Impact of Rehabilitation on Gait Kinematic following Grade II Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury among Wrestlers

Table 3

Comparison of joints angles mean between pre- and postrehabilitation program at swing phase.

Joint angles	Swing phase		Paired differences				value	Cohen’s
			Mean	SD	SEM
HA (pre)	Acceleration phase		22.50%↑	3.81	0.98	3.72	0.03	0.97
H.A. (post)
KA (pre)			21.46%↑	6.29	1.62	5.94	0.01	1.52
KA (post)
AA (pre)			28.69%↑	3.15	0.81	3.18	0.03	0.82
A.A. (post)
HA (pre)	Midswing (swing phase)		38.26%↑	6.73	1.73	5.24	0.01	1.35
HA (post)
KA (pre)			36.34%↑	5.40	1.39	6.15	0.01	1.59
KA (post)
AA (pre)			71.73%↑	0.89	0.23	1.4	0.17	0.37
A.A. (post)
H.A. (pre)	Terminal-swing (swing phase)		33.86%↑	5.05	1.30	6.38	0.01	1.65
H.A. (post)
KA (pre)			94.3%↓	2.26	0.58	9.46	0.01	2.45
KA (post)
A.A. (pre)			0.00	0.65	0.16	0.00	1.000	00.00
A.A. (post)

HA: hip angle; KA: knee angle; AA: ankle angle; ; significant value if ; SD: standard deviation; SEM: standard error mean; ˆeffect size is large if .