Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Behavioural Neurology
Volume 2015, Article ID 514361, 16 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/514361
Review Article

Brain Signals of Face Processing as Revealed by Event-Related Potentials

1Departamento de Psicología Biológica y de la Salud, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain
2División de Psicología, Colegio Universitario Cardenal Cisneros, 28006 Madrid, Spain
3Institute of Brain, Behaviour and Mental Health, Centre for Clinical and Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
4Centro de Neurociencias de Cuba, 11600 Havana, Cuba

Received 11 March 2015; Revised 10 May 2015; Accepted 11 May 2015

Academic Editor: João Quevedo

Copyright © 2015 Ela I. Olivares et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. V. Bruce and A. W. Young, “Understanding face recognition,” The British Journal of Psychology, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 305–327, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. M. Burton, V. Bruce, and R. A. Johnston, “Understanding face recognition with an interactive activation model,” The British journal of psychology, vol. 81, no. 3, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. M. Burton, V. Bruce, and P. J. B. Hancock, “From pixels to people: a model of familiar face recognition,” Cognitive Science, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–31, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. B. Lewis and H. D. Ellis, “How we detect a face: a survey of psychological evidence,” International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 3–7, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. J. Farah, R. C. O'Reilly, and S. P. Vecera, “Dissociated overt and covert recognition as an emergent property of a lesioned neural network,” Psychological Review, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 571–588, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. J. Calder and A. W. Young, “Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 641–651, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. E. I. Olivares and J. Iglesias, “Brain potential correlates of the ‘internal features advantage’ in face recognition,” Biological Psychology, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 133–142, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. E. I. Olivares, J. Iglesias, and S. Rodríguez-Holguín, “Long-latency ERPs and recognition of facial identity,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 136–151, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. I. Gobbini and J. V. Haxby, “Neural systems for recognition of familiar faces,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 32–41, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. V. Haxby, E. A. Hoffman, and M. I. Gobbini, “The distributed human neural system for face perception,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 223–233, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Ishai, “Let's face it: It's a cortical network,” NeuroImage, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 415–419, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. J. Wiggett and P. E. Downing, “The face network: overextended? (Comment on: ‘Let's face it: it's a cortical network’ by Alumit Ishai),” NeuroImage, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 420–422, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. Mechelli, C. J. Price, K. J. Friston, and A. Ishai, “Where bottom-up meets top-down: neuronal interactions during perception and imagery,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 1256–1265, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. E. Hasselmo, E. T. Rolls, and G. C. Baylis, “The role of expression and identity in the face-selective responses of neurons in the temporal visual cortex of the monkey,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 203–218, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. I. Perrett, E. T. Rolls, and W. Caan, “Visual neurones responsive to faces in the monkey temporal cortex,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 329–342, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R. G. D. P. Menendez, S. G. Andino, G. Lantz, C. M. Michel, and T. Landis, “Noninvasive localization of electromagnetic epileptic activity. I. Method descriptions and simulations,” Brain Topography, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 131–137, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. R. D. Pascual-Marqui, C. M. Michel, and D. Lehmann, “Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain,” International Journal of Psychophysiology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 49–65, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. N. J. Trujillo-Barreto, E. Aubert-Vázquez, and P. A. Valdés-Sosa, “Bayesian model averaging in EEG/MEG imaging,” NeuroImage, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1300–1319, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. E. J. Barbeau, M. J. Taylor, J. Regis, P. Marquis, P. Chauvel, and C. Liégeois-Chauvel, “Spatio temporal dynamics of face recognition,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 997–1009, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. B. Kotchoubey, “Event-related potentials, cognition, and behavior: a biological approach,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 42–65, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. Bentin and D. Carmel, “Accounts for the N170 face-effect: a reply to Rossion, Curran & Gauthier,” Cognition, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 197–202, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. I. Gauthier and M. J. Tarr, “Becoming a ‘Greeble’ expert: exploring mechanisms for face recognition,” Vision Research, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 1673–1682, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. E. McKone and R. Robbins, “The evidence rejects the expertise hypothesis: reply to Gauthier & Bukach,” Cognition, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 331–336, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. B. Rossion, C.