Systematic Analysis of CXC Chemokine–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A Network in Colonic Adenocarcinoma from the Perspective of Angiogenesis

Situ, Yongli; Lu, Xiaoyong; Cui, Yongshi; Xu, Qinying; Deng, Li; Lin, Hao; Shao, Zheng; Chen, Jv

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5137301

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Background Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Abbreviations Data Availability Ethical Approval Disclosure Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 5137301 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5137301

Systematic Analysis of CXC Chemokine–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A Network in Colonic Adenocarcinoma from the Perspective of Angiogenesis

Yongli Situ,¹Xiaoyong Lu,¹Yongshi Cui,¹Qinying Xu,¹Li Deng,¹Hao Lin,²Zheng Shao,¹and Jv Chen³

Academic Editor: Aziz ur Rehman Aziz

Received30 Apr 2022

Revised09 Sept 2022

Accepted14 Sept 2022

Published04 Oct 2022

Abstract

Background. Tumor angiogenesis plays a vital role in tumorigenesis, proliferation, and metastasis. Recently, vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) and CXC chemokines have been shown to play vital roles in angiogenesis. Exploring the expression level, gene regulatory network, prognostic value, and target prediction of the CXC chemokine-VEGFA network in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) is crucial from the perspective of tumor angiogenesis. Methods. In this study, we analyzed gene expression and regulation, prognostic value, target prediction, and immune infiltrates related to the CXC chemokine-VEGFA network in patients with COAD using multiple databases (cBioPortal, UALCAN, Human Protein Atlas, GeneMANIA, GEPIA, TIMER (version 2.0), TRRUST (version 2), LinkedOmics, and Metascape). Results. Our results showed that CXCL1/2/3/5/6/8/11/16/17 and VEGFA were markedly overexpressed, while CXCL12/13/14 were underexpressed in patients with COAD. Moreover, genetic alterations in the CXC chemokine-VEGFA network found at varying rates in patients with COAD were as follows: CXCL1/2/17 (2.1%), CXCL3/16 (2.6%), CXCL5/14 (2.4%), CXCL6 (3%), CXCL8 (0.8%), CXCL11/13 (1.9%), CXCL12 (0.6%), and VEGFA (1.3%). Promoter methylation of CXCL1/2/3/11/13/17 was considerably lower in patients with COAD, whereas methylation of CXCL5/6/12/14 and VEGFA was considerably higher. Furthermore, CXCL9/10/11 and VEGFA expression was notably correlated with the pathological stages of COAD. In addition, patients with COAD with high CXCL8/11/14 or low VEGFA expression levels survived longer than patients with dissimilar expression levels. CXC chemokines and VEGFA form a complex regulatory network through coexpression, colocalization, and genetic interactions. Moreover, many transcription factor targets of the CXC chemokine-VEGFA network in patients with COAD were identified: RELA, NFKB1, ZFP36, XBP1, HDAC2, SP1, ATF4, EP300, BRCA1, ESR1, HIF1A, EGR1, STAT3, and JUN. We further identified the top three miRNAs involved in regulating each CXC chemokine within the network: miR-518C, miR-369-3P, and miR-448 regulated CXCL1; miR-518C, miR-218, and miR-493 regulated CXCL2; miR-448, miR-369-3P, and miR-221 regulated CXCL3; miR-423 regulated CXCL13; miR-378, miR-381, and miR-210 regulated CXCL14; miR-369-3P, miR-382, and miR-208 regulated CXCL17; miR-486 and miR-199A regulated VEGFA. Furthermore, the CXC chemokine-VEGFA network in patients with COAD was notably associated with immune infiltration. Conclusions. This study revealed that the CXC chemokine-VEGFA network might act as a prognostic biomarker for patients with COAD. Moreover, our study provides new therapeutic targets for COAD, serving as a reference for further research in the future.

1. Background

Colon cancer is a common malignant tumor of the digestive tract. The incidence and mortality of colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) are the third highest of all cancer types [1]. Since the early diagnosis of COAD remains difficult, its mortality is increasing yearly [2]. Approximately 50% of COAD patients relapse or die within five years [3]. Although using bioactive materials in anticancer drugs improves their overall therapeutic effects [4, 5], finding new biomarkers and therapeutic targets for early diagnosis remains the most critical initial step in the prevention and treatment of COAD.

Chemokines are a family of small heparin-binding proteins 8–10 kDa in size. Four subgroups exist within the chemokine family (CXC, CC, CX3C, and C). The CXC subgroup has been shown to play a crucial role in angiogenesis in physiological and pathological settings [6]. Recently, the role of CXCL in regulating tumor angiogenesis has attracted increasing interest [7]. Different members of the CXC chemokines subgroup can promote or inhibit angiogenesis, thus promoting or inhibiting tumor growth [8]. Multiple factors have been identified as regulators of angiogenesis. However, CXC chemokines are a unique family of cytokines that regulate angiogenesis in several ways [9]. Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) is a vital factor that plays an essential role in tumor angiogenesis and development [10]. Sunitinib, a VEGFA inhibitor, has been used to treat advanced renal cell carcinoma. However, the side effects of sunitinib can be quite severe and include kidney and cardiovascular damage [11]. CXC chemokines and VEGFA are heavily regulated during tumor angiogenesis. CXCL12 can promote a malignant phenotype by promoting the clonal growth of colorectal cancer cells and regulating the expression of VEGF and ICAM-1 [12].

Multiple online databases were used to explore the expression level, gene regulation network, prognostic value, and regulation targets of the CXC chemokine-VEGFA network in patients with COAD from an angiogenic perspective in this study. In addition, we aimed to identify the relationship between CXC chemokine and VEGFA expression and the development and prognosis of COAD, as well as to provide new insights into targeted therapies for patients with COAD.

