Thymol Reduces <i>agr</i>-Mediated Virulence Factor Phenol-Soluble Modulin Production in <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>

Lade, Harshad; Chung, Sung Hee; Lee, Yeonhee; Kumbhar, Bajarang Vasant; Joo, Hwang-Soo; Kim, Yun-Gon; Yang, Yung-Hun; Kim, Jae-Seok

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8221622

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 8221622 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8221622

Thymol Reduces agr-Mediated Virulence Factor Phenol-Soluble Modulin Production in Staphylococcus aureus

Harshad Lade,¹Sung Hee Chung,¹Yeonhee Lee,²Bajarang Vasant Kumbhar,³Hwang-Soo Joo,²Yun-Gon Kim,⁴Yung-Hun Yang,⁵and Jae-Seok Kim¹

Academic Editor: Mejdi Snoussi

Received23 Feb 2022

Revised08 Apr 2022

Accepted23 Apr 2022

Published09 May 2022

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is a major human bacterial pathogen that carries a large number of virulence factors. Many virulence factors of S. aureus are regulated by the accessory gene regulator (agr) quorum-sensing system. Phenol-soluble modulins (PSMs) are one of the agr-mediated virulence determinants known to play a significant role in S. aureus pathogenesis. In the present study, the efficacy of thymol to inhibit PSM production including δ-toxin in S. aureus was explored. We employed liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) to quantify the PSMsα1–PSMα4, PSMβ1 and PSMβ2, and δ-toxin production from culture supernatants. We found that thymol at 0.5 MIC (128 μg/mL) significantly reduced the PSMα and δ-toxin production in S. aureus WKZ-1, WKZ-2, LAC USA300, and ATCC29213. Downregulation in transcription by quantitative real-time (qRT) PCR analysis of response regulator agrA and receptor histidine kinase agrC upon 0.5 MIC thymol treatment affirmed the results of LC–MS quantification of PSMs. In silico molecular docking analysis demonstrated the binding affinity of thymol with receptors AgrA and AgrC. Transmission electron microscopy images revealed no ultrastructural alterations (cell wall and membrane) in thymol-treated WKZ-1 and WKZ-2 S. aureus strains. Here, we demonstrated that thymol reduces various PSM production in S. aureus clinical isolates and reference strains with mass spectrometry.

1. Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus is a major human bacterial pathogen associated with hospital-acquired infections and the leading cause of community-associated infections [1]. S. aureus causes many infections, including skin and soft tissue infections, osteomyelitis, bacteremia, abscesses, endocarditis, and septicemia [2]. To invade and survive in the host, S. aureus produces a large arsenal of virulence factors such as gene products involved in adhesion, toxins secretion, and host defense evasion [3]. These virulence factors help S. aureus to survive and persist in stressful in vivo conditions, although these are not essential for cell growth. This has led to the search for agents to inhibit virulence factors without imposing selective pressure for the development of resistance.

The expression of several S. aureus virulence factors including phenol-soluble modulins (PSMs) is mainly regulated by the accessory gene regulator (agr) quorum-sensing system in a response to cell density [4–6]. The agr-system is two-component signaling (TCS) transduction system comprising membrane-bound receptor histidine kinase AgrC and cytoplasmic response regulator AgrA [7]. To begin with the transcription and translation of the agr operon, AgrB modifies and secretes AgrD to produce autoinducing peptides (AIP). When the extracellular AIP concentration reaches a critical threshold value, the signal is sensed by AgrC, resulting in autophosphorylation of the cytoplasmic domain of AgrC followed by transfer of phosphate to AgrA. Upon phosphorylation, AgrA binds to the P2 and P3 promoters of agr operon, driving expression of the RNAII and RNAIII transcripts, respectively. Furthermore, AgrA directly binds to the promoters for transcription of the PSMs in an RNAIII-independent fashion [8, 9]. The P2 promoter drives a positive feedback loop resulting in the upregulation of agr operon, whereas the P3 promoter drives the transcription of RNAIII, the effector molecule of agr operon [9–11]. The RNAIII is responsible for the upregulation of extracellular proteins such as α-hemolysin, enterotoxins, leukocidins, lipases, and proteases along with the downregulation of cell-surface proteins such as Protein A and fibronectin-binding proteins [9]. Furthermore, the hld gene is located on the RNAIII portion of the agr operon, which encodes for δ-toxin [9, 11]. As the agr-system is central to the expression of several virulence factors including PSM production, it has often been proposed as a potential target to attenuate S. aureus pathogenicity.

PSMs are a group of small amphipathic peptides, including PSMα1 to PSMα4 (~20–25 amino acids), PSMβ1 to PSMβ2 (~45 amino acids), and δ-toxin (~26 amino acid) [8, 12–15]. The αPSMs possess the most strong cytolytic activity among PSMs [8]. δ-toxin is amphipathic and alpha-helical in structure and is generally the most strongly expressed peptide than other PSMs. It possesses moderate cytolytic capacities and the capacity to stimulate formyl peptide receptor 2 (FPR2) [14, 15]. PSM peptides are involved in a series of biological functions critical for staphylococci pathogenesis [8, 16] and may cause lysis of human erythrocytes and leukocytes and inflammatory response stimulation [17]. PSMs can aggregate and form bacterial functional amyloids [18], which are speculated to contribute to biofilm structuring and detachment [16]. Biofilm-associated S. aureus infections resist antimicrobial treatment and innate host immune response [19]. This requires aggressive antimicrobial therapy and the removal of infected tissues [20].

