A Nomogram to Predict Noninflammatory Skin Involvement of Invasive Breast Cancer
Purpose. The aim of this study was to develop and assess a nomogram to predict noninflammatory skin involvement of invasive breast cancer. Methods. We developed a prediction model based on SEER database, a training dataset of 89202 patients from January 2010 to December 2016. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to build a predicting model incorporating the feature selected in the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model. Discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness of the predicting model were assessed using the C-index, calibration plot, and decision curve analysis. Internal validation was assessed using the bootstrapping validation. Results. Predictors contained in the prediction nomogram included use of age, race, grade, tumor size, stage-N, ER status, PR status, and Her-2 status. The model shows good discrimination with a C-index of 0.857 (95% confidence interval: 0.807–0.907) and good calibration. High C-index value of 0.847 could still be reached in the internal validation. Conclusion. This study constructed a novel nomogram with accuracy to help clinicians access the risk of noninflammatory skin involvement by tumor. The assessment of clinicopathologic factors can predict the individual probability of skin involvement and provide assistance to the clinical decision-making.
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) released the latest global cancer burden data in 2020. The number of new cases of breast cancer in the world ranked first. It is gratifying that the five-year survival rate of breast cancer was nearly 90% in developed countries and 83% in China. More and more surgeons and patients have requirements for postoperative reconstruction of breast cancer surgery (BCS). Over the years, surgical techniques for breast cancer have evolved from mastectomy to breast-conserving surgery and breast reconstruction. Mastectomy  including radical mastectomy, or traditional non-skin-sparing mastectomy (NSSM) and skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM), plays an important role in breast surgery. Radical mastectomy remains most commonly performed today and was described by Madden in 1965, which requires removal of varying degrees of skin (NSSM). In contrast with radical mastectomy, SSM requires the preservation of the maximum skin, even overall skin. The skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) techniques described as entails excision of the biopsy scar, all breast parenchyma, skin overlying a superficial tumor, was first introduced in 1991 by Toth and Lappert . However, whether to remove the skin from the overlying tumor is not accepted by all surgeons . In addition, several meta-analyses showed no significant difference between SSM and non-SSM in oncological considerations . Be that as it may, negative surgical margins are imperative for SSM . Previous retrospective studies have found local recurrence rates of 0.6%-10.4% in SSM and 1.3%-11.5% after mastectomy . A British study found that compared with mastectomy, patients with negative axillary lymph nodes had a 5-fold higher risk of local recurrence after SSM () . This means that surgeons need to be cautious when choosing SSM. Once the skin invasion is detected, the skin overlying the tumor cannot be preserved. Generally speaking, clinicians can find the breast skin invasion visually, such as orange peel sign and dimples. Ultrasound, mammography, and MRI can also be used to assess skin involvement. These imaging modalities predict the possibility of skin invasion though measuring the distance between the mass and the skin. Nevertheless, such predictions are inaccurate leading a high false positive rate, simultaneously adding the extra financial burden to patients. Due to limitations of these methods, the skin of breast will be removed more or less.
Despite the shortcomings above, there is currently no model that can directly predict noninflammatory skin involvement so far. Until now, majority of the literature has simply speculated on the tumor safety based on local recurrence or pathological examination, which was definitely lagging behind. In an attempt to fill this vacancy, the research was to establish a nomogram that can directly predict whether the skin of breast cancer patient has been involved or not by mining the SEER database.
2. Materials and Methods
SEER database (https://seer.cancer.gov/) is supported by the Surveillance Research Program of Cancer Control and Population Sciences. Data were extracted from 18 registries within the SEER database from January 2010 to December 2016, which represents approximately 28% of the U.S. population. We only collected critical data available. The following data included age, race, grade, tumor size, stage-N, ER status, PR status, Her-2 status, and molecular subtyping.
Inclusion criteria are as follows: the inclusion patients were all nonmetastatic invasive breast cancers with T1-3 and T4a-T4b tumor staging in AJCC seventh edition, in which T4b was defined as ulceration and/or ipsilateral satellite nodules and/or edema (including peau d’orange) of the skin, which does not meet the criteria for inflammatory carcinoma in AJCC seventh edition.
Exclusion criteria are as follows: (1) unknown distant metastasis; (2) unknown race or grades; (3) unknown ER status, PR status, Her-2 status, or stage N; and (4) nonmetastatic invasive breast cancers with Tx, T0, Tis, T4c, T4d, or T4NOS.