2. Methods

2.1. UALCAN Analysis

UALCAN (http://ualcan.path.uab.edu/analysis.html) is a free online database that provides analysis based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and MET500 cohort data [13]. The “Expression Analysis” module from the UALCAN database was utilized to examine TCGA gene expression data, and the following screening criteria were applied: (1) gene: CXC chemokines and VEGFA, (2) dataset: COAD, and (3) threshold setting conditions: value cutoff = 0.05. A Student’s -test was used for the comparative analysis [14–16]. Data were obtained on February 14, 2022.

2.2. Human Protein Atlas Analysis

The Human Protein Atlas (https://www.proteinatlas.org/), an open-access resource, provides analyses of specific human genes and proteins [17]. Screening condition: (1) gene: CXC chemokines and VEGFA, (2) section: tissue and pathology, (3) tissue: colon and COAD, and (4) picture of tissue types: normal colon tissue and COAD. Data were obtained on February 14, 2022.

2.3. GEPIA

GEPIA (http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn/index.html) is an analysis tool that delivers RNA sequencing expression data from 9,736 cancerous and 8,587 noncancerous samples [18]. Gene (CXC chemokines and VEGFA), dataset (COAD), and threshold conditions ( value cutoff = 0.05) were set as screening criteria. The expression of CXC chemokines and VEGFA, as well as the pathological stage of COAD, was analyzed using a Student’s -test. The prognosis of patients with COAD was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier curve [14–16]. Data were obtained on February 15, 2022.

2.4. cBioPortal Analysis

cBioPortal (http://cbioportal.org) is a free online database for visualizing, studying, and analyzing cancer genomic data [19]. The analysis of genetic alterations in the CXC chemokine-VEGFA network was conducted using cBioPortal in this study. Overall, 636 samples of COAD were analyzed. A -score threshold of ±2.0 was used to calculate mRNA expression -scores for all samples (log RNA Seq V2 RSEM). CXC chemokines and VEGFA were the chosen genes [14–16]. Data were obtained on February 15, 2022.

2.5. STRING Analysis

STRING (https://string-db.org/cgi/input.pl) is a free online database that helps researchers analyze all publicly available sources of protein–protein interaction (PPI) data [20]. We created the PPI network interaction using STRING in this study. The screening criteria were set as follows: (1) confidence: 0.400 and (2) species: Homo sapiens [14, 15]. Data were obtained on February 16, 2022.

2.6. GeneMANIA Analysis

GeneMANIA (http://www.genemania.org) is a free online database that creates PPI networks and analyzes gene function [21]. The interaction networks were built using this database to explore the roles of CXC chemokines and VEGFA [14–16]. Data were obtained on February 16, 2022.

2.7. Metascape Analysis

Metascape (https://metascape.org) is a free online gene function analysis tool that assists users in using current common bioinformatics analysis approaches to batch gene and protein analysis to predict function [22]. We conducted Gene Ontology (GO) function and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses of the CXC chemokine-VEGFA network in COAD using Metascape [14–16]. Data were obtained on February 17, 2022.

2.8. TRRUST Analysis

TRRUST (https://www.grnpedia.org/trrust/) is a free online database for human transcriptional regulatory networks [23]. We sought to discover critical factors regulating the expression of the CXC chemokine-VEGFA network in COAD patients using TRRUST. The “Find key regulators for query genes” module of TRRUST, species (human), and gene (CXC chemokines and VEGFA) were chosen in this study [14–16]. Data were obtained on February 17, 2022.

2.9. LinkedOmics Analysis

LinkedOmics (http://www.linkedomics.org/) is a free database that provides methods for analyzing and comparing cancer multiomics data [24]. The “LinkInterpreter” module of LinkedOmics was used to derive biological insights into miRNA target enrichment and transcription factor target enrichment of the CXC chemokine-VEGFA network. A minimum number of three genes (size), cancer type (COAD), a simulation of 500, gene (CXC chemokines and VEGFA), and target dataset (RNA-seq) were chosen in this study [14–16]. Data were obtained on February 18, 2022.

2.10. TIMER Analysis

TIMER (https://cistrome.shinyapps.io/timer/) is a free online platform for systematically analyzing tumor-infiltrating immune cells [25]. The “Gene module” of TIMER was used to assess the correlation between the expression level of the CXC chemokine-VEGFA network and tumor-infiltrating immune cells [14–16]. Data were obtained on February 18, 2022.

3. Results

3.1. Aberrant Expression of CXC Chemokine-VEGFA Network

The expression levels of the CXC chemokine-VEGFA network in patients with COAD compared with those without COAD were analyzed. We observed that the transcriptional levels of CXCL1/2/3/5/6/8/11/16/17 and VEGFA were remarkably upregulated in (1) sex (male and female), (2) pathological stage (stage 1–4), and (3) sample type (COAD) () (Figures 1(a1)–1(g3) and 1(k1)–1(m3)). However, CXCL12/13 expression level in patients with COAD was downregulated in (1) sex (male and female), (2) pathological stage (stage 1–4), and (3) sample type (COAD) () (Figures 1(h1)–1(i3)). CXCL14 expression level in patients with COAD was downregulated in (1) sex (male), (2) pathological stage (stage 2), and (3) sample type (COAD) () (Figures 1(j1)–1(j3)). In addition, immunohistochemical results validated the differential expression of the CXC chemokine-VEGFA network between patients with COAD and those without COAD (Figure 2). The pathological stage of COAD and the differential expression of the CXC chemokine-VEGFA network were assessed in this study. The pathological stage in patients with COAD and the expression of CXCL9/10/11 and VEGFA were found to have a significant correlation () (Figure 3). Subsequently, the prognostic ability of the CXC chemokine-VEGFA network expression in COAD patients was evaluated. The overall survival was longer in COAD patients when levels of CXCL8/11/14 expression were higher () (Figures 4(a)–4(c)) or when levels of VEGFA expression were lower () (Figure 4(d)).

Figure 1

The transcription of CXC chemokine-VEGFA network in COAD (UALCAN). (a1–m1) The transcription expression of CXCL1/2/3/5/6/8/11/12/13/14/16/17 and VEGFA in COAD based on sample types. (a2–m2) The transcription expression of CXCL1/2/3/5/6/8/11/12/13/14/16/17 and VEGFA in COAD based on the sex of the patient. (a3–m3) The transcription expression of CXCL1/2/3/5/6/8/11/12/13/14/16/17 and VEGFA in COAD based on individual cancer stages. Sample type denotes normal and patient groups. Gender denotes male and female. A Student’s -test was used for the comparative analysis, ; ; .