An alternative strategy that is currently being widely investigated to tackle antimicrobial-resistant staphylococcal infections includes antivirulence therapy [21]. Numerous natural compounds inhibiting virulence factor production of S. aureus, either alone or in combination with traditional antibiotics, have been reported [21]. For example, thymol (2-isopropyl-5-methylphenol), a constituent of thyme herb (Thymus vulgaris L.), possesses a wide spectrum of antimicrobial activity [22–29] and reduces the biofilm formation of S. aureus strains [30–33]. Furthermore, it is known to inhibit staphyloxanthin production in MRSA [34]. It decreases the production of α-hemolysin and enterotoxins (i.e., sea and seb) in both methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) and MRSA strains in a dose-dependent manner [26]. However, no report is available for the PSM inhibitory activity of thymol. Hence, the present study is aimed to explore the inhibitory potential of thymol on the PSMs and δ-toxin in different S. aureus strains and understand the mechanisms underlying its action.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions

The S. aureus strains used in this study are described in Table 1. The clinical isolates of S. aureus WKZ-1 and S. aureus WKZ-2 are isogenic strains except for the presence of methicillin resistance Staphylococcal cassettes chromosome mec (SCCmec) in WKZ-2 [35–37]. S. aureus Los Angeles County (LAC) of pulsed-field type USA300 [38] and its isogenic Δagr (agr system entirely deleted except for a 3 part of RNAIII) and Δ3KO (αpsm, βpsm, and hld knockout) were also evaluated [39, 40]. The reference strains of S. aureus ATCC29213 and S. aureus RN4220 were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and BEI Resources, respectively. For the PSM production assay, the S. aureus strains were grown in tryptic soy broth (TSB) (BD, Sparks, MD) at 37°C with shaking (200 rpm). The bacterial stock cultures were stored in skimmed milk at -70°C.

2.2. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Determination

The MIC of thymol (CAS No. 89-83-8; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) against S. aureus strains was determined by broth microdilution assay following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [41]. Cation-Adjusted Mueller Hinton II Broth (CA-MHB) (BD, Sparks, MD) was used for the estimation of MIC, as recommended by the CLSI [42]. A stock solution of thymol (51.2 mg/mL) was prepared in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Sigma-Aldrich) and working solutions (2–1024 μg/mL) were prepared by serial twofold dilutions in CA-MHB. The working solution was then added in polystyrene 96-well microtiter plate-U bottoms (FALCON, Corning, NY) with a final assay volume of 100 μL per well. A suspension of S. aureus strains was prepared in CA-MHB and inoculated into each well of the microtiter plate to give a final cell density of 5 × 10⁵ colony-forming units (CFU)/mL. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h and the MIC values were recorded as the lowest concentration of thymol with no visible growth. S. aureus ATCC29213 was used as a quality control strain for MIC testing.

2.3. PSM Quantification by Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (LC–MS)

The PSM production by S. aureus strains was quantified by LC–MS as described previously with some modifications [43, 44]. Briefly, overnight grown S. aureus strains (30 μL) were inoculated in 3 mL of TSB (with and without 0.5 MIC thymol) and incubated at 37°C under shaking conditions (200 rpm) for 20 h [45]. The cultures were centrifuged at 4,000 rpm for 20 min at 4°C to pellet the cells and supernatant was used for PSM quantification. S. aureus LAC USA300 strain was employed as a positive control for PSMs quantification, while its isogenic mutant Δ3KO was used as negative controls.

For LC–MS analysis, 5 μL of supernatant was injected into the C8 (ZORBAX SB-C8, 2.1 × 5 mm, 1.8 μm) (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA) column connected to a Waters ZQ 2000 LC–MS system (Waters, Milford, MA) and eluted by a gradient program with trifluoroacetic acid (TFA; 0.05%) in water and 0.05% TFA in acetonitrile at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. Electrospray ionization of samples was performed at 3.5 kV, and ions were infused into the ion entrance of a mass spectrometer. The values of the analytes were scanned continuously, and mass spectra were recorded. The values of 2+ and 3+ charged ions of α-type PSMs and 3+ and 4+ charged ions of β-type PSMs were used to extract chromatograms for quantification of each PSM [43]. PSMs were quantified by integration of the extracted ion chromatogram of formyl- and deformylated-PSMs. The concentration of PSMs was determined by calibration with three different concentrations of each synthetic formyl PSM. Formyl PSMs were synthesized by Peptron (Daejeon, Korea) and Cosmogenetech (Daejeon, Korea).

2.4. Quantitative Real-Time (qRT) PCR Analysis

To assess the effect of thymol on the expression of genes associated with PSM production, qRT-PCR was performed. The S. aureus strains were cultivated in TSB (with and without 0.5 MIC thymol) under similar conditions as the PSMs quantification assay. After 6 h of growth, the bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation at 5,000xg for 10 min, and pellets were resuspended in RNAprotect Bacteria Reagent (Qiagen, Düsseldorf, Germany) and incubated for 5 min at room temperature. Cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 5,000xg for 10 min, RNAprotect Bacteria Reagent was discarded, and the samples were stored at −80°C.

RNA extraction was carried out using the RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen, Düsseldorf, Germany) with initial lysis in 1 mg/mL lysostaphin solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) at 37°C for 30 min. RNA concentration was analyzed using a NanoDrop 1000™ spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE). The PrimeScript™ RT Master Mix and TB Green™ Fast qPCR Mix kits (Takara, Tokyo, Japan) were used for RNA reverse transcription and qPCR system preparation separately. Real-time PCR was performed on a LightCycler® 480 RT-PCR system (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) with specific primers (Table 2). RT-PCR conditions were initial denaturation (95°C for 5 sec), followed by denaturation (95°C for 10 sec), annealing (58°C for 10 sec), and extension (72°C for 10 sec) for 45 cycles. Relative gene expression was calculated by the 2^−ΔΔCT method with housekeeping gene gyrB as an internal control [46].

