Review Article

Antimicrobial Efficacy of Silver Diamine Fluoride against Enterococcus faecalis: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies

Table 2

A list of the items assessed to evaluate the overquality of the studies included in this review.

Section/topicItem numberChecklist items

Title1aThe title must identify the study as being laboratory-based, e.g. “laboratory investigation” or “in vitro,” or “ex vivo” or another appropriate term
1bThe area/field of interest must be provided (briefly) in the title

Keywords2aAt least two keywords related to the subject and content of the investigation must be provided

Abstract3aThe rationale/justification of what the investigation contributes to the literature and/or addresses a gap in knowledge must be provided
3bThe aim/objectives of the investigation must be provided
3cThe body of the abstract must describe the materials and methods used in the investigation and include information on data management and statistical analysis
3dThe body of the abstract must describe the most significant scientific results for all experimental and control groups
3eThe main conclusion(s) of the study must be provided

Introduction4aA background summary of the scientific investigation with relevant information must be provided
4bThe aim(s), purpose(s) or hypothesis(es) of an investigation must be provided ensuring they align with the methods and results

Materials and methods5aA clear ethics statement and the ethical approval granted by an ethics board, such as an institutional review board or institutional animal care and use committee, must be described
5bWhen harvesting cells and tissues for research, all the legal, ethical, and welfare rights of human subjects and animal donors must be respected and applicable procedures described
5cThe use of reference samples must be included, as well as negative and positive control samples, and the adequacy of the sample size justified
5dSufficient information about the methods/materials/supplies/samples/specimens/instruments used in the study must be provided to enable it to be replicated
5eThe use of categories must be defined, reliable and be described in detail
5fThe numbers of replicated identical samples must be described within each test group. The number of times each test was repeated must be described
5 gThe details of all the sterilization, disinfection, and handling conditions must be provided, if relevant
5 hThe process of randomization and allocation concealment, including who generated the random allocation sequence, who decided on which specimens to be included and who assigned specimens to the intervention must be provided (if applicable)
5iThe process of blinding the operator who is conducting the experiment (if applicable) and the examiners when assessing the results must be provided
5jInformation on data management and analysis including the statistical tests and software used must be provided

Results6aThe estimated effect size and its precision for all the objective (primary and secondary) for each group including controls must be provided
6bInformation on the loss of samples during experimentation and the reasons must be provided, if relevant
6cAll the statistical results, including all comparisons between groups must be provided

Discussion7aThe relevant literature and status of the hypothesis must be described
7bThe true significance of the investigation must be described
7cThe strength(s) of the study must be described
7dThe limitations of the study must be described
7eThe implications for future research must be described

Conclusion(s)8aThe rationale for the conclusion(s) must be provided
8bExplicit conclusion(s) must be provided, i.e. the main “take-away” lessons

Funding and support9aSources of funding and other support (such as supply of drugs, equipment) as well as the role of funders must be acknowledged and described

Conflicts of interest10aAn explicit statement on conflicts of interest must be provided

In accordance with a modified version of the Preferred Reporting Items for Laboratory studies in Endodontology (PRILE) guidelines developed by Nagendrababu et al., [22].