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

3.2. Promoter Methylation and Genetic Alteration Analyses of CXC Chemokine-VEGFA Network

TCGA was utilized to analyze the genetic alterations of the CXC chemokine-VEGFA network in patients with COAD. As a result, the expression of VEGFA was altered by 1.3% in COAD patients (Figure 5). COAD patients had higher promoter methylation levels of VEGFA than individuals without COAD (Figure 6). However, differences in chemokine expression levels in patients with COAD, CXC1/2/17 (2.1%), CXCL3/16 (2.6%), CXCL5/14 (2.4%), CXCL6 (3%), CXCL8 (0.8%), CXCL11/13 (1.9%), and CXCL12 (0.6%), were found (Figure 5). Similarly, the promoter methylation level of VEGFA and CXCL5/6/12/14 was higher in COAD patients than in healthy individuals (Figure 6). Conversely, healthy individuals had higher promoter methylation levels of CXCL1/2/3/11/13/17 expression than patients with COAD (Figure 6).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

(i)

(j)

(k)

Figure 6

Promoter methylation of CXC chemokine-VEGFA network in COAD (UALCAN). (a) The promoter methylation level of CXCL1 in healthy individuals and COAD patients. (b) The promoter methylation level of CXCL2 in healthy individuals and COAD patients. (c) The promoter methylation level of CXCL3 in healthy individuals and COAD patients. (d) The promoter methylation level of CXCL5 in healthy individuals and COAD patients. (e) The promoter methylation level of CXCL6 in healthy individuals and COAD patients. (f) The promoter methylation level of CXCL11 in healthy individuals and COAD patients. (g) The promoter methylation level of CXCL12 in healthy individuals and COAD patients. (h) The promoter methylation level of CXCL13 in healthy individuals and COAD patients. (i) The promoter methylation level of CXCL14 in healthy individuals and COAD patients. (j) The promoter methylation level of CXCL17 in healthy individuals and COAD patients. (k) The promoter methylation level of VEGFA in healthy individuals and COAD patients. Note: our results did not show statistically significant data. A Student’s -test was used for the comparative analysis, ; ; .

3.3. CXC Chemokines and VEGFA Interaction Network

The potential interactions between CXC chemokines and VEGFA in patients with COAD were explored. Overall, 13 nodes and 68 edges were obtained in the PPI network using STRING software (Figure 7(a)). The average node degree and local clustering coefficient of the PPI network were 10.5 and 0.908, respectively. Furthermore, the CXC chemokine-VEGFA network (33 genes and 2,152 edges) was linked to a complex interaction network through shared protein domains, coexpression, predicted, colocalization, and genetic interactions using GeneMANIA (Figure 7(b)). Moreover, cell chemotaxis, chemokine and cytokine receptor binding, chemokine and cytokine activity, leukocyte chemotaxis, and migration were the major functions of the CXC chemokine-VEGFA network in COAD patients (Figure 7(b)). In brief, CXC chemokines were connected to and interacted with VEGFA in a complex network.

(a)

(b)

3.4. GO and KEGG Pathway Enrichment Analyses

Metascape was utilized to analyze the functions of the CXC chemokine-VEGFA network in patients with COAD. We found that the biological processes connected with CXC chemokines and VEGFA were mainly related to leukocyte chemotaxis, myeloid leukocyte migration, positive regulation of leukocyte chemotaxis, lymphocyte migration, and regulation of multiorganism processes (Figure 8(a)). Moreover, chemokine and cytokine activity, heparin binding, and growth factor activity were the main molecular functions of CXC chemokine-VEGFA network expression (Figure 8(b)). The KEGG pathway of the CXC chemokine-VEGFA network in COAD was mainly involved in cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, rheumatoid arthritis, interleukin- (IL-) 17 signaling pathway, and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathway (Figure 8(c)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

3.5. Transcription Factor Targets Involved with the CXC Chemokine-VEGFA Network

Potential transcription factors involved with the CXC chemokine-VEGFA network in COAD patients were identified (Table 1). v-rel reticuloendotheliosis viral oncogene homolog A (RELA) and nuclear factor-kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B cells 1 (NFKB1) were the critical transcription factors involved with CXCL1/2/5/8/12 and VEGFA in COAD patients (). In addition, CXCL8 and VEGFA were found to be regulated by ZFP36 ring finger protein (ZFP36), X-box-binding protein 1 (XBP1), histone deacetylase 2 (HDAC2), activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4), E1A-binding protein p300 (EP300), early growth response 1 (EGR1), signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), and Jun proto-oncogene (JUN) (). Furthermore, CXCL1/5/14 and VEGFA were found to be regulated by Sp1 transcription factor (SP1) (). Breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) was the key transcription factor involved with CXCL1 and VEGFA in COAD patients (). Finally, estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) and hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha subunit (HIF1A) regulated the functions of CXCL12 and VEGFA ().

3.6. miRNA Targets of CXC Chemokine-VEGFA Network

The top three miRNA targets of the CXC chemokine-VEGFA network were obtained (Table 2). The miRNA targets of CXCL1 were miR-518C, miR-369-3P, and miR-44. In addition, miR-518C, miR-218, and miR-493 were identified as potential miRNA targets that regulate CXCL2. Furthermore, we observed that CXCL3 was regulated by miR-448, miR-369-3P, and miR-221. miRNA target of CXCL13 is miR-423. Moreover, miR-378, miR-381, and miR-210 were identified as potential miRNA targets that regulate CXCL14. CXCL17 is regulated by miR-369-3P, miR-382, and miR-208. Furthermore, our results showed that miR-486 and miR-199A are potential miRNA targets that regulate VEGFA.