2.5. Molecular Docking Analysis

To explore the binding mode and interaction of thymol with AgrA and AgrC of S. aureus, molecular docking was performed using AutoDock4.2 software [49]. The crystal structures of AgrA (PDB ID: 3BS1) and AgrC (PDB ID: 4BXI) were retrieved from the Protein Data Bank (http://www.rcsb.org). The missing residues of AgrC were modelled using the SWISS-MODEL server (https://swissmodel.expasy.org/) [50] and further energy minimization was performed using the GROMACS 2021.1 (https://www.gromacs.org) to obtain the least energy conformation of AgrC. The AgrC contains ATP binding domain [51]; hence, ATP was docked using AutoDock4.2 [49]. The purpose of using AgrC-ATP complex for docking study was to understand the binding mode of thymol. These AgrA and AgrC were further used for molecular docking study of thymol (PubChem ID: 6989) as well as previously reported antivirulence compounds. The savirin (PubChem ID: 3243271), staquorsin, and bumetanide (PubChem ID: 2471) were used as a positive control for AgrA [52–54]. The atomic coordinates of staquorsin were built using Discovery Studio Visualizer 2016 (BIOVIA, Dassault Systèmes, San Diego). The binding mode of thymol AgrC was determined through a blind docking approach followed by a local docking protocol (http://autodock.scripps.edu) using the Autodock4.2 software. However, the binding mode of thymol as well as savirin, staquorsin, and bumetanide with AgrA was investigated using a site-specific local docking approach considering the kinase domain, similar to earlier studies [52, 53]. The least binding energy docked conformation of the above-mentioned compounds with AgrA and AgrC was further analyzed and visualized through the PyMol (The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 2.0 Schrödinger, LLC) and Discovery Studio Visualizer 2016.

2.6. Minimal Biofilm Inhibitory Concentration (MBIC) Assay

The antibiofilm activity of thymol against S. aureus strains was evaluated by MBIC assay. MBIC assay was performed in TSB supplemented with 1.0% D-(+)-glucose (TSBg) to support biofilm formation and reproducible quantification [55]. Briefly, S. aureus was diluted in TSBg to make the inoculum. Thymol was dissolved in DMSO and then serially diluted in TSBg twofold across the wells of 96-well polystyrene plate with flat bottoms (FALCON, Corning, NY). The microtiter plate wells contained a total volume of 200 μL TSBg containing the bacterial inoculum (1 × 10⁶ CFU/mL) and thymol (32–256 μg/mL). After incubation at 37°C for 24 h in stationary conditions, the bacterial culture from the microtiter plate well was gently aspirated and washed twice with 200 μL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) to remove nonadherent bacteria. The adherent bacteria were fixed by heating at 65°C for 1 h and were stained with 150 μL of 0.1% (w/v) crystal violet (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) for 5 min [56]. The excess crystal violet stain was then discarded, and the plates were washed twice with 200 μL per well of PBS to remove the nonadherent dye and allowed to dry for 30 min at room temperature. The stained adherent biofilm was dissolved in 150 μL per well of 33.0% glacial acetic acid (v/v) for 30 min, and MBIC was determined by measuring the OD₅₉₅ on MULTISKAN FC reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The percentage biofilm inhibition was calculated using the formula [32, 48]:

A well-characterized biofilm-producing strain S. aureus RN4220 was employed as a positive control [55, 57], while uninoculated culture media served as a negative control.

2.7. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) Analysis

TEM was carried out to investigate the effects of 0.5 MIC thymol on the S. aureus ultrastructure as described previously [58, 59]. Briefly, 3 mL of TSBg (with and without 0.5 MIC thymol) in a 6-well plate (SPL Life Sciences, Pocheon, Korea) inoculated with S. aureus WKZ-1 and S. aureus WKZ-2 cultures (1 × 10⁶ CFU/mL) was incubated for 24h at 37°C. The culture broth was gently aspirated, and cells were washed with PBS (pH 7.4), fixed with 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde, and postfixed with 1.0% osmium tetroxide (OsO₄) in sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 6.5; 50 mM). Samples were then progressively dehydrated with 15 min treatments of increasingly concentrated ethanol (50%, 70%, 90%, 95%, and 100%). After dehydration, the bacterial samples were dried with hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS), embedded in Epon 82 (Ted Pella, Redding, CA), and sectioned into 70 nm slices using a Leica Ultracut UCT ultramicrotome. The sections were then stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Morphological and ultrastructural alterations of cells were observed and photographed using a Cryo TEM with a field-emission gun at 200 kV of FEI Tecnai F20G2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The TEM analysis was performed at the Advanced Analysis Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seoul, Korea.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Statistics were determined using GraphPad Prism (version 9.2.0) and Microsoft Excel. All the assays were performed in replicate and the results were presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). The statistical significance was determined by an unpaired Student’s -test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. values <0.05 were considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. MIC of Thymol against S. aureus Strains

The MIC values of thymol as determined by CLSI guidelines against S. aureus WKZ-1 and WKZ-2 clinical isolates, as well as reference strain LAC USA300 and its isogenic mutants (Δagr and Δ3KO), ATCC29213, and RN4220, were 256 μg/mL. Notably, the MIC did not change against MRSA strains such as WKZ-2 and LAC USA300.

