Research Article

Effects of Rigid and Nonrigid Connections between the Miniscrew and Anchorage Tooth on Dynamics, Efficacy, and Adverse Effects of Maxillary Second Molar Protraction: A Finite Element Analysis

Table 2

Simulation results.

PropertyScopeModel 1Model 2Model 3
MinimumMaximumAverageMinimumMaximumAverageMinimumMaximumAverage

Von Mises stress (Pa)All bodies0.034133968510001313200.19869512240001710900.1994746540000265410
Miniscrew84.0031091600018138001361303214600020902003188.420948000314710
MC365283398300027024002129.3395770001191800
CB1.38172143508259.47.79351290608715.16.9211076007201.3

Hydrostatic stress (Pa) of PDLAll teeth-185501908641.912-2238020448-41.21-2161619891-41.715
Molar-1855019086256.85-2238020448430.59-2161619891615.05
Bicuspid-1593.43491.4-139.38-8594.67366-1064.7-1491912599-2008.1

Displacement-Y (μm)All bodies-29.867.8788-0.27785-22.7769.2276-0.16363-23.17312.8980.58086
All teeth-15.0467.8788-0.76672-18.8539.2276-0.46188-18.9829.5846-0.35065
Molar-15.0467.8788-4.5531-18.8539.2276-5.6413-18.9829.5846-5.5237
Bicuspid-0.0470370.930440.413750.0236645.78123.0526-0.146059.14634.7655

Displacement-X (μm)Molar-8.056310.9250.85247-7.297211.6760.76299-7.089412.6481.2485
Bicuspid-0.0719821.17410.544640.536235.42072.57060.683428.64483.8454

Displacement-Z (μm)Molar-1.75011.3832-0.19644-3.13392.3739-0.86759-3.00952.1798-0.81859
Bicuspid-0.478730.13339-0.12516-0.300581.83920.93506-0.195743.13451.6291