3.7. Correlation of CXC Chemokine-VEGFA Network Expression and Differentially Expressed Genes

mRNA sequencing data of 379 patients with COAD were obtained from TCGA database of LinkedOmics. Upon analysis, 19,828 genes were closely related to CXCL1/2/3/5/6/8/11/12/13/14/16/17 and VEGFA (Figure 9). Among these, we observed that 11,701 and 8,127 genes were negatively and positively correlated with CXCL1 expression, respectively (Figure 9(a1)). Moreover, 50 genes had a notable positive or negative correlation with CXCL1 expression in COAD patients () (Figures 9(a2) and 9(a3)). CXCL1 expression was strongly associated with the increased expression of CXCL3 (Pearson’s correlation coefficient , ) (Figure 10(a1)), CXCL2 (, ) (Figure 10(a2)), and ZC3H12A (Pearson’s , ) (Figure 10(a3)).

Figure 10

Gene expression correlation analysis of CXC chemokine-VEGFA network in COAD (LinkedOmics). The scatter plot shows Pearson’s correlation of CXCL1 expression with expression of (a1) CXCL3, (a2) CXCL2, and (a3) ZC3H12A in COAD; Pearson’s correlation of CXCL2 expression with expression of (b1) CXCL3, (a2) CXCL1, and (b2) ZC3H12A in COAD; Pearson’s correlation of CXCL3 expression with expression of (a1) CXCL1, (b1) CXCL2, and (b3) ZC3H12A in COAD; Pearson’s correlation of CXCL5 expression with expression of (c1) IL24, (c2) IL8, and (c3) MMP3 in COAD; Pearson’s correlation of CXCL6 expression with expression of (d1) CXCL5, (d2) MMP3, and (d3) IL8 in COAD; Pearson’s correlation of CXCL8 expression with expression of (e1) GPR109B, (e2) IL1B, and (e3) OSM in COAD; Pearson’s correlation of CXCL11 expression with expression of (f1) CXCL10, (f2) UBD, and (f3) IDO1 in COAD; Pearson’s correlation of CXCL12 expression with expression of (g1) NPR1, (g2) SLIT3, and (g3) SHE in COAD; Pearson’s correlation of CXCL13 expression with expression of (h1) TIGIT, (h2) SH2D1A, and (h3) SIRPG in COAD; Pearson’s correlation of CXCL14 expression with expression of (i1) D4S234E, (i2) TNFSF11, and (i3) COL9A1 in COAD; Pearson’s correlation of CXCL16 expression with expression of (j1) ZMYND15, (j2) FLII, and (j3) NDEL1 in COAD; Pearson’s correlation of CXCL17 expression with expression of (k1) FAM83A, (k2) GPR110, and (k3) SEMG1 in COAD; and Pearson’s correlation of VEGFA expression with expression of (l1) GTPBP2, (l2) CCNL1, and (l3) CREBZF in COAD.

Furthermore, we found that 11,137 and 8,691 genes were negatively and positively correlated with CXCL2 expression, respectively (Figure 9(b1)). Among them, 50 genes had a marked positive or negative correlation with CXCL2 expression in COAD patients (Figures 9(b2) and 9(b3)). Moreover, the expression of CXCL2 was positively associated with the expression of CXCL3 (, ) (Figure 10(b1)), CXCL1 (Pearson’s , ) (Figure 10(b2)), and ZC3H12A (, ) (Figure 10(b3)). Furthermore, 12,096 and 7,732 genes were negatively and positively correlated with CXCL3 expression, respectively (Figure 9(c1)). Among them, 50 genes had a notable positive or negative correlation with CXCL3 expression in COAD patients (Figures 9(c2) and 9(c3)). Expression of CXCL3 was positively associated with the expression of CXCL1 (, ) (Figure 10(c1)), CXCL2 (, ) (Figure 10(c2)), and ZC3H12A (, ) (Figure 10(c3)). Our results showed that 8,680 and 11,148 genes were negatively and positively correlated with CXCL5 expression, respectively (Figure 9(d1)). Among them, 50 genes had a notable positive or negative correlation with CXCL5 expression in COAD patients (Figures 9(d2) and 9(d3)). CXCL5 expression was positively associated with the expression of IL24 (, ) (Figure 10(d1)), IL8 (, ) (Figure 10(d2)), and MMP3 (, ) (Figure 10(d3)). Our results suggested that 8,605 and 11,223 genes were negatively and positively correlated with CXCL6 expression, respectively (Figure 9(e1)). Among them, 50 genes had a marked positive or negative correlation with CXCL6 expression in COAD patients (Figures 9(e2) and 9(e3)). CXCL6 expression was positively associated with the expression of CXCL5 (, ) (Figure 10(e1)), MMP3 (, ) (Figure 10(e2)), and IL8 (, ) (Figure 10(e3)). In addition, 9,079 and 10,749 genes were negatively and positively correlated with CXCL8 expression, respectively (Figure 9(f1)). Among them, 50 genes had a significant positive or negative correlation with CXCL8 expression in COAD patients (Figures 9(f2) and 9(f3)). CXCL8 expression was positively associated with GPR109B (, ) (Figure 10(f1)), IL1B (, ) (Figure 10(f2)), and OSM (, ) (Figure 10(f3)). Furthermore, 9,517 and 10,311 genes were negatively and positively correlated with CXCL11 expression, respectively (Figure 9(g1)). Among them, 50 genes had a significant positive or negative correlation with CXCL11 expression in COAD patients (Figures 9(g2) and 9(g3)). CXCL11 expression was positively associated with CXCL10 (, ) (Figure 10(g1)), UBD (, ) (Figure 10(g2)), and IDO1 (, ) (Figure 10(g3)). Moreover, 8,017 and 11,811 genes were negatively and positively correlated with CXCL12 expression, respectively (Figure 9(h1)). Among them, 50 genes had a significant positive or negative correlation with CXCL12 expression in COAD patients (Figures 9(h2) and 9(h3)). CXCL12 expression was positively associated with NPR1 (, ) (Figure 10(h1)), SLIT3 (, ) (Figure 10(h2)), and SHE (, ) (Figure 10(h3)). Our results showed that 8,779 and 11,049 genes were negatively and positively correlated with CXCL13 expression, respectively (Figure 9(i1)). Among them, 50 genes had a significant positive or negative correlation with CXCL13 expression in COAD patients (Figures 9(i2) and 9(i3)). CXCL13 expression was positively associated with expression of TIGIT (, ) (Figure 10(i1)), SH2D1A (, ) (Figure 10(i2)), and SIRPG (, ) (Figure 10(i3)). In addition, 8,724 and 11,104 genes were negatively and positively correlated with CXCL14 expression, respectively (Figure 9(j1)). Among them, 50 genes had a significant positive or negative correlation with CXCL14 expression in COAD patients (Figures 9(j2) and 9(j3)). CXCL14 expression was positively associated with the expression of D4S234E (, ) (Figure 10(j1)), TNFSF11 (, ) (Figure 10(j2)), and COL9A1 (, ) (Figure 10(j3)). Furthermore, 9,737 and 10,091 genes were negatively and positively correlated with CXCL16 expression, respectively (Figure 9(k1)). Among them, 50 genes had a significant positive or negative correlation with CXCL16 expression in COAD patients (Figures 9(k2) and 9(k3)). CXCL16 expression was positively associated with the expression of ZMYND15 (, ) (Figure 10(k1)), FLII (, ) (Figure 10(k2)), and NDEL1 (, ) (Figure 10(k3)). We also found that 10,483 and 9,345 genes were negatively and positively correlated with CXCL17 expression, respectively (Figure 9(l1)). Among them, 50 genes had a significant positive or negative correlation with CXCL17 expression in COAD patients (Figures 9(l2) and 9(l3)). CXCL17 expression was positively associated with the expression of FAM83A (, ) (Figure 10(l1)), GPR110 (, ) (Figure 10(l2)), and SEMG1 (, ) (Figure 10(l3)). Finally, we found that 10,446 and 9,382 genes were negatively and positively correlated with VEGFA expression, respectively (Figure 9(m1)). Among them, 50 genes had a significant positive or negative correlation with VEGFA expression in COAD patients (Figures 9(m2) and 9(m3)). VEGFA expression was positively associated with the expression of GTPBP2 (, ) (Figure 10(m1)), CCNL1 (, ) (Figure 10(m2)), and CREBZF (, ) (Figure 10(m3)).