3.2. Thymol Reduces PSM Production by S. aureus Clinical Isolates and Reference Strains

The bioactivity of thymol was tested at 0.5 MIC via an in vitro assay that evaluated its ability to inhibit PSM production. To ensure that 0.5 MIC thymol reduces PSM production in S. aureus strains without growth attenuation, the growth was measured as OD₅₉₅ after 20 h incubation at 37°C (Figure S1). The results suggest that 0.5 MIC thymol did not inhibit the growth of WKZ-1 and WKZ-2 as well as all the reference strains and mutants.

Mass spectrometric analysis revealed the significantly reduced production of PSMα1, PSMα2, PSMα3, and PSMα4 in WKZ-1 and WKZ-2 isolates after 0.5 MIC thymol treatment () (Figure 1). Furthermore, a significant reduction in the productions of PSMα1-α4 was also observed in ATCC29213 and LAC USA300 culture supernatants (). LAC Δagr and Δ3KO did not produce αPSMs.

In this study, WKZ-1 and WKZ-2 isolates produced a considerable amount of PSMβ1 and subsequent 0.5 MIC thymol treatment significantly reduced its levels () (Figure 1). Furthermore, thymol reduced the production of PSMβ1 and PSMβ2 in reference strains of ATCC29213 and LAC USA300 (). No production of βPSMs was observed in the RN4220 strain.

We observed that 0.5 MIC thymol significantly reduced the δ-toxin production in WKZ-1 and WKZ-2 isolates as well as ATCC29213, RN4220, and LAC USA300 () (Figure 2). As shown in Figure 2, LAC Δagr and Δ3KO did not produce δ-toxin. Together, these results demonstrate that thymol is effective in reducing the PSMs and δ-toxin production of S. aureus.

3.3. Thymol Target agrA and agrC of S. aureus

With the finding that thymol reduces PSM production, we focused on important agr-system genes that are known to regulate PSM production in S. aureus. The expression of all candidate genes was analyzed from the PSM production assay after 6 h. As shown in Figure 3, 0.5 MIC thymol treatment reduced the expression of the regulator genes of agrA (response regulator) and agrC (receptor histidine kinase) in WKZ-1 and WKZ-2. Furthermore, ATCC29213, RN4220, LAC USA300, and LAC Δ3KO also showed the downregulation of agrA and agrC after thymol treatment. No expression of agrC and agrA genes was observed in the LAC Δagr mutant.

The expression levels of psmα, psmβ, and RNAIII (effector molecule of agr-system) were significantly downregulated in WKZ-1 and WKZ-2 as well as ATCC29213, RN4220, and LAC USA300 after 0.5 MIC thymol treatment () (Figure 3). No expression of psmα, psmβ, and RNAIII genes was observed in LAC Δagr as expected. Because LAC Δ3KO mutant only has a start codon change from ATG to ATT, the hld gene was still detected but not functional.

3.4. Binding Mode of Thymol with AgrA and AgrC Regulator

Results of the molecular docking study showed that thymol interacts with AgrA and AgrC of S. aureus. The least energy docked conformation of thymol was found to be -4.31 and -5.13 kcal/mol with AgrA and AgrC, respectively (Table 3). The AgrA-thymol complex (Figure 4(a)) was stabilized by the hydrogen bonding interactions with Glu217 (2.1 Å), His200 (2.5 Å), and nucleotide G12 (1.8 Å) (Figure 4(b) and Table 3). Here, thymol forms van der Waals interaction with Glu217, Arg218, Ala230, Ser231, Phe203, and π-alkyl type of interactions with Tyr229 and His200. Furthermore, the control docking studies with savirin, staquorsin, and bumetanide reveal the considerable binding affinity with AgrA (Table 3). The least binding energy conformation of savirin, staquorsin, and bumetanide was found to be -6.40, -6.83, and -4.06 kcal/mol, respectively. We found that AgrA-savirin complex (Figure S2a) was stabilized by bonding interactions with the Glu217 (1.7 Å), His200 (1.8 Å), and π-π type of interaction with Tyr229 (Figure S2b and Table 3), similar to an earlier study [52]. Furthermore, AgrA-staquorsin complex (Figure S2c) was stabilized by bonding interactions with Ser202 (1.9 Å), His200 (2.1 Å), nucleotide Adenosine (1.6 Å), and nucleotide Thymin (1.6 Å), and carbon-hydrogen interaction with the Glu217 (1.9 Å) (Figure S2d and Table 3). Staquorsin also forms van der Waals, π-carbon, π-anion, π-sulfur, π-alkyl, and π- π type of interactions with AgrA. The AgrA-bumetanide complex (Figure S2e) shows the hydrogen interaction with Glu217 (2.0 Å), Ala230 (2.7 Å), and DC (1.8 Å) (Figure S2f and Table 3).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 4

Binding mode of AgrA and AgrC with thymol using molecular docking. Here, AgrA and AgrC are shown in the space fill model with gray color, while thymol is shown in the stick model with carbon in green and oxygen in red color. The ATP in AgrC is shown in the stick model and carbon in cyan, oxygen in red, and phosphorus in golden color. (a) Binding mode of thymol with AgrA at kinase domain. (b) 2D interactions of thymol with AgrA atoms. (c) The interactions of thymol with AgrC. (d) Interaction network of thymol with AgrC residues. Panel (b) and (d) show the residues with dark green color form conventional hydrogen bonding, light green form van der Waals forces, and pink form alkyl type of interactions with thymol.