-C. Kung, and M. J. Tarr, “Visual expertise with nonface objects leads to competition with the early perceptual processing of faces in the human occipitotemporal cortex,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 40, pp. 14521–14526, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. I. Gauthier and C. Bukach, “Should we reject the expertise hypothesis?” Cognition, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 322–330, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. T. A. Busey and J. R. Vanderkolk, “Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for configural processing in fingerprint experts,” Vision Research, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 431–448, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. J. Farah, K. D. Wilson, M. Drain, and J. N. Tanaka, “What is ‘Special’ about face perception?” Psychological Review, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 482–498, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. T. J. McKeeff, R. W. McGugin, F. Tong, and I. Gauthier, “Expertise increases the functional overlap between face and object perception,” Cognition, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 355–360, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. S. R. Schweinberger, “Neurophysiological correlates of face recognition,” in Handbook of Face Perception, A. Calder, G. Rhodes, M. H. Johnson, and J. V. Haxby, Eds., Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  30. S. Bentin, T. Allison, A. Puce, E. Perez, and G. McCarthy, “Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 551–565, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. B. Rossion, I. Gauthier, M. J. Tarr et al., “The N170 occipito-temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face-specific processes in the human brain,” NeuroReport, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 69–74, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. S. R. Schweinberger, V. Huddy, and A. M. Burton, “N250r: a face-selective brain response to stimulus repetitions,” NeuroReport, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1501–1505, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. M. F. Neumann, T. N. Mohamed, and S. R. Schweinberger, “Face and object encoding under perceptual load: ERP evidence,” NeuroImage, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 3021–3027, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. G. Thierry, A. J. Pegna, C. Dodds, M. Roberts, S. Basan, and P. Downing, “An event-related potential component sensitive to images of the human body,” NeuroImage, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 871–879, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. K. Bötzel, S. Schulze, and S. R. G. Stodieck, “Scalp topography and analysis of intracranial sources of face-evoked potentials,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 135–143, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. K. A. Dalrymple, I. Oruç, B. Duchaine et al., “The anatomic basis of the right face-selective N170 IN acquired prosopagnosia: a combined ERP/fMRI study,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 2553–2563, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. R. J. Itier and M. J. Taylor, “N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 132–142, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. S. R. Schweinberger, E. C. Pickering, I. Jentzsch, A. M. Burton, and J. M. Kaufmann, “Event-related brain potential evidence for a response of inferior temporal cortex to familiar face repetitions,” Cognitive Brain Research, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 398–409, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. N. Kanwisher, J. McDermott, and M. M. Chun, “The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 4302–4311, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  40. G. McCarthy, A. Puce, J. C. Gore, and T. Allison, “Face-specific processing in the human fusiform gyrus,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 605–610, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. G. McCarthy, A. Puce, A. Belger, and T. Allison, “Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. II: response properties of face-specific potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 431–444, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. R. N. Henson, Y. Goshen-Gottstein, T. Ganel, L. J. Otten, A. Quayle, and M. D. Rugg, “Electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of face perception, recognition and priming,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 793–805, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. V. T. Nguyen and R. Cunnington, “The superior temporal sulcus and the N170 during face processing: single trial analysis of concurrent EEG-fMRI,” NeuroImage, vol. 86, pp. 492–502, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. M. A. Bobes, F. Lopera, L. Díaz et al., “Brain potentials reflect residual face processing in a case of prosopagnosia,” Cognitive Neuropsychology, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 691–718, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. T. Allison, H. Ginter, G. McCarthy et al., “Face recognition in human extraestriate cortex,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 821–825, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. T. Allison, A. Puce, D. D. Spencer, and G. McCarthy, “Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. I: potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by face and non-face stimuli,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 415–430, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. S. Bentin, Y. Golland, A. V. Flevaris, L. C. Robertson, and M. Moscovitch, “Processing the trees and the forest during initial stages of face perception: electrophysiological evidence,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1406–1421, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. K. Bötzel and O.