3.8. Immune Cell Infiltration and CXC Chemokine-VEGFA Network Expression

CXCL1 expression in COAD patients was positively associated with CD8+ T cell infiltration, neutrophils, and dendritic cells () (Figure 11(a)). However, macrophages were negatively associated with CXCL1 expression () (Figure 11(a)). In addition, neutrophil infiltration was positively associated with the expression of CXCL2 and CXCL3 () (Figures 11(b) and 11(c)). However, macrophages were negatively associated with CXCL2 and CXCL3 expression () (Figures 11(b) and 11(c)). Furthermore, expression levels of CXCL5/6/8 in patients with COAD were positively associated with the infiltration of CD8+ T cells, macrophages, neutrophils, and dendritic cells () (Figures 11(d)–11(f)). B cells, CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, macrophages, neutrophils, and dendritic cells were positively associated with CXCL11/12/13/16 expression () (Figures 11(g)–11(i) and 11(k)). The expression level of CXCL14 in patients with COAD was positively associated with the infiltration of CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, neutrophils, and dendritic cells () (Figure 11(j)). B cells were positively associated with CXCL17 expression () (Figure 11(l)). CD4+ T cells were positively associated with VEGFA expression () (Figure 11(m)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

(i)

(j)

(k)

(l)

(m)

4. Discussion

Tumor angiogenesis plays a vital role in tumorigenesis, proliferation, and metastasis. In recent years, studies have identified VEGFA and CXC chemokines as important participants in angiogenesis, particularly tumor angiogenesis [14, 15, 26–28]. The expression levels of CXC chemokines and VEGFA have been studied in a range of tumor types; however, findings are contradictory with regard to colonic adenocarcinomas [29, 30]. This study investigated expression level, gene regulatory network, prognostic value, and target prediction of the CXC chemokine-VEGFA network for COAD from a tumor angiogenesis perspective.

In this study, we also examined the potential correlation between pathological stage and differential expression of COAD. The expression of CXCL1/2/3/5/6/8/11/16/17 and VEGFA was upregulated in patients with COAD compared with that in individuals without COAD. Patients with COAD also showed downregulated CXCL12/13/14 expression. The results were similar to those reported in a previous study in patients with COAD [30] and contradicted those reported previously in patients with colorectal cancer [29]. This may be due to the small sample size and the variable types of colorectal cancer. We further attempted to explain the different expression levels by investigating promoter methylation and gene alteration in patients with COAD, as these factors affect tumor cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and metastasis. We observed that patients with COAD had different rates of genetic alteration in their genes. Moreover, the promoter methylation levels of CXCL5/6/12/14 and VEGFA were higher in patients with COAD than those in healthy individuals. Conversely, the promoter methylation levels of CXCL1/2/3/11/13/17 were lower in patients with COAD. Thus, we hypothesized that genetic methylation and alteration within the CXC chemokine-VEGFA network might be the leading cause of abnormal gene expression levels in patients with COAD.

We also observed a notable correlation between the CXCL9/10/11 and VEGFA expression and the pathological stage of COAD. Furthermore, the survival of patients with COAD was higher with low VEGFA or high CXCL8/11/14 expression levels. Therefore, the expression levels of CXCL8/11/14 and VEGFA may be potential prognostic indicators for COAD. CXCL8/11/14 and VEGFA promote tumor angiogenesis in different ways [31–33]. Thus, they may affect the prognosis of patients with COAD through multiple biological functions.