Analysis of the AgrC-thymol complex (Figure 4(c)) showed that it was stabilized by the hydrogen bonding interaction with Lys17 (2.72 Å) (Figure 4(d) and Table 3). Additionally, Ile24, Ile8, Leu11, Ile20, and Ile36 make alkyl types of interactions, while Ile8, Ile20, Ile24, and Ile36 make an π-type of interactions with thymol. Here, thymol shows a significant binding affinity with the AgrC-ATP complex and may inhibit the dephosphorylation ATP to ADP and Pi. This may lead to the unavailability of Pi for activation of AgrA.

3.5. Antibiofilm Potential of Thymol against S. aureus Strains

The effect of thymol at increasing concentrations (32 to 256 μg/mL) on biofilm formation by S. aureus strains was assessed on polystyrene surface. The growth OD of control and thymol-treated S. aureus strains did not show any significant difference up to 128 μg/mL of thymol concentrations () (Figure 5). At 128 μg/mL concentration, thymol showed maximum of biofilm inhibition in all strains including S. aureus WKZ-1 (54.3%), S. aureus WKZ-2 (56.7%), S. aureus ATCC29213 (67.8%), RN4220 (74.4%), and LAC USA300 (58.9%) and its isogenic Δagr (48.4%) and Δ3KO (55.8%) (). Biofilm inhibition beyond 128 μg/mL may appear due to growth inhibitory effects of thymol.

3.6. Morphological Changes by TEM

TEM was used to observe changes to the cell structure after 0.5 MIC thymol treatment. The TEM images confirmed that WKZ-1 and WKZ-2 cells were intact after treatment with a subinhibitory concentration of thymol (Figure 6). Moreover, TEM images of the treated S. aureus strains confirmed intact septa. These findings suggest that the integrity of S. aureus cells was maintained with 0.5 MIC thymol treatment with no destruction of the cell wall and cell membrane morphologically.

4. Discussion

The agr-system plays an important role in the regulation of several virulence factors in S. aureus, such as upregulation of PSMs, δ-toxin, nucleases, lipase, and other staphylococcal toxins [9, 39]. Thus, inhibition of the agr-system has been suggested as a target for controlling S. aureus virulence [60, 61]. Thymol, a herb-derived essential oil, has been reported to inhibit the agr-mediated virulence factor of α-hemolysin in the MRSA strain 2985 [26]. However, the previous reports were performed for a quite limited number of S. aureus strains and without direct measurement of PSMα1-4, PSMβ1-2, and δ-toxin production by mass spectrometry. In addition, a previous study showed the inhibitory effect of thymol on master regulator agrA expression [26], while another study showed an unaltered expression of agrA [32].

In the present study, we found a significant reduction in the production of PSMα1-α4 in both MSSA (WKZ-1) and MRSA (WKZ-2) clinical isolates by 0.5 MIC thymol treatment (Figure 1). PSM peptides are produced as functional amyloids that play distinct roles in S. aureus pathogenicity [62], and its inhibition in both MSSA and MRSA strains indicates the antivirulence potential of thymol. Consistent with previous studies, we found δ-toxin was the most strongly produced peptide in WKZ-1 and WKZ-2 as well as other S. aureus strains (Figure 2) [14, 15]. δ-toxin possesses a moderate capacity to lyse human neutrophils and PSM-mediated phenotypes like bacteremia [8, 13].

To understand the mechanism of PSMs reduction by thymol, the gene expression analysis by qRT-PCR and in silico molecular docking studies of major PSMs regulators (AgrA and AgrC) were performed. qRT-PCR analysis showed downregulation of agrA and agrC upon thymol treatment (Figure 3), which could reduce PSM production. We found a decrease in the agrC expression in 0.5 MIC thymol-treated S. aureus cultures (Figure 3) in contrast to the unaltered expression of agrC previously observed in S. aureus Newman strain [32]. We observed that S. aureus LAC Δagr mutant did not produce αPSMs, βPSMs, and δ-toxin as expected. Notably, previous studies reported the agr-system as the therapeutic target to attenuate S. aureus virulence [52, 63]. A functional agr-system is essential for S. aureus virulence as shown by the reduction of pathogenicity in isogenic agr mutants [39, 64, 65].

We found the transcript levels of RNAIII encoding δ-toxin were significantly reduced in all S. aureus strains upon thymol treatment (Figure 3). δ-toxin is a member of the PSMs family encoded by the hld gene, which is located on the RNAIII portion of the agr operon [8, 13]. As a key effector molecule of the agr-system, RNAIII is associated with the expression of several virulence genes in S. aureus [66]. The RNAIII inhibiting peptide (YSPWTNF-NH2) and its synthetic analogs were reported to inhibit RNAII and RNAIII transcription as well as effectively suppress diseases caused by S. aureus [67]. Thus, inhibition of RNAIII gene expression by thymol might be an effective strategy for reducing the production of δ-toxin as well as other virulence factors.

