Perilipin 2 Protects against Lipotoxicity-Induced Islet Fibrosis by Inducing Islet Stellate Cell Activation Phenotype Changes

Zhou, Yunting; Wang, Yuming; Ni, Chengming; Wang, Huiying; Zhou, Junming; Wan, Bingying; Li, Huiqin; Li, Fengfei; Huang, Rong; Xu, Wei; Shan, Ting; Cai, Tingting; Kong, Xiaoceng; Liu, Bingli; Liu, Xiaomei; Sun, Zilin; Ma, Jianhua

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4581405

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 4581405 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4581405

Perilipin 2 Protects against Lipotoxicity-Induced Islet Fibrosis by Inducing Islet Stellate Cell Activation Phenotype Changes

Yunting Zhou,¹Yuming Wang,¹Chengming Ni,²Huiying Wang,¹Junming Zhou,³Bingying Wan,⁴Huiqin Li,¹Fengfei Li,¹Rong Huang,¹Wei Xu,⁵Ting Shan,¹and Tingting Cai¹ et al.

Academic Editor: Dawid Szczepankiewicz

Received24 Dec 2021

Accepted20 Jun 2022

Published06 Jul 2022

Abstract

Aims. We explored whether and how perilipin 2 (Plin2) protected islets against lipotoxicity-induced islet dysfunction by regulating islet stellate cells (ISCs) activation. Methods. Six-week-old male rats were given a high-fat diet or a control diet for 28 weeks. Glucose metabolic phenotypes were assessed using glucose/insulin tolerance tests, masson, and immunohistochemical staining. ISCs activation levels were assessed from rats and palmitic acid- (PA-) treated cultured ISCs by immunofluorescence, Oil red O staining, electron microscopy, quantitative PCR, and western blotting. Changes in ISCs phenotype of activation degree and its underlying mechanisms were assessed by target gene lentiviral infection, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and western blotting. Results. Obese rats showed glucose intolerance, decreased endocrine hormone profiles, and elevated expression of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), a polygonal appearance without cytoplasmic lipid droplets of ISCs in rats and isolated islets. PA-treated cultured ISCs exhibited faster proliferation and migration abilities with the induction of mRNA levels of lipid metabolism proteins, especially Plin2. The overexpression of Plin2 resulted in ISCs “re-quiescent” phenotypes associated with inhibition of the Smad3-TGF-β signaling pathways. Conclusions. Our observations suggest a protective role of Plin2 in weakening ISCs activation. It may serve as a novel therapeutic target for preventing islet fibrosis for T2DM.

1. Introduction

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a prevalent chronic metabolic disease associated with progressive islet dysfunction [1]. Ectopic fat deposition and excessive lipid droplets (LDs) in the cytoplasm of cells promote impaired glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, reduce insulin storage, inhibit pro-insulin synthesis, increase pancreatic fibrosis, and accelerate islet cell apoptosis [2–4]. Our previous studies showed that stellate cells in islets, named islet stellate cells (ISCs), which are rich in LDs and positive for desmin and GFAP expression under physiological conditions, proliferate fast and generate the fibrotic extracellular matrix (ECM) when activated by various pathological stimuli. Furthermore, ISCs show specific expression of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), and secretion of collagen I (Col I), fibronectin (FN), and other ECM components that induce the formation of islet fibrosis with a parallel disappearance of LDs, consequently leading to T2DM [5, 6]. However, the underlying pathogenesis and mechanism of ISCs activation have not yet been investigated.

