A Comparative Study of Diospyros malabarica (Gaub) Extracts in Various Polarity-Dependent Solvents for Evaluation of Phytoconstituents and Biological Activities

Table 3

Extraction yield (% w/w) of D. malabarica extracts prepared using different solvents.

Solvents	Extract	Powdered mass (g)	Extracted mass (g)	Yield (%)
Petroleum ether	Bark	50	2.1	4.2
Dichloro methane		50	2.3	4.6
Ethyl acetate		50	2.6	5.2
Ethanol		50	7.1	14.2
Methanol		50	8.9	17.8
Aqueous		50	2.3	4.6
Petroleum ether	Stem	50	1	2
Dichloro methane		50	1.2	2.4
Ethyl acetate		50	1.3	2.6
Ethanol		50	2.2	4.4
Methanol		50	3.3	6.6
Aqueous		50	1.4	2.8
Petroleum ether	Leave	50	1.3	2.6
Dichloro methane		50	1.5	3
Ethyl acetate		50	1.9	3.8
Ethanol		50	6.6	13.2
Methanol		50	6.9	13.8
Aqueous		50	1.9	3.8
Petroleum ether	Unripe fruit	50	1.3	2.6
Dichloromethane		50	1.5	3
Ethyl acetate		50	1.7	3.4
Ethanol		50	4.3	8.6
Methanol		50	4.9	9.8
Aqueous		50	2.2	4.4
Petroleum ether	Ripe fruit	50	1.4	2.8
Dichloro methane		50	1.6	3.2
Ethyl acetate		50	1.8	3.6
Ethanol		50	3.8	7.6
Methanol		50	4.4	8.8
Aqueous		50	2	4
Petroleum ether	Root	50	0.5	1
Dichloro methane		50	0.6	1.2
Ethyl acetate		50	0.9	1.9
Ethanol		50	3.4	6.8
Methanol		50	4.9	8.1
Aqueous		50	1.9	3.8