2.2. Statistical Analysis
All the patients met the requirements and were enrolled in the primary cohort, which was further randomized into training cohort and validation cohorts following the ratio of 1 : 1 using R, version 3.6.0 (http://www.rproject.org/) (Figure 1).Baseline clinicopathologic characteristics of the patients included were conducted with a descriptive analysis. We utilized the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method to select the optimal predictive characteristics in risk of noninflammatory skin involvement from the patients with invasive breast cancer; the method is suitable for the reduction in high dimensional data.
We selected characteristics with nonzero coefficients in the LASSO regression model. The characteristics selected from the LASSO regression model were used for multivariable logistic regression analysis to build a model for predicting. In the multivariate logistic regression model, bilateral values < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. All the factors with values < 0.05 in multivariate regression were incorporated into the construction of the prediction model.
Then, we used calibration plots to assess the accuracy of nomogram. In order to quantify nomogram’s discriminative ability to identify the noninflammatory skin involvement, the Harrell’s concordance index (C-index) was performed. R (version 3.6.0) (http://www.r-project.org/) was performed in all statistical analyses. We used the “rms” package in R to build the nomograms.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Patients’ Characteristics
A total of 176418 patients eventually enrolled in the study from the SEER database. In the training cohort, noninflammatory skin involvement occurred in 1.2% of invasive breast cancers in the study, which was accordant with the validation cohort. The patients were divided into the training cohort and the validation cohort, and all clinicopathologic features are summarized in Table 1. Of all the clinicopathologic characteristics, eight potential predictors on the basis of 176418 patients in the cohort had nonzero coefficients in the LASSO regression model (see in Table 2 and Figures 2(a) and 2(b)). We performed univariate unadjusted logistic regression analysis to the variables age, race, grade, stage-N, ER status, PR status, Her-2 status, tumor size, and molecular subtyping.
3.2. Development of a Nomogram
A nomogram was constructed with the data of training cohort. And significant factors in the logistic regression were used to construct a nomogram. These factors include age, race, grade, stage-N, ER status, PR status, Her-2 status, tumor size, and molecular subtyping (Figure 3). Each factor used to construct the nomogram was assigned a score. By adding these scores, we can predict the possibility of noninflammatory skin involvement of breast cancer patient.
3.3. Calibration and Validation of the Nomogram
The C-index of the prediction model was 0.872 in the training group and 0.878 in the validation cohort, respectively, which indicated that the model had good discrimination. The calibration plots showed excellent agreement with both of the training cohort and validation cohort (Figure 4). The ROC curve showed that AUC was 0.868, which indicated that the model had good predictive ability (Figure 5).
At present, whether the patient’s skin of breast is invaded is a key issue that both doctors and patients are concerned about when preparing for breast cancer surgery, especially in SSM and BCS. Preoperative evaluation is conducive to the smooth implementation of the surgical process. Further, adequate preoperative assessment can facilitate surgery to achieve the desired results. To achieve these goals, predictive models need to build for clinical decision-making urgently. Nomograms are widely used for tumor-related prediction, which can reduce statistical predictive models into a single numerical estimate of the probability of an event . These user-friendly graphical interfaces can be utilized for facilitating clinical decision-making. Nevertheless, no study has been reported previously about tumor noninflammatory skin involvement. As a consequence, we build a predictive model of noninflammatory skin involvement in invasive breast cancer for the first time and hope to provide clinical reference when making decisions.
In this study, 176481 patients with invasive breast cancer were included from the SEER database in which noninflammatory skin involvement rate was 1.2%, which was in concordance with previous study. Lookingbill et al.  analyzed 7,316 breast cancer patients and found that skin involvement was 1.3%. These data show that the probability of skin invasion in breast cancer patients is relatively low. According to principle of oncology, the skin must be essentially removed if the skin has been involved regardless of any procedures. Thus, whether the skin is involved by tumor or not is extremely important. Generally speaking, breast skin involvement is assessed by physical examination and ultrasound, mammography, or MR. M A EL-Adalany et al. analyzed 125 breast cancer patients and found that abnormal unilateral nipple enhancement was the most important independent MRI predictor of malignant NAC invasion () . In this nomogram, we found that age, histological grade, and numbers of lymph node metastases, race, ER status, PR status, Her-2 status, and tumor size were independent predictors of breast cancer skin involvement. Among these factors, histological grade, number of lymph node metastases, and tumor size were strongly correlated with skin involvement. From the perspective of single factor (Figure 3), it was found that the higher the histological grade of breast cancer, the larger the tumor; the more lymphatic metastasis, then the more likely of skin invasion. ER/PR negative, HER-2 positive, and black patients were the high risk factors for skin involvement. It is worth mentioning that women over 50 were more likely to have skin invasion, in which tumor size had the greatest influence.X. M. Yang et al.  found that breast cancer patients with larger primary tumor and more regional lymph node metastasis were more likely to have skin invasion. A study found that tumor type, HER-2 status, and PR status were significant predictors of malignant papillary areola complex invasion, and the values are, respectively, 0.006, <0.001, and 0.014 . A British study found that more than 4 lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients (HR 8.0, ) and involved surgical margins (HR 3.3, ) were predictor of local recurrence of breast cancer . Obviously, these factors are also traditional risk factors for tumor recurrence, which have been proven in many studies [12, 13]. Güth et al. also observed that patients with a higher number of involved axillary lymph nodes and extensive lymph nodes involvement were more likely to invade the skin of breast . And the results of these studies are similar to our results. A Japanese study recommended to remove the skin covering the tumor at a distance of less than 2 mm from the tumor to the dermis on ultrasound when performed NSM or SSM in invasive breast cancer . In this study, ultrasound was used for evaluation, which was single and subjective. The combination of clinicopathologic data in our study seems to be more convincing.
SEER database represents nearly one-third of the U.S. population. Therefore, the nomogram based on SEER database can be used as a relatively accurate prediction tool to predict noninflammatory skin involvement. In particular, in this study, the C-index of the training cohort and validation cohort was higher, respectively, which can more precisely predict the large sample data. In addition, good discrimination and calibration power were demonstrated in internal validation. A similar conclusion with ROC curve was obtained, which proves that our model has high prediction accuracy.
The skin overlap the tumor plays an important role in numerous breast cancer surgery, especially in breast-conserving surgery, total mastectomy and oncoplastic surgery. In breast-conserving surgery, skin excision may lead to the deviation of the nipple and areola and the asymmetry of bilateral nipple position. In total mastectomy, extra skin flap transplantation may be needed because of the large area cutaneous deficiency in the surgical area. In oncoplastic surgery, skin removal may result in excessive skin tension, implant exposure, and the risk of infection [16, 17]. The nomogram developed in this study can help clinicians predict skin invasion of tumor and then may preserve as much as possible breast skin for patients especially during oncoplastic surgery.
In conclusion, this study construct a novel nomogram to help clinicians access the risk of noninflammatory skin involvement by tumor. The assessment of clinicopathologic factors can predict the individual probability of skin involvement and provide assistance to the clinical decision-making. In the future, we will verify it further.
The study data are from SEER database (https://seer.cancer.gov/).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
We thank all members of our study team for their whole-hearted cooperation. The study is funded by the Health Commission of Hubei Province (No. WJ2019H191), the Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province, and the Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology.
S. Lanitis, P. P. Tekkis, G. Sgourakis, N. Dimopoulos, R. al Mufti, and D. J. Hadjiminas, “Comparison of skin-sparing mastectomy versus non-skin-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 251, no. 4, pp. 632–639, 2010.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. EL-Adalany, A. A. E. K. A. EL-Razek, and D. EL-Metwally, “Prediction of nipple-areolar complex involvement by breast cancer: role of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI),” Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2021.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. M. Yang, L. Ding, Y. Xu et al., “Analysis of characteristics and prognosis factors of cutaneous metastasis in female breast cancer,” Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment, vol. 28, no. 17, pp. 1329–1338, 2021.View at: Google Scholar
H. P. Xia, S. R. Gao, X. F. Zhang et al., “Analysis on risk factors of recurrence and metastasis of breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery for patients with breast cancer,” Biomedical Research, vol. 28, no. 16, pp. 7047–7050, 2017.View at: Google Scholar
T. Fujii, Y. Nakazawa, M. Ogino et al., “Oncological safety of immediate breast reconstruction with skin- or nipple-sparing mastectomy: the value of tumor-to-dermis distance measured by preoperative ultrasonography,” World Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2021.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar