Chemical Characterization and Cytotoxic/Antibacterial Effects of Nine Iranian Propolis Extracts on Human Fibroblast Cells and Oral Bacteria

Table 6

The percentage of microbial biofilm degradation.

Samples	2 × MBC/MFC concentrations of each Propolis									CHX 0.2
	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
S. mutans	27%	5	21	21	23	27.5	30.5	23	3.5	75%
S. salivarius	16.5	4.5	17	16.5	27.5	20	28	26.5	4.5	79
S. mitis	17	5	13.5	13.5	22.5	17	65.5	23	3.5	75.5
L. acidophilus	13.5	7.5	17	13.5	21	18.5	22.5	25	4.5	73
C. albicans	12	2.5	5.5	4.5	9.5	15	15	2.5	4	74
E. coli	13	7.5	16	14	22	16	23	24	4	73
S. aureus	16	5.5	13	14	22	16	60	21	4	74

Kermanshah (sample 1), Fasa (sample 2), Tabriz (sample 3), Neor Lake (sample 4), Sarab (sample 5), Gilan (sample 6), Khalkhal (sample 7), Kurdistan (sample 8), and Fereydun Shahr (sample 9). There were statistically difference between groups 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 9 (-value < 0.05). There was a statistical difference between groups 1, 3, and 8 (-value < 0.05). There were statistically difference between groups 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 9 with 1, 3, and 8 (-value <Kermanshah (sample 1), Fasa (sample 2), Tabriz (sample 3), Neor Lake (sample 4), Sarab (sample 5), Gilan (sample 6), Khalkhal (sample 7), Kurdistan (sample 8), and Fereydun Shahr (sample 9). There were statistically difference between groups 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 9 (-value < 0.05). There was a statistical difference between groups 1, 3, and 8 (-value < 0.05). There were statistically difference between groups 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 9 with 1, 3, and 8 (-value < 0.001). 0.001).