In cells from mammalian, LDs were regarded as a fuel supplier for energy support and as a lipolytic barrier for avoiding cellular lipotoxicity via the regulation of LD lipolysis [7]. Therefore, LDs, along with LD-associated proteins, are responsible for maintaining lipid metabolism homeostasis [8]. The perilipin family is a group of key LD-associated proteins, including enzymes for fat synthesis and decomposition, LD transporters, and fusion-related molecules involved in signal transduction. Among them, five members have been identified, namely, perilipin 1 (Plin1) to perilipin 5 (Plin5) [9]. This family of proteins is a marker molecule on the surface of LDs in eukaryotic cells and plays a critical role in regulating LD metabolism and maintaining intracellular lipid balance [10, 11]. The liver mainly expresses perilipin 2 (Plin2), perilipin 3 (Plin3), and Plin5, among which Plin2 is highly expressed [12]. Some studies found mice on a high-fat diet (HFD) showed decreased liver TG and increased hepatic insulin sensitivity after Plin2 antisense oligonucleotide treatment or after liver-specific Plin2 knockout [13, 14]. In the pancreas, the majority of islet neutral lipid staining was shown to co-localize with PLIN2 and PLIN3 in human adult normal and T2DM patients [15]. Recently, Roland Stein et al. found [16] glucose-stimulated insulin secretion was blunted in Plin2 knockdown EndoC-βH1 cells and improved in Plin2 overexpression cells, suggesting LD accumulation regulated by perilipin levels is a critical signaling molecule to impact islet cell activity. However, the role of perilipin family in regulation of the ISC phenotype is unclear.

Our present study aimed to define the specific mechanism underlying the association between the perilipin family and ISCs phenotype, especially concerning the suppression of ISCs activation. Our findings will provide new insights into the underlying molecular mechanism of ISCs activation pathological process and novel target therapy for preventing its adverse effects on islets.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

Sprague-Dawley rats (male, 6-week-old) were purchased and housed under standard conditions at constant temperature with a half-half light/dark cycle. All animals were randomly assigned to an obese group fed a HFD ( =12, 60% fat/total kcal) and a control group fed a commercial rodent chow diet ( =12, 10% fat/total kcal) for 28 weeks. Random blood glucose levels and body weight were detected weekly. All animal studies were established by the Research Animal Care Committee of Nanjing Medical University. All procedures of animal experiment were performed according to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH No. 8023, revised 1978).

2.2. ISC Isolation and Expansion

Islets from obese and control rats were obtained by digestion using collagen P solution (1 mg/mL; Sigma, USA) with following on purification on LSM density gradients (MP, CA, USA), and subsequently handpicked with 20 μL pipettes [17]. ISCs were grown after islet attachment and cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium/F12 supplemented with fetal bovine serum and penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) using the standard protocol described in our previous article [18]. Cells prepared at 3-6 passages were used for further experiments.

2.3. Intraperitoneal Glucose Tolerance Test (IPGTT) and IP-Insulin Tolerance Test (IPITT)

For the IPGTT experiment, after fasting for 12 h before the experiment, blood samples from the tail vein of mice were harvested and measured at 0, 15, 30, 60, and 120 min followed by administering D-glucose (2 g.kg-1) using a glucose monitor (Bayer, Geneva, Switzerland). For the IPITT experiment, the rats fasted for 4 h before the experiment, and blood samples were obtained at the same points after insulin administration (1 IU.kg-1). Areas under the curve (AUC) of the blood glucose-time point function were obtained and calculated by Sigma Plot software (Systat Software, CA, USA). The value of homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was assessed through previously published procedures [17].

2.4. Western Blotting

ISCs were divided into treated and control groups, with PA-mixed medium (300 μM) or with 0.05% BSA for 48, 72, and 96 h, respectively. At different in vitro culturing times, experiments were performed using the standard protocol [19] with the primary antibodies specific for the following proteins: rabbit anti-PLIN2 (Cat#ab108323, Abcam, UK), rabbit anti-PLIN3 (Cat#ab47638, Abcam, UK), Col I (Cat#ab34710, Abcam, UK), rabbit anti-FN (Cat#ab2413, Abcam, UK), rabbit anti-perilipin 4 (PLIN4) (Cat#10694-1-AP, Proteintech, USA), mouse anti-PLIN5 (Cat#sc-514296, Santa Cruz, USA), mouse anti-β-actin (Cat#TA811000, Origene, China), mouse anti-α-SMA (Cat#A2547, 1 : 3000, Sigma, USA), rabbit anti-P-Smad3 (Cat#9520, CST, USA), rabbit anti-Smad3 (Cat# 8685S, CST, USA), and rabbit anti-TGF-β (Cat#3711, CST, USA). Horseradish peroxidase- (HRP-) conjugated goat anti-rabbit (Cat#SE134, Solarbio, China) or anti-mouse (Cat#SE131, Solarbio, China) antibody was used as the secondary antibody. Quantitative analysis of proteins was performed using enhanced chemiluminescence (Millipore, USA) and Image J software (National Institutes of Health, MD, USA), respectively.

