Research Article
Mastication Wear of Two Low Profile Attachment Systems for Overdenture: An In Vitro Study
Table 4
Results of the retention test performed with clear matrices.
(a) |
| | Test ° | 1 | 2 | Difference between 1 and 2 | Matrix | 0 cycles | 400.000 cycles | Group | Attachment | Patrix | 0 cycles | 400.000 cycles |
| A | L | | | | -38.62% | A | NL | | | -38.02% | B | L | | | -43.62% | B | NL | | | -41.20% |
|
|
(b) |
| | Test ° | 3 | 4 | Difference between 3 and 4 | Matrix | 0 cycles | 400.000 cycles | Group | Attachment | Patrix | 400.000 cycles | 800.000 cycles |
| A | L | | | | -30.78% | A | NL | | | -31.84% | B | L | | | -60.19% | B | NL | | | -47.20% |
|
|
(c) |
| | Test ° | 5 | 6 | Difference between 5 and 6 | Matrix | 0 cycles | 400.000 cycles | Group | Attachment | Patrix | 800.000 cycles | 1.200.000 cycles |
| A | L | | | | -23.54% | A | NL | | | -38.03% | B | L | | | -52.14% | B | NL | | | -43.47% |
|
|
L: loaded side. NL: nonloaded side. All data, except for differences expressed as a percentage, are expressed in Newtons.
|