Research Article

Optimizing Neuropsychological Assessments for Cognitive, Behavioral, and Functional Impairment Classification: A Machine Learning Study

Table 9

Top 10 features most frequently found as best predictors across all 10 rounds and all 100 iterations using the FDR feature reduction.

Level of impairmentFeatures

CDR = 1 versus CDR = 0(1) LDELTOTAL (LM)71%
(2) TOTALMOD (ADAS)10%
(3) LIMMTOTAL (LM)4%
(4) FAQTOTAL (FAQ)4%
(5) Q4 (ADAS)4%
(6) AVTOT5 (AVLT)3%
(7) AVTOT4 (AVLT)1%
(8) Q1 (ADAS)0.8%
(9) AVDEL30MIN (AVLT)0.6%
(10) TOTAL11 (ADAS)0.5%

CDR = 0.5 versus CDR = 0(1) LDELTOTAL (LM)91%
(2) Q4 (ADAS-Cog)22%
(3) LIMMTOTAL (LM)15%
(4) TOTALMOD (ADAS-Cog)12%
(5) GDHOPE (GDS)6%
(6) MMD (MMSE)2%
(7) MMSCORE (MMSE)0.3%
(8) AVTOT4 (AVLT)0.1%
(9) CATVEGESC (Semantic Fluency Test)0.1%
(10) TOTAL11 (ADAS)0.1%

CDR = 1 versus CDR = 0.5(1) FAQTOTAL (FAQ)31%
(2) TOTALMOD (ADAS-Cog)22%
(3) AVTOT5 (AVLT)10%
(4) FAQFORM (FAQ)
(5) Q1 (ADAS-Cog)
6%
6%
(6) FAQREM (FAQ)6%
(7) TOTAL11 (ADAS)5%
(8) CLOCKSCOR (CLOCK Test)4%
(9) CATVEGESC (Semantic Fluency Test)4%
(10) Q8 (ADAS)4%

10 rounds of the nested CV and across 100 iterations.