Research Article
Chemical Characterization and Cytotoxic/Antibacterial Effects of Nine Iranian Propolis Extracts on Human Fibroblast Cells and Oral Bacteria
Table 6
The percentage of microbial biofilm degradation.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kermanshah (sample 1), Fasa (sample 2), Tabriz (sample 3), Neor Lake (sample 4), Sarab (sample 5), Gilan (sample 6), Khalkhal (sample 7), Kurdistan (sample 8), and Fereydun Shahr (sample 9). There were statistically difference between groups 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 9 (-value < 0.05). There was a statistical difference between groups 1, 3, and 8 (-value < 0.05). There were statistically difference between groups 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 9 with 1, 3, and 8 (-value <Kermanshah (sample 1), Fasa (sample 2), Tabriz (sample 3), Neor Lake (sample 4), Sarab (sample 5), Gilan (sample 6), Khalkhal (sample 7), Kurdistan (sample 8), and Fereydun Shahr (sample 9). There were statistically difference between groups 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 9 (-value < 0.05). There was a statistical difference between groups 1, 3, and 8 (-value < 0.05). There were statistically difference between groups 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 9 with 1, 3, and 8 (-value < 0.001). 0.001). |