes. A study of 420 scapulas,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Żytkowski, R. S. Tubbs, J. Iwanaga, E. Clarke, M. Polguj, and G. Wysiadecki, “Anatomical normality and variability: historical perspective and methodological considerations,” Translational Research in Anatomy, vol. 23, article 100105, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Haładaj, G. Wysiadecki, E. Clarke, M. Polguj, and M. Topol, “Anatomical variations of the pectoralis major muscle: notes on their impact on pectoral nerve innervation patterns and discussion on their clinical relevance,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2019, Article ID 6212039, 15 pages, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Hong, D. S. Kwak, and I. B. Kim, “Morphometric evaluation of detailed asymmetry for the proximal humerus in Korean population,” Symmetry, vol. 13, no. 5, p. 862, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Hasegawa, K. Uenishi, T. Fukunaga, R. Kimura, and M. Osawa, “Stature estimation formulae from radiographically determined limb bone length in a modern Japanese population,” Legal Medicine, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 260–266, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Iwanaga, V. Singh, A. Ohtsuka et al., “Acknowledging the use of human cadaveric tissues in research papers: recommendations from anatomical journal editors,” Clinical Anatomy, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 2–4, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Ye-Gyung Kim et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

833

Downloads

419

Citations