-J. Grüsser, “Electric brain potentials evoked by pictures of faces and non-faces: a search for ‘face-specific’ EEG-potentials,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 349–360, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. M. Eimer, “Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognition,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 694–705, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. M. Eimer, “The face-specific N170 component reflects late stages in the structural encoding of faces,” NeuroReport, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 2319–2324, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. D. A. Jeffreys, “A face-responsive potential recorded from the human scalp,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 193–202, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. S. Caharel, S. Poiroux, C. Bernard, F. Thibaut, R. Lalonde, and M. Rebai, “ERPs associated with familiarity and degree of familiarity during face recognition,” International Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 112, no. 12, pp. 1499–1512, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. S. Campanella, C. Hanoteau, D. Dépy et al., “Right N170 modulation in a face discrimination task: an account for categorical perception of familiar faces,” Psychophysiology, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 796–806, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. F. Guillaume and G. Tiberghien, “Electrophysiological study of contextual variations in a short-term face recognition task,” Cognitive Brain Research, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 471–487, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. J. J. Heisz, S. Watter, and J. M. Shedden, “Progressive N170 habituation to unattended repeated faces,” Vision Research, vol. 46, no. 1-2, pp. 47–56, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. N. Kloth, C. Dobel, S. R. Schweinberger, P. Zwitserlood, J. Bölte, and M. Junghöfer, “Effects of personal familiarity on early neuromagnetic correlates of face perception,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 3317–3321, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. S. Bentin and L. Y. Deouell, “Structural encoding and identification in face processing: ERP evidence for separate mechanisms,” Cognitive Neuropsychology, vol. 17, no. 1–3, pp. 35–54, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. G. Galli, M. Feurra, and M. P. Viggiano, ““Did you see him in the newspaper?” Electrophysiological correlates of context and valence in face processing,” Brain Research, vol. 1119, no. 1, pp. 190–202, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. Y. Xu, J. Liu, and N. Kanwisher, “The M170 is selective for faces, not for expertise,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 588–597, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. I. Amihai, L. Y. Deouell, and S. Bentin, “Neural adaptation is related to face repetition irrespective of identity: a reappraisal of the N170 effect,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 209, no. 2, pp. 193–204, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. N. Kloth, S. R. Schweinberger, and G. Kovács, “Neural correlates of generic versus gender-specific face adaptation,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 2345–2356, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. U. Maurer, B. Rossion, and B. D. McCandliss, “Category specificity in early perception: Face and word N170 responses differ in both lateralization and habituation properties,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 2, article 18, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. S. R. Schweinberger, J. M. Kaufmann, S. Moratti, A. Keil, and A. M. Burton, “Brain responses to repetitions of human and animal faces, inverted faces, and objects—an MEG study,” Brain Research, vol. 1184, no. 1, pp. 226–233, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. S. R. Schweinberger, N. Kloth, and R. Jenkins, “Are you looking at me? Neural correlates of gaze adaptation,” NeuroReport, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 693–696, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. E. Zion-Golumbic and S. Bentin, “Dissociated neural mechanisms for face detection and configural encoding: evidence from N170 and induced gamma-band oscillation effects,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 1741–1749, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. M. Seeck and O. J. Grüsser, “Category-related components in visual evoked potentials: photographs of faces, persons, flowers and tools as stimuli,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 338–349, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. D. A. Jeffreys and E. S. A. Tukmachi, “The vertex-positive scalp potential evoked by faces and by objects,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 340–350, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. D. A. Jeffreys, E. S. A. Tukmachi, and G. Rockley, “Evoked potential evidence for human brain mechanisms that respond to single, fixated faces,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 