The potential functions and interactions of the CXC chemokine-VEGFA network were further explored in this study. They were found to be complex and tightly connected. CXC chemokines and VEGFA may promote cancer progression, and this could be through a potential interaction network. Genes in the network were mainly involved in cytokine receptor binding, chemokine and cytokine activity, leukocyte chemotaxis, and migration, all of which are closely related to angiogenesis. For instance, IL-8 (CXCL8) promotes tumor angiogenesis by binding to CXCR1 and CXCR2 receptors [34]. In addition, increasing the antitumor activity of cytokine-induced killer cells could reduce tumor proliferation and angiogenesis [35]. Collectively, these results suggest that the CXC chemokine-VEGFA network may influence the development of COAD by increasing tumor angiogenesis.

Furthermore, the functions of the CXC chemokine-VEGFA network in patients with COAD were mainly related to chemokine activity, cytokine activity, and growth factor activity, as demonstrated by GO enrichment analysis, all of which are closely related to tumor angiogenesis. More studies are needed to confirm the mechanism by which this happens. In this study, we further found through KEGG pathway analysis that the cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction signaling pathway, IL-17 signaling pathway, and NF-κB signaling pathway were highly involved in the CXC chemokine-VEGFA network in COAD patients, all of which are highly related to tumor angiogenesis [36, 37]. Therefore, the respective regulation of these pathways may serve as a potential treatment strategy for patients with COAD.

Mutated or altered transcription factors represent a unique class of drug targets that mediate aberrant gene expression, and the development of corresponding targeting drugs may impact future cancer treatments. Thus, the targets and regulators of the CXC chemokine-VEGFA network in COAD patients were further analyzed. The transcription factor targets of the CXC chemokine-VEGFA network in patients with COAD were identified. RELA, NFKB1, ZFP36, XBP1, HDAC2, SP1, ATF4, EP300, BRCA1, ESR1, HIF1A, EGR1, STAT3, and JUN were deemed crucial regulatory factors. Our results showed that these factors have potential functions in regulating tumor angiogenesis by targeting VEGFA. Studies have shown that RELA, NFKB1, HDAC2, SP1, ATF4, EP300, BRCA1, ESR1, HIF1A, EGR1, STAT3, and JUN regulate tumor angiogenesis, thus affecting tumor growth and prognosis [27, 28, 38–48]. However, the role of ZFP36 and XBP1 in tumor angiogenesis has not yet been reported. miRNAs also play a crucial role in regulating gene expression. miRNAs suppress target gene expression by targeting their 3-untranslated regions. miRNA target discovery may ultimately help elucidate the underlying mechanisms of tumorigenesis. Thus, CXC chemokine-VEGFA network-associated miRNA targets in patients with COAD were further explored. Most miRNAs (miR-218, miR-493, miR-221, miR-222, miR-423, miR-378, miR-381, miR-210, miR-382, and miR-199A) have been shown to regulate tumor angiogenesis [49–52]. In summary, our study provides the basis for potential therapeutic strategies for treating COAD by predicting regulated factors and miRNA targets. This study had limitations; no cell line in vitro or in vivo studies were performed to further validate our results.

The correlation between CXC chemokine-VEGFA network expression and differentially expressed genes in COAD patients was explored in this study. We found that in patients with COAD, approximately 20,000 genes were negatively or positively correlated with CXC chemokine-VEGFA network expression. From these, we screened for genes with the highest correlation with CXC chemokines and VEGFA. Some of the genes with the highest correlation (ZC3H12A, IL24, MMP3, IL1B, OSM, IDO1, NPR1, and TIGIT) were positively associated with tumor angiogenesis [53, 54]. Regulation of these cancer-related genes may offer an alternative therapeutic strategy for the treatment of patients with COAD. Immune infiltration is highly related to the clinical prognosis of tumors. Immune cells reach the tumor site through vascular transport, and vascularization of tumors is a process mediated by angiogenesis. We observed that CXC chemokine-VEGFA network expression, which regulates angiogenesis, is correlated with the infiltration of immune cells. This infiltration involved CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, neutrophils, macrophages, and dendritic cells. Improving immune cell infiltration in COAD by developing drugs that act on the CXC chemokine-VEGFA network or CXC chemokines and VEGFA-related regulatory targets may serve as a viable therapeutic oncology approach.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we determined the expression levels and gene regulatory network of the CXC chemokine-VEGFA network, which plays a vital role in angiogenesis in COAD. We also identified new prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets. These findings provide insight into the study and treatment of COAD.

Abbreviations

COAD:	Colon adenocarcinoma
VEGFA:	Vascular endothelial growth factor A
GEPIA:	Gene expression profiling analysis
GO:	Gene Ontology
KEGG:	Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
TCGA:	The Cancer Genome Atlas
RELA:	v-rel reticuloendotheliosis viral oncogene homolog A
NFKB1:	Nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B cells 1
ZFP36:	ZFP36 ring finger protein
XBP1:	X-box-binding protein 1
HDAC2:	Histone deacetylase 2
ATF4:	Activating transcription factor 4
EP300:	E1A-binding protein p300
EGR1:	Early growth response 1
STAT3:	Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3
JUN:	Jun proto-oncogene
SP1:	Sp1 transcription factor
BRCA1:	Breast cancer 1
ESR1:	Estrogen receptor 1
HIF1A:	Hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha subunit.

Data Availability

The UALCAN (http://ualcan.path.uab.edu/analysis.html), Human Protein Atlas (https://www.proteinatlas.org/), GEPIA (http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn/index.html), cBioPortal (http://cbioportal.org), STRING (https://string-db.org/cgi/input.pl), GeneMANIA (http://www.genemania.org), Metascape (https://metascape.org), TRRUST (https://www.grnpedia.org/trrust/), LinkedOmics (http://www.linkedomics.org/), and TIMER (https://cistrome.shinyapps.io/timer/) were used.

Ethical Approval

The patients involved in the database have obtained ethical approval. Users can download relevant data for free for research and publish relevant articles.

