In the article titled “Clinical and Preclinical Cognitive Function Improvement after Oral Treatment of a Botanical Composition Composed of Extracts from Scutellaria baicalensis and Acacia catechu” [1], there is an error in a sentence in the abstract section. The sentence, “In a separate human clinical trial, test subjects orally given 300 mg of UP326 BID for 30 days showed marked improvement in speed and accuracy of processing complex information in computer tasks and reduced their standard deviation of performance compared to baseline and the placebo group” should be corrected to “In a separate human clinical trial, test subjects orally given 300 mg of UP326 per day for 30 days showed marked improvement in speed and accuracy of processing complex information in computer tasks and reduced their standard deviation of performance compared to baseline and the placebo group.”
Corrigendum | Open Access
Corrigendum to “Clinical and Preclinical Cognitive Function Improvement after Oral Treatment of a Botanical Composition Composed of Extracts from Scutellaria baicalensis and Acacia catechu”
Received06 Apr 2017
Accepted26 Apr 2017
Published03 Jul 2017
References
M. Yimam, B. P. Burnett, L. Brownell, and Q. Jia, “Clinical and preclinical cognitive function improvement after oral treatment of a botanical composition composed of extracts from Scutellaria baicalensis and Acacia catechu,” Behavioural Neurology, vol. 2016, Article ID 7240802, 9 pages, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Mesfin Yimam et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.