351–362, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. N. George, J. Evans, N. Fiori, J. Davidoff, and B. Renault, “Brain events related to normal and moderately scrambled faces,” Cognitive Brain Research, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 65–76, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. C. Joyce and B. Rossion, “The face-sensitive N170 and VPP components manifest the same brain processes: the effect of reference electrode site,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 116, no. 11, pp. 2613–2631, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. K. Linkenkaer-Hansen, J. M. Palva, M. Sams, J. K. Hietanen, H. J. Aronen, and R. J. Ilmoniemi, “Face-selective processing in human extrastriate cortex around 120 ms after stimulus onset revealed by magneto- and electroencephalography,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 253, no. 3, pp. 147–150, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. M. J. Taylor, S. J. Bayless, T. Mills, and E. W. Pang, “Recognising upright and inverted faces: MEG source localisation,” Brain Research, vol. 1381, pp. 167–174, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. H. Halit, M. De Haan, and M. H. Johnson, “Modulation of event-related potentials by prototypical and atypical faces,” NeuroReport, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 1871–1875, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. T. Nakashima, K. Kaneko, Y. Goto et al., “Early ERP components differentially extract facial features: evidence for spatial frequency-and-contrast detectors,” Neuroscience Research, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 225–235, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. T. Mitsudo, Y. Kamio, Y. Goto, T. Nakashima, and S. Tobimatsu, “Neural responses in the occipital cortex to unrecognizable faces,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 122, no. 4, pp. 708–718, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. R. J. Itier and M. J. Taylor, “Inversion and contrast polarity reversal affect both encoding and recognition processes of unfamiliar faces: a repetition study using ERPs,” NeuroImage, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 353–372, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. J. Liu, A. Harris, and N. Kanwisher, “Stages of processing in face perception: an MEG study,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 910–916, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. T. Tanskanen, R. Näsänen, T. Montez, J. Päällysaho, and R. Hari, “Face recognition and cortical responses show similar sensitivity to noise spatial frequency,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 526–534, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. T. Tanskanen, R. Näsänen, H. Ojanpää, and R. Hari, “Face recognition and cortical responses: effect of stimulus duration,” NeuroImage, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 1636–1644, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. U. Martens, S. R. Schweinberger, M. Kiefer, and A. M. Burton, “Masked and unmasked electrophysiological repetition effects of famous faces,” Brain Research, vol. 1109, no. 1, pp. 146–157, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. S. R. Schweinberger, E.-M. Pfütze, and W. Sommer, “Repetition priming and associative priming of face recognition: evidence from event-related potentials,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 722–736, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. C. Saavedra, J. Iglesias, and E. I. Olivares, “Event-related potentials elicited by the explicit and implicit processing of familiarity in faces,” Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 24–31, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. S. G. Boehm and W. Sommer, “Neural correlates of intentional and incidental recognition of famous faces,” Cognitive Brain Research, vol. 23, no. 2-3, pp. 153–163, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. M. Bindemann, A. M. Burton, H. Leuthold, and S. R. Schweinberger, “Brain potential correlates of face recognition: geometric distortions and the N250r brain response to stimulus repetitions,” Psychophysiology, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 535–544, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. M. F. Neumann and S. R. Schweinberger, “N250r and N400 ERP correlates of immediate famous face repetition are independent of perceptual load,” Brain Research, vol. 1239, pp. 181–190, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. R. N. Henson, A. Rylands, E. Ross, P. Vuilleumeir, and M. D. Rugg, “The effect of repetition lag on electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of visual object priming,” NeuroImage, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1674–1689, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. L. S. Scott, J. W. Tanaka, D. L. Sheinberg, and T. Curran, “The role of category learning in the acquisition and retention of perceptual expertise: a behavioral and neurophysiological study,” Brain Research, vol. 1210, pp. 204–215, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. J. M. Kaufmann, S. R. Schweinberger, and A. M. Burton, “N250 ERP correlates of the acquisition of face representations across different images,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 625–641, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. M. Kutas and S. A. Hillyard, “Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity,” Science, vol. 207, no. 4427, pp. 203–205, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. J. B. Debruille, “The N400 potential could index a semantic inhibition,” Brain Research Reviews, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 