2.5. Immunohistochemistry and Immunofluorescence

Consecutive tissue sections were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde with paraffin embedded. After blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin, the sections were incubated with a rabbit anti-insulin (Cat#ab181547, Abcam, UK)/glucagon (Cat#ab92517, Abcam, UK)/α-SMA antibody (1 : 200) at 4°C overnight. Following the washing step, sections were incubated with HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit antibody at room temperature for 1 h; immunohistochemistry was performed with DAB and counterstained with hematoxylin. Goat anti-mouse IgG H&L (Alexa Fluor® 594) (Cat#ab150116, Abcam, UK) antibodies (1 : 3000) were used as the secondary antibody. Immunofluorescence was performed as described previously [17] to evaluate α-SMA expression in islets. Masson trichrome staining was performed according to standard protocols [20].

2.6. Cell Viability, Migration, and Proliferation Assays

For the wound healing experiment, 3 × 10⁵ ISCs in each 6-well plate were grown to 70%-80% confluence, then the monolayers of cells were scraped off using 20 μL pipette tip. After 24 h incubation, the cells that migrate into boundaries of the wound were manually counted. The area of ISCs migration was visualized and calculated under light microscopy using Image J software. For the CCK-8 experiment, cells were suspended at a final concentration of 2 × 10³/well and incubated for 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively. Thereafter, 10 μL CCK-8 reagent (Keygen, Biotech) was added to 100 μL standard serum-free medium. After incubating for 1 h at 37°C temperature, the absorbance of each well was measured using auto microplate reader (BioTek, Inc., USA).

2.7. Electron Microscopy (EM)

Freshly differentiated ISCs were fixed with control medium or induced medium in 2.5% glutaraldehyde containing 2.0% paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffer (adjusted pH to 7.4) for 1 h at 4°C. After rinsing in phosphate buffer, the cells were postfixed in 1% cacodylate-buffered osmium tetroxide at room temperature for 2 h and then dehydrated in a graded ethanol series (30%, 50%, 70%, 95%, and 100%). Following transferred to propylene oxide, the cells were embedded in epon. Ultrathin sections at 60-80 nm thick were placed on 200 mesh copper grids coated with formvar-carbon and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Microphotographs were obtained and analyzed using H-600-4 system (Hitachi, Japan).

2.8. qPCR Quantification

Total RNA from cells was obtained and isolated using TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, USA), and each tube of RNA (1 μg) was reverse transcribed with HiScript RT SuperMix kits (Vazyme, China). Then, the DNA was used to perform qPCR assay using SYBR Green PCR master mix kits (Vazyme, China). Specific mRNA primers of rat (Table 1) were designed at the GenBank database. PCR was performed with the following conditions: 95°C for 30 s, then 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 s and 60°C for 30 s using the Step One Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Relative mRNA expression was quantified using the ΔΔCt method.

2.9. Gene Transfection

Lentiviral vectors of target gene-Plin2 overexpression were constructed by GenePharma company (Shanghai, China). ISCs from passage 6 were infected with Plin2 overexpression vector at the best multiplicity of infection as the experiment group, and these transfected with empty vector were treated as control groups. Means of an inverted fluorescence were observed under the fluorescent microscope. Stable cell clones were selected by mixed medium supplemented with 2 μg/mL puromycin for 6 days. The transfection efficiency of cells was estimated with qPCR and western blot analyses.

2.10. Lipid Accumulation Observation

Cell retinol levels were measured using a previously described method [17]. Triglyceride (TG) content was measured using commercial TG kits (Jiancheng Technology Co., China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. All levels of retinol and TG were normalized to the protein concentration in the cells. Oil red O staining was conducted by incubating 4% paraformaldehyde-fixed material for 30 min at room temperature with Oil red O solution in isopropanol (Sigma, USA). The Oil red O positive staining area in images of cells in each well culture plate was converted Image J in our previously described method [19].