Disclosure

A preprint has previously been published [14, 15].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ Contributions

ZS and JC performed data analysis work and aided in writing the manuscript. YLST designed the study and assisted in writing the manuscript. QYX, LD, XYL, YSC, and HL edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the project of financial fund science and technology special competitive allocation of Zhanjiang (Zhanke[2010]174), the Guangdong Medical University “punching and reinforcing” 2021 funding project (4SG21202G), and the Science and Technology Development Center of Chinese Pharmaceutical Society (CMEI2021KPYJ00310).

References

R. L. Siegel, K. D. Miller, and A. Jemal, “Cancer statistics, 2019,” CA: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 7–34, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Aran, A. P. Victorino, L. C. Thuler, and C. G. Ferreira, “Colorectal cancer: epidemiology, disease mechanisms and interventions to reduce onset and mortality,” Clinical Colorectal Cancer, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 195–203, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. M. Parkin, F. Bray, J. Ferlay, and P. Pisani, “Global cancer statistics, 2002,” CA: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 74–108, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Guo, K. Li, B. Hu et al., “Membrane-destabilizing ionizable lipid empowered imaging-guided siRNA delivery and cancer treatment,” Exploration, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 35–49, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Liu, C. Chen, T. Wei et al., “Dendrimeric nanosystem consistently circumvents heterogeneous drug response and resistance in pancreatic cancer,” Exploration, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 21–34, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. C. Keeley, B. Mehrad, and R. M. Strieter, “CXC chemokines in cancer angiogenesis and metastases,” Advances in Cancer Research, vol. 106, pp. 91–111, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Zhang, Q. Wu, C. Wang, L. Yang, P. Liu, and C. Ma, “AKIP1 promotes angiogenesis and tumor growth by upregulating CXC-chemokines in cervical cancer cells,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 448, no. 1-2, pp. 311–320, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. M. Strieter, J. A. Belperio, R. J. Phillips, and M. P. Keane, “CXC chemokines in angiogenesis of cancer,” Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 195–200, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. M. Strieter, M. D. Burdick, B. N. Gomperts, J. A. Belperio, and M. P. Keane, “CXC chemokines in angiogenesis,” Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 593–609, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Xu, H. Zhang, Y. Chong, B. Guan, and P. Guo, “YAP promotes VEGFA expression and tumor angiogenesis though Gli2 in human renal cell carcinoma,” Archives of Medical Research, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 225–233, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Lai, A. Molfino, P. Seminara et al., “Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor therapy and cardiovascular and renal damage in renal cell carcinoma,” Current Vascular Pharmacology, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 190–196, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Ottaiano, R. Franco, A. Aiello Talamanca et al., “Overexpression of both CXC chemokine receptor 4 and vascular endothelial growth factor proteins predicts early distant relapse in stage II-III colorectal cancer patients,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 2795–2803, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. S. Chandrashekar, B. Bashel, S. A. H. Balasubramanya et al., “UALCAN: a portal for facilitating tumor subgroup gene expression and survival analyses,” Neoplasia, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 649–658, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Situ, Q. Xu, L. Deng et al., “System analysis ofVEGFAin renal cell carcinoma: the expression, prognosis, gene regulation network and regulation targets,” The International Journal of Biological Markers, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 90–101, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Situ, X. U. Qinying, D. E. Li et al., “Systematic analysis of CXC chemokine–vascular endothelial growth factor a network in colonic adenocarcinoma from the perspective of angiogenesis,” 2022, PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Sun, Q. Chen, L. Zhang, J. Chen, and X. Zhang, “Exploration of prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets in the microenvironment of bladder cancer based on CXC chemokines,” Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 6262–6287, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Navani, “The human protein atlas,” Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology of India, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 27–31, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Tang, C. Li, B. Kang, G. Gao, C. Li, and Z. Zhang, “GEPIA: a web server for cancer and normal gene expression profiling and interactive analyses,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 45, no. W1, pp. W98–W102, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Gao, B. A. Aksoy, U. Dogrusoz et al., “Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal,” Science Signaling, vol. 6, no. 269, p. pl1, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Szklarczyk, A. L. Gable, D. Lyon et al., “STRING v11: protein-protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 47, no. D1, pp. D607–D613, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Warde-Farley, S. L. Donaldson, O. Comes et al., “The GeneMANIA prediction server: biological network integration for gene prioritization and predicting gene function,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 38, suppl_2, pp. W214–W220, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhou, B. Zhou, L. Pache et al., “Metascape provides a biologist-oriented resource for the analysis of systems-level datasets,” Nature Communications, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 1523, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Han, J. W. Cho, S. Lee et al., “TRRUST v2: an expanded reference database of human and mouse transcriptional regulatory interactions,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 46, no. D1, pp. D380–D386, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. V. Vasaikar, P. Straub, J. Wang, and B. Zhang, “LinkedOmics: analyzing multi-omics data within and across 32 cancer types,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 46, no. D1, pp. D956–D963, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Li, J. Fan, B. Wang et al., “TIMER: a web server for comprehensive analysis of tumor-infiltrating immune cells,” Cancer Research, vol. 77, no. 21, pp. e108–e110, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kumar, M. Cherukumilli, S. H. Mahmoudpour, K. Brand, and O. R. Bandapalli, “ShRNA-mediated knock-down of CXCL8 inhibits tumor growth in colorectal liver metastasis,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 500, no. 3, pp. 731–737, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Li, R. Yan, W. Chen et al., “Long non coding RNA SLC26A4-AS1 exerts antiangiogenic effects in human glioma by upregulating NPTX1 via NFKB1 transcriptional factor,” The FEBS Journal, vol. 288, no. 1, pp. 212–228, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Li, J. A. Ma, X. Sheng, and C. Xiao, “Screening of CXC chemokines in