472–477, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. S. E. Barrett and M. D. Rugg, “Event-related potentials and the semantic matching of faces,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 913–922, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. S. E. Barrett, M. D. Rugg, and D. I. Perrett, “Event-related potentials and the matching of familiar and unfamiliar faces,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 105–117, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. M. A. Bobes, M. Valdessosa, and E. Olivares, “An ERP study of expectancy violation in face perception,” Brain and Cognition, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. J. B. Debruille, J. Pineda, and B. Renault, “N400-like potentials elicited by faces and knowledge inhibition,” Cognitive Brain Research, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 133–144, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. B. Jemel, N. George, E. Olivares, N. Fiori, and B. Renault, “Event-related potentials to structural familiar face incongruity processing,” Psychophysiology, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 437–452, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. E. V. Mnatsakanian and I. M. Tarkka, “Matching of familiar faces and abstract patterns: behavioral and high-resolution ERP study,” International Journal of Psychophysiology, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 217–227, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. E. Olivares, M. A. Bobes, E. Aubert, and M. Valdes-Sosa, “Associative ERP effects with memories of artificial faces,” Cognitive Brain Research, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 39–48, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. E. I. Olivares, J. Iglesias, and M. Antonieta Bobes, “Searching for face-specific long latency ERPs: a topographic study of effects associated with mismatching features,” Cognitive Brain Research, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 343–356, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. E. I. Olivares, C. Saavedra, N. J. Trujillo-Barreto, and J. Iglesias, “Long-term information and distributed neural activation arerelevant for the ‘internal features advantage’ in face processing: electrophysiological and source reconstruction evidence,” Cortex, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 2735–2747, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. K. A. Paller, B. Gonsalves, M. Grabowecky, V. S. Bozic, and S. Yamada, “Electrophysiological correlates of recollecting faces of known and unknown individuals,” NeuroImage, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 98–110, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. K. A. Paller, C. Ranganath, B. Gonsalves et al., “Neural correlates of person recognition,” Learning and Memory, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 253–260, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. M. Valdés-Sosa and M. A. Bobes, “Making sense out of words and faces: ERPs evidence for multiple memory systems,” in Machinery of the Mind, E. R. John, Ed., pp. 252–288, Birkhauser, Boston, Mass, USA, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  103. E. I. Olivares, J. Iglesias, M. A. Bobes, and M. Valdés-Sosa, “Making features relevant: learning faces and event-related potentials recording using an analytic procedure,” Brain Research Protocols, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. T. Curran and J. Hancock, “The FN400 indexes familiarity-based recognition of faces,” NeuroImage, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 464–471, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. E. Salinas and T. J. Sejnowski, “Correlated neuronal activity and the flow of neural information,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 539–550, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. F. Varela, J.-P. Lachaux, E. Rodriguez, and J. Martinerie, “The brainweb: phase synchronization and large-scale integration,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 229–239, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. Y. B. Sirotin and A. Das, “Anticipatory haemodynamic signals in sensory cortex not predicted by local neuronal activity,” Nature, vol. 457, no. 7228, pp. 475–479, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. O. David, I. Guillemain, S. Saillet et al., “Identifying neural drivers with functional MRI: an electrophysiological validation,” PLoS Biology, vol. 6, no. 12, article e315, pp. 2683–2697, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. K. J. Friston, L. Harrison, and W. Penny, “Dynamic causal modelling,” NeuroImage, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1273–1302, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. M. I. Garrido, J. M. Kilner, S. J. Kiebel, K. E. Stephan, and K. J. Friston, “Dynamic causal modelling of evoked potentials: a reproducibility study,” NeuroImage, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 571–580, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. O. David, S. J. Kiebel, L. M. Harrison, J. Mattout, J. M. Kilner, and K. J. Friston, “Dynamic causal modeling of evoked responses in EEG and MEG,” NeuroImage, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1255–1272, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. P. Vuilleumier, J. L. Armony, J. Driver, and R. J. Dolan, “Effects of attention and emotion on face processing in the human brain: an event-related fMRI study,” Neuron, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 829–841, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  113. S. L. Fairhall and A. Ishai, “Effective connectivity within the distributed cortical network for face perception,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 