Behavioural Neurology / 2014 / Article / Tab 3 / Clinical Study
Verbal Comprehension Ability in Aphasia: Demographic and Lexical Knowledge Effects Table 3 Performance of patients presenting with and without comprehension deficits and controls on the demographically adjusted CIG, PPVT-R, and CIG-PPVT-R difference scores.
Individuals with aphasia: comprehension rating Controls (
) Impaired (
) Nonimpaired (
) CIG Raw (mean, SD) 10.29 (2.70) 0.63 (0.92) 3.81 (4.11)
(mean, SD) 0.07 (0.95) −1.79 (0.03) −1.57 (0.34) Range −1.83 to 1.43 −1.86 to −1.75 −1.80 to −0.84 PPVT-R Raw (mean, SD) 151.03 (21.08) 87.18 (35.53)** 136.36 (18.85)
(mean, SD) 0.06 (0.96) −1.61 (0.18) −0.99 (1.00) Range −1.75 to 1.63 −1.75 to −1.11 −1.68 to 1.47 Simple algebraic difference CIG-PPVT difference score
(mean, SD) 0.01 (1.10) −0.17 (0.19)* −0.57 (0.72) Range −3.34 to 2.95 −0.73 to −0.05 −2.31 to 2.07 Payne and Jones' [27 ] method CIG-PPVT difference score
(mean, SD) 0.013 (1.22) −0.19 (0.22) −0.36 (1.17) Range −3.70 to 3.26 −0.81 to −0.05 −2.56 to 2.29
Patient group differences: *P = .02, **P = .01.