the microenvironment of ovarian cancer and the biological function of CXCL10,” World Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 329, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Yang, Y. Wei, F. Sheng et al., “Comprehensive analysis of the prognosis and immune infiltration for CXC chemokines in colorectal cancer,” Aging (Albany NY), vol. 13, no. 13, pp. 17548–17567, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Q. Zhao, C. Jiang, Q. Gao et al., “Gene expression and methylation profiles identified CXCL3 and CXCL8 as key genes for diagnosis and prognosis of colon adenocarcinoma,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 235, no. 5, pp. 4902–4912, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Augsten, C. Hägglöf, E. Olsson et al., “CXCL14 is an autocrine growth factor for fibroblasts and acts as a multi-modal stimulator of prostate tumor growth,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 9, pp. 3414–3419, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Rupertus, J. Sinistra, C. Scheuer et al., “Interaction of the chemokines I-TAC (CXCL11) and SDF-1 (CXCL12) in the regulation of tumor angiogenesis of colorectal cancer,” Clinical & Experimental Metastasis, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 447–459, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. S. Song, M. J. Kim, H. J. Sun et al., “Aberrant thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor signaling increases VEGF-A and CXCL8 secretion of thyroid cancer cells, contributing to angiogenesis and tumor growth,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 414–425, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Ewington, A. Taylor, R. Sriraksa, Y. Horimoto, E. W. F. Lam, and M. A. el-Bahrawy, “The expression of interleukin-8 and interleukin-8 receptors in endometrial carcinoma,” Cytokine, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 417–422, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Lin, H. Li, X. Li et al., “A single-chain variable fragment antibody/chemokine fusion protein targeting human endoglin to enhance the anti-tumor activity of cytokine-induced killer cells,” Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 1574–1583, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. H. Luo, L. Rao, L. F. Luo, K. Chen, R. Z. Ran, and X. L. Liu, “Long non-coding RNA NKILA inhibited angiogenesis of breast cancer through NF- κB/IL-6 signaling pathway,” Microvascular Research, vol. 129, p. 103968, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Pan, J. Shen, J. Cao et al., “Interleukin-17 promotes angiogenesis by stimulating VEGF production of cancer cells via the STAT3/GIV signaling pathway in non-small-cell lung cancer,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 16053, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Ding, J. Xu, C. Wang et al., “Suppression of the SAP18/HDAC1 complex by targeting TRIM56 and Nanog is essential for oncogenic viral FLICE-inhibitory protein-induced acetylation of p65/RelA, NF-κB activation, and promotion of cell invasion and angiogenesis,” Cell Death and Differentiation, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 1970–1986, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Fang, Y. Zhan, R. Zhu et al., “Bufalin suppresses tumour microenvironment-mediated angiogenesis by inhibiting the STAT3 signalling pathway,” Journal of Translational Medicine, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 383, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Grillo, C. DelloRusso, R. C. Lynch, J. Folkman, and A. Zaslavsky, “Regulation of the angiogenesis inhibitor thrombospondin-1 by the breast cancer susceptibility gene-1 (BRCA1),” The Breast Journal, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 434-435, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hulsurkar, Z. Li, Y. Zhang, X. Li, D. Zheng, and W. Li, “Beta-adrenergic signaling promotes tumor angiogenesis and prostate cancer progression through HDAC2-mediated suppression of thrombospondin-1,” Oncogene, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 1525–1536, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Li, Z. Z. Zou, M. Wen et al., “ZLM-7 inhibits the occurrence and angiogenesis of breast cancer through miR-212-3p/Sp1/VEGFA signal axis,” Molecular Medicine, vol. 26, no. 1, p. 109, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Y. Lin, G. Chen, Y. Q. Zhang et al., “MicroRNA-30d promotes angiogenesis and tumor growth via MYPT1/c-JUN/VEGFA pathway and predicts aggressive outcome in prostate cancer,” Molecular Cancer, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 48, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Bi, P. Kong, L. Zhang et al., “EP300 as an oncogene correlates with poor prognosis in esophageal squamous carcinoma,” Journal of Cancer, vol. 10, no. 22, pp. 5413–5426, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Maruggi, F. I. Layng, R. Lemos Jr. et al., “Absence of HIF1A leads to glycogen accumulation and an inflammatory response that enables pancreatic tumor growth,” Cancer Research, vol. 79, no. 22, pp. 5839–5848, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wang, Y. Ning, G. N. Alam et al., “Amino acid deprivation promotes tumor angiogenesis through the GCN2/ATF4 pathway,” Neoplasia, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 989–997, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wu, M. Zhang, X. Bi, L. Hao, R. Liu, and H. Zhang, “ESR1 mediated circ_0004018 suppresses angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma via recruiting FUS and stabilizing TIMP2 expression,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 408, no. 2, p. 112804, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Zhang, X. Tao, Q. Cao et al., “lnc003875/miR-363/EGR1 regulatory network in the carcinoma -associated fibroblasts controls the angiogenesis of human placental site trophoblastic tumor (PSTT),” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 387, no. 2, p. 111783, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Li, Q. He, S. Baral et al., “MicroRNA-493 regulates angiogenesis in a rat model of ischemic stroke by targeting MIF,” The FEBS Journal, vol. 283, no. 9, pp. 1720–1733, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Sun, T. Huang, C. Zhang et al., “Retracted article: Long non-coding RNA LINC00968 reduces cell proliferation and migration and angiogenesis in breast cancer through up-regulation of PROX1 by reducing hsa-miR-423-5p,” Cell Cycle, vol. 18, no. 16, pp. 1908–1924, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Yang, W. Wang, C. Zhou et al., “MiR-221/222 promote human glioma cell invasion and angiogenesis by targeting TIMP2,” Tumour Biology, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 3763–3773, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Zhang, J. Dong, Y. He et al., “miR-218 inhibited tumor angiogenesis by targeting ROBO1 in gastric cancer,” Gene, vol. 615, pp. 42–49, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Dey, A. Mondal, J. B. DuHadaway et al., “IDO1 signaling through GCN2 in a subpopulation of Gr-1+ cells shifts the IFNγ/IL6 balance to promote neovascularization,” Cancer Immunology Research, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 514–528, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. S. Frieling, T. Li, M. Tauro, and C. C. Lynch, “Prostate cancer-derived MMP-3 controls intrinsic cell growth and extrinsic angiogenesis,” Neoplasia, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 511–521, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Yongli Situ et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

290

Downloads

557

Citations