Research Article
An Enhanced Technique of COVID-19 Detection and Classification Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network from Chest X-Ray and CT Images
Table 7
Performance comparisons between the IDConv-Net and state-of-the-art models on CT images.
| Model | Dataset | Precision | Recall | -score | Training accuracy | Testing accuracy |
| Noisy-OR Bayesian [64] | Transverse-section CT | 86.87 | 86.67 | 86.70 | 87.05 | 86.70 | Decision fusion [65] | COVID-CT | 88.14 | 88.79 | 86.70 | 89.78 | 88.34 | Ensemble [66] | CT (HRCT) | 90.63 | 93.55 | 92.06 | 92.83 | 91.94 | DenseNet [67] | HRCT images | 96.00 | 97.00 | 93.00 | 91.36 | 92.00 | DenseNet161 [68] | COVID19Net | 85.39 | 77.55 | 81.28 | 84.36 | 82.76 | Ensemble (Hard voting) [68] | COVID19Net | 82.80 | 78.57 | 80.63 | 82.88 | 81.77 | Ensemble (Soft voting) [68] | COVID19Net | 83.70 | 78.57 | 81.05 | 84.21 | 82.27 | VGG16-based DL [69] | Hospital of Tabriz Data | 91.50 | 89.78 | 90.63 | 91.68 | 90.14 | 3D-ResNets with attention [63] | Several cooperative hospitals | 86.27 | 92.33 | 85.20 | ā | 93.30 | U-NET [70] | CT segmentation dataset | 96.38 | 96.04 | 86.10 | 95.93 | 95.60 | Proposed IDConv-Net model | Merged 2D-CT | 98.64 | 98.31 | 98.48 | 99.53 | 98.41 |
|
|