The molecular docking study showed the significant binding efficacy of thymol with AgrA and AgrC regulators (Table 3). Thymol formed conventional hydrogen bonding, alkyl, and π-type of interactions with AgrA and AgrC. Interestingly, thymol prefers a similar binding mode that interferes with AgrA-DNA binding as reported previously for savirin [52]. The binding of thymol to the AgrA may cause the inhibition of AgrA−P2/P3 interactions, leading to the inhibition of agr-mediated virulence factor PSM production. It is reported that savirin disrupts S. aureus agr-system by inhibiting the activation of AgrA, thus preventing the upregulation of virulence genes [52]. Our model analysis showed consistent results with the previous reports on savirin, staquorsin, and bumetanide [52–54], and thymol also exhibited significant binding efficiency to AgrA of S. aureus. We speculate that the binding affinity of thymol with AgrC may also affect the conformational properties of AgrC essential for dephosphorylation of ATP to ADP + Pi, leading to interference with AgrA activation due to the unavailability of Pi group (Figure 7). Thymol could also interfere with the agr-system by blocking the transcription function of AgrA.

Figure 7

Schematic of the S. aureus agr quorum-sensing system. The binding affinity of thymol with AgrC could affect the conformational properties of AgrC essential for dephosphorylation of ATP to ADP + Pi, leading to interference with AgrA activation. Thymol may also block the transcription function of AgrA, leading to inhibition of PSM production. Red arrows show inhibition of PSMs including δ-toxin production in S. aureus. The agents targeting agr-mediated virulence of S. aureus are shown: solonamide B, and fengycin (competitively interferes with AIP binding to AgrC) [44, 68, 69], savirin (inhibit AgrC and AgrA downstream of AIP sensing) [52], ω-hydroxyemodin (directly binds to AgrA and prevents the interaction of AgrA with P2 promoter) [70].

In this study, the inhibition of S. aureus biofilms by thymol was found to be concentration-dependent, which is consistent with previous studies [30–32]. Biofilm formation in S. aureus is associated with antimicrobial resistance [19, 71], and inhibition of biofilm formation could be a promising strategy against S. aureus infections. This study showed the inhibition of PSMs and δ-toxin with the hindering biofilm formation of S. aureus by thymol, and these results suggest potential and additive advantages of thymol against S. aureus infections.

5. Conclusion

Antimicrobial strategies targeting virulence factors have attracted great interest recently. The present study revealed the antivirulence potential of thymol, especially PSMs and δ-toxin of S. aureus by inhibiting agr-mediated virulence factors. Thymol, a herb-derived molecule as an antivirulence agent, could inhibit the PSM and δ-toxin production, suggesting the potential therapeutic agent on S. aureus infections.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are shown in the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Bio and Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Korean government, Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) 2017M3A9E4077232. This study was also supported by the Hallym University research fund. The following reagents were provided by the Network on Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus (NARSA) for distribution by BEI Resources, NIAID, NIH: S. aureus WKZ-1, NR-28984; S. aureus WKZ-2, NR-28985; and S. aureus RN4220, NR-45946.

Supplementary Materials

The supplementary data S1 and S2 used to support the findings of this study is included within the supplementary information file. (Supplementary Materials)