2400–2406, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. V. T. Nguyen, M. Breakspear, and R. Cunnington, “Fusing concurrent EEG-fMRI with dynamic causal modeling: application to effective connectivity during face perception,” NeuroImage, vol. 102, pp. 60–70, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  115. S. Debener, M. Ullsperger, M. Siegel, and A. K. Engel, “Single-trial EEG-fMRI reveals the dynamics of cognitive function,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 558–563, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  116. R. C. Sotero and N. J. Trujillo-Barreto, “Biophysical model for integrating neuronal activity, EEG, fMRI and metabolism,” NeuroImage, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 290–309, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  117. P. J. Johnston, W. Stojanov, H. Devir, and U. Schall, “Functional MRI of facial emotion recognition deficits in schizophrenia and their electrophysiological correlates,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1221–1232, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  118. T. Iidaka, A. Matsumoto, K. Haneda, T. Okada, and N. Sadato, “Hemodynamic and electrophysiological relationship involved in human face processing: evidence from a combined fMRI-ERP study,” Brain and Cognition, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 176–186, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  119. A. Delorme and S. Makeig, “EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis,” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 9–21, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  120. S. Makeig, M. Westerfield, T.-P. Jung et al., “Dynamic brain sources of visual evoked responses,” Science, vol. 295, no. 5555, pp. 690–694, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  121. M. De Vos, J. D. Thorne, G. Yovel, and S. Debener, “Let's face it, from trial to trial: comparing procedures for N170 single-trial estimation,” NeuroImage, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 1196–1202, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  122. G. A. Rousselet, J. S. Husk, P. J. Bennett, and A. B. Sekuler, “Single-trial EEG dynamics of object and face visual processing,” NeuroImage, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 843–862, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  123. M. G. Philiastides and P. Sajda, “Temporal characterization of the neural correlates of perceptual decision making in the human brain,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 509–518, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  124. R. Ratcliff, M. G. Philiastides, and P. Sajda, “Quality of evidence for perceptual decision making is indexed by trial-to-trial variability of the EEG,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 16, pp. 6539–6544, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  125. G. A. Rousselet and C. R. Pernet, “Quantifying the time course of visual object processing using ERPs: It's time to up the game,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 2, article 107, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  126. K. Nemeth, M. Zimmer, S. R. Schweinberger, P. Vakli, and G. Kovács, “The background of reduced face specificity of N170 in congenital prosopagnosia,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 7, Article ID e101393, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  127. E. Basar, Brain Function and Oscillations: II. Integrative Brain Function, Neurophysiology and Cognitive Processes, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 1999.
  128. G. Buzsáki and A. Draguhn, “Neuronal olscillations in cortical networks,” Science, vol. 304, no. 5679, pp. 1926–1929, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  129. S. Karakaş, Ö. U. Erzengin, and E. Başar, “A new strategy involving multiple cognitive paradigms demonstrates that ERP components are determined by the superposition of oscillatory responses,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 111, no. 10, pp. 1719–1732, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  130. W. Klimesch, P. Sauseng, S. Hanslmayr, W. Gruber, and R. Freunberger, “Event-related phase reorganization may explain evoked neural dynamics,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 1003–1016, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  131. G. Pfurtscheller and F. H. Lopes da Silva, “Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 110, no. 11, pp. 1842–1857, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  132. L. M. Ward, “Synchronous neural oscillations and cognitive processes,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 553–559, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  133. Y. Tang, D. Liu, Y. Li, Y. Qiu, and Y. Zhu, “The time-frequency representation of the ERPs of face processing,” in Proceeding of the IEEE Engineering Medical Biological Society Conference, pp. 4114–4117, 2008.
  134. D. Anaki, E. Zion-Golumbic, and S. Bentin, “Electrophysiological neural mechanisms for detection, configural analysis and recognition of faces,” NeuroImage, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1407–1416, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  135. Y. Chen, F. Pan, H. Wang, S. Xiao, and L. Zhao, “Electrophysiological correlates of processing own- and other-race faces,” Brain Topography, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 606–615, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  136. A. D. Engell and G. McCarthy, “The relationship of gamma oscillations and face-specific ERPs recorded subdurally from occipitotemporal cortex,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1213–1221, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus