Research Article
Evaluation of the Reliability and Quality of YouTube Video Content about Perianal Fistulas
Table 1
Basic characteristics of the videos reviewed.
| | Feature | Daily views | Comments | Likes | | | |
| | Image type | | | | | Real () | | | | | Presentation () | | | | | Animation () | | | | | Uploaders | | | | | Medical doctors () | | | | | Technicians () | | | | | Health channels () | | | | | Patients () | | | | | Others () | | | | | Professionals vs. lay persons | | | | | Professionals () | | | | | Nonprofessionals () | | | | | Video content | | | | | General information () | | | | | Treatment () | | | | | Imaging () | | | | | Examination () | 226 | 139 | 2100 | | Alternative medicine () | | | | | Education () | | | | | Patient experience () | | | |
|
|