References

N. A. Turner, B. K. Sharma-Kuinkel, S. A. Maskarinec et al., “Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus : an overview of basic and clinical research,” Nature Reviews. Microbiology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 203–218, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Y. C. Tong, J. S. Davis, E. Eichenberger, T. L. Holland, and V. G. Fowler, “Staphylococcus aureus infections: epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 603–661, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Tuchscherr and B. Löffler, “Staphylococcus aureus dynamically adapts global regulators and virulence factor expression in the course from acute to chronic infection,” Current Genetics, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 15–17, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Yarwood and P. M. Schlievert, “Quorum sensing in Staphylococcus infections,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 112, no. 11, pp. 1620–1625, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. P. Novick, “Autoinduction and signal transduction in the regulation of staphylococcal virulence,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1429–1449, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Bronner, H. Monteil, and G. Prévost, “Regulation of virulence determinants in Staphylococcus aureus: complexity and applications,” FEMS Microbiology Reviews, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 183–200, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. P. Novick and E. Geisinger, “Quorum sensing in staphylococci,” Annual Review of Genetics, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 541–564, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Peschel and M. Otto, “Phenol-soluble modulins and staphylococcal infection,” Nature Reviews. Microbiology, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 667–673, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Y. Queck, M. Jameson-Lee, A. E. Villaruz et al., “RNAIII-independent target gene control by the agr quorum-sensing system: insight into the evolution of virulence regulation in Staphylococcus aureus,” Molecular Cell, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 150–158, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. P. Novick, H. F. Ross, S. J. Projan, J. Kornblum, B. Kreiswirth, and S. Moghazeh, “Synthesis of staphylococcal virulence factors is controlled by a regulatory RNA molecule,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 3967–3975, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Y. C. Cheung, H.-S. Joo, S. S. Chatterjee, and M. Otto, “Phenol-soluble modulins – critical determinants of staphylococcal virulence,” FEMS Microbiology Reviews, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 698–719, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. S. Chatterjee and M. Otto, “How can Staphylococcus aureusphenol-soluble modulins be targeted to inhibit infection?” Future Microbiology, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 693–696, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Otto, “Phenol-soluble modulins,” International Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 304, no. 2, pp. 164–169, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Wang, K. R. Braughton, D. Kretschmer et al., “Identification of novel cytolytic peptides as key virulence determinants for community-associated MRSA,” Nature Medicine, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 1510–1514, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. S. Chatterjee, H. S. Joo, A. C. Duong et al., “Essential Staphylococcus aureus toxin export system,” Nature Medicine, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 364–367, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Periasamy, H.-S. Joo, A. C. Duong et al., “How Staphylococcus aureus biofilms develop their characteristic structure,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 1281–1286, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Laabei, W. D. Jamieson, Y. Yang, J. Van Den Elsen, and A. T. A. Jenkins, “Investigating the lytic activity and structural properties of Staphylococcus aureus phenol soluble modulin (PSM) peptide toxins,” Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Biomembranes, vol. 1838, no. 12, pp. 3153–3161, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Schwartz, A. K. Syed, R. E. Stephenson, A. H. Rickard, and B. R. Boles, “Functional amyloids composed of phenol soluble modulins stabilize Staphylococcus aureus biofilms,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 8, no. 6, article e1002744, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Otto, “Staphylococcal biofilms,” Microbiology Spectrum, vol. 6, no. 4, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
T. D. S. dos Santos Glatthardt, J. C. de Mello Campos, R. C. Chamon et al., “Small molecules produced by commensal Staphylococcus epidermidis disrupt biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 86, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S.-C. Wu, F. Liu, K. Zhu, and J. Shen, “Natural products that target virulence factors in antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 67, no. 48, pp. 13195–13211, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. J. D. Dorman and S. G. Deans, “Antimicrobial agents from plants: antibacterial activity of plant volatile oils,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 308–316, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. J. W. Lambert, P. N. Skandamis, P. J. Coote, and G.-J. E. Nychas, “A study of the minimum inhibitory concentration and mode of action of oregano essential oil, thymol and carvacrol,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 453–462, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Il Kwon, N. H. Jeong, S. H. Jun et al., “Thymol attenuates the worsening of atopic dermatitis induced by Staphylococcus aureus membrane vesicles,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 59, pp. 301–309, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Il Kwon, N. H. Jeong, S. Y. Kim et al., “Inhibitory effects of thymol on the cytotoxicity and inflammatory responses induced by Staphylococcus aureus extracellular vesicles in cultured keratinocytes,” Microbial Pathogenesis, vol. 134, article 103603, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Qiu, D. Wang, H. Xiang et al., “Subinhibitory concentrations of thymol reduce enterotoxins A and B and α-hemolysin production in Staphylococcus aureus isolates,” PLoS One, vol. 5, no. 3, article e9736, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L.-H. Wang, Z.-H. Zhang, X.-A. Zeng, D.-M. Gong, and M.-S. Wang, “Combination of microbiological, spectroscopic and molecular docking techniques to study the antibacterial mechanism of thymol against Staphylococcus aureus: membrane damage and genomic DNA binding,” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, vol. 409, no. 6, pp. 1615–1625, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Zhou, Z. Wang, H. Mo et al., “Thymol mediates bactericidal activity against Staphylococcus aureus by targeting an aldo–keto reductase and consequent depletion of NADPH,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 67, no. 30, pp. 8382–8392, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. García-Salinas, H. Elizondo-Castillo, M. Arruebo, G. Mendoza, and S. Irusta, “Evaluation of the antimicrobial activity and cytotoxicity of different components of natural origin present in essential oils,” Molecules, vol. 23, no. 6, p. 1399, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Nostro, F. Procopio, F. C. Pizzimenti et al., “Effects of oregano, carvacrol and thymol on Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms,” Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 519–523, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Yuan, Y. Dai, P. Ouyang et al., “Thymol inhibits biofilm formation, eliminates pre-existing biofilms, and enhances clearance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in a mouse peritoneal implant infection model,” Microorganisms, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 99, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Valliammai, A. Selvaraj, U. Yuvashree, C. Aravindraja, and S. Karutha Pandian, “Sara-Dependent antibiofilm activity of thymol enhances the antibacterial efficacy of rifampicin against Staphylococcus aureus,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 11, p. 1744, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. S. Aksoy, F. G. Avci, O. M. Ugurel, B. Atas, N. A. Sayar, and B. Sariyar Akbulut, “Potentiating the activity of berberine for _Staphylococcus aureus_ in a combinatorial treatment with thymol,” Microbial Pathogenesis, vol. 149, article 104542, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Valliammai, A. Selvaraj, P. Muthuramalingam, A. Priya, M. Ramesh, and S. K. Pandian, “Staphyloxanthin inhibitory potential of thymol impairs antioxidant fitness, enhances neutrophil mediated killing and alters membrane fluidity of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 141, article 111933, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Wielders, M. Vriens, S. Brisse et al., “Evidence for in-vivo transfer of mecA DNA between strains of Staphylococcus aureus,” Lancet, vol. 357, no. 9269, pp. 1674-1675, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. L. A. Bloemendaal, E. C. Brouwer, and A. C. Fluit, “Methicillin resistance transfer from Staphylocccus epidermidis to methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in a patient during antibiotic therapy,” PLoS One, vol. 5, no. 7, article e11841, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. T. M. Jansen, M. M. Beitsma, C. J. Koeman, W. J. B. Van Wamel, J. Verhoef, and A. C. Fluit, “Novel mobile variants of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec in Staphylococcus aureus,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 2072–2078, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Carrel, E. N. Perencevich, and M. Z. David, “USA300 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, United States, 2000–2013,” Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 1973–1980, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Y. C. Cheung, R. Wang, B. A. Khan, D. E. Sturdevant, and M. Otto, “Role of the accessory gene regulator agr in community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pathogenesis,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 1927–1935, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H.-S. Joo, G. Y. C. Cheung, and M. Otto, “Antimicrobial activity of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is caused by phenol-soluble modulin derivatives,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 11, pp. 8933–8940, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
CLSI, Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA, 30th edition, 2020.
CLSI, Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically. 11th ed. CLSI standard M07, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA, 2018.
H.-S. Joo and M. Otto, “The isolation and analysis of phenol-soluble modulins of Staphylococcus epidermidis,” Staphylococcus Epidermidis, Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, pp. 93–100, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Piewngam, Y. Zheng, T. H. Nguyen et al., “Pathogen elimination by probiotic _Bacillus_ via signalling interference,” Nature, vol. 562, no. 7728, pp. 532–537, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Kim, Y. Lee, H. Kim et al., “Phenol-soluble modulin-mediated aggregation of community-associated methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus in human cerebrospinal fluid,” Cell, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 788, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. J. Livak and T. D. Schmittgen, “Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2^{−ΔΔ _C_}_T method,” Methods, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 402–408, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. F. Bezar, A. A. Mashruwala, J. M. Boyd, and A. M. Stock, “Drug-like fragments inhibit agr- mediated virulence expression in Staphylococcus aureus,” Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 6786, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Selvaraj, T. Jayasree, A. Valliammai, and S. K. Pandian, “Myrtenol attenuates MRSA biofilm and virulence by suppressing sarA expression dynamism,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 10, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. M. Morris, R. Huey, W. Lindstrom et al., “AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: automated docking with selective receptor flexibility,” Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol. 30, no. 16, pp. 2785–2791, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Waterhouse, M. Bertoni, S. Bienert et al., “SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 46, no. W1, pp. W296–W303, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. K. Srivastava, K. Rajasree, A. Fasim, G. Arakere, and B. Gopal, “Influence of the AgrC-AgrA complex on the response time of Staphylococcus aureus quorum sensing,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 196, no. 15, pp. 2876–2888, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. K. Sully, N. Malachowa, B. O. Elmore et al., “Selective chemical inhibition of agr quorum sensing in Staphylococcus aureus promotes host defense with minimal impact on resistance,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 10, no. 6, article e1004174, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. H. Mahdally, R. F. George, M. T. Kashef, M. Al-Ghobashy, F. E. Murad, and A. S. Attia, “Staquorsin: a novel Staphylococcus aureus Agr-mediated quorum sensing inhibitor impairing virulence in vivo without notable resistance development,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 12, p. 1841, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Palaniappan and A. P. Solomon, “Targeting AgrA quorum sensing regulator by bumetanide attenuates virulence in Staphylococcus aureus - a drug repurposing approach,” Life Sciences, vol. 273, article 119306, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Lade, J. H. Park, S. H. Chung et al., “Biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates is differentially affected by glucose and sodium chloride supplemented culture media,” Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 8, no. 11, p. 1853, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. D. Christensen, W. A. Simpson, J. J. Younger et al., “Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 996–1006, 1985.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Sugimoto, F. Sato, R. Miyakawa et al., “Broad impact of extracellular DNA on biofilm formation by clinically isolated Methicillin-resistant and -sensitive strains of Staphylococcus aureus,” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. B. Oyama, S. E. Girdwood, A. R. Cookson et al., “The rumen microbiome: an underexplored resource for novel antimicrobial discovery,” npj Biofilms Microbiomes, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 33, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. I. Goncheva, R. S. Flannagan, B. E. Sterling et al., “Stress-induced inactivation of the Staphylococcus aureus purine biosynthesis repressor leads to hypervirulence,” Nature Communications, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 775, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Salam and C. L. Quave, “Targeting virulence in Staphylococcus aureus by chemical inhibition of the accessory gene regulator system in vivo,” MSphere, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. A. Ford, I. M. Hurford, and J. E. Cassat, “Antivirulence strategies for the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infections: a mini review,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 11, p. 14, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Salinas, J. P. Colletier, A. Moshe, and M. Landau, “Extreme amyloid polymorphism in Staphylococcus aureus virulent PSM α peptides,” Nature Communications, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Khodaverdian, M. Pesho, B. Truitt et al., “Discovery of antivirulence agents against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 3645–3652, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Abdelnour, S. Arvidson, T. Bremell, C. Rydén, and A. Tarkowski, “The accessory gene regulator (agr) controls Staphylococcus aureus virulence in a murine arthritis model,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 61, no. 9, pp. 3879–3885, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. L. Cheung, K. J. Eberhardt, E. Chung et al., “Diminished virulence of a sar-/agr- mutant of Staphylococcus aureus in the rabbit model of endocarditis,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 1815–1822, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Tan, S. R. Li, B. Jiang, X. M. Hu, and S. Li, “Therapeutic targeting of the Staphylococcus aureus accessory gene regulator (agr) system,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 9, p. 55, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Gov, A. Bitler, G. Dell’Acqua, J. V. Torres, and N. Balaban, “RNAIII inhibiting peptide (RIP), a global inhibitor of Staphylococcus aureus pathogenesis: structure and function analysis,” Peptides, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1609–1620, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Baldry, B. Kitir, H. Frøkiær et al., “The agr inhibitors solonamide B and analogues alter immune responses to Staphylococccus aureus but do not exhibit adverse effects on immune cell functions,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 1, article e0145618, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Mansson, A. Nielsen, L. Kjærulff et al., “Inhibition of virulence gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus by novel depsipeptides from a marine photobacterium,” Marine Drugs, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 2537–2552, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Daly, B. O. Elmore, J. S. Kavanaugh et al., “ω-Hydroxyemodin limits Staphylococcus aureus quorum sensing-mediated pathogenesis and inflammation,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 2223–2235, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. Römling, S. Kjelleberg, S. Normark, L. Nyman, B. E. Uhlin, and B. Åkerlund, “Microbial biofilm formation: a need to act,” Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 276, no. 2, pp. 98–110, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Harshad Lade et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

800

Downloads

757

Citations