2.11. Statistical Analysis

Data are expressed as the mean ± S.E at least three independent experiments. Differences were evaluated and reported using Student’s -test and one-way ANOVA test post hoc analysis, respectively. Statistical significance was calculated at . All statistical analyses were determined using GraphPad Prism 6.0 statistical software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).

3. Results

3.1. Effect of HFD on Islet Morphology and Function

Twenty-eight weeks of HFD feeding significantly aggravated body weight and serum insulin concentration (Figure 1(a)). We also detected glucose intolerance in obese rats, showing that blood glucose levels 15-120 min after glucose challenge were elevated. Although the random blood glucose levels in rats with or without HFD feeding were not influenced, modest but significant glucose intolerance with elevated HOMA-IR was shown in HFD-fed rats (Figures 1(b) and (d)). As shown in Figure 1(c), pancreatic islets in control diet-fed rats were mostly round with smooth contours. In contrast, islets in HFD-free rats showed abnormal disorder of cells with noncircular borders, and the number of glucagon- and insulin-positive cells was markedly decreased than those in the control rats. Masson’s stained tissue histological analysis revealed an abnormal collagen arrangement in obese rats compared to the uniform deposition observed in control rats. Insulin immunoreactivity of the islets from obese rats also decreased while it was accompanied by upregulation of α-SMA in double immunofluorescence labeling, indicating ISCs activation (Figure 1(e)). Ultrastructural studies have shown that ISCs in control rats exhibit characteristics compatible with quiescent ISCs, namely, few LDs and abundant fibers in the extracellular compartment. The ISCs in obese rats displayed characteristics compatible with activated ISCs, namely, concomitant disappearance of the LDs and extensive collagen fibers in the extracellular compartment (Figure 1(f)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Figure 1

Lipotoxicity induces glucose metabolic phenotypes damage and ISCs activation in vivo. (a) Body weight and circulating insulin content were detected from HFD and control rats. (b) Islet function of HFD and control rats was analyzed via IPGTT/IPITT experiment and HOME-IR value calculation. (c) Representative images of insulin/glucagon and masson’s trichrome stained in pancreatic islets from HFD and control rats. (e–f) Representative images of insulin and α-SMA double-stained and electron microscopy in pancreatic islet sections from HFD and control rats. Quantification of α-SMA fluorescent signals was measured using Image Pro Plus software. Magnification: 40x, 10000x, 20000x; scale bars: 50 μm, 1 μm, 0.5 μm. , . Error bars shown as ± SE of =12 mice per group.

3.2. Effect of High-Fat Diet on ISCs Bio-Phenotype In Vivo

As shown in Figure 2(a), the rate of ISCs outgrowth was markedly faster in HFD-fed rat islets cultured in medium than in those from control rats. One of the major changes of phenotypic characteristics of ISCs activation is the loss of LDs in cytoplasm. Following their activation status, ISCs isolated from HFD-fed rats also showed lower LDs content per cell than those isolated from controls at different time points (Figure 2(b)). Immunofluorescence showed more abundant α-SMA protein expression in ISCs from HFD rats than in ISCs from controls (Figure 2(c)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 2

The phenotype changes of ISCs from HFD rats at different in vitro culturing time. (a) Relative light microscopy micrographs of ISCs outgrowth rates from HFD and control rats at different culture time point (0 h, 48 h, 96 h, and 120 h). (b) Relative Oil red O staining of lipid droplets images of ISCs from HFD and control rats at different in vitro culturing time (48 h and 96 h). (c) Immunofluorescent staining of α-SMA protein expression in ISCs from HFD and control rats. Magnification: 40x; scale bars: 50 μm. , . Error bars shown as ± SE of =12 mice per group.

3.3. Effect of PA on ISCs Bio-Phenotype In Vitro

After 48 h of incubating ISCs with PA (300 μM), the upregulation protein expression of α-SMA, FN, and Col I was detected by western blotting, and this phenomenon continued until 96 h (Figure 3(a)). Furthermore, we also performed the wound healing migration assay to compare the migration rates of PA-treated ISCs and control ISCs. The results showed that PA-treated ISCs cultured in medium had a significantly faster migration rate than that of the control ISCs (Figure 3(b)). Similarly, PA-treated ISCs had significantly higher viability rates than control ISCs (Figure 3(c)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

3.4. Effect of PA on LDs-Associated Protein Expression in ISCs

After ISCs were treated with 300 μM PA, the mRNA levels of lipid metabolism markers, such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (Pparγ) and its target regulators-acyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase 8 (Acad8), carnitine acyltransferase 1α (Cpt1α), acyl-coA thioesterase 1 (Acot1), and perilipin family members (Plin2, Plin3, Plin4, Plin5), decreased in a time-dependent manner relative to the control group, with Plin2 being the least expressed (Figure 4(a)). The western bolt results showed that PA treatment in cultured ISCs induced protein levels of PLIN2 and Plin4 increased rather than PLIN3 and PLIN5 (Figure 4(b)).

(a)

(b)

3.5. Effect of Plin2 Overexpression Weakening ISCs Activation via Smad3-TGF-β Signaling Pathway

We overexpressed Plin2 in ISCs via lentiviral transduction to explore the effect of Plin2 on ISCs phenotype. The results of changes of morphology and LDs content in these cells showed that ISCs overexpressed Plin2 gene had a classical polygonal appearance similar to that of quiescent ISCs and expressed increase of protein of PLIN2 and reduction of protein of FN, Col I, and α-SMA compared with negative control (NC) ISCs (Figures 5(a) and (b)). We further investigated that lipid accumulation of triglyceride (TG) rather than retinyl ester was significantly increased in ISCs overexpressing Plin2 than those in NC ISCs both in Figure 5(c). The abundance of fibrogenesis in ISCs overexpressing Plin2 prompted us to assess the activation state of the classic fibrogenesis signaling pathways-Smad3-TGF-β. We found a 1.8-fold reduction in the Smad3 signaling pathway in ISCs overexpressing Plin2 compared with NC ISCs. Similarly, TGF-β levels were decreased by 43% in overexpressed ISCs (Figure 5(d)). Thus, the results showed that Plin2 inhibits ISCs activation through the Smad3-TGF-β pathways.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 5

Plin2 overexpression reverses ISCs phenotype via proliferation and fibrogenesis signaling pathways. (a) Representative photomicrographs of phenotype change in activated ISCs transduced with Plin2 gene overexpressed or NC. (b) The protein expression of α-SMA, Col I, and FN in ISCs overexpressed Plin2 was detected by western blotting. (c) The lipid accumulation observation was measured in ISCs overexpressed Plin2. (d) The protein expression of Smad3-TGF-β in ISCs overexpressed Plin2 was detected by western blotting. Magnification: 40x; scale bars: 50 μm. , , . Error bars shown as ± SE of three independent repeated experiments.

4. Discussion

The aim of this present study is to investigate the effects of perilipin family on lipotoxicity-induced islet dysfunction by mediating ISCs activation and its intracellular signaling mechanism. Our data showed that high fat and PA treatment increased the outgrowth rate of ISCs both in vivo, and induced accelerated cell migration and cell viability, elevated expression of α-SMA, and increased secretion of extracellular components in vitro. Furthermore, the above effects were associated with elevated levels of functional perilipin family active metabolites, especially Plin2, with the inactivation of Smad3 signaling pathway. To our knowledge, this is the first report to reveal the effects of the perilipin family on ISCs activation induced by lipotoxicity.

Increasing evidence points toward a strong association between the distribution of excess fat in obese patients with T2DM [21–23]. In the present study, we found that rats fed the HFD exhibited decreased insulin sensitivity, increased HOMA-IR values, and larger AUC of IPGTT and IPITT relative to those in controls rats. Furthermore, we used double immunofluorescence and electron microscopy to determine whether HFD induces phenotypic changes in ISCs in islets. The biological appearance from classical polygonal to fibroblast-like and upregulation of α-SMA immunoreactivity of the islets indicate ISCs activation. Emerging evidence showed that ISCs activation is the key issues for islet fibrosis under pathological conditions [6, 18, 24]. Our study also showed that ISCs grown from obese rat islets lost their cytoplasmic LDs more rapidly than those grown from normal rat islets. The elevated rate of ISCs outgrowth from the islets, viability of ISCs, migration rate of ISCs, and α-SMA expression of ISCs suggested the activation of obese rat ISCs, all of which are contributed to the fibrotic transformation process [25]. These results indicate that dietary high-fat supplementation for 28 weeks induced a positive relationship between α-SMA expression and ISCs in obese rats. These observations are consistent with previous studies that showed in diabetic environment, the activation of ISCs leads to increase in ISC-derived secretory products and influences islet function [5, 6, 19, 26]. Our group previously found that ISCs were similar but not identical to pancreatic stellate cells (PSCs) [27]. Given the developmental biological and anatomical location of ISCs, we believe that ISCs may contribute significantly to islet fibrosis. Thus, understanding the underlying molecular mechanism resulting in the quiescent state of ISCs may prevent its adverse effects on islet function.

To extend these observations, we explored the important role of LD-associated protein molecules in maintaining the quiescent phenotype of ISCs. Adipogenesis is known as an organized multistep process that requires the sequential activation of many transcription factors, including Pparγ, which are essential for maintaining stellate cells in their quiescent state [28–30]. Pparγ is considered a central regulator of lipid metabolism to maintain the adipocyte phenotype by directly binding to and transactivating response elements in several adipocyte-specific genes [31]. Recently, novel modes of LDs growth (including rapid/homotypic as well as slow/atypical LD fusion) have been revealed and essential proteins (e.g., the perilipin family) have been identified [32, 33]. Meanwhile, LDs mature by inhibiting neutral lipid core formation and decreasing Plin2 and Plin5 expressions via downregulation of Pparγ [34]. Under palmitate overload, upregulation of Plin5 promotes LDs storage and alleviates lipotoxicity in INS-1 β-cells with improved cell apoptosis and β-cells function [35]. While exploring the role of the perilipin family in regulating the ISCs phenotype, we first found Pparγ and perilipin proteins, especially PLIN2, to be associated with decreased functional LDs active metabolites levels, which serve as key molecular events for lipotoxicity-driven ISCs activation. Recently, the protective effect of Plin2 in human β cells against lipotoxic-induced cellular autophagic flux and reduces endoplasmic reticulum stress has been reported [15, 16, 36]. Plin2 overexpression restored the polygonal appearance of quiescent ISCs with LDs re-formation and reduced the activation degree and ECM synthesis, producing a resting-state phenotype. This result is consistent with previously published reports showing that ligand-activated Pparγ upregulates Plin2 gene expression and activity of the Plin2 promoter to regulate the function of Pparγ on lipid storage at the cellular level [37]. Hence, our observations firstly showed that LD-associated protein molecules are essential for maintaining a quiescent ISCs population, suggesting that cell-based strategies that block ISCs activation potential could effectively remodel the ISCs bio-phenotype.

Additionally, our study provides insights into the intracellular signaling mechanisms underlying Plin2-mediated inhibition of ISCs activation. The results demonstrated that phosphorylation and activation of Smad3 reduced with Plin2 overexpression in ISCs. Identifying these signaling pathways as targets for Plin2 in ISCs is in agreement with our previous study and other reports, showing that the Smad-TGF-β pathway could be activated in ISCs from patients with diabetes [5]. Therefore, Smad3 signaling, one of the key pancreatic fibrosis parameters, is also a switch molecule of ISCs activation, as well as PSCs [5, 38]. Although these findings support that Plin2 is crucial for inhibiting ISCs activation in the HFD-lipotoxic environment, the specific mechanism underlying needs further exploration. It is also required to investigate the effect of Plin2 in association with ISCs activation using transgenic models to elucidate this process in diabetes pathogenesis; future studies should also determine whether accumulation in ISCs affects lipid homeostasis in islets and the insulin-resistant state in other tissues; what’s more important is when and how the link and signals crosstalk are changed between ISCs and islet cells may answer how changes of LDs levels in ISCs regulate islet cell frangibility to lipotoxicity.

In summary, this study identified that this population of ISCs is activated toward to fibrotic phenotype by exposure to a lipotoxic environment. ISCs activation could be inhibited by Plin2, which participate in the regulation of the specific mechanisms with Smad3 signaling pathways to prevent ISCs activation fibrotic phenotype. These findings help us to clarify new targets for preventing or treating diabetes.

Data Availability

All data has been included in this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Yt.Z., Ym.W., Cm.N., and Hy.W. performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. T.S. and R.H. were responsible for the animal experiments. F.L., By.W., and J.Z. were responsible for the cell culture, tissue collection, and data analysis. X.K. and Bl.L. were responsible for the lentiviral transfection. W.X. was responsible for the animal data analysis. X.L. modified the manuscript. Z.S. and J.M. conceived, designed, and directed the study. Yunting Zhou, Yuming Wang, and Chengming Ni contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (NSFC-81870534, to L.S; NSFC-81870563, to J.M), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (to Yt.Z), Jiangsu Innovative and Enterpreneurial Talent Program (No.JSSCBS20211546, to Yt.Z), and Xinghuo Talent Program of Nanjing First Hospital (to Yt.Z).

References

I. D. F. Congress, “Shaping the future of diabetes,” Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, vol. 2019, no. 158, article 107954, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
M. E. Piche, A. Tchernof, and J. P. Despres, “Obesity phenotypes, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases,” Circulation Research, vol. 126, no. 11, pp. 1477–1500, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Levelt, M. Pavlides, R. Banerjee et al., “Ectopic and visceral fat deposition in lean and obese patients with type 2 diabetes,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 53–63, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Guglielmi and P. Sbraccia, “Type 2 diabetes: does pancreatic fat really matter?” Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, vol. 34, no. 2, p. e2955, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Xu, H. F. Geng, J. Liang et al., “Wingless-type MMTV integration site family member 5a is a key inhibitor of islet stellate cells activation,” J Diabetes Investig, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 307–314, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F.-F. Li, B.-J. Chen, W. Li et al., “Islet stellate cells isolated from fibrotic islet of Goto-Kakizaki rats affect biological behavior of beta-cell,” Journal Diabetes Research, vol. 2016, p. 6924593, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
A. R. Thiam and E. Ikonen, “Lipid droplet nucleation,” Trends in Cell Biology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 108–118, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Fujimoto and R. G. Parton, “Not just fat: the structure and function of the lipid droplet,” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, vol. 3, no. 3, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Sztalryd and D. L. Brasaemle, “The perilipin family of lipid droplet proteins: gatekeepers of intracellular lipolysis,” Biochimica et biophysica acta (bba)-molecular and cell biology of lipids, vol. 1862, no. 10, pp. 1221–1232, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Itabe, T. Yamaguchi, S. Nimura, and N. Sasabe, “Perilipins: a diversity of intracellular lipid droplet proteins,” Lipids in Health and Disease, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 83, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. E. Bickel, J. T. Tansey, and M. A. Welte, “PAT proteins, an ancient family of lipid droplet proteins that regulate cellular lipid stores,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1791, no. 6, pp. 419–440, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. M. Carr and R. S. Ahima, “Pathophysiology of lipid droplet proteins in liver diseases,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 340, no. 2, pp. 187–192, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Imai, S. Boyle, G. M. Varela et al., “Effects of perilipin 2 antisense oligonucleotide treatment on hepatic lipid metabolism and gene expression,” Physiological Genomics, vol. 44, no. 22, pp. 1125–1131, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. H. Chang, L. Li, P. Saha, and L. Chan, “Absence of adipose differentiation related protein upregulates hepatic VLDL secretion, relieves hepatosteatosis, and improves whole body insulin resistance in leptin-deficient mice[S],” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 2132–2142, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Tong, C. Dai, J. T. Walker et al., “Lipid droplet accumulation in human pancreatic islets is dependent on both donor age and health,” Diabetes, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 342–354, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Tong and R. Stein, “Lipid droplets protect human β-cells from lipotoxicity-induced stress and cell identity changes,” Diabetes, vol. 70, no. 11, pp. 2595–2607, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhou, J. Zhou, B. Sun et al., “Vitamin A deficiency causes islet dysfunction by inducing islet stellate cell activation via cellular retinol binding protein 1,” International Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 947–956, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Zha, F. Li, W. Xu, B. Chen, and Z. Sun, “Isolation and characterization of islet stellate cells in rat,” Islets, vol. 6, no. 2, article e28701, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Li, Y. Zhou, X. Wang et al., “A modified in vitro tool for isolation and characterization of rat quiescent islet stellate cells,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 384, no. 1, article 111617, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. F. Lazarous, M. Shou, and E. F. Unger, “Combined bromodeoxyuridine immunohistochemistry and Masson trichrome staining: facilitated detection of cell proliferation in viable vs. infarcted myocardium,” Biotechnic & Histochemistry, vol. 67, no. 5, p. 253, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. J. Nolan, N. B. Ruderman, S. E. Kahn, O. Pedersen, and M. Prentki, “Insulin resistance as a physiological defense against metabolic stress: implications for the management of subsets of type 2 diabetes,” Diabetes, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 673–686, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Gaborit and A. Dutour, “Ectopic fat deposition and diabetes mellitus,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 68, no. 23, pp. 2594-2595, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Saisho, “Pancreas volume and fat deposition in diabetes and normal physiology: consideration of the interplay between endocrine and exocrine pancreas,” The Review of Diabetic Studies, vol. 13, no. 2-3, pp. 132–147, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Zha, W. Xu, P. M. Jones, and Z. Sun, “Isolation and characterization of human islet stellate cells,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 341, no. 1, pp. 61–66, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Delghingaro-Augusto, L. Madad, A. Chandra, C. J. Simeonovic, J. E. Dahlstrom, and C. J. Nolan, “Islet inflammation, hemosiderosis, and fibrosis in intrauterine growth- restricted and high fat-fed Sprague-Dawley rats,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 184, no. 5, pp. 1446–1457, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Xu, J. Liang, H. F. Geng et al., “Wingless-type MMTV integration site family member 5a is a key secreted islet stellate cell-derived product that regulates islet function,” International Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 2019, Article ID 7870109, 8 pages, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Wang, W. Li, J. Chen et al., “A transcriptional sequencing analysis of islet stellate cell and pancreatic stellate cell,” Journal Diabetes Research, vol. 2018, p. 7361684, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
A. T. Ali, W. E. Hochfeld, R. Myburgh, and M. S. Pepper, “Adipocyte and adipogenesis,” European Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 92, no. 6-7, pp. 229–236, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Shafiei, S. Shetty, P. E. Scherer, and D. C. Rockey, “Adiponectin regulation of stellate cell activation via PPARγ-dependent and -independent mechanisms,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 178, no. 6, pp. 2690–2699, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Hazra, S. Xiong, J. Wang et al., “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ induces a phenotypic switch from activated to quiescent hepatic stellate cells,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 12, pp. 11392–11401, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. M. Willson, M. H. Lambert, and S. A. Kliewer, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ and metabolic disease,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 341–367, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Yang, A. Galea, V. Sytnyk, and M. Crossley, “Controlling the size of lipid droplets: lipid and protein factors,” Current Opinion in Cell Biology, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 509–516, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. J. Kim, T. W. Jung, E. S. Kang et al., “Depot-specific regulation of perilipin by rosiglitazone in a diabetic animal model,” Metabolism, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 676–685, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Tian, P. Lei, C. Teng et al., “Targeting PLIN2/PLIN5-PPARγ: sulforaphane disturbs the maturation of lipid droplets,” Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, vol. 63, no. 20, article e1900183, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhu, X. Zhang, L. Zhang et al., “Perilipin5 protects against lipotoxicity and alleviates endoplasmic reticulum stress in pancreatic β-cells,” Nutrition & Metabolism (London), vol. 16, no. 1, p. 50, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. P. Najt, S. Senthivinayagam, M. B. Aljazi et al., “Liver-specific loss of Perilipin 2 alleviates diet-induced hepatic steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis,” American Journal of Physiology. Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, vol. 310, no. 9, pp. G726–G738, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Kang, S. Hengbo, L. Jun et al., “PPARG modulated lipid accumulation in dairy GMEC via regulation of ADRP gene,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 192–201, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Tezuka, A. Ota, S. Karnan et al., “The plant alkaloid conophylline inhibits matrix formation of fibroblasts,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 293, no. 52, pp. 20214–20226, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Yunting Zhou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

